Influence of circle of Willis modeling on hemodynamic parameters in anterior communicating artery aneurysms and recommendations for model selection.

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been utilized to calculate hemodynamic parameters in anterior communicating artery aneurysm (AComA), which is located at a junction between left and right A1 and A2 segments. However, complete or half circle of Willis (CoW) models are used indiscriminately. This study aims to suggest recommendations for determining suitable CoW model. Five patient-specific CoW models with AComA were used, and each model was divided into complete, left-half, and right-half models. After validating the CFD using a flow experiment, the hemodynamic parameters and flow patterns in five AComAs were compared. In four out of five cases, inflow from one A1 side had a dominant influence on the AComA, while both left and right A1 sides affected the AComA in the remaining case. Also, the average difference in time-averaged wall shear stress between the complete and half models for four cases was 4.6%, but it was 62% in the other case. The differences in the vascular resistances of left and right A1 and A2 segments greatly influenced the flow patterns in the AComA. These results may help to enhance clinicians' understanding of blood flow in the brain, leading to improvements in diagnosis and treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

Influence of blood viscosity models and boundary conditions on the computation of hemodynamic parameters in cerebral aneurysms using computational fluid dynamics.

BACKGROUND: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is widely used to calculate hemodynamic parameters that are known to influence cerebral aneurysms. However, the boundary conditions for CFD are chosen without any specific criteria. Our objective is to establish the recommendations for setting the analysis conditions for CFD analysis of the cerebral aneurysm. METHOD: The plug and the Womersley flow were the inlet boundary conditions, and zero and pulsatile pressures were the outlet boundary conditions. In addition, the difference in the assumption of viscosity was analyzed with respect to the flow rate. The CFD process used in our research was validated using particle image velocimetry experiment data from Tupin et al.'s work to ensure the accuracy of the simulations. RESULTS: It was confirmed that if the entrance length was sufficiently secured, the inlet and outlet boundary conditions did not affect the CFD results. In addition, it was observed that the difference in the hemodynamic parameter between Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid decreased as the flow rate increased. Furthermore, it was confirmed that similar tendencies were evaluated when these recommendations were utilized in the patient-specific cerebral aneurysm models. CONCLUSIONS: These results may help conduct standardized CFD analyses regardless of the research group.

Computational Study of Hemodynamic Changes Induced by Overlapping and Compacting of Stents and Flow Diverter in Cerebral Aneurysms.

Purpose: The flow diversion effect of an intracranial stent is closely related to its metal coverage rate (MCR). In this study, the flow diversion effects of Enterprise and low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stents are compared with those of a Pipeline flow diverter, focusing on the MCR change. Moreover, the changes in the flow diversion effect caused by the additional manipulations of overlapping and compaction are verified using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Methods: CFD analysis was performed using virtually generated stents mounted in an idealized aneurysm model. First, the flow diversion effects of single Enterprise, LVIS, and Pipeline devices were analyzed. The Enterprise and LVIS were sequentially overlapped and compared with a Pipeline, to evaluate the effect of stent overlapping. The effect of compacting a stent was evaluated by comparing the flow diversion effects of a single and two compacted LVIS with those of two overlapped, uncompacted LVIS and uncompacted and compacted Pipeline. Quantitative analysis was performed to evaluate the hemodynamic parameters of energy loss, average velocity, and inflow rate. Results: Statistically significant correlations were observed between the reduction rates of the hemodynamic parameters and MCR. The single LVIS without compaction induced a reduction in all the hemodynamic parameters comparable to those of the three overlapped Enterprise. Moreover, the two overlapped, uncompacted LVIS showed a flow diversion effect as large as that induced by the single uncompacted Pipeline. Compacted stents induced a better flow diversion effect than uncompacted stents. The single compacted LVIS induced a flow diversion effect similar to that induced by the two uncompacted LVIS or single uncompacted Pipeline. Conclusions: The MCR of a stent correlates with its flow diversion effect. Overlapping and compaction can increase the MCR of an intracranial stent and achieve a flow diversion effect as large as that observed with a flow diverter.