Cold versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps (Randomized-controlled German CHRONICLE-trial).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard therapy for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20mm. Recently, it has been suggested that polyp resection without current (cold resection) may be superior to the standard technique using cutting/coagulation current (hot resection) by reducing adverse events (AE), but evidence from a randomized trial is missing. METHODS: In this randomized-controlled multicentric trial involving 19 centers, non-pedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20mm were randomly assigned to cold or hot EMR. Primary outcome was major AE (perforation or post-endoscopic bleeding). Among secondary outcomes major AE subcategories, postpolypectomy-syndrome and residual adenoma were most relevant. RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2023, 396 polyps in 363 patients (48.2% female) were enrolled for the intention-to-treat analysis. Major AE occurred in 1.0 % in the cold and in 7.9% in the hot group (p=0.001; Odds ratio [OR] 0.12 [95%-CI: 0.03-0.54]). Rates for perforation and post-endoscopic bleeding were significantly lower in the cold group with 0% vs. 3.9% (p=0.007) and 1.0% vs. 4.4% (p=0.040). Postpolypectomy-syndrome occurred with similar frequency (3.1% vs. 4.4%, p=0.490). After cold resection, residual adenoma was found more frequently, with 23.7% vs. 13.8% (p=0.020; OR 1.94 [95%-CI: 1.12-3.38]). In multivariable analysis, lesion diameter of ≥4cm was an independent predictor both for major AE (OR 3.37) and residual adenoma (OR 2.47), and high-grade dysplasia/cancer for residual adenoma (OR 2.92). CONCLUSION: Cold resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps appears considerably safer than hot EMR, however at the cost of a higher residual adenoma rate. Further studies have to confirm to which extent polyp size and histology can determine an individualized approach (Trial number: DRKS00025170).

Updated German guideline on diagnosis and treatment of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Diagnosis and therapy of esophageal carcinoma is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The purpose of the updated German guideline "Diagnosis and Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus-version 3.1" is to provide practical and evidence-based advice for the management of patients with esophageal cancer. Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel based on an extensive and systematic evaluation of the published medical literature and the application of well-established methodologies (e.g. Oxford evidence grading scheme, grading of recommendations). Accurate diagnostic evaluation of the primary tumor as well as lymph node and distant metastases is required in order to guide patients to a stage-appropriate therapy after the initial diagnosis of esophageal cancer. In high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or mucosal carcinoma endoscopic resection shall be performed. Whether endoscopic resection is the definitive therapeutic measure depends on the histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. Esophagectomy should be performed minimally invasive or in combination with open procedures (hybrid technique). Because the prognosis in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is poor with surgery alone, multimodality therapy is recommended. In locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction, perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative radiochemotherapy should be administered. In locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus, preoperative radiochemotherapy followed by complete resection or definitive radiochemotherapy without surgery should be performed. In the case of residual tumor in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and R0 resection of squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, adjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab should be given. Systemic palliative treatment options (chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone) in unresectable or metastastic esophageal cancer depend on histology and are stratified according to PD-L1 and/or Her2 expression.

Spontaneous detachment of the spiral overtube from the endoscope in the upper esophagus: a case report and literature review of a rare complication during motorized spiral enteroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is a recent modality for diagnostic and therapeutic examination of the small bowel using a spiral-shaped overtube with an integrated electric motor attached to an endoscope. With growing evidence of its efficacy, MSE is increasingly being used by endoscopic facilities. We herein present an uncommon case of the detachment of the spiral overtube from the endoscope during MSE. CASE REPORT: We performed antegrade MSE in a 75-year-old female under general anesthesia for coagulation of multiple small-bowel arteriovenous malformations and resection of a polyp detected on a previous capsule endoscopy. The management was successful, and we had no passage difficulties. However, during the withdrawal phase of the enteroscope, the entire spiral overtube disconnected from the endoscopic shaft and became stuck in the esophagus and pharynx. Attempts to remove the lodged spiral using various endoscopic forceps, graspers, snares, or a dilatation balloon failed. Also, the laryngoscopic use of Magill forceps did not allow grabbing the spiral properly. Eventually, the spiral could be retrieved laryngoscopically with arthroscopic grasping forceps. This incident caused laryngeal swelling and bleeding lacerations of the upper esophagus, which were clipped on a subsequent gastroscopy. No further long-lasting complications occurred in the patient. CONCLUSION: Detachment of the spiral from the enteroscope is a potentially life-threatening and challenging complication of MSE. Artificial ventilation under observation by an anesthesiologist allowed for calm management of this dangerous situation and increased the overall safety of the procedure. Hence, we believe that in the context of antegrade MSE, general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation should be mandatory.

Endoscopic powered resection device for residual colonic lesions: the first multicenter, prospective, international clinical study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic resection is standard treatment for adenomatous colorectal lesions. Depending on lesion morphology and resection technique, recurrence can occur. Scarred adenomas are challenging to resect and may require surgical management. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of an endoscopic powered resection (EPR) system for scarred adenomatous colorectal lesions. METHODS: This single-arm, prospective, multicenter study was conducted from January 2018 to January 2021 at 12 sites. Patients with persistent flat or sessile colorectal lesions were enrolled. Primary end points were technical success (the ability of the device to resect the lesion[s] without use of other resection devices without device-related serious adverse events [AEs]) and safety (the occurrence of AEs through 90 days). Secondary end points included endoscopic confirmation of resection completeness, occurrence of colon stenosis, disease persistence, and diagnostic value of resected specimens. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were in the intention-to-treat/safety analysis population. Primary analysis was performed on 45 per-protocol (PP) patients with 48 lesions. All PP patients were solely treated by using the EPR device. Technical success was achieved in 44 (98%) patients. Three (5%) serious AEs occurred: 2 delayed self-limited bleeds and 1 perforation. Nonserious AEs included 4 (6%) cases of mild intraprocedural bleeding. Completeness of resection and histopathologic diagnosis of tissue specimens were achieved in all patients. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had disease persistence after the first treatment, and there was no colon stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: EPR is safe and effective for benign, persistent, large (>20 mm), scarred colorectal adenomas and should be considered as an alternative treatment in lieu of surgery. A persistence rate of 46.7% indicates that >1 treatment is necessary for effective endoscopic treatment. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04203667.).

Pancreatic changes with lifestyle and age: What is normal and what is concerning?

During the aging process, typical morphological changes occur in the pancreas, which leads to a specific "patchy lobular fibrosis in the elderly." The aging process in the pancreas is associated with changes in volume, dimensions, contour, and increasing intrapancreatic fat deposition. Typical changes are seen in ultrasonography, computed tomography, endosonography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Typical age-related changes must be distinguished from lifestyle-related changes. Obesity, high body mass index, and metabolic syndrome also lead to fatty infiltration of the pancreas. In the present article, age-related changes in morphology and imaging are discussed. Particular attention is given to the sonographic verification of fatty infiltration of the pancreas. Ultrasonography is a widely used screening examination method. It is important to acknowledge the features of the normal aging processes and not to interpret them as pathological findings. Reference is made to the uneven fatty infiltration of the pancreas. The differential diagnostic and the differentiation from other processes and diseases leading to fatty infiltration of the pancreas are discussed.

Role of transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) for diagnosis of retroperitoneal fibrosis (Ormond's disease).

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF), often referred to as Ormond's disease when it is of idiopathic origin, is a rare disease characterized by the presence of inflammatory infiltrates and periaortic masses in the retroperitoneum. For a definite diagnosis, a biopsy and subsequent pathological examination is required. Currently accepted methods for retroperitoneal biopsy include open, laparoscopic, or CT-guided approaches. However, transduodenal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) for diagnosis of RPF has attracted only little attention in the literature. CASE REPORTS: We report two male patient cases who presented with leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein, and a suspicious retroperitoneal mass of unknown origin on computed tomography. One patient also reported left lower quadrant pain, whereas the other patient suffered from back pain and weight loss. In both patients, idiopathic RPF was successfully diagnosed by using transduodenal EUS-FNA/FNB with 22- and 20-gauge aspiration needles. Histopathology revealed dense lymphocytic infiltrates and fibrosis. The procedures lasted approximately 25 and 20 minutes, respectively, and in both patients no serious adverse events occurred. Treatment included steroid therapy and administration of Azathioprine. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that using EUS-FNA/FNB to diagnose RPF is a feasible, fast, and safe method, which should always be considered as a first-line diagnostic modality. Hence, this case report emphasizes that gastrointestinal endoscopists are likely to play an important role in the setting of suspected RPF.

FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A novel validated prognostic score to facilitate treatment decision-making in real-world.

There is no prospective, randomised head-to-head trial comparing first-line FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer. We assess real-world effectiveness and quality of life (QoL) of both regimens using a new prognostic score. This analysis includes 1540 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer from the prospective, clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Pancreatic Cancer separated into learning (n = 1027) and validation sample (n = 513). The Pancreatic Cancer Score (PCS) was developed using multivariate Cox regression. We compared overall survival (OS) and time to deterioration (TTD) for longitudinal QoL between first-line FOLFIRINOX (n = 407) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (n = 655) according to patients' prognostic risk, after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) by propensity score analysis. The PCS includes nine independent prognostic factors for survival: female sex, BMI ≥24/unknown, ECOG performance status ≥1, Charlson comorbidity index ≥1, tumour staging IV/unknown at primary diagnosis, liver metastases, bilirubin >1.5× upper limit of normal (ULN), leukocytes >ULN and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥4. Median OS of the validation sample was 11.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4-14.4), 8.5 (95% CI: 6.8-9.6) and 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.0-7.4) for favourable- (0-3 risk factors), intermediate- (4-5 factors) and poor-risk group (6-9 factors), respectively. After IPTW, only poor-risk patients had significantly longer median OS and TTD of overall QoL with FOLFIRINOX (OS: 6.9 months, 95% CI: 3.9-13.3; TTD: 10.6 months, 95% CI: 2.0-14.1) vs gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (OS: 4.0 months, 95% CI: 2.8-4.8; TTD: 4.1 months, 95% CI: 2.4-4.5). Our novel PCS may facilitate treatment decisions in clinical routine of advanced pancreatic cancer, since only poor-risk, but not favourable-risk patients, seem to benefit from intensified treatment with FOLFIRINOX.

Outcome Quality After Colorectal Cancer Resection in Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers­Patient-Reported and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In this observational study, patient-reported outcomes and short-term clinical outcome parameters in patients with colorectal cancer were studied 12 months after the start of treatment. Outcomes were also compared across German Certified Colorectal Cancer Centres. METHODS: Data were collected from 4239 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone elective tumor resection in one of 102 colorectal cancer centers and had responded to a quality-of-life questionnaire before treatment (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29). 3142 (74.1%) of these patients completed a post-treatment questionnaire 12 months later. Correlation analyses were calculated and case-mix adjusted comparisons across centers were made for selected patient-reported outcomes, anastomotic insufficiency, and 30-day-mortality. RESULTS: At 12 months, mild improvements were seen in mean quality-of-life scores (66 vs. 62 points), constipation (16 vs. 19), and abdominal pain (15 vs. 17). Worsening was seen in physical function (75 vs. 82) and pain (22 vs. 19). Better patient-reported outcomes at 12 months were associated with better scores before treatment. Better results in at least three of the five scores were associated with male sex, higher educational level, higher age, and private health insurance. Major worsening of fecal incontinence was seen among patients with rectal cancer without a stoma. The largest differences across centers were found with respect to physical function. Anastomotic insufficiency was found in 4.3% of colon cancer patients and 8.2% of rectal cancer patients. 1.9% of patients died within 30 days after their resection. CONCLUSION: Clinicians can use these findings to identify patients at higher risk for poorer patient-reported outcomes. The differences among cancer centers that were found imply that measures for quality improvement would be desirable.

How to perform EUS-guided biliary drainage.

EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has recently gained widespread acceptance as a minimally invasive alternative method for biliary drainage. Even in experienced endoscopy centers, ERCP may fail due to inaccessibility of the papillary region, altered anatomy (particularly postsurgical alterations), papillary obstruction, or neoplastic gastric outlet obstruction. Biliary cannulation fails at first attempt in 5%-10% of cases even in the absence of these factors. In such cases, alternative options for biliary drainage must be provided since biliary obstruction is responsible for poor quality of life and even reduced survival, particularly due to septic cholangitis. The standard of care in many centers remains percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). However, despite the high technical success rate with experienced operators, the percutaneous approach is more invasive and associated with poor quality of life. PTBD may result in long-term external catheters for biliary drainage and carry the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) in up to 10% of patients, including bile leaks, hemorrhage, and sepsis. PTBD following a failed ERCP also requires scheduling a second procedure, resulting in prolonged hospital stay and additional costs. EUS-BD may overcome many of these limitations and offer some distinct advantages in accessing the biliary tree. Current data suggest that EUS-BD is safe and effective when performed by experts, although SAEs have been also reported. Despite the high number of clinical reports and case series, high-quality comparative studies are still lacking. The purpose of this article is to report on the current status of this procedure and to discuss the tools and techniques for EUS-BD in different clinical scenarios.

Causes of mortality in elderly UICC stage III colon cancer (CC) patients--Tumor-related death and competing risks from the German AIO colorectal study group Colopredict Plus (CPP) registry.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer (CC) is a disease of elderly patients (pts.) with a median age of 73 years (yrs.). Lack of data about the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is caused by underrepresentation of this clinically relevant cohort in interventional trials. We analyzed real-world data from the German CPP registry with regard to a possible benefit of ACT in elderly (70+ yrs.) versus younger pts. (50 to <70 yrs.) taking cause-specific deaths into account. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of age and ACT on overall survival (OS) and cause-specific death of stage III pts. using Cox regression. RESULTS: In total, 1558 pts. were analyzed and follow-up was 24.6 months. 62.6% of the elderly received ACT whereas 91.1% of younger pts. (p < 0.001). Oxaliplatin combinations were significantly less often given to older than younger pts. (38.8% vs. 88.9%; p < 0.001). Mean Charlson comorbidity score was significantly lower in pts. that received ACT (0.61) than in those without ACT (1.16; p < 0.001). ACT was an independent positive prognostic factor for cancer-related death in elderly pts. even in pts. 75+ yrs. No significant difference in the effect of ACT could be observed between age groups (interaction: cancer-specific death HR = 1.7948, p = 0.1079; death of other cause HR = 0.7384, p = 0.6705). CONCLUSION: ACT was an independent positive prognostic factor for OS. There may be a cohort of elderly with less co-morbidities who benefit from ACT.

Endoscopic management of giant gastric dilatation in an anorexia nervosa patient after binge eating.

Acute gastric dilatation is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition that may occur in patients suffering from anorexia nervosa after ingesting large amounts of food within a short period. Frequently, this condition is considered a surgical emergency due to subsequent occurrence of complications such as gastric necrosis or perforation.Here we report a case of a young female patient (23 years) with anorexia nervosa who presented with severe abdominal pain, nausea, and inability to vomit after a period of binge eating. Abdominal computed tomography revealed an extremely dilated stomach measuring 39.0 cm × 18.0 cm in size. Initial nasal decompression therapy using gastric tubes had failed. Due to the absence of complications, it was decided to treat her solely by endoscopic means under mechanical ventilation. After undergoing multiple overtube-assisted esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs), she fully recovered eventually.This case demonstrates that interventional endoscopic treatment of a patient with uncomplicated acute gastric dilatation is feasible and safe, at least under general anesthesia. Hence, this option should be considered when sole gastric tube suction fails, and there is no indication of complications such as peritonitis, sepsis, perforation, or gastric ischemia. A more invasive and aggressive surgical procedure may be avoided in selected cases, and the length of hospital stay may be shortened.