Effect of Osteoporosis on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Following One-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate how osteoporosis affected the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plating. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The incidence of complications associated with implants is high when ACDF is performed in patients with poor bone quality. METHODS: In total, 101 patients without (T-score ≥1.0, group A) and 25 with (T-score ≤-2.5, group B) osteoporosis who underwent single-level ACDF with plating were followed up for >2 years. The clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups. The fusion rate and implant-related complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Although clinical outcomes such as visual analog scale scores for the arm (2.0±2.3 vs. 2.4±2.9, p=0.490) and neck pain (1.4±1.9 vs. 1.8±2.2, p=0.343) and neck disability index (7.7±7.1 vs. 9.9±7.5, p=0.225) were slightly higher in group B, no statistically significant difference was noted. Cage subsidence (13.9% vs. 16.0%, p=0.755) and plate migration (7.9% vs. 8.0%, p=1.000) rates did not differ between the two groups. The fusion rate at 1 year postoperatively was higher in group A than in group B (80.3% vs. 68.2%, p=0.139) and slightly increased in both groups (94.6% vs. 86.4%, p=0.178) at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis did not significantly affect the rate of cage subsidence or plate migration after cervical fusion. After ACDF, increased cage subsidence and implant migration rates had no significant effect on clinical outcomes.

Trabecular structural difference between the superior and inferior regions of the vertebral body: a cadaveric and clinical study.

Background: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures commonly involve the superior vertebral body; however, their associated causes have not yet been clearly established. This study aimed to determine the trabecular structural differences between the superior and inferior regions of the vertebral body using cadaveric and clinical studies. Materials and methods: First, five vertebrae were collected from three human cadavers. The trabecular structures of the superior and inferior regions of each vertebral body were analyzed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), finite element analysis (FEA), and biomechanical test. Based on the results of the ex vivo study, we conducted a clinical study. Second, spine CT images were retrospectively collected. Bone volume and Hounsfield unit were analyzed for 192 vertebral bodies. Finally, after sample size calculation based on the pilot study, prospectively, 200 participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lateral spine. The bone mineral densities (BMDs) of the superior and inferior regions of each lumbar vertebral body were measured. The paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the statistical analyses, and p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Cadaver studies revealed differences between the superior and inferior trabecular bone structures. The bone volume ratio, BMD, and various other trabecular parameters advocated for decreased strength of the superior region. Throughout the biomechanical study, the limitations of the compression force were 3.44 and 4.63 N/m2 for the superior and inferior regions, respectively. In the FEA study, the inferior region had a lower average displacement and higher von Mises stress than the superior region. In the clinical spine CT-based bone volume and BMD study, the bone volume was significantly higher in the inferior region than in the superior region. In the lateral spine DXA, the mean BMD of the superior region of vertebral bodies was significantly lower compared with that of the inferior region. Conclusion: The superior trabecular structure of the lumbar vertebral bodies possesses more biomechanical susceptibility compared with the inferior trabecular structure, confirming its dominant role in causing osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Physicians should also focus on the BMD values of the superior region of the vertebral body using lateral spine DXA to evaluate osteoporosis.

Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Standard Dermatomes and Myotomes for Determining the Pathologic Level in Surgically Verified Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of typical dermatomes and myotomes for determining the pathologic level in surgically verified patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: Patients who underwent single-level surgery due to cervical radiculopathy with at least a 60% reduction in preoperative symptoms or recovery of muscle power after surgery were included. The observed clinical symptoms (pain, paresthesia, motor weakness) were compared to those of typical cervical dermatomes and myotomes. RESULTS: Among the 227 patients reviewed, 142 (62.6%) had a standard dermatomal pattern, and 74 of 110 (67.3%) had a standard myotomal pattern. The myotome of C5/6 radiculopathy showed much more variance than those of other cervical segments. Among the patients with severe motor weakness (muscle strength ≤ grade 3 or obvious muscle atrophy), all those with involvement of root C5, C7, and C8 showed a typical pattern (C4/5: 13 of 13 patients, C6/7: 5 of 5 patients, C7/T1: 3 of 3 patients), while only 2 of the 6 patients (33.3%) with severe motor weakness caused by C5/6 radiculopathy fit the typical pattern. CONCLUSION: Among various symptoms, cervical myotome is of great value in determining the pathological level. However, it should be noted that there is high variability in human dermatomes and myotomes, especially for motor weakness due to C6 root compression, which is more variable than others.

Significance of Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy as a Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) has previously been reported as a technique to decompress ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) by translating the vertebral body anteriorly. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical efficacies of VBSO and clarify the surgical indications of VBSO for treating myelopathy caused by OPLL. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with symptomatic OPLL-induced cervical myelopathy treated with VBSO or laminoplasty who were followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical alignment, range of motion, fusion, modified K-line (mK-line) status, and minimum interval between ossified mass and mK-line (INT(min)), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were assessed. Patients in the VBSO group were compared with those who underwent laminoplasty. RESULTS: Cervical lordosis and INT(min) significantly increased in the VBSO group. All patients in the VBSO group assessed as mK-line (-) preoperatively were assessed as mK-line (+) postoperatively. However, in the LMP group, the mK-line status changed from (+) preoperatively to (-) postoperatively in 3 patients. Final JOA score (p = 0.02) and JOA score improvement (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the VBSO group. JOA recovery ratio (p = 0.03) and proportion of patients with a recovery rate ≥50% were significantly higher in the VBSO group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VBSO is an effective surgical option for OPLL-induced myelopathy, demonstrating favorable neurological recovery and lordosis restoration with low complication rates. It is best indicated for kyphotic alignment, OPLL with a high space-occupying ratio, and OPLL involving ≤3 segments.

Fusion and subsidence rates of vertebral body sliding osteotomy: Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques for multilevel cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) was previously reported as a technique to decompress spinal canal by translating the vertebral body anteriorly and is indicated for cervical myelopathy caused by spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. However, little is known about its fusion and subsidence rates. PURPOSE: To compare the fusion and subsidence rates of VBSO, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent VBSO, ACDF, or ACCF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and were followed-up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Fusion and subsidence rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck pain, neck disability index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were assessed. METHODS: Results of the VBSO, ACDF, and ACCF groups were compared using Student's t-test and chi-square test. RESULTS: The fusion rate at 1-year postoperatively and the final follow-up for VBSO was 92.9% (37/42). VBSO demonstrated a higher 1-year fusion rate than ACDF (77.9% [74/95], p=0.04) and ACCF (74.2% [23/31], p=0.04). However, the fusion rate at the final follow-up did not demonstrate significant difference. The mean amount of subsidence (ACDF group, 1.5±1.2 mm; VBSO group, 1.5±1.5 mm; p=1.00) and rate of significant subsidence of > 3 mm (ACDF group, 13.7% [13/95]; VBSO group, 14.3% [6/42]; p=1.00) were similar for ACDF and VBSO. Furthermore, the mean amount of subsidence in VBSO was significantly less than that in ACCF (1.5±1.5 mm vs 2.4±2.0 mm; p=0.04). Neck pain VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: VBSO demonstrated faster solid union than ACDF and ACCF, although the fusion rates at the final follow-up were similar. VBSO resulted in less subsidence than ACCF at the 1-year follow-up. VBSO could be applied safely when the shape and/or location of the pathologic foci and sagittal alignment favor its application without much concern for pseudarthrosis or subsidence.

Fate of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Following Anterior Cervical Fusion: Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy or Laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: In the treatment of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)-induced cervical myelopathy, laminoplasty (LMP) is the most widely used surgical procedure. However, the progression of ossification masses is a well-known complication of LMP. This study aimed to investigate whether the novel anterior cervical decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy; VBSO) based on anterior column fusion suppresses the progression of OPLL compared with motion-preserving posterior decompression surgery (LMP). METHODS: All 77 consecutive patients (VBSO group, n = 33; LMP group, n = 44) who underwent VBSO or LMP for cervical OPLL at our institute between January 2012 and November 2017 were included. A total of 62 and 86 cervical motion segments in the VBSO and LMP groups were investigated, respectively. The OPLL thickness was measured twice (immediate postoperative and final follow-up), and the change of OPLL thickness was compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The increase in OPLL thickness in the VBSO group (-0.18 ± 0.24 mm) was significantly smaller than that in the LMP group (1.0 ± 0.9 mm, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in some patients, suppressed OPLL progression and decreased OPLL thickness were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The solid fusion of the anterior column by VBSO is associated with the lower incidence of OPLL growth and potential for growth arrest.

A novel anterior decompression technique for kyphosis line (K-line) ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): vertebral body sliding osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Conventional anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is associated with a high incidence of surgery-related complications. A novel anterior decompression technique [vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO)] has been developed to prevent such complications and achieve effective anterior decompression for severe OPLL patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the procedure of novel surgical technique and to evaluate the long-term surgical outcomes. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2014, 24 patients underwent VBSO for treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by severe OPLL. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), neurologic outcomes and perioperative complications were investigated. Various radiographic parameters such as the preoperative canal occupying ratio, postoperative canal widening, and preoperative and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment were also measured. Minimum follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS: The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score) improved from 12.4±2.9 preoperatively to 16.0±1.4 at the final follow-up (P<0.05). The mean recovery rate of the C-JOA score at the final follow-up was 68.65%±17.80%. The mean operating time was 130.7±21.0 minutes and the EBL was 176.3±38.0 mL. There were no perioperative complications. Pseudarthrosis was detected in two cases at 12 months postoperatively. The average spinal canal compromised ratio by OPLL decreased from 64.0%±15.0% preoperatively to 15.5%±12.2% postoperatively (P<0.05), with an average postoperative canal widening of 5.15±1.39 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Novel anterior decompression technique termed VBSO may be an effective and safe surgical option for anterior decompression surgery in patients with severe cervical OPLL. Since, VBSO does not involve a direct manipulation of the OPLL mass or dissection of the interspace between the OPLL and dura mater, this may significantly decrease the incidence of surgery-related complications, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss.

Ipsilateral Pedicle Stress Fracture After Endoscopic Foraminal Decompression for Patient with Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery is useful for the treatment of various spinal conditions. Although surgery-related complications such as dural injury, exiting nerve root injury, incomplete decompression, and hematoma have been reported, there are few reports of late complications after endoscopic surgery. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 51-year-old man complained of radiating pain to the right leg. The patient underwent endoscopic foraminal decompression under the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis with isthmic type spondylolisthesis (L5-S1). The lower extremity radiating pain was improved after surgery. Six weeks after surgery, the patient's symptoms recurred. The patient experienced a sudden onset of severe low back pain, which was aggravated by any motion of the lumbar spine. Computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a fracture line with a sclerotic margin at the base of the right pedicle at the L5 level. Because the symptoms significantly interfered with his normal activities of daily living, the patient was treated with a total laminectomy, followed by posterior instrumented fusion. As the indication for endoscopic spinal surgery is widening, endoscopic decompression surgery is being performed for patients with low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis, regardless of the presence of advanced spinal instability. However, endoscopic decompression surgery may cause damage to the posterior facet joint, which may have worsened the instability and lead to late complications such as progression of spondylolisthesis and pedicle stress fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon should carefully review risk factors such as isthmic type spondylolisthesis before planning spine surgery and minimize facet joint damage during endoscopic decompression.

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Anterior Decompression Technique for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is associated with a high incidence of surgery-related complications. A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy [VBSO]) has been developed to prevent such complications. This study attests the efficacy and safety of VBSO versus those of standard ACCF. METHODS: Patients requiring surgery for cervical OPLL underwent VBSO (24 patients) or ACCF (38 patients). Operating time, estimated blood loss, neurologic outcomes, complications, and various radiographic parameters were investigated. RESULTS: The VBSO group showed a shorter mean operating time and less estimated blood loss versus the ACCF group. Sixteen patients in the ACCF group experienced various complications, namely neurologic deficit (two patients), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (four patients), graft migration (three patients), and pseudarthrosis (seven patients). In the VBSO group, only pseudarthrosis was reported (two patients). CONCLUSIONS: VBSO provides similar neurologic outcomes with a shorter operating time and less bleeding compared with ACCF. Surgeons do not need to directly manipulate the OPLL mass or dissect the interspace between the OPLL and dura mater. Therefore, this technique may decrease the incidence of surgery-related complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.

L1 incidence reflects pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch in sagittal balance evaluation.

Retrospective study.To investigate the radiologic and geometrical association between L1 incidence (L1I) with pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis (PI/LL) mismatch and T1 incidence (T1I) with PI/LL/thoracic kyphosis (TK) mismatch.The relationship between PI and LL is not clear, and it might be because of the absence of a direct radiologic parameter to represent PI/LL mismatch. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on a direct radiologic parameter for representing PI/LL mismatch.This study is a retrospective review of 146 patients who underwent anteroposterior and lateral standing radiographs of the whole spine. L1I was defined as the angle between the line perpendicular to the L1 upper endplate and the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral endplate to the center of both femoral heads. T1I was defined as the angle between the line perpendicular to the T1 upper endplate and the line connecting the midpoint of the sacral endplate to the center of both femoral heads. Both were validated using the Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis.Radiologically measured L1I and T1I were coterminous with calculated measurements of ΔPI/LL and ΔPI/LL/TK in terms of means and standard deviations, respectively. Excellent correlations were found between L1I and ΔPI/LL, and T1I and ΔPI/LL/TK (R = 0.997, P < .01; R = 0.981, P < .01, respectively). In linear regression analysis, the slope and intercept of L1I were 0.991 and -0.041, with a predictability of 99.4% (R = 0.994), and those of T1I were 0.990 and -0.026, with a predictability of 99.0% (R = 0.990), respectively.L1I and T1I were strongly correlated with PI/LL mismatch and PI/LL/TK mismatch, respectively. L1I and T1I are direct parameters that represent PI/LL mismatch and PI/LL/TK mismatch. They would be useful in analyzing sagittal balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy) for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Conventional anterior decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy, including anterior corpectomy and fusion, is technically demanding and is known to be associated with a higher incidence of surgery-related complications, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, neurologic deterioration, and graft failure compared with posterior surgery. PURPOSE: We introduce a novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy [VBSO]) for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case series for novel surgical technique. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fourteen patients (M:F=11:3, mean age 56.9±10) with cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL who underwent VBSO by a single surgeon were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The surgical outcome was evaluated according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), and the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was calculated. Patients were also evaluated radiographically with plain and dynamic cervical spine radiographs and pre- and postoperative computed tomography images. METHODS: Fourteen patients were followed up for more than 24 months, and operation time, estimated blood loss, neurologic outcomes, and surgery-related complications were investigated. Radiological measurements were also performed to analyze the following parameters: (1) canal-occupying ratio and postoperative canal widening, and (2) pre- and postoperative sagittal alignment. RESULTS: The mean recovery rate of C-JOA score at the final follow-up was 68.65±17.8%. There were no perioperative complications, including neurologic deterioration, vertebral artery injury, esophageal injury, graft dislodgement, and CSF leaks, after surgery except for pseudarthrosis in one case. An average spinal canal compromised ratio by OPLL decreased from 61.5±8.1% preoperatively to 16.5±11.2% postoperatively. An average postoperative canal widening was 5.15±1.39 mm, and improvement of cervical alignment was observed in all patients, with average recovery angle of 7.3±6.1° postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The VBSO allows sufficient decompression of spinal cord and provides excellent neurologic outcomes. Because surgeons do not need to manipulate the OPLL mass directly, this technique could significantly decrease surgery-related complications. Furthermore, as VBSO is based on the multilevel discectomy and fusion technique, it would be more helpful to restore a physiological lordosis.

Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?

BACKGROUND: The contribution of preoperative embolization in reducing intraoperative blood loss and its clinical importance are unclear. So, we aimed to compare the perioperative clinical outcomes based on whether preoperative embolization was performed and assess the role and safety of preoperative embolization in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. METHODS: We enrolled 52 patients (men, 37; women, 15) who underwent palliative decompression for MSCC. Demographic data, neurologic status, surgery-related data (operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion), complications, and survival time were recorded. Patients were categorized based on whether they received preoperative embolization: groups E (embolization) (n = 18) and NE (non-embolization) (n = 34) and the clinical parameters were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed specifically for cases of hypervascular tumors (23/52, 44%). RESULTS: The transfusion degree was greater in the NE group (4.6 pints) than in the E group (2.5 pints, P = 0.025); the other parameters did not differ between the groups. However, massive bleeding (>2000 mL) was more frequent in the NE group (10/34) than in the E group (0/18, P = 0.010). Subgroup analysis indicated that intraoperative blood loss was greater in the NE group (1988 mL) than in the E group (1095 mL, P = 0.042) in hypervascular tumor patients. Although massive bleeding was more frequent among hypervascular tumor patients, 3 patients with non-hypervascularized tumors also exhibited massive bleeding (P = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative transfusion can be reduced by preoperative embolization in MSCC patients. Neurologic recovery, operation time, and complications did not differ according to the application of embolization. As preoperative embolization is relatively safe and effective for controlling intraoperative bleeding without any neurologic deterioration, it is highly recommended for hypervascular tumors. Moreover, it may also be effective for non-hypervascular tumors as massive bleeding may be noted in some cases.

Clinical Relevance of Classifying Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Results Based on Functional and Radiological Findings After Arthroscopic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the results of arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears have reported widely varied prognoses. Among other factors, the sizable discrepancy can be attributable to the fact that the current definition of massive rotator cuff tears covers an extensive area of tendons. HYPOTHESIS: Functional and radiological results according to subgroups would show significant inter-subgroup differences preoperatively and postoperatively. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 104 patients who required arthroscopic repair for massive rotator cuff tears were prospectively evaluated. The patients were allocated into 3 groups according to tendon involvement as diagnosed by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging: group 1 (anterosuperior type involving the subscapularis and supraspinatus), group 2 (posterosuperior type involving the infraspinatus and supraspinatus), and group 3 (anteroposterior type involving the subscapularis, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus). We compared functional results (at 2 years postoperatively) and radiological findings (at 1 year postoperatively) for each group. RESULTS: There were 34 patients in group 1, 54 in group 2, and 16 in group 3. In all 3 groups, functional results significantly improved after surgery. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in functional results among the 3 groups. On the radiological evaluations, each group (groups 1, 2, and 3) showed a significantly different result in the preoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD) (7.19, 5.44, and 5.22 mm, respectively), tear size (38.8, 39.3, and 46.4 mm, respectively), extent of retraction (33.9, 40.0, and 41.4 mm, respectively), postoperative AHD (8.92, 7.37, and 6.71 mm, respectively), and retear rate (23.5%, 51.9%, and 56.2%, respectively) ( P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Massive rotator cuff tears can be divided into 3 types: anterosuperior (group 1), posterosuperior (group 2), and anteroposterior (group 3). Each group has distinctive characteristics and shows different results in the preoperative AHD, tear size, extent of retraction, postoperative AHD, and retear rate, which provide a reasonable basis for categorization. So far, massive rotator cuff tears have only been broadly defined, consequently being understood as a single category by many. However, to clearly understand and evaluate this injury, we suggest identifying differences within the category through proper subclassification.

Repair of tibialis anterior muscle herniation using periosteum.

Muscular herniation consists of focal muscular protrusions through an acquired or congenital fascial defect. The anterior tibialis muscle is most frequently affected. Asymptomatic muscle hernias are usually treated conservatively. For severe symptoms or cosmetic complaints, several surgical techniques are available to treat muscle herniation, including fasciotomy, fascial patch grafting using autologous fascia lata, or synthetic mesh. However, the optimal surgical approach remains debatable. The authors propose a novel and reproducible surgical method using a periosteal turn-down technique. This surgical technique has the advantages of fewer complications, greater cost-effectiveness, and high reproducibility. The authors find this to be a useful technique.