Negativity and Positivity in the ICU: Exploratory Development of Automated Sentiment Capture in the Electronic Health Record.

OBJECTIVES: To develop proof-of-concept algorithms using alternative approaches to capture provider sentiment in ICU notes. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: The Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring of Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) deidentified notes databases. PATIENTS: Adult (≥18 yr old) patients admitted to the ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We developed two sentiment models: 1) a keywords-based approach using a consensus-based clinical sentiment lexicon comprised of 72 positive and 103 negative phrases, including negations and 2) a Decoding-enhanced Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers with disentangled attention-v3-based deep learning model (keywords-independent) trained on clinical sentiment labels. We applied the models to 198,944 notes across 52,997 ICU admissions in the MIMIC-III database. Analyses were replicated on an external sample of patients admitted to a UCSF ICU from 2018 to 2019. We also labeled sentiment in 1,493 note fragments and compared the predictive accuracy of our tools to three popular sentiment classifiers. Clinical sentiment terms were found in 99% of patient visits across 88% of notes. Our two sentiment tools were substantially more predictive (Spearman correlations of 0.62-0.84, p values < 0.00001) of labeled sentiment compared with general language algorithms (0.28-0.46). CONCLUSION: Our exploratory healthcare-specific sentiment models can more accurately detect positivity and negativity in clinical notes compared with general sentiment tools not designed for clinical usage.

Venous Flow Coupler in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the utility of venous flow couplers in monitoring free tissue flaps in the immediate postoperative setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Otolaryngology department at a single tertiary care institution. METHODS: A retrospective case series of free flap reconstructions in which venous flow couplers were employed to supplement flap monitoring. All free flap cases performed over the past 4 years were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were venous flow coupler and arterial flow Doppler monitored for 5 days postoperatively. RESULTS: From July 2014 through May 2018, the venous flow coupler was used with the arterial flow Doppler and clinical monitoring in 228 cases. Eleven cases did not meet criteria for inclusion; thus, 217 cases were analyzed. Twenty cases (9.2%) returned to the operating room with concern for flap compromise, and 16 were salvaged. The combination of venous flow coupler and arterial flow Doppler identified 19 of these flaps. Venous flow couplers identified 5 compromised flaps before there was an arterial signal change, and all were salvaged. Additionally, there was a 24.1% false-positive rate when 2 venous flow couplers were used in parallel. For the venous flow coupler, the positive predictive value was 64.3% and the negative predictive value, 98.9%. The false-positive rate in the series was 5.1%. The sensitivity was 90% and the specificity, 94.9%. CONCLUSION: The venous flow coupler is able to detect venous thrombosis in the absence of arterial thrombosis and may contribute to improved flap salvage rates.

Transoral robotic retropharyngeal node dissection in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Patterns of metastasis and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the retropharyngeal lymph nodes is essential in the treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Transoral robotic retropharyngeal lymph node dissection (RPLND) may provide valuable staging information and guide selection of adjuvant therapy in a transoral robotic surgery (TORS) treatment paradigm. METHODS: Outcomes were compared between 30 patients with oropharyngeal SCC with tonsillar primaries undergoing RPLND and 37 stage-matched cases without RPLND. RESULTS: Retropharyngeal metastasis was confirmed in 6 patients undergoing RPLND. Compared with 37 stage-matched controls, there were no differences in length of stay, length of feeding tube dependence, net change in perioperative weight, or rates of hemorrhage and postoperative complications. RPLND altered adjuvant treatment recommendations in 1 of 30 patients. CONCLUSION: RPLND is technically feasible by a purely transoral robotic approach. Its performance is not associated with worse swallowing outcomes or rates of complication. In select patients, RPLND may provide valuable staging information and guide the selection of adjuvant therapy.