Influence of blood collection systems on the prothrombin time and international sensitivity index determined with human and rabbit thromboplastin reagents.

Three brands of blood collection tubes were studied for their influence on the prothrombin time (PT) and international sensitivity index (ISI) for 5 commercial thromboplastin reagents. With all reagents, PTs were shorter in Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, Plymouth, England) samples than in S-Monovette (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) or Venosafe (Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) samples. ISI values were higher with Vacutainer samples than with S-Monovette or Venosafe samples. The ISI differences between the tubes were small for Thromborel-S (2.1%; Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) and Hepato Quick (1.1%; Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France; Roche Diagnostics Nederland, Almere, the Netherlands) but greater for Neoplastin Plus (5.5%; Diagnostica Stago; Roche Diagnostics Nederland), Simplastin HTF (8.3%; bioMérieux, Durham, NC), and Innovin (8.8%; Dade Behring). The PT and ISI differences between the tubes could be explained mostly by the effect of magnesium ion contamination in the sodium citrate solutions. When PT ratios were transformed into international normalized ratios (INRs) using crossover ISI (ie, samples collected with one type of tube and ISI determined with another collection system for the PT reagent), the differences in mean INRs could be approximately 10%. For ISI calibration of reference thromboplastins, blood collection tubes should be used with minimal divalent metal ion contamination of the citrate solution.

Long-term stability and reproducibility of CoaguChek test strips.

Whole-blood point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors are being used on an increasing scale for the monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. These monitors are used with disposable test strips containing tissue factor reagent. The purpose of the present study was to assess the stability of different CoaguChek-S strip lots for a period of one year. Ten strip lots introduced successively in the Netherlands were obtained from the manufacturer's representative and stored at 4-8 degrees C. Six deep-frozen pooled plasmas were analyzed for the prothrombin time and INR with the strips at six or seven occasions spread over one year. The test plasmas were recalcified immediately before application to the CoaguChek-S system. Regression analysis was performed on the clotting times obtained with each plasma. In the majority of cases (i.e.95%), no significant change was observed at the 5% significance level. A significant change was observed in only 3 cases. In addition, a ranking statistic was used as test of a monotonic relationship in the two-way analysis of variance. The results of the ranking statistic were not significant for any strip lot, indicating that the test strips were stable under these storage conditions. The reproducibility of INR measured with the CoaguChek-S was assessed. The mean within-run coefficient of variation (CV) of INR ranged from 2.58% to 3.36% (CV). The between-lot variation of the mean INR ranged from 3.2 to 4.5 % (CV). The over-all variation of single INR measurements, i.e. including between-lot and within-lot, ranged from 5.0 to 6.0 % (CV).

Preanalytical variables and off-site blood collection: influences on the results of the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio test and implications for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy.

BACKGROUND: The quality of oral anticoagulant therapy management with coumarin derivatives requires reliable results for the prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR). We assessed the effect on PT/INR of preanalytical variables, including ones related to off-site blood collection and transportation to a laboratory. METHODS: Four laboratories with different combinations of blood collection systems, thromboplastin reagents, and coagulation meters participated. The simulated preanalytical variables included time between blood collection and PT/INR determinations on samples stored at room temperature, at 4-6 degrees C, and at 37 degrees C; mechanical agitation at room temperature, at 4-6 degrees C, and at 37 degrees C; time between centrifugation and PT/INR determination; and times and temperatures of centrifugation. For variables that affected results, the effect of the variable was classified as moderate when <25% of samples showed a change >10% or as large if >25% of samples showed such a change. RESULTS: During the first 6 h after blood collection, INR changed by >10% in <25% of samples (moderate effect) when blood samples were stored at room temperature, 4-6 degrees C, or 37 degrees C with or without mechanical agitation and independent of the time of centrifugation after blood collection. With one combination of materials and preanalytical conditions, a 24-h delay at room temperature or 4-6 degrees C had a large effect, i.e., changes >10% in >25% of samples. In all laboratories, a 24-h delay at 37 degrees C or with mechanical agitation had a large effect. We observed no clinically or statistically relevant INR differences among studied centrifugation conditions (centrifugation temperature, 20 degrees C or no temperature control; centrifugation time, 5 or 10 min). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend a maximum of 6 h between blood collection and PT/INR determination. The impact of a 24-h delay should be investigated for each combination of materials and conditions.