Subcellular Localization of Maspin Correlates with Histone Deacetylase 1 Expression in Human Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Maspin is known to be a tumor suppressor protein. Its nuclear localization and endogenous inhibition of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) are considered crucial for its tumor suppressor activity. However, it remains unclear whether subcellular localization of maspin correlates with HDAC1 expression level in human breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 164 resected specimens of invasive breast carcinoma using antibodies for maspin and HDAC1. Subcellular localization of maspin protein and HDAC1 mRNA expression level in two human breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, MDA-MB-231) and mammary epithelial cell line (MCF10) were analyzed by immunofluorescence and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. RESULTS: The frequency of cytoplasmic-only, pancellular (combined nuclear and cytoplasm) and no staining of maspin were 31%, 14.0% and 55%, respectively. The cytoplasmic-only subgroup showed significantly higher histological grade (p=0.004), negative progesterone receptor status (p=0.003) and shorter disease-free survival compared to the pancellular subgroup (p=0.043). High HDAC1 expression was observed in 60% of cases and was significantly correlated with cytoplasmic-only staining compared to pancellular (p<0.001) or no staining (p=0.004). Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that maspin protein was localized mainly in the cytoplasm in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, while in both the nucleus and cytoplasm in MCF10A cells. HDAC1 mRNA levels were significantly up-regulated in MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells compared to MCF10A cells (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: High HDAC1 expression may contribute to the aggressiveness of human breast cancer with cytoplasmic-only expression of maspin.

Correlation between Ultrasound Findings of Tumor Margin and Clinicopathological Findings in Patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Breast ultrasound findings regarding tumor margins are crucial in judging whether a tumor is malignant or benign. However, the relationships between the margins and clinicopathological characteristics remain largely unknown. In this study, we examined the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma whose ultrasound images showed either well-defined and rough or indistinct margins. METHODS: Of all consecutive patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at the Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery of Tottori University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2014, 122 patients whose ultrasound images showed either "well-defined and rough" or "indistinct" tumor margins were included in this study. Mammography and ultrasound images taken at the initial examination were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on ultrasound findings of the tumor margins: the "well-defined and rough group" and the "indistinct group." The relationships among ultrasound findings, mammography findings and clinicopathological findings were investigated in the two groups. RESULTS: The well-defined and rough group was more likely to contain solid-tubular carcinoma, while the indistinct group was more likely to contain scirrhous carcinoma. The MIB-1 index was higher in the well-defined and rough group than in the indistinct group. Additionally, the proportion of patients with nuclear grade 3, estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-negative, and triple-negative breast cancer was greater in the well-defined and rough group than in the indistinct group. CONCLUSION: Invasive ductal carcinomas with well-defined and rough margins on ultrasound were likely to be malignant and proliferative than those with indistinct margins.

Microcalcification of Tumor is a Predictor of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is often performed for patients with unresectable breast carcinoma or without indication of breast conserving therapy. However, it is currently difficult to predict response to NAC with diagnostic imaging of breast carcinoma. In this study, we investigated imaging findings that could serve as a predictor of the response to NAC for patients with invasive breast carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with invasive breast carcinoma who received NAC at the Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery of Tottori University Hospital between January 2010 and May 2014 were retrospectively investigated. Their imaging findings from mammograms and ultrasonograms were reviewed. The association between findings on mammograms and ultrasonograms captured before NAC and response to treatment after NAC was examined. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients with invasive breast carcinoma, 19 (73%) responded well to treatment and 7 (27%) did not. Most notably, all 10 patients who had microcalcifications on mammogram responded well to treatment (53% of responders), and all patients who did not respond to treatment had no microcalcifications (P < 0.05). Of these 10 patients, 9 (90%) had microcalcifications of comedo type and one (10%) had non comedo type. As a distribution, 8 of the 10 (80%) had a clustered type of microcalcifications and the remaining 2 (20%) had a segmental type of them. CONCLUSION: Microcalcifications of tumor observed in mammogram (particularly comedo type) could be a predictor of response to NAC for patients with invasive breast carcinoma.