Postural differences in the immediate effects of active exercise with compression therapy on lower limb lymphedema.

PURPOSE: Although regarded as an important treatment for lymphedema, the therapeutic effects of active exercise with compression therapy (AECT) are supported by little evidence. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative benefits of AECT with different postures for patients with lower limb lymphedema (LLL). METHODS: Eighteen women with LLL secondary to surgical treatment of gynecological cancer, completed (1) AECT in a seated position (seated AECT), (2) AECT in a supine position (supine AECT), and (3) compression-only therapy in a supine position (CT) in this randomized, controlled, crossover trial. AECT was performed on a bicycle ergometer while wearing elastic compression bandages. Each intervention was performed for 15 min, and the three conditions were separated by a 1-week washout period. Lower-limb volumes were evaluated using a PerometerTM sensor (Pero-system, Wuppertal, Germany), and symptom severity was assessed before and after each intervention using a visual analog scale (pain, heaviness) and palpation (pitting, stiffness). The effects of the interventions were estimated using linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: The magnitude of limb volume decreases differed significantly among the interventions, with a greater decrease after supine AECT than after CT. Pre-intervention pitting severity and skin stiffness were significantly correlated with the magnitude of volume decrease after all interventions and after AECT in the supine position, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Supine AECT using a bicycle ergometer has marked immediate effects to decrease the fluid volume of severe LLL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN clinical trial registry (UMIN-CTR; ID000020129) by CONSORT 2010, TRN R000023253, December 9, 2015.

Immediate effects of active exercise with compression therapy on lower-limb lymphedema.

PURPOSE: Active exercise with compression therapy (AECT) is a standard treatment for gynecological cancer-related lower-limb lymphedema (LLL) in clinical situations. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the immediate effects of the use of AECT on LLL. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate effects of AECT on LLL. METHODS: Participants in this randomized controlled crossover trial comprised 23 women with LLL who completed high-load AECT, low-load AECT, and compression-only therapy (CT). AECT was performed on a bicycle ergometer with short stretch bandages. Each intervention was performed for 15 min, with successive interventions separated by a 1-week washout period. Lower-limb volume was assessed using a Perometer™ sensor (Pero-system, Wuppertal, Germany). General symptoms (pain and heaviness) and skin symptoms (pitting and stiffness) were assessed using a visual analog scale and palpation, respectively. Measurements were taken before and after each intervention. Analysis of variance using linear mixed-effect modeling was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Volume decrement differed significantly between all three interventions (P < 0.05). Lower-limb volume was significantly reduced after high-load AECT compared to that after CT. General symptoms and skin symptoms were similar across the three interventions, but severity of pre-intervention skin symptoms correlated significantly with volume decrement after high- and low-load AECT. High-load AECT using the bicycle ergometer was more effective than CT for decreasing lower-limb volume. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that high-load AECT has marked effects on severe LLL.