Midline Cleft Lip and Bifid Nose Deformity: Description, Classification, and Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Midline facial clefts are rare and challenging deformities caused by failure of fusion of the medial nasal prominences. These anomalies vary in severity, and may include microform lines or midline lip notching, incomplete or complete labial clefting, nasal bifidity, or severe craniofacial bony and soft tissue anomalies with orbital hypertelorism and frontoethmoidal encephaloceles. In this study, the authors present 4 cases, classify the spectrum of midline cleft anomalies, and review our technical approaches to the surgical correction of midline cleft lip and bifid nasal deformities. Embryology and associated anomalies are discussed. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed our experience with 4 cases of midline cleft lip with and without nasal deformities of varied complexity. In addition, a comprehensive literature search was performed, identifying studies published relating to midline cleft lip and/or bifid nose deformities. Our assessment of the anomalies in our series, in conjunction with published reports, was used to establish a 5-tiered classification system. Technical approaches and clinical reports are described. RESULTS: Functional and aesthetic anatomic correction was successfully achieved in each case without complication. A classification and treatment strategy for the treatment of midline cleft lip and bifid nose deformity is presented. CONCLUSIONS: The successful treatment of midline cleft lip and bifid nose deformities first requires the identification and classification of the wide variety of anomalies. With exposure of abnormal nasolabial anatomy, the excision of redundant skin and soft tissue, anatomic approximation of cartilaginous elements, orbicularis oris muscle repair, and craniofacial osteotomy and reduction as indicated, a single-stage correction of midline cleft lip and bifid nasal deformity can be safely and effectively achieved.

Three patterns of fronto-orbital remodeling for metopic synostosis: comparison of cranial growth outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The authors compared cranial growth across three patterns of fronto-orbital remodeling for metopic synostosis. METHODS: The authors reviewed all patients who underwent fronto-orbital remodeling for isolated metopic synostosis between 2006 and 2009. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with preoperative, short-term postoperative (4 to 12 months), and long-term postoperative (>36 months) three-dimensional photographs. Patients were categorized by fronto-orbital remodeling pattern: group 1, retrocoronal; group 2, partial coronal; and group 3, precoronal. Head circumference, minimum frontal breadth (ft-ft), and maximum cranial length were measured by three-dimensional photographs, converted to standard Z scores, and compared. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria (group 1, n=12; group 2, n=10; and group 3, n=9). Group 1 presented with the greatest phenotypic severity. From preoperative to short-term postoperative assessment, head circumference Z scores rose for group 1 but dropped for groups 2 and 3, and the three groups demonstrated equivalent increases in minimum frontal breadth Z scores. From short-term to long-term postoperatively, the three groups demonstrated similar stability in head circumference Z scores but decreased minimum frontal breadth Z scores. From preoperatively to long-term postoperatively, head circumference Z scores rose for group 1 but fell for groups 2 and 3 (change in Z score, 0.5, -0.5, and -0.7, respectively; p=0.06) and the three groups demonstrated equivalent drops in minimum frontal breadth Z scores. Across preoperative to short-term postoperative and preoperative to long-term postoperative assessment, group 1 displayed the least drop in maximum cranial length Z scores. CONCLUSIONS: Retrocoronal patterns of fronto-orbital remodeling provide long-term gains in head circumference percentile and the least growth impairment in cranial length. Irrespective of osteotomy design, expansion in frontal breadth relapses significantly over time. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Total cranial vault remodeling for isolated sagittal synostosis: part I. Postoperative cranial suture patency.

BACKGROUND: Total vault reconstruction addresses all phenotypic aspects of scaphocephaly. The clinical implications of remodeling across open cranial sutures, however, remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess patency of unaffected sutures following total vault remodeling for isolated sagittal synostosis. METHODS: The authors reviewed routine postoperative computed tomographic scans of patients who underwent total vault remodeling for isolated sagittal synostosis between 2004 and 2008. Sutural patency was scored by a single reviewer as follows: 0 = closed, 1 = partial, and 2 = open. Individual suture scores were tallied for a total sutural patency score. Computed tomographic scans were stratified by postoperative time and craniofacial surgeon. RESULTS: Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Individual sutural closure rates were 42.6, 38.3, 74.5, and 74.5 percent for right coronal, left coronal, right lambdoidal, and left lambdoidal sutures, respectively. Lambdoidal sutures had a significantly higher rate of closure than coronal sutures (OR(Closure), 4.3; 95 percent CI, 2.3 to 8.0; p < 0.001); lambdoidal patency significantly changed over time (χ2 = 9.9, p = 0.04). Across craniofacial surgeons, coronal and lambdoidal patency were equivalent. The total sutural patency score did not significantly correlate with postoperative time, surgical age, preoperative cephalic index, or craniofacial surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Total vault remodeling for isolated sagittal synostosis results in a high degree of secondary craniosynostosis. Lambdoidal sutures are especially prone to closure, with their patency diminishing over time. At this time, radiographic fusion of adjacent sutures following surgery has not been related to any difference in head shape. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Longitudinal study of the neurodevelopmental characteristics of treated and untreated nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in infancy.

PURPOSE: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) are a group of congenital disorders sharing premature fusion of one or more of the cranial sutures that restricts and distorts growth of the skull and underlying brain. This study examined the neurodevelopmental sequelae of NSC both prior to and following reconstructive cranial surgery. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive referrals with mixed forms of untreated NSC aged 4 to 16 months (M = 8.9, SD = 2.9) comprised the pre-operative cohort. Forty-four of these patients aged 6 to 32 months (M = 21.2, SD = 4.5) underwent post-operative developmental evaluation. Neurodevelopmental function was assessed with the mental (Mental Development Index) and motor (Psychomotor Development Index) scales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-2nd edition. RESULTS: Children with untreated NSC displayed significantly lower mental (M = 97.5) and motor (M = 87.7) scores than normative expectations, with the distribution of scores also differing significantly from the normative distribution. Post-operatively, children continued to display significantly lower mental (M = 89.5) and motor (M = 88.0) abilities, with mental abilities falling significantly lower than pre-operative levels. An increased prevalence of severe motor delay was found, and no child displayed accelerated development. Subgroup comparisons revealed no differences in mental or motor skills between the primary diagnostic subtypes (sagittal and metopic synostosis) both prior to and following corrective surgery. CONCLUSIONS: NSC is associated with an increased incidence of developmental delay in both treated and untreated conditions. Timing of surgery appears unrelated to developmental outcome.

Delayed sagittal sinus tear: a complication of spring cranioplasty for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Spring cranioplasty is now a well-established surgical technique in the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. It is widely regarded as a less invasive modality compared with operations such as cranial vault remodeling. Indeed, very few complications have been described in the literature in association with spring cranioplasty. We present a case of delayed sagittal sinus tear with hemorrhage following spring cranioplasty in a 4-month-old patient with sagittal craniosynostosis. Likely causes of the injury are discussed highlighting sagittal sinus injury as a potential risk of spring cranioplasty.

Analysis of morbidity and mortality in surgical management of craniosynostosis.

Multidisciplinary care involving plastic surgery and neurosurgery is generally accepted as optimal to manage craniosynostosis to avoid complications and to identify patients at risk. We conducted a retrospective 30-year review of craniosynostosis surgery at a single major craniofacial institute to establish the rate and predictors of complications. Medical records of 796 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery for craniosynostosis from 1981 to 2010 at our institute were analyzed for complications. Complications were defined as intraoperative and postoperative adverse events requiring changed management. Reoperation was defined as a repeat transcranial procedure. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for complications or revision. Across the years, the procedures evolved from technically simple to complex, which increased complications but better outcomes. Complications occurred in 111 patients (14%), and 33 (5.4%) needed major revision. Multivariate analysis identified multisuture and syndromic craniosynostosis, more recent surgeries, younger age (<9 months), spring-assisted cranioplasty, longer surgery, and greater transfusion as predictors of complications. Patients with syndromic and multisutural craniosynostosis and those operated on younger than 9 months had increased risk of major revision surgery for regression to phenotype. Our experience over 30 years indicates that pediatric transcranial craniosynostosis surgery can be safely carried out in our tertiary referral center. There were no deaths from primary surgery, and complication and reoperation rates mirror those of other published studies. Syndromic and complex craniosynostosis predicted both complications and need for major revision. Spring cranioplasty was associated with higher complications. Overall results support a recommended age for craniosynostosis surgery between 9 and 12 months.

Changing epidemiology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and revisiting the risk factors.

Recent studies in Europe and the United States report increased incidence of metopic synostosis. Whether a similar trend had occurred in Australia remains unknown. This research aimed to determine changes in incidence and subtypes of craniosynostosis in Victoria and to identify perinatal risk factors. A retrospective audit of patients (n = 522) presenting to the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis from 1982 to 2008 was undertaken. Perinatal data were sourced from the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection. The changes in incidence of craniosynostosis subtypes were calculated based on Poisson regression, and risk factors for craniosynostosis and subtypes were analyzed by univariate logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 3.1 in 10,000 live births in Victoria. On average, the incidence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis increased by 2.5% per year among Victorian live births. Over 25 years, metopic synostosis incidence significantly increased by 7.1% per year in the population of Victoria, outpacing other subtypes. The risk factors for metopic synostosis include being male, multiple births (ie, twins), preterm gestation, low birth weight, high maternal age, and emergency cesarean birth. This study revealed a true increase in incidence of metopic synostosis in Victoria, which could be a result of increased frequency of multiple births, preterm gestation, low birth weight, and high maternal age in the Victorian population from 1982 to 2008. The incidence of other nonsyndromic craniosynostoses, which include sagittal, unicoronal, and multisutural craniosynostoses, however, has remained unchanged.

Neurodevelopmental functioning of infants with untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy.

PURPOSE: Single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is a congenital craniofacial disorder, in which premature fusion of one of the skull sutures restricts and distorts growth of the cranium and underlying brain. This disorder of prenatal onset occurs during a critical phase of rapid growth and development of the immature brain. Craniosynostosis carries a known risk of developmental impairment. The neurodevelopmental sequelae of SSC prior to treatment remains however incompletely understood. This study sought to determine the neurodevelopmental sequelae of untreated single-suture craniosynostosis during early infancy. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with unoperated SSC (sagittal, metopic and unicoronal) comprised the sample cohort. Patients were aged between 4 and 16 months (M = 8.9 months, SD = 2.9 months). Neurodevelopmental functioning was assessed with the mental (Mental Development Index) and motor (Psychomotor Development Index) scales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, second edition. RESULTS: Children with SSC displayed significantly lower mean mental (M = 97.7, SD = 6.7, p < 0.05) and motor (M = 87.7, SD = 13.0, p < 0.001) scores than normative population averages. The distribution of these scores also differed significantly from the normative distribution; an increased rate of significant motor developmental delay was found, and none of the children displayed accelerated development. Subgroup comparisons between the primary diagnostic subtypes in this sample revealed no significant differences in mental or motor skill functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Untreated SSC is associated with an increased incidence of developmental delay during early infancy, with motor skills appearing the most vulnerable to impairment during this developmental phase.

Measuring cranial vault volume with three-dimensional photography: a method of measurement comparable to the gold standard.

The gold standard for measuring cranial vault volume is a computed tomography (CT) scan. Computed tomography scans in the pediatric population carry the significant risk of inducing a malignancy later in life. In a novel study, we show that a three-dimensional (3D) photograph can be used to measure and track cranial vault volume changes in craniosynostosis patients. In a study of adequate power as determined by pre hoc analysis, we demonstrate a greater than 0.91 correlation coefficient between volume as measured by CT and 3D photograph in more than 70 patients presenting to a tertiary craniofacial center (P < 0.001). Volume above a plane running through the lateral canthus (ex) and tragus (t) sag-ex-t on the digital 3D photograph differs from CT by a mean percentage difference of 31.9% (SD, 14.0%; 95% confidence interval, P < 0.0001). A linear regression model was used to determine the equation describing the relationship between volume as measured by 3D photograph and CT; with this equation, the absolute volume of the cranial vault is easily determined using only the 3D image. Interrater reliability is high (>0.99, ICC). The ability to measure cranial vault volume from the 3D photograph adds an important dimension to the complete and objective analysis of skull growth and postoperative change.

Quantitative morphometric outcomes following the Melbourne method of total vault remodeling for scaphocephaly.

The Melbourne method of total vault remodeling was developed at The Royal Children's Hospital (Melbourne) to address all phenotypic aspects of scaphocephaly. To quantitatively evaluate this technique, a retrospective analysis was performed on 33 consecutive patients who underwent the Melbourne procedure between October 2004 and June 2007. To monitor outcomes, three-dimensional digital surface photography was used, obtaining 4 anthropometric measurements (cranial length, cranial width, head circumference, auricular head height) preoperatively and postoperatively. To assess the effect on continuing cranial vault development, cranial volume was calculated with computed tomography. Anthropometric measurements were obtained in 27 patients (81.8%), with a mean postoperative follow-up of 8.9 months. Cranial index (width/length) demonstrated an 11.1% improvement. The mean head circumference in the scaphocephaly group preoperatively remained larger than the normative population postoperatively, although the magnitude of difference was decreased, whereas the mean auricular head height demonstrated a 10.5% increase postoperatively, remaining higher than the normative population. Cranial volume was calculated in 30 patients (91%), with a mean postoperative follow-up of 7.9 months. This demonstrated that the mean intracranial volume was significantly higher in the scaphocephaly group preoperatively, and this difference was maintained postoperatively. These results support our belief that the Melbourne procedure is a technique that may be used to correct all phenotypic aspects of scaphocephaly, with no apparent evidence for a detrimental effect on cranial growth.

Nasal reconstruction for maxillonasal dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Maxillonasal dysplasia, Binder type (Binder syndrome and nasomaxillary hypoplasia), is a spectrum of deficient nasomaxillary osteocartilaginous framework, deficient nasal soft tissues, and a short columella. The correction of these deformities is challenging, and results are often disappointing. Tissue expansion with multiple bone grafts for nasal augmentation from childhood has been advocated as a means to address the constricted soft tissues. However, bone grafts in children have been associated with unpredictable growth and resorption. Agreeing with the principle of serial nasal augmentation that commences in childhood, we used alloplastic material for tissue expansion followed by definitive reconstructive rhinoplasty at the completion of growth and orthognathic surgery as required. Definitive rhinoplasty mainly used a 1-piece costochondral graft cantilevered to the frontal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients over a period of 27 years were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the age of presentation, namely, prepubertal and postpubertal. The prepubertal group underwent serial tissue expansion of the constricted nasal envelope with customized silicone implants and final reconstruction by costochondral rhinoplasty at the end of puberty. The postpubertal group underwent 1-stage costochondral rhinoplasty. The definitive rhinoplasty used a cantilevered 1-piece costochondral graft retaining the dorsal periosteum that was dowelled into the frontal sinus wall. RESULTS: In the prepubertal group (n = 20), 41 silicone implants were placed in the childhood years for tissue expansion of the nasal envelope. One patient developed implant infection, and another required replacement after extrusion. Long-term follow-up showed minimal resorption of the costochondral graft in the pre-expanded prepubertal group and minimal to moderate graft resorption in the postpubertal group. CONCLUSIONS: Successful treatment of maxillonasal dysplasia is dependent on the following: an understanding of the underlying pathologic anatomy, namely, that of the constricted nasal tissues, serial tissue expansion of the nasal envelope in childhood, and definitive costochondral rhinoplasty at the end of growth. Early tissue expansion with the placement of alloplastic silicone implants effectively stretches the constricted nasal soft tissues in Binder syndrome to limit graft resorption after definitive nasal reconstruction with costochondral rib grafts. There is a possible role for similar tissue expansion in the postpubertal patient with alloplastic material before costochondral grafting if the soft tissues are inadequate. Long-term resorption of cantilevered, 1-piece, periosteum-covered costochondral grafts was minimal.

The effect of fronto-orbital advancement on strabismus in children with unicoronal synostosis.

Unicoronal synostosis is frequently associated with strabismus. While the literature reports on the underlying bony dysmorphology and associated extraocular muscle dysfunction, the effect of the bony changes of fronto-orbital advancement has unpredictable effects on the strabismus associated with unicoronal synostosis. Previous authors have reported both resolution and new onset of strabismus following fronto-orbital advancement. The purpose of this study is to document the incidence of strabismus in patients with unicoronal synostosis and to assess the effect of fronto-orbital advancement on strabismus. A retrospective review of 20 patients with unicoronal synostosis was performed. The results demonstrated that 90% of our patients were noted to have strabismus preoperatively and this persisted postoperatively. Despite fronto-orbital advancement, strabismus persisted postoperatively. Seven (36.8%) required extraocular muscle surgery. In this series of patients with unicoronal synostosis there was a higher incidence of strabismus than previously reported elsewhere. Correction of the recessed frontal bone with bilateral fronto-orbital advancement does not fully address the orbital bony dysmorphology or correct the extraocular muscle dysfunction associated with unicoronal synostosis.

Complete correction of severe scaphocephaly: the Melbourne method of total vault remodeling.

BACKGROUND: A new method of total calvarial remodeling for correcting significant scaphocephaly is described, and experience with the first 30 consecutive patients is presented. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (22 boys and eight girls) with moderate to severe scaphocephaly who underwent total calvarial remodeling using the Melbourne technique were analyzed retrospectively. Mean age at surgery was 7.5 months (range, 4 to 18 months). All had significant frontal and occipital deformities, bitemporal narrowing, a low cranial index, an anteriorly located vertex, and a narrow posteroinferiorly sloping posterior cranium. Clinical photographs, computed tomographic imaging, and cranial index were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. A sufficient follow-up period in 17 patients enabled the measurement of changes in cranial indices. RESULTS: A dramatic improvement in head shape was confirmed subjectively by clinical examination and photographs and, in 17 patients, objectively by analyses of the cranial indices. In these 17 patients, mean preoperative cranial index was 64.6 percent preoperatively (range, 56 to 69.3 percent) and increased to a mean of 77.5 percent postoperatively (range, 72 to 81 percent). The mean increase in cranial index was 12.9 percent (range, 9.5 to 19 percent). Among the 30 patients, overall complications were major in one patient (3.3 percent) (presumed air embolus) and minor in three (10 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The Melbourne technique of total vault remodeling consistently achieves a virtually normal head shape. After analysis of the first 30 cases, the authors recommend this as their technique of choice for severe scaphocephaly when the full constellation of deformities is present.

Nasal dermoid sinus cysts: a retrospective review and discussion of investigation and management.

Nasal dermoid sinus cysts are uncommon congenital anomalies presenting either as cysts or sinuses. They are frequently associated with extension into the intracranial space, requiring craniotomy for adequate resection. At the Royal Children's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia, we have managed 25 patients with nasal dermoid sinus cysts over 8 years and present details of clinical features, preoperative assessment, and surgical management. Six patients presented with infection, including 1 with osteomyelitis. Four of our patients had intracranial extension of their lesions, and all were treated successfully with tailored investigation and appropriate surgical procedures. Insights into diagnosis, investigation, and surgery are offered to facilitate the management of these challenging lesions.

[Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with micrognathia].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in children with congenital micrognathia using mandibular distraction osteogenesis and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this approach. METHODS: 6 patients (4 males, 2 females) had undergone mandibular distraction osteogenesis, 12 distraction devices were placed through extraoral incision for bilateral distraction. The mean age of treatment was 1 year and 9 months (range 4 months to 9 years). Every patient had been evaluated pre and postoperatively with cephalometry. The period of consolidation was 4 - 11 weeks. The period of follow-up was from 2 to 10 months. RESULTS: The average distraction distance was 19.2 mm (range 15 to 25 mm). The osteotomy and distraction processes were smooth in all the cases, the osteogenesis was good, without infection and other complications. The posterior airway space was increased from averaged 4.5 mm preoperatively to 10. 1mm after surgery. Five children had normal respiration and sleep restored with naso-pharyngeal airway removal or tracheostomy decannulation. One patient is to receive a planned second stage of distraction with a horizontal vector. The results were stable without relapse during a follow-up period of 2 to 10 months. CONCLUSIONS: Application of mandibular distraction osteogenesis is an important component and effective in the treatment of OSAS and permits mandibular advancement in the younger child. As more experience is gained with distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of children with OSAS, the role of distraction will become better defined.

[Distraction osteogenesis in patients with syndromic midface retrusion--a primary experience].

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of midface distraction for correction of severe syndromic Four consecutive patients with severe syndromic midface retrusion underwent midface retrusion. METHODS: distraction osteogenesis. The patients(three girls and one boy) aged from 4 to 12 years. Two were with Crouzon syndrome, one with Apert and one with Marfan syndrome. One was treated with Le Fort III external distraction, two with Le Fort III internal distraction, and the other with monobloc internal distraction. The distraction devices were activated on the fourth postoperative day at 1 mm per day. RESULTS: All patients completed the distraction as activated on the fourth postoperative day at 1 mm per day. Results was planned. Successful advancement of 8 to 20 mm was obtained at the occlusal level in all patients as measured by cephalograms. The facial appearance was significantly improved,especially in the orbits and the upper part of the nose. Follow-up from 4 months to one year demonstrated that the face was symmetrical. All patients obtained This study shows that although midface distraction osteogenesis needs to be satisfactory results. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that although midface distraction osteogenesis needs to be improved to increase its controllability, it has obvious advantages over the traditional way of bone graft and rigid fixation. Midface distraction avoids bone grafts and alleviates the restriction of the soft tissue to midfacial bone advancement. Midface distraction osteogenesis is an effective and practical way to correct severe syndromic midfacial hypoplasia.

[The correction of fronto-orbital deformity in infant craniosynostosis--a one year experience].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correction of fronto-orbital deformation in infant craniosynostosis and to discuss the timing of treatment and surgical technique. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with craniosynostoses underwent bilateral fronto-orbital osteotomies and advancement via coronal approaches. There were two females and 9 males with an age range from 6 to 9 months. Among the patients, six had trigonocephaly secondary to metopic synostosis, two had non-syndromic plagiocephaly secondary to unilateral coronal synostosis, one had turricephaly secondary to multi-sutural synostosis and two patients had brachycephaly due to syndromic synostosis (Apert syndrome and Saethre-Chotzen syndrome). RESULTS: The shape of forehead, bilateral orbit and bilateral temples in all patients markedly improved with 2-11 months follow-up. There were not obvious complications except that the unilateral parietal bossing happened to the child with turricephaly postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory results show that fronto-orbital advancement is safe and effective way to correct frontal and orbital retrusion secondary to craniosynostosis.