Comparison of neurological manifestation in children with and without coronavirus 2019 experiencing seizures with fever.

Whether neurologic symptoms due to SARS-CoV-2 differ from those of non-SARS-CoV-2 viral infection is unclear. We aimed to describe these neurological manifestations and compare the clinical characteristics and treatments in children with seizures and fever with or without COVID-19. We retrospectively analyzed data from 105 hospitalized children (<18 years) with clinical seizures and fever between September 2021 and August 2022. We compared the clinical characteristics and treatments between the COVID-19 (n = 20) and non-COVID-19 (n = 85) groups. Patients with COVID-19 were older than those without (32.5 [20-86] months vs. 20 [16-32] months, p = 0.029). Seizure type and duration and impaired consciousness duration did not differ between groups. Six and 32 patients experienced status epilepticus lasting 30 min in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups, respectively. Most treatments did not differ between groups; however, electroencephalography was used less frequently for COVID-19. Neurological sequelae occurred in one and four patients in the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups, respectively. In conclusion, seizures with fever due to SARS-CoV-2 were more common in older children. Seizure characteristics and neurologic sequelae did not differ in children with and those without COVID-19. In general, electroencephalography was used less during COVID-19 for infection control measures.

Growth and differentiation factor-15 as a potential prognostic biomarker for status-epilepticus-associated-with-fever: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Biomarkers predicting poor outcomes of status-epilepticus-associated-with-fever (SEF) at an early stage may contribute to treatment guidance. However, none have been reported thus far. We investigated the dynamics of serum growth and differentiation factor (GDF)-15 after seizure onset in patients with SEF and determined whether GDF-15 can predict poor outcomes, particularly in the first 6 h after seizure onset. METHODS: We enrolled 37 pediatric patients with SEF and eight patients with simple febrile seizures (SFS) and collected their blood samples within 24 h of seizure onset and eight febrile control patients between March 1, 2017 and September 30, 2020. All patients were aged ≤15 years. RESULTS: In the SEF group, the median post-seizure serum GDF-15 values were 1,065 (<6h), 2,720 (6-12 h), and 2,411 (12-24 h) pg/mL. The median serum GDF-15 in the first 6 h was measured in patients with SEF without a significant past medical history (n = 21) and was found to be statistically significantly higher (1,587 pg/mL) than in the febrile control (551 pg/mL) and SFS (411 pg/mL) groups. The median serum GDF-15 was statistically significantly higher in patients with SEF with sequelae (n = 5) and patients with acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures/reduced diffusion/hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome (n = 6) than in patients with SEF without sequelae (n = 16) (15,898 vs 756 pg/mL) and patients with prolonged FS (n = 15) (9,448 vs 796 pg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the dynamics of serum GDF-15 in patients with SEF and indicates the potential of GDF-15 as an early predictor of poor outcomes.

Prediction of AESD and neurological sequelae in febrile status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical prediction rule (CPR) for acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion (AESD) was developed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 - 0.96. Our objective was to verify the AESD CPR in a new cohort and compare the utilities of three CPRs of acute encephalopathy: the Tada, Yokochi, and Nagase criteria. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data and medical charts of 580 consecutive patients (aged < 18 years) with febrile convulsive status epilepticus lasting for ≥ 30 min in 2002 - 2017 and measured the performance of the CPRs in predicting AESD and sequelae. RESULTS: The CPRs predicted AESD with an AUC of 0.84 - 0.88. The Tada criteria predicted AESD with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.25 and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.99. The Yokochi criteria predicted AESD with a PPV and NPV of 0.20 and 0.95, respectively, after 12 h. The Nagase criteria predicted AESD with a PPV and NPV of 0.14 and 1.00, respectively, after 6 h. The PPVs of the Tada, Yokochi, and Nagase criteria for sequelae were 0.28, 0.28, and 0.17, respectively; the corresponding NPVs were 0.97, 0.95, and 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the AESD CPR in a new cohort was lower than that in the derivation study. CPRs are not sufficient as diagnostic tests, but they are useful as screening tests. The Nagase criteria are the most effective for screening among the three CPRs due to their high NPV and swiftness.