[Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia : What have we achieved?] / Katheterablation ventrikulärer Tachyarrhythmien : Was haben wir erreicht?

The role of catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) has evolved over the last two decades into an established treatment option. In patients with idiopathic VT catheter ablation is the gold standard treatment option with high effectiveness and low risk of complications. Due to the high risk of side effects the use of antiarrhythmic drugs is only indicated in exceptional cases. In patients with structural heart diseases, such as ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy, VT is the most frequent cause of death. Furthermore, recurrent shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are one of the main reasons for the high morbidity and mortality; however, in these patients a complex myocardial substrate is present and consequently there is a relevant risk of recurrence after VT ablation. A periprocedural mortality of approximately 3% must be considered in these often severely ill patients. Nevertheless, there is no reasonable alternative to catheter ablation, particularly in patients who continue to have VT episodes even under therapy with amiodarone. Questions with respect to the optimal procedural technique for VT ablation, the endpoint and optimal timing of ablation need to be clarified in clinical trials.

Influence of periprocedural anticoagulation strategies on complication rate and hospital stay in patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The use of non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs), uninterrupted (uVKA) and interrupted vitamin K antagonists (iVKA) are common periprocedural oral anticoagulation (OAC) strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Comparative data on complication rates resulting from OAC strategies for solely persistent AF (persAF) undergoing ablation are sparse. Thus, we sought to determine the impact of these OAC strategies on complication rates among patients with persAF undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing persAF ablation were included. Depending on preprocedural OAC, three groups were defined: (1) NOACs (paused 48 h preablation), (2) uVKA, and (3) iVKA with heparin bridging. A combined complication endpoint (CCE) composed of bleeding and thromboembolic events was analyzed. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2014, 1440 persAF ablation procedures were performed in 1092 patients. NOACs were given in 441 procedures (31 %; rivaroxaban 57 %, dabigatran 33 %, and apixaban 10 %), uVKA in 488 (34 %), and iVKA in 511 (35 %). Adjusted CCE rates were 5.5 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) (3.1-7.8)] in group 1 (NOACs), 7.5 % [95 % CI (5.0-10.1)] in group 2 (uVKA), and 9.9 % [95 % CI (6.6-13.2)] in group 3. Compared to group 1, the combined complication risk was almost twice as high in group 3 [odd's ratio (OR) 1.9, 95 % CI (1.0-3.7), p = 0.049)]. The major complication rate was low (0.9 %). Bleeding complications, driven by minor groin complications, are more frequent than thromboembolic events (n = 112 vs. 1, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing persAF ablation with iVKA anticoagulation have an increased risk of complications compared to NOACs. Major complications, such as thromboembolic events, are generally rare and are exceeded by minor bleedings.

[Pre-interventional, peri-interventional and post-interventional anticoagulation in the setting of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation : current practice and practical approach]. / Prä-, peri- und postinterventionelle Antikoagulation im Rahmen der Vorhofflimmerablation : Aktueller Stand und praktisches Vorgehen.

In addition to treatment with drugs to control the rate and rhythm, the method of catheter ablation is a cornerstone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Another crucial part in treating patients with atrial fibrillation is an adequate oral anticoagulation. Apart from the vitamin K antagonists (VKA) phenprocoumon and warfarin, the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been approved for oral anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation. As a result there are different potential treatment possibilities for pre-interventional, peri-interventional and post-interventional anticoagulation in the setting of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Due to increasing clinical experience with DOAC and the increasing number of atrial fibrillation ablations worldwide, peri-interventional treatment strategies are continuously changing. Therefore, the current article discusses current standards and gives practical guidance.

[Anticoagulation in high thromboembolic risk after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry]. / Antikoagulationssituation bei hohem thromboembolischem Risiko nach Vorhofflimmerablation: Daten des Ablations-Qualitätsregisters.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of symptomatic drug-refractory AF. According to current guidelines, the prevention of stroke and embolism is the most important therapeutic goal in AF and the recommendations for anticoagulation (OAC) after successful CA are based upon the CHA2DS2-VASc-Score 3. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of OAC in patients with a high risk for thromboembolic events 1 year after CA and to identify predictor variables for discontinuation of OAC. METHODS: Between January 2007 and January 2010 13092 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 52 German electrophysiological centers agreed to participate in this prospective multicenter registry. 41 centers included patients undergoing CA for AF. Analysis included patients who were discharged with OAC after CA and had a CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥ 2. A centralized 1 year follow-up (FU) was conducted via telephone. RESULTS: 1300 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One year after CA 51.8 % of these patients were on OAC. Factors significantly associated with discontinuation of OAC included no AF recurrence in FU (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 2.14, [95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.73-2.66], P < 0.001) and paroxysmal AF (OR: 1.53 [95 % CI: 1.29-1.81], P < 0.001). Factors associated with continuation of OAK were patient age (OR per 10 years: 0.79 [95 % CI: 0.68-0.91], P = 0.002), valvular heart disease (OR: 0.67 [95 % CI: 0.48-0.92], P = 0.013), an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator or a cardiac resynchronization therapy system (OR: 0.55 [95 % CI: 0.41-0.74], P < 0.001) and neurological events in hospital or during FU (OR: 0.40 [95 % CI: 0.18-0.88], P < 0.022). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients with an indication for OAC are not adequately anticoagulated one year after CA for AF. Paroxysmal AF or freedom from AF is significantly associated with discontinuation of OAC.

Idiopathic ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias from the great cardiac vein: challenges and risks of catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia is well established but epicardial origin, proximity to coronary arteries, and limited accessibility may complicate ablation from the venous system in particular from the great cardiac vein (GCV). METHODS: Between April 2009 and October 2010 14 patients (56 ± 15 years; 9 male) out of a total group of 117 patients with idiopathic outflow tract tachycardias were included undergoing ablation for idiopathic VT or premature ventricular contractions (PVC) originating from GCV. All patients in whom the PVC arose from the GCV were subject to the study. In these patients angiography of the left coronary system was performed with the ablation catheter at the site of earliest activation. RESULTS: Successful ablation was performed in 6/14 (43%) and long-term success was achieved in 5/14 (36%) patients. In 4/14 patients (28.6%) ablation was not performed. In another 4 patients (26.7%), ablation did not abolish the PVC/VT. In the majority, the anatomical proximity to the left coronary system prohibited effective RF application. In 3 patients RF application resulted in a coronary spasm with complete regression as revealed in repeat coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: A relevant proportion idiopathic VT/PVC can safely be ablated from the GCV without significant permanent coronary artery stenosis after RF application. Our data furthermore demonstrate that damage to the coronary artery system is likely to be transient.

[Interventional therapy of atrial fibrillation: possibilities and limitations]. / Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der interventionellen Therapie von Vorhofflimmern.

Recently, significant progress has been made treating atrial fibrillation (AF) with catheter ablation emerging as an increasingly important technique. Electrical disconnection of the pulmonary veins (PV) is a widely accepted endpoint for interventional treatment of paroxysmal AF (PAF). According to the current guidelines, catheter ablation can be considered as a therapeutic option in patients who failed antiarrhythmic drug treatment for PAF. The procedural endpoint for PVI is achievement of permanent electrical isolation of the PVs, which in the vast majority of patients harbor triggered electrical activity inducing and maintaining PAF. The success rate of this approach in patients with PAF ranges between 60 and 80% after a single procedure and augments to > 80 % in patients undergoing a repeat procedure to abolish recovered PV connection. However, it is now evident that persistent or long-standing persistent AF may not be successfully treated by PVI alone since the majority of patients have AF maintaining substrate beyond the PV. From a pathophysiological perspective this is explained by structural and electrical remodeling of the atrial myocardium in patients with persistent AF. Therefore, it is today widely accepted that additional substrate modification is required to effectively address persistent AF using catheter ablation. It has been shown that a combined approach of PV isolation, ablation of fractionated atrial electrograms and application of lines to treat atrial macro-reentrant tachycardias ("stepwise approach") aiming for restoration of sinus rhythm is a favorable strategy to treat persistent AF. However, significant expertise is needed to accomplish all steps within these complex procedures. Therefore, catheter ablation for persistent AF cannot yet be considered "clinically established" and should only be performed in high volume centers. Additional data is needed to verify the beneficial effect of this strategy and determine "predictors" identifying patients profiting most from these ablation strategies. In patients with PAF, catheter ablation has emerged as an established therapy also in comparison to antiarrythmic drug treatment. Recent studies have shown that catheter ablation for PAF is superior to antiarrhythmic drug treatment with regard to mid-term suppression of any atrial arrhythmia. Overall, catheter ablation for AF has still to be considered as a symptomatic treatment since evidence for beneficial effects with regard to more robust clinical endpoints such as death, rehospitalization and ischemic cerebral events are not yet available.

[Surface ECG presentation and intracardiac electrogram characteristics of uncommon supraventricular tachycardia entities]. / Differenzialdiagnose ungewöhnlicher Elektrogramme - vom Oberflächen-EKG zur elektrophysiologischen Diagnose.

The vast majority of patients with supraventricular tachycardias present with specific 12-lead surface ECG characteristics allowing the diagnosis of the underlying mechanisms prior to the invasive electrophysiological study. However, an accurate diagnosis remains challenging in a subset of patients, even when using well-established stimulation maneuvers and sophisticated conventional mapping methods. Thus, the aim of the present manuscript is to describe some cases with uncommon entities of supraventricular tachycardias where the combined interpretation of 12-lead ECG presentation and invasive electrophysiological characteristics revealed the correct diagnoses.

Fecal seepage and soiling: a problem of rectal sensation.

PURPOSE: To determine the physiologic alteration resulting in fecal seepage and soiling, results of anorectal manometric testing were evaluated in patients with varying degrees of fecal incontinence. METHODS: Anal manometric studies performed on 170 patients with fecal incontinence were reviewed. Results of their studies, including mean resting pressure, maximum resting pressure, maximum squeezing pressure, minimum rectal sensory volume, and minimum volume at which reflex relaxation first occurs, were compared with those of 35 control group subjects with normal fecal continence. Manometric studies were performed using a four-channel, water-perfused catheter. Incontinent patients were divided into three groups based on presenting complaints: complete incontinence (incontinence of gas and liquid and solid stool), partial incontinence (incontinence of gas and liquid), and seepage and soiling (incontinence of small amounts of liquid and solid stool without immediate awareness). RESULTS: Resting pressures were significantly lower in complete incontinence, partial incontinence, and seepage and soiling groups than in the controls (P < 0.001). Resting pressures of the complete incontinence group were also significantly lower than those of the partial incontinence and seepage and soiling groups (P = 0.03). Squeezing pressures were lower for both the complete incontinence and partial incontinence groups than for those in the control group (P < 0.001) and in the seepage and soiling group, which did not differ significantly from controls. The minimum rectal sensory volume was greater in all incontinent groups than in controls (P < 0.001). Sensory volume of the seepage and soiling group was significantly greater than that of the complete incontinence and partial incontinence groups (P < 0.01). The difference between sensory volume and the volume producing reflex relaxation was greatest in the seepage and soiling group and differed from that of the partial incontinence and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the mechanism of incontinence is different in seepage and soiling patients and involves a dyssynergy of rectal sensation and anal relaxation. Patients with the pattern of seepage and soiling may be successfully treated with stool bulking agents (e.g., psyllium or bran).