ABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this review was to determine the effect of CLA infusion post cardiac surgery on pain, time to ambulation, severe adverse events, patient satisfaction, time to extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital, total narcotic consumption, and pulmonary function. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42014010188). Methods: We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED); and PsycINFO; as well as hand-searching cardiothoracic surgery and anesthetic journals and meeting abstracts. Results: Ten eligible trials with a total of 546 participants were identified. Meta-analyses showed that CLA infusion significantly reduced the total mean visual analog pain score at 72 hours (mean difference [MD] = -14.31 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -25.59 to -3.03); time to ambulation (MD = -2.81 hours, 95% CI = -5.23 to -0.4); morphine requirement (MD = -10.19 mg, 95% CI = -11.80 to -8.58) but did not reduce time to ambulate to chair (MD = -1.65 hours, 95% CI = -4.04 to 0.74); time to extubation (MD = -0.18 hours, 95% CI = -1.24 to 0.89); length of ICU stay (MD = 0.9 hours, 95% CI = -2.96 to 4.75); and hospital length of stay (MD = -0.59 days, 95% CI = -1.24 to 0.07). There were insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis on severe adverse events, patient satisfaction, or pulmonary function. Conclusions: CLA infusion after cardiac surgery reduces pain score at 72 hours, shortens time to ambulation, and reduces morphine consumption at 48 hours.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of continuous infusion of ropivacaine compared to sham infusion or usual care on pain scores before and after physiotherapy treatment, distance walked and time to discharge from physiotherapy, after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double blind controlled trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five participants who underwent CABG surgery with left internal mammary artery grafts were allocated, to the ropivacaine group (n=26), the sham group (n=25), or usual care group (n=24). Participants in the ropivacaine group received 0.5% ropivacaine and participants in the sham group received normal saline, both as continuous infusions via two parasternally tunnelled catheters for 96hours continuously. The usual care group did not receive a device. All groups had patient-controlled analgesia and/or oral analgesia. RESULTS: Seventy-two participants completed the study. There was no significant between-group differences in pain scores, distance walked on any post operative day (POD) or number of participants discharged from physiotherapy by POD 4. For the group as a whole there was a significant linear decrease in pain score from mean (SD) 42 (24) mm on POD1 to 15 (16) mm on POD4 (p<0.001), (MD 27mm, 95% CI 22 to 32) and walking distance increased from 1 (5) m on POD1 to 183 (239) m on POD4 (p<0.001) MD 181m, 95% CI 126 to 236). CONCLUSION: Infusion of ropivacaine post CABG surgery was unable to reduce pain, increase distance walked or reduce time to physiotherapy discharge compared to sham or usual care. Trial registration number ACTRN12612001243808.