School performance and educational achievement in children exposed to maternal cancer in utero.

BACKGROUND: In utero exposure to maternal cancer and cancer treatment might influence the child's cognitive development. This study investigated if exposure to maternal cancer during fetal life impacted school performance and educational achievement as adults. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective cohort study identified all live-born children in Denmark between January 1978 and December 2013. Exposure was defined as maternal cancer diagnosis during pregnancy. Four partly overlapping birth cohorts were constructed depending on the outcome of interest: (1) receiving special educational support for birth years 2001-2013; (2) grade point average (GPA) at the final exams after 10th grade for 1986-2003; (3) educational achievement at 20 years for 1978-1998; and (4) education at 30 years for 1978-1988. Logistic and linear models were adjusted for birth year, maternal age, maternal education and maternal death. RESULTS: The estimated probability of receiving special educational support was similar in the exposed group and the reference (adjusted OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.77, non-significant). The GPA did not statistically differ (0.13 grade points; 95% CI -0.18 to 0.45, non-significant). The achieved educational levels were similar for the exposed group and the reference at 20 years, with an adjusted OR of 1.07 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.40) for low versus medium educational level, and at 30 years with an adjusted OR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.50) for low versus high educational level and of 1.07 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.72) for medium versus high educational level. CONCLUSION: Our findings did not indicate poorer performance in compulsory school nor impairment of adult educational achievement after exposure to maternal cancer in utero.

Cancer in pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: A nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the obstetrical management of cancer in pregnancy and to determine adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: A nationwide cohort study. SETTING AND POPULATION: We included all pregnancies (n = 4 071 848) in Denmark from 1 January 1973 to 31 December 2018. METHODS: Exposure was defined as pregnancies exposed to maternal cancer (n = 1068). The control group comprised pregnancies without cancer. The groups were compared using logistic regression analysis and adjusted for potential confounders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes were induced abortion, preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: More women with cancer in pregnancy, as compared with the control group, experienced induced abortion (24.8% vs. 20.0%); first-trimester induced abortion adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.5), second-trimester induced abortion; aOR 8.8 (95% CI 6.3-12.3), planned preterm birth (11.8% vs. 1.3%); aOR 10.8 (95% CI 8.0-14.6) and planned preterm birth at <32 gestational weeks; aOR 16.3 (95% CI 8.3-31.7). Neonates born to mothers with cancer in pregnancy had a higher risk of respiratory distress syndrome; aOR 3.5 (95% CI 2.8-4.4), low birthweight; aOR 3.8 (95% CI 3.1-4.8), admission to neonatal intensive care unit for >7 days; aOR 5.1 (95% CI 3.9-6.6), neonatal infection; aOR 1.8 (95% CI1.1-3.1) and neonatal mortality; aOR 4.7 (95% CI 2.7-8.2), but not of SGA; aOR 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.5) and malformations; 1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.7). CONCLUSION: Cancer in pregnancy increases the risk of induced abortion and planned premature birth. Neonates born to mothers with cancer in pregnancy had an increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, presumably due to prematurity. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Cancer in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of premature birth leading to adverse neonatal outcomes.

Epidemiological changes in Eisenmenger syndrome in the Nordic region in 1977-2012.

OBJECTIVE: Improved diagnostic tools, timely closure of the shunt and a better understanding of the complexity of Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) have led to improved care and treatment in tertiary centres. These may have decreased the incidence of ES and improved survival of patients with ES, although evidence is still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate temporal changes in incidence, prevalence and mortality in patients with ES for 35 years in the Nordic region. METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based study including 714 patients with ES. Survival analysis was performed based on all-cause mortality and accounting for immortal time bias. RESULTS: The incidence of ES decreased from 2.5/million inhabitants/year in 1977 to 0.2/million inhabitants/year in 2012. Correspondingly, prevalence decreased from 24.6 to 11.9/million inhabitants. The median survival was 38.4 years, with 20-year, 40-year and 60-year survival of 72.5%, 48.4%, and 21.3%, respectively. Complex lesions and Down syndrome were independently associated with worse survival (HR 2.2, p<0.001 and HR 1.8, p<0.001, respectively). Age at death increased from 27.7 years in the period from 1977 to 1992, to 46.3 years from July 2006 to 2012 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and prevalence of ES in the Nordic region have decreased markedly during the last decades. Furthermore, the median age at death increased throughout the study period, indicating prolonged life expectancy in the ES population. However, increasing age represents decreased incidence, rather than improved survival. Nonetheless, longevity with ES is still shorter than in the background population.

Predictors of Death in Contemporary Adult Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Eisenmenger syndrome is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus, however, on mortality risk stratification. We aimed to investigate survival and predictors of death in a large, contemporary cohort of Eisenmenger syndrome patients. METHODS: In a multicenter approach, we identified adults with Eisenmenger syndrome under follow-up between 2000 and 2015. We examined survival and its association with clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: We studied 1098 patients (median age, 34.4 years; range, 16.1-84.4 years; 65.1% female; 31.9% with Down syndrome). The majority had a posttricuspid defect (n=643, 58.6%), followed by patients with a complex (n=315, 28.7%) and pretricuspid lesion (n=140, 12.7%). Over a median follow-up of 3.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4-5.9), allowing for 4361.6 patient-years observation, 278 patients died and 6 underwent transplantation. Twelve parameters emerged as significant predictors of death on univariable analysis. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41/10 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.59; P<0.001), pretricuspid shunt (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02-2.39; P=0.041), oxygen saturation at rest (HR, 0.53/10%; 95% CI, 0.43-0.65; P<0.001), presence of sinus rhythm (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P=0.013), and presence of pericardial effusion (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.59-3.66; P<0.001) remained significant predictors of death. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant premature mortality among contemporary adults with Eisenmenger syndrome. We report, herewith, a multivariable mortality risk stratification model based on 5 simple, noninvasive predictors of death in this population.