ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare autoantibody-mediated disease. For steroid and/or rituximab-refractory AIHA, there is no consensus on optimal treatment. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, could be beneficial by suppression of CD38+ plasma cells and thus autoantibody secretion. In addition, because CD38 is also expressed by activated T cells, daratumumab may also act via immunomodulatory effects. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab monotherapy in an international retrospective study including 19 adult patients with heavily pretreated refractory AIHA. In warm AIHA (wAIHA, n = 12), overall response was 50% with a median response duration of 5.5 months (range, 2-12), including ongoing response in 2 patients after 6 and 12 months. Of 6 nonresponders, 4 had Evans syndrome. In cold AIHA (cAIHA, n = 7) overall hemoglobin (Hb) response was 57%, with ongoing response in 3 of 7 patients. One additional patient with nonanemic cAIHA was treated for severe acrocyanosis and reached a clinical acrocyanosis response as well as a Hb increase. Of 6 patients with cAIHA with acrocyanosis, 4 had improved symptoms after daratumumab treatment. In 2 patients with wAIHA treated with daratumumab, in whom we prospectively collected blood samples, we found complete CD38+ T-cell depletion after daratumumab, as well as altered T-cell subset differentiation and a severely diminished capacity for cell activation and proliferation. Reappearance of CD38+ T cells coincided with disease relapse in 1 patient. In conclusion, our data show that daratumumab therapy may be a treatment option for refractory AIHA. The observed immunomodulatory effects that may contribute to the clinical response deserve further exploration.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Humans , Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-AT-III mediated heparin-resistance during CPB occurs by complex-forming with heparin-binding proteins. Currently, there are no specific recommendations for non-AT-III mediated heparin-resistance. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a fatal case of a 70-yr-old male-patient undergoing cardiac-surgery in which refractory heparin-resistance was observed. The massive AL amyloidosis found at autopsy is thought to be responsible and illustrates that awareness and knowledge of the etiology and perioperative strategies of non-AT-III mediated heparin-resistance is important. CONCLUSION: For anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in case of a non-AT-III medicated heparin resistance, we refer to the decision tree added to this manuscript and if necessary to consider direct thrombin inhibitors, such as bivalirudin or argatroban, as it bypasses the complexing pathway.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis , Humans , Heparin/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/drug therapy , Peptide Fragments , Cardiopulmonary BypassSubject(s)
Erythrocyte Transfusion , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , Hemoglobins/analysis , Neoplasms/therapy , Organizational Policy , Age Distribution , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Guideline Adherence , Hematologic Diseases/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Neoplasms/blood , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
Haemato-oncological patients receive many red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, however evidence-based guidelines are lacking. Our aim is to quantify the effect of restrictive and liberal RBC transfusion strategies on clinical outcomes and blood use in haemato-oncological patients. A literature search, last updated on 11 August 2016, was performed in PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and Academic Search Premier without restrictions on language and year of publication. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared different RBC transfusion strategies in haemato-oncological patients were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane collaboration's tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale was performed. After removing duplicates, 1142 publications were identified. Eventually, 15 studies were included, reporting on 2636 patients. The pooled relative risk for mortality was 0·68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·46-1·01] in favour of the restrictive strategy. The mean RBC use was reduced with 1·40 units (95% CI 0·70-2·09) per transfused patient per therapy cycle in the restrictive strategy group. There were no differences in safety outcomes. All currently available evidence suggests that restrictive strategies do not have a negative impact regarding clinical outcomes in haemato-oncological patients, while it reduces RBC use and associated costs.
