Report from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors subcommittee on graduate medical education funding: effects of decreased medicare support.

INTRODUCTION: Recent changes by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) have resulted in decreased Medicare support for emergency medicine (EM) residencies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of reduced graduate medical education (GME) funding support on residency size, resident rotations, and support for a fourth postgraduate year (PGY) of training and for residents with previous training. METHODS: A 36-question survey was developed by the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) committee on GME funding and sent to all 122 EM program directors (PDs). Responses were collected by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) office and blinded with respect to the institution. RESULTS: Of 122 programs, 109 (89%) responded, of which 78 were PGY 1-3 programs, 19 were PGY 2-4, and 12 were PGY 1-4. The PDs were asked specifically whether there were changes in program size due to changes in Medicare reimbursement. Although few programs (12%) decreased their size or planned to decrease their size, 39% had discussions regarding decreasing their size. Thirty percent of the PDs responded that other programs at their institution had already decreased their size; 26% of the PDs had problems with financing outside rotations; and 24% had a decrease in off-service residents in their emergency departments (EDs). Only seven (6%) of programs paid residents from practice plan dollars, while most (82%) were fully supported by federal GME funding. Nearly all four-year programs (97%) received full resident salary support from their institutions and 77% of programs accept residents with previous training. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all EM programs are fully supported by their institutions, including the fourth postgraduate year. Most programs take residents with previous training. Although few programs have reduced their size, many are discussing this. Many programs have had difficulty with funding off-service rotations and many have had decreased numbers of off-service residents in their EDs. Recent GME funding changes have had adverse effects on EM residency programs.

Update on the development of emergency medicine as a specialty in Turkey.

Emergency medical care, both prehospital and hospital-based, is currently provided by general practitioners in over 90% of the emergency departments in Turkey. In the early 1990s, government and university leaders recognized that Turkey needed to improve its emergency medical care system, and they chose to adapt the mature and tested Anglo-American model of emergency medicine (EM). EM was declared to be an independent specialty by the Ministry of Health in 1993. The first paramedic school and the first EM residency programme (36 months in length) were opened at the Dokuz Eylul University in 1993 and 1994, respectively. In 1995, the Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey (EMAT) was established. Today, there are 14 EM residency programmes around the country, and these are trying to design a common curriculum. The connection between departments is improving with annual meetings organized by EMAT. In addition, EMAT is developing international collaboration in the Middle East region. The Turkish government is trying to promote EM specialist physicians and paramedics in the national emergency care system.

Planning recommendations for international emergency medicine and out-of-hospital care system development.

OBJECTIVES: To present suggestions on planning for development of emergency medicine (EM) and out-of-hospital care in countries that are in an early phase of this process, and to provide basic background information for planners not already familiar with EM. METHODS: The techniques and programs used by the authors and others in assisting in EM development in other countries to date are described. CONCLUSIONS: Some aspects of EM system development have applicability to most countries, but other aspects must be decided by planners based on country-specific factors. Because of the very recent initiation of many EM system development efforts in other countries, to the authors' knowledge there have not yet been extensive evaluative reports of the efficacy of these efforts. Further studies are needed on the relative effectiveness and cost-benefit of different EM development efforts.

Underestimation of case severity by emergency department patients: implications for managed care.

The objective was to examine differences in symptom severity assessment by emergency department (ED) patients and by emergency physicians (EPs) and to relate these assessments with case management and disposition. The design was prospective convenience sample of ED patients. The setting was a U.S. university hospital ED with an annual ED patient census 28,000. The participants were all ED patients registered when first author was in ED; excluded were patients treated by the major trauma response team and those with a psychiatric chief complaint. All patients were interviewed by the first author and asked to classify their symptoms as emergent, urgent, or nonurgent; the EP attending classed patients' symptoms at presentation and after work-up was complete. Three hundred-one cases were entered in the study from May to August 1996. Although 28% of ED patients self-rated their symptoms as nonurgent, 5% of this group required hospital admission. Of this group 35% were assessed by the EP attending as having required emergent or urgent ED care. Of this group 5% also rated by the EP initially as nonurgent had their case severity upgraded after work-up. Reliance on either patient symptom self-assessment or physician screening assessment by telephone to determine appropriateness of an ED visit is not reliably safe for at least 5% of presenting patients. Even prospective ED visit severity assessment does not reliably identify "unnecessary" ED visits.

Proposed curriculum for an "observational" international emergency medicine fellowship program.

This article presents information on considerations involved in setting up and conducting fellowship training programs in emergency medicine (EM) for physicians from other countries. General goals for these programs are to assist in providing physicians from other countries with the knowledge and skills needed to further develop EM in their home countries. The authors report their opinions, based on their cumulative extensive experiences, on the necessary and optional structural elements to consider for international EM fellowship programs. Because of U.S. medical licensing restrictions, much of the proposed programs' content would be "observational" rather than involving direct "hands-on" clinical EM training. Due to the very recent initiation of these programs in the United States, there has not yet been reported any scientific evaluation of their structure or efficacy. International EM fellowship programs involving mainly observational EM experience can serve as one method to assist in EM development in other countries. Future studies should assess the impact and efficacy of these programs.

Proposed fellowship training program in international emergency medicine.

Interest in international emergency medicine (EM) has grown steadily over the last ten years. This growth has been fueled by increased demand for emergency services abroad and the proliferation of emergency physicians (EPs) working in international relief and development. As a response, several academic EM programs have developed international EM fellowships for the purpose of providing formal training to EPs interested in international health. Although there have been preliminary articles describing fellowship curricula, to the authors' knowledge no recommendations have been proposed by national consensus that suggest emphasis or required components of a fellowship program. Therefore, a group of EPs interested in fellowship training convened for the purpose of developing goals and objectives for a postgraduate training program in international EM. To that end, this article proposes guidelines for a fellowship training program for international EM.

Case management by physician assistants and primary care physicians vs emergency physicians.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether physician assistants' (PAs') and primary care physicians' (PCPs') case management for 5 common primary care medical problems is similar to that of emergency physicians (EPs). METHODS: An anonymous survey was used to compare PAs, PCPs, and EPs regarding intended diagnostic and treatment options for hypothetical cases of asthma, pharyngitis, cystitis, back strain, and febrile child. Published national practice guidelines were used as a comparison criterion standard where available. The participants stated that they treated all of the patients and responded to all of the cases to be included in the survey. The responses of the PA and PCP groups were compared with those of the EP group, and financial charges for care by each group were analyzed. RESULTS: The EPs tended to follow treatment guidelines closer than did other primary care specialists. The management of PCPs and PAs differed from that of EPs, as follows: [table: see text] CONCLUSION: The EPs more closely followed clinical guidelines than did the PAs and PCPs for these standardized clinical scenarios. Although the relationship of such theoretical practice to actual practice remains unknown, use of these clinical scenarios may identify intended practice patterns warranting attention.

Guidelines for evaluation of international emergency medicine assistance and development projects.

Interest in the development of the specialty of emergency medicine and of emergency health care systems has greatly increased worldwide in the last few years. The guidelines in this article were developed in an effort to assist others in design and evaluation of all types of emergency medicine projects.

The development of international emergency medicine: a role for U.S. emergency physicians and organizations. SAEM International Interest Group.

There is a rapidly growing interest in emergency medicine (EM) and emergency out-of-hospital care throughout the world. In most countries, the specialty of EM is either nonexistent or in an early stage of development. Many countries have recognized the need for, and value of, establishing a quality emergency health care system and are striving to create the specialty. These systems do not have to be high tech and expense but can focus on providing appropriate emergency training to physicians and other health care workers. Rather than repeatedly "reinventing the wheel" with the start of each new emergency care system, the preexisting knowledge base of EM can be shared with these countries. Since the United States has an advanced emergency health care system and the longest history of recognizing EM as a distinct medical specialty, lessons learned in the United States may benefit other countries. In order to provide appropriate advice to countries in the early phase of emergency health care development, careful assessment of national resources, governmental structure, population demographics, culture, and health care needs is necessary. This paper lists specific recommendations for EM organizations and physicians seeking to assist the development of the specialty of EM internationally.

Emergency medicine in Jordan.

The kingdom of Jordan is well known in the Middle East for the high-quality health care it provides its citizens and other patients from throughout the region. The specialty of emergency medicine is developing in Jordan along unique lines, mainly as an outgrowth of family medicine.

Analysis of factors affecting U.S. emergency physician workforce projections. SAEM Workforce Task Force.

OBJECTIVES: To use existing data sources to refine prior estimates of the U.S. emergency medicine (EM) workforce and to estimate effects of proposed changes in the U.S. health care system on the EM workforce. METHODS: Relevant data were extracted from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) 1995 Membership Activity Report, the American Medical Association (AMA) publication "1995/96 Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S.," the American Hospital Association (AHA) 1994 hospital directory, a written survey of each state's medical licensing board and state medical society, and the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) annual activity report for 1995. These data were used to project workforce supply and demand estimates applicable to workforce models. RESULTS: None of the available information sources had complete data on the number and distribution of emergency physicians (EPs) currently practicing in the United States. Extrapolating the limited reliable statewide EP numbers to make nationwide projections reveals a shortage of EPs needed to fully staff the nation's existing EDs. At least 22 states had an average ratio of < 5 EPs per existing ED. Additional national projections incorporating a decreasing number of U.S. EDs indicate that the current annual number of EM residency graduates will not eliminate the deficit of EPs for at least several decades, given that projected numbers of retiring EPs annually will soon equal the total annual EM residency graduate production. CONCLUSIONS: Although the current data on EPs in practice in the United States are incomplete, the authors project a relative shortage of EPs. More accurate and complete information on the numbers and distribution of EPs in America is needed to improve workforce projections.

Workforce projections for emergency medicine: how many emergency physicians does the United States need?

OBJECTIVE: To mathematically model the supply of and demand for emergency physicians (EPs) under different workforce conditions. METHODS: A computer spreadsheet model was used to project annual EP workforce supply and demand through the year 2035. The mathematical equations used were: supply = number of EPs at the beginning of the year plus annual residency graduates minus annual attrition; demand = 5 full-time equivalent positions/ED x the number of hospital EDs. The demand was empirically varied to account for ED census variation, administrative and teaching responsibilities, and the availability of physician extenders. A variety of possible scenarios were tested. These projections make the assumption that emergency medicine (EM) residency graduates will preferentially fill clinical positions currently filled by EPs without EM board certification. RESULTS: Under most of the scenarios tested, there will be a large deficit of EM board-certified EPs well into the next century. Even in scenarios involving a decreasing "demand" for EPs (e.g., in the setting of hospital closures or the training of physician extenders), a significant deficit will remain for at least several decades. CONCLUSIONS: The number of EM residency positions should not be decreased during any restructuring of the U.S. health care system. EM is likely to remain a specialty in which the supply of board-certified EPs will not meet the demand, even at present levels of EM residency output, for the next several decades.

Effect of age on prehospital cardiac resuscitation outcome.

To compare resuscitation outcomes in elderly and younger prehospital cardiac arrest victims, we used a retrospective case series over 5 years in rural advanced life support (ALS) units and a University hospital base station. Participants included 563 adult field resuscitations. Excluded were patients with noncardiac etiologies, those less than 30 years old, and those with unknown initial rhythms. Patients were grouped by age. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge were compared by Yates' chi-square test. ALS treatment of cardiac arrest was by regional protocols and on-line physician direction. Sixty percent (320/532) of patients were over 65 years old. The proportion with initial rhythm ventricular fibrillation (VF) was 50% in the elderly and 48% in younger patients. ROSC was achieved in 18% of elderly and 16% of younger patients; survival was 4% among the elderly and 5% for younger patients. The oldest survivor was 87 years old. Most survivors were discharged, in good Cerebral Performance Categories. There was no difference in outcome by age group when initial cardiac rhythm was considered. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and ALS and initial rhythm VF were associated with the best resuscitation success. Age has less effect on resuscitation success than other well-known factors such as early CPR and ALS. Advanced age alone should probably not deter resuscitation attempts.

On-line medical direction: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency with which physician, on-line medical direction (OLMD) [direct medical control] of prehospital care results in orders, to describe the nature of these orders, and to measure OLMD time intervals. METHODS: Blinded, prospective study. SETTING: A university hospital base-station resource center. PARTICIPANTS: Ten emergency physicians, 50 advanced life support providers. INTERVENTIONS: Prehospital treatment was directed by both standing orders and OLMD physician orders. Independent observers recorded event times and the characteristics of OLMD. RESULTS: Physician orders were given in 47 (19%) of the 245 study cases, and covered a variety of interventions, including many already authorized by standing orders. Mean OLMD radio time was four minutes (245 +/- 216 seconds [sec]), and time from beginning of OLMD to hospital arrival averaged 12 minutes (718 +/- 439 sec). Mean transport time in this system was 13 minutes. CONCLUSION: Despite detailed standing orders, OLMD results in orders for clinical interventions in 19% of cases. On-line medical direction requires about four minutes of physician time per call. This constituted about one-third of the potential field treatment time interval in this system. Thus, OLMD appears to play an important role in providing quality prehospital care.

Attending supervision of nonemergency medicine residents in a university hospital ED.

There have been a limited number of studies assessing the impact of attending physician supervision of residents in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study is to describe the changes in patient care when attending emergency physicians (AEPs) supervise nonemergency medicine residents in a university hospital ED. This was a prospective study including 1,000 patients, 32 second- and third-year nonemergency medicine residents and eight AEPs. The AEPs classified changes in care for each case as major, minor, or none, according to a 40-item data sheet list. There were 153 major changes and 353 minor changes by the AEP. The most common major changes were ordering laboratory or x-ray tests that showed a clinically significant abnormality, and eliciting important physical exam findings. Potentially limb- or life-threatening errors were averted by the AEP in 17 patients. Supervision of nonemergency medicine residents in the ED resulted in frequent and clinically important changes in patient care.

Comparison of interventions in prehospital care by standing orders versus interventions ordered by direct [on-line] medical command.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the patient care measures provided by paramedics according to standing orders versus measures ordered by direct [on-line] medical command in order to determine the types and frequency of medical command orders. DESIGN: Prospective identification of patient care measures done as part of a prehospital quality assurance program. SETTING: An urban paramedic service in the northeast United States with direct medical command from three local hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eight paramedic reports from October 1992 through March 1993. INTERVENTIONS: All patient care interventions recorded as done by standing orders or by direct medical command orders. Errors in patient care were determined by the same criteria as in the prior two studies of the same system. RESULTS: Direct medical command gave orders in 143/1,008 (14.2%) cases. Paramedics performed 2,453/2,624 (93.5%) of the total patient care interventions using standing orders. In 61 cases (6.1%), medical command ordered a potentially beneficial intervention not specified by standing orders or not done by the paramedic. 21/171 (12.3%) command orders were for additional doses of epinephrine or atropine in cardiac arrest cases (where the initial doses had been given under standing orders), and 59/171 (34.5%) were for interventions already mandated or permitted by standing orders. The paramedic error rate was 0.6%, and the medical command error rate was 1.8% (unchanged form the prior study of the same standing-orders system). CONCLUSION: Direct medical command gave orders in 14% of cases in this standing-orders system, but 35% of command orders only reiterated the standing orders. More selective and reduced uses of on-line command could be done in this system with no change in the types or numbers of patient care interventions performed.

Decrease in medical command errors with use of a "standing orders" protocol system.

The purpose of this study was to determine the physician medical command error rates and paramedic error rates after implementation of a "standing orders" protocol system for medical command. These patient-care error rates were compared with the previously reported rates for a "required call-in" medical command system (Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21(4):347-350). A secondary aim of the study was to determine if the on-scene time interval was increased by the standing orders system. Prospectively conducted audit of prehospital advanced life support (ALS) trip sheets was made at an urban ALS paramedic service with on-line physician medical command from three local hospitals. All ALS run sheets from the start time of the standing orders system (April 1, 1991) for a 1-year period ending on March 30, 1992 were reviewed as part of an ongoing quality assurance program. Cases were identified as nonjustifiably deviating from regional emergency medical services (EMS) protocols as judged by agreement of three physician reviewers (the same methodology as a previously reported command error study in the same ALS system). Medical command and paramedic errors were identified from the prehospital ALS run sheets and categorized. Two thousand one ALS runs were reviewed; 24 physician errors (1.2% of the 1,928 "command" runs) and eight paramedic errors (0.4% of runs) were identified. The physician error rate was decreased from the 2.6% rate in the previous study (P < .0001 by chi 2 analysis). The on-scene time interval did not increase with the "standing orders" system.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)