Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chest ; 162(4): e173-e176, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36210110

ABSTRACT

CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old woman was transferred to the ED from an outside hospital because of hemoptysis and concern for left-sided pulmonary infiltrate with associated pleural effusion. The patient presented to this outside hospital multiple times over the past 3 months because of left-sided shoulder pain, diffuse myalgias, and supraventricular tachycardia. On her third visit, she was found to have a left-sided pleural effusion and underwent diagnostic and therapeutic thoracentesis; 1.5 L of fluid was removed. Fluid studies reportedly demonstrated an exudative pleural effusion with negative bacterial cultures and no evidence of neoplastic process. The patient was referred to the Rheumatology Department by the outside hospital for suspected underlying autoimmune process. In the months leading up to her current presentation, the patient had been prescribed one prednisone burst and two prednisone tapers. She was then placed on a regimen of 10 mg prednisone daily and 200 mg hydroxychloroquine bid by her primary care doctor. This was tapered by the Rheumatology Department such that the patient was on 7.5 mg of prednisone daily on arrival to this ED. Rheumatologic workup until this point revealed only low titer (1:80) positive antinuclear antibody. Prior to these ED visits, the patient had been otherwise healthy with only a history of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass 17 years earlier. Aside from recent daily low-dose prednisone use, the patient did not have other preexisting immune compromise or risk factors for aspiration such as seizure disorder, chronic alcohol use, or cognitive impairment. Before her transfer, the patient experienced foul-smelling, maroon-colored hemoptysis as well as anemia that required a higher level of care. On arrival to the ED, she was in acute hypoxic respiratory failure. The patient was intubated emergently and was admitted to the medical critical care unit for further treatment.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Pleural Effusion , Adult , Antibodies, Antinuclear , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Hemoptysis/diagnosis , Hemoptysis/etiology , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine , Prednisone/therapeutic use
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 60: 156-163, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35986978

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between emergency department point-of-care cardiac ultrasonography (POCUS) utilization and time to pericardial effusion drainage during an 8-year period when the emergency ultrasound program was established at our institution. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis or other procedure for evacuation of pericardial effusion. Data was collected using both direct queries to the electronic health record database and two-examiner chart review. The primary outcome was time to intervention for pericardial effusion drainage. Multivariable Cox regression, with and without inverse probability weighting for likelihood to receive POCUS, was used to determine the association between POCUS and time to intervention. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality. RESULTS: 257 patient encounters were included with 137 receiving POCUS and 120 who did not. The proportion of patients receiving POCUS increased from 18.5% to 69.5% during the early to late periods of the study. POCUS was associated with an earlier median time to intervention of 21.6 h (95% CI 17.2, 24.2) compared to 34.6 h (27.0, 50.5) in the No POCUS group. After adjustment for patient demographics, anticoagulation, time of presentation and hemodynamic instability, POCUS was associated with earlier intervention (HR 2.08 [95% CI 1.56, 2.77]). POCUS use was not associated with a difference in 28-day mortality, which was evaluated as a secondary outcome. However, diagnosis of pericardial effusion by the ED physician using any means (POCUS or other imaging) was associated with decreased 28-day mortality (9.7% vs. 26.0%, -16.3% for POCUS [95% CI -29.1, -3.5]). CONCLUSION: POCUS was associated with an earlier time to intervention for pericardial effusions after adjustment for multiple confounding factors. Failure to diagnose pericardial effusion in the ED using any diagnostic testing including POCUS, was associated with increased 28-day mortality.


Subject(s)
Pericardial Effusion , Anticoagulants , Drainage/methods , Humans , Pericardial Effusion/complications , Pericardial Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pericardial Effusion/therapy , Point-of-Care Systems , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography
3.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(3): 532-537, 2020 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32421498

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Extubation of appropriate patients in the emergency department (ED) may be a strategy to avoid preventable or short-stay intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and could allow for increased ventilator and ICU bed availability when demand outweighs supply. Extubation is infrequently performed in the ED, and a paucity of outcome data exists. Our objective was to descriptively analyze characteristics and outcomes of patients extubated in an ED-ICU setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study at an academic medical center in the United States. Adult ED patients extubated in the ED-ICU from 2015-2019 were retrospectively included and analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 202 patients extubated in the ED-ICU; 42% were female and median age was 60.86 years. Locations of endotracheal intubation included the ED (68.3%), outside hospital ED (23.8%), and emergency medical services/prehospital (7.9%). Intubations were performed for airway protection (30.2%), esophagogastroduodenoscopy (27.7%), intoxication/ingestion (17.3%), respiratory failure (13.9%), seizure (7.4%), and other (3.5%). The median interval from ED arrival to extubation was 9.0 hours (interquartile range 6.2-13.6). One patient (0.5%) required unplanned re-intubation within 24 hours of extubation. The attending emergency physician (EP) at the time of extubation was not critical care fellowship trained in the majority (55.9%) of cases. Sixty patients (29.7%) were extubated compassionately; 80% of these died in the ED-ICU, 18.3% were admitted to medical-surgical units, and 1.7% were admitted to intensive care. Of the remaining patients extubated in the ED-ICU (n = 142, 70.3%), zero died in the ED-ICU, 61.3% were admitted to medical-surgical units, 9.9% were admitted to intensive care, and 28.2% were discharged home from the ED-ICU. CONCLUSION: Select ED patients were safely extubated in an ED-ICU by EPs. Only 7.4% required ICU admission, whereas if ED extubation had not been pursued most or all patients would have required ICU admission. Extubation by EPs of appropriately screened patients may help decrease ICU utilization, including when demand for ventilators or ICU beds is greater than supply. Future research is needed to prospectively study patients appropriate for ED extubation.


Subject(s)
Airway Extubation , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Airway Extubation/methods , Airway Extubation/statistics & numerical data , Critical Care/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/standards , Retrospective Studies , United States
4.
J Emerg Med ; 56(4): 444-447, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755346

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Brugada pattern on electrocardiography (ECG) can manifest as type 1 (coved pattern) and type 2 (saddleback pattern). Brugada syndrome represents an ECG with Brugada pattern in a patient with symptoms or clinical factors, including syncope, cardiac arrest, ventricular dysrhythmias, and family history. Brugada syndrome is caused by a genetic channelopathy, but the Brugada pattern may be drug-induced. Epinephrine-induced Brugada pattern has not been reported previously. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old man developed anaphylaxis secondary to a bee sting, had a transient loss of consciousness, and self-administered intramuscular epinephrine. He subsequently presented to the emergency department and was found to have a type 1 Brugada pattern on ECG that resolved during observation. A historic ECG was reviewed that demonstrated a baseline type 2 Brugada pattern. His anaphylaxis was managed with steroids and antihistamines. He was observed without subsequent dysrhythmic events on telemetry or any further symptoms. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The differential diagnosis for syncope includes dysrhythmia, such as Brugada syndrome. Among other possible drugs, epinephrine may induce a type 1 Brugada pattern. Patients with Brugada pattern on ECG should be referred immediately to electrophysiology for consideration of implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator device, given the association of Brugada pattern with sudden cardiac arrest and ventricular dysrhythmias.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Brugada Syndrome/diagnosis , Epinephrine/adverse effects , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Brugada Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Electrocardiography/methods , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...