Legionnaires' disease after a campervan holiday: a case report.

This case report describes a case of Legionnaires' disease for whom the source of infection was the campervan in which the patient had travelled for 3 months. This case shows that Legionnaires' disease can be acquired by exposure to a relatively new (not previously reported) source that is commonly used as (holiday)transportation vehicle.

High-protein enteral nutrition enriched with immune-modulating nutrients vs standard high-protein enteral nutrition and nosocomial infections in the ICU: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE: Enteral administration of immune-modulating nutrients (eg, glutamine, omega-3 fatty acids, selenium, and antioxidants) has been suggested to reduce infections and improve recovery from critical illness. However, controversy exists on the use of immune-modulating enteral nutrition, reflected by lack of consensus in guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-protein enteral nutrition enriched with immune-modulating nutrients (IMHP) reduces the incidence of infections compared with standard high-protein enteral nutrition (HP) in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The MetaPlus study, a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, was conducted from February 2010 through April 2012 including a 6-month follow-up period in 14 intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Belgium. A total of 301 adult patients who were expected to be ventilated for more than 72 hours and to require enteral nutrition for more than 72 hours were randomized to the IMHP (n = 152) or HP (n = 149) group and included in an intention-to-treat analysis, performed for the total population as well as predefined medical, surgical, and trauma subpopulations. INTERVENTIONS: High-protein enteral nutrition enriched with immune-modulating nutrients vs standard high-protein enteral nutrition, initiated within 48 hours of ICU admission and continued during the ICU stay for a maximum of 28 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was incidence of new infections according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions. Secondary end points included mortality, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and subtypes of infections according CDC definitions. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of new infections between the groups: 53% (95% CI, 44%-61%) in the IMHP group vs 52% (95% CI, 44%-61%) in the HP group (P = .96). No statistically significant differences were observed in other end points, except for a higher 6-month mortality rate in the medical subgroup: 54% (95% CI, 40%-67%) in the IMHP group vs 35% (95% CI, 22%-49%) in the HP group (P = .04), with a hazard ratio of 1.57 (95% CI, 1.03-2.39; P = .04) for 6-month mortality adjusted for age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score comparing the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adult patients breathing with the aid of mechanical ventilation in the ICU, IMHP compared with HP did not improve infectious complications or other clinical end points and may be harmful as suggested by increased adjusted mortality at 6 months. These findings do not support the use of IMHP nutrients in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR2181.

Effect of rivastigmine as an adjunct to usual care with haloperidol on duration of delirium and mortality in critically ill patients: a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is frequently diagnosed in critically ill patients and is associated with adverse outcome. Impaired cholinergic neurotransmission seems to have an important role in the development of delirium. We aimed to establish the effect of the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine on the duration of delirium in critically ill patients. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥18 years) who were diagnosed with delirium were enrolled from six intensive care units in the Netherlands, and treated between November, 2008, and January, 2010. Patients were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive an increasing dose of rivastigmine or placebo, starting at 0·75 mL (1·5 mg rivastigmine) twice daily and increasing in increments to 3 mL (6 mg rivastigmine) twice daily from day 10 onwards, as an adjunct to usual care based on haloperidol. The trial pharmacist generated the randomisation sequence by computer, and consecutively numbered bottles of the study drug according to this sequence to conceal allocation. The primary outcome was the duration of delirium during hospital admission. Analysis was by intention to treat. Duration of delirium was censored for patients who died or were discharged from hospital while delirious. Patients, medical staff, and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Members of the data safety and monitoring board (DSMB) were unmasked and did interim analyses every 3 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00704301. FINDINGS: Although a sample size of 440 patients was planned, after inclusion of 104 patients with delirium who were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis (n=54 on rivastigmine, n=50 on placebo), the DSMB recommended that the trial be halted because mortality in the rivastigmine group (n=12, 22%) was higher than in the placebo group (n=4, 8%; p=0·07). Median duration of delirium was longer in the rivastigmine group (5·0 days, IQR 2·7-14·2) than in the placebo group (3·0 days, IQR 1·0-9·3; p=0·06). INTERPRETATION: Rivastigmine did not decrease duration of delirium and might have increased mortality so we do not recommend use of rivastigmine to treat delirium in critically ill patients. FUNDING: ZonMw, the Netherlands Brain Foundation, and Novartis.

Can mild-to-moderate hyperhomocysteinaemia impair endothelial function in the absence of other risk factors for cardiovascular disease?

The majority of clinical studies demonstrate that patients with hyperhomocysteinaemia have an increased risk of atherothrombotic events. However, there is a striking and poorly understood heterogeneity in the severity of clinical features in individuals with hyperhomocysteinaemia. This observation suggests that other factors must exist that modulate the relationship between hyperhomocysteinaemia and clinical disease. Therefore identifying factors that inhibit or enhance the vasculotoxic effects of homocysteine is important, as is elucidation of how homocysteine damages blood vessels. This comment discusses the study of Woodman and colleagues in this issue of Clinical Science in which they investigate the effects of hyperhomocysteinaemia on endothelial function.

Selective ET(A) receptor antagonism with ABT-627 attenuates all renal effects of endothelin in humans.

++Endothelin (ET-1) acts as a potent vasoconstrictor in the human kidney, and this vasoconstriction could contribute to the ischemia seen in acute renal failure. In animal studies, the vasoactive properties of ET-1 are known to be ET(A) receptor-and/or ET(B) receptor-mediated; however, the receptor subtype involved in the human kidney remains to be defined. In a phase I, single-center, double-blind, randomized, three-period, crossover design, the effects of orally administered ABT-627, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, on renal hemodynamics during ET-1 infusion were evaluated. Two doses of ABT-627 (5 and 20 mg) were compared with placebo and nifedipine. For each dose level of ABT-627, a cohort of nine subjects was studied. A para-aminohippuric acid/inulin clearance test was performed once at the end of each 7-d treatment period. Infusion of ET-1 significantly decreased effective renal plasma flow, GFR, sodium excretion, and urine flow. Pretreatment with 20 mg of ABT-627 significantly decreased mean arterial pressure. In contrast, 7 d of treatment with both doses of ABT-627 did not affect baseline renal parameters. However, because mean arterial pressure decreased, a tendency toward a reduction of renal vascular resistance could indeed be demonstrated. Compared with placebo, both doses of ABT-627 were equally effective in blocking all renal effects caused by ET-1 infusion. In the model of exogenous ET-1 infusion, ABT-627 had a tendency to prevent ET-1-induced renal changes more effectively compared with nifedipine. The contribution of endogenous ET-1 and the ET(A) receptor in maintaining basal renal vascular tone in the human kidney is small. In addition, compared with placebo, selective ET(A) receptor antagonism with both doses of ABT-627 completely prevented all renal changes caused by ET-1 infusion.