Thermodynamic solubility measurement without chemical analysis.

In this work, the optical imaging based single particle analysis (SPA) and the gold standard shake-flask (SF) solubility methods are compared. We show that to analyze pharmaceutical compounds spanning 7 log units in solubility and a diverse chemical space with limited resources, several analytical techniques are required (HPLC-UV, LC-MS, refractometry and UV-Vis spectrometry), whereas solely the SPA method is able to analyze all the same compounds. SPA experiments take only minutes, while for SF, it may take days to reach thermodynamic equilibration. This decreases the time span needed for the solubility experiment from initial preparations to obtaining the result from roughly three days to less than three hours. The optimal particle size for SPA ranges from approximately one to hundreds of microns. Challenges include measuring large particles, very fast dissolving compounds and handling small sample sizes. Inherent exclusion of density from the SPA measurement is a potential source of error for compounds with very low or high density values. The average relative difference of 37 % between the two methods is very good in the realm of solubility, where 400 % interlaboratory reproducibility can be expected.

Fast imaging-based single particle analysis method for solubility determination.

The solubility and dissolution rates of chemical compounds are crucial properties in several fields of industry and research. However, accurate, rapid and green methods for their measurement, which only consume micrograms of compound, are lacking. Here, the unique approach of non-specific, image-based single particle analysis (SPA) for solubility testing is directly compared to and thus validated on the mid-solubility range with the current gold standard shake-flask method with UV-Vis spectroscopy employed for determining sample concentrations. Five biologically active compounds representing a range of physicochemical properties including pKa and logP were analyzed with both methods. The comparison of SPA and the shake-flask (SF) analysis shows excellent linear correlation (R2 = 0.99). Higher variability of the SPA method is attributed to variability between the properties of individual particles, which cannot be detected with traditional methods. Due to the similar average solubility values compared to those produced with SF, it is concluded that the SPA method has great potential as an analytical tool for small-scale solubility studies. It also has several practical advantages over the current gold standard shake-flask method, such as speed, low consumables consumption, and no requirement for prior knowledge of compound chemistry.