Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 335: 115866, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547601

ABSTRACT

The ketogenic diet (KD, also known as metabolic therapy) has been successful in the treatment of obesity, type 2 diabetes, and epilepsy. More recently, this treatment has shown promise in the treatment of psychiatric illness. We conducted a 4-month pilot study to investigate the effects of a KD on individuals with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder with existing metabolic abnormalities. Twenty-three participants were enrolled in a single-arm trial. Results showcased improvements in metabolic health, with no participants meeting metabolic syndrome criteria by study conclusion. Adherent individuals experienced significant reduction in weight (12 %), BMI (12 %), waist circumference (13 %), and visceral adipose tissue (36 %). Observed biomarker enhancements in this population include a 27 % decrease in HOMA-IR, and a 25 % drop in triglyceride levels. In psychiatric measurements, participants with schizophrenia showed a 32 % reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores. Overall Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity improved by an average of 31 %, and the proportion of participants that started with elevated symptomatology improved at least 1-point on CGI (79 %). Psychiatric outcomes across the cohort encompassed increased life satisfaction (17 %) and enhanced sleep quality (19 %). This pilot trial underscores the potential advantages of adjunctive ketogenic dietary treatment in individuals grappling with serious mental illness.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diet, Ketogenic , Schizophrenia , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Proof of Concept Study , Schizophrenia/epidemiology
2.
Caspian J Intern Med ; 14(2): 371-375, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37223294

ABSTRACT

Background: Anti-TPO antibodies are one of the characteristic factors in autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT). Previous studies reported a high prevalence of anti-TPO antibodies (Abs) in Iran. We have therefore assessed the prevalence of anti-TPO Abs in Gorgan, Iran. Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted from 2015 to 2018 in Gorgan city, Northeast of Iran. The Participants included women with Poly cystic ovary syndrome (PCOs), celiac patients, men with hepatitis C infection, and age and sex-matched controls. ELISA method was used for the analysis of laboratory tests. Results: The number of enrolled subjects in PCOs, celiac disease, and Hepatitis C infection groups were 76, 67, and 60, respectively. Anti-TPO Abs positivity was significantly higher in patients with PCOS than in the control group (18.4% vs. 0.00%; p = 0.000). There were no significant differences in the frequency of anti-TPO Abs positive cases between CD patients and the controls (26.9% vs. 21.1% p =0.413). The incidence of anti-TPO Abs positivity was significantly higher in the control group (10% vs. 25%; P = 0.031). Conclusion: Very high level of anti-TPO Abs was observed in both patients and healthy population in Golestan province. Considering this rate and its association with autoimmune disorders, it is suggested to prioritize screening programs for related disease in this area.

3.
J Affect Disord ; 295: 28-32, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391959

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility and clinical significance of tracking mania and depression in community college students before and after early identification and intervention. METHODS: From Affective Illness to Recovery: STudent Access to Rapid Treatment (FAIRSTART) is an early intervention program to provide diagnostic therapeutic consultation, short-term care, and community ongoing care referral for 18-28 year-old outpatient community college students (mean age 22.9±4.0 years) experiencing manic symptoms. Over three years, 54 FAIRSTART participants (70% with DSM-IV bipolar I/II/not otherwise specified disorder, BDI/II/NOS) were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation (ADE) and followed (range: one-time consult to 4.3±3.6 visits over 3-6 month follow-up) with the STEP-BD Clinical Monitoring Form. RESULTS: 38/54 patients (70%) had BDI/II/NOS, 11 unipolar depression (20%), 1 psychosis spectrum disorder (2%), 2 dysthymia/persistent depressive disorder (4%), and 2 incomplete intake with mood disorder diagnosis undetermined (4%). Average illness duration was 9.1±5.3 years. Among the 38 BD I/II/NOS patients, depression (SUM-D, t(30)=6.5; p<0.001) and mania (SUM-M, t(30)=4.7; p<0.001) scores improved significantly from baseline to last visit, with 17 (44.7%) reporting recovery by time transitioned from FAIRSTART to community care (after 4.3±3.6 visits). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term, early intervention in community college students with mood symptoms appeared feasible and yielded significant improvements in depression and mania scores. However, additional studies, with longer-term follow-ups, larger sample sizes, and comparison to current care standards, are needed to determine this early intervention program's impact on trajectory of mania symptoms in transitional age young adult populations.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Adolescent , Adult , Affect , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Mood Disorders , Young Adult
4.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 35(1): 8-18, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609786

ABSTRACT

Assess bipolar disorder subtype and treatment location effects on bipolar disorder core pharmacotherapy. Outpatients not in a syndromal episode referred to the University of Milan and Stanford University Bipolar Disorder Clinics were assessed with SCID for the fourth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mood Disorders, and the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder Affective Disorders Evaluation, respectively. Prevalence and clinical correlates of antidepressant, antipsychotic, and mood stabilizer use, in aggregate and individually, were compared in bipolar I (BDI) versus II (BDII) patients in Milan/Stanford and in Milan versus Stanford patients, stratified by subtype. Milan/Stanford pooled BDI versus BDII patients significantly more often took antipsychotic (69.8 versus 44.8%), mood stabilizers (68.6 versus 57.7%), and valproate (40.1 versus 17.5%), and less often took antidepressants (23.1 versus 55.6%) and lamotrigine (9.9 versus 25.2%). Milan versus Stanford patients (stratified by bipolar disorder subtype) significantly more often took antipsychotic (BDI and BDII), antidepressants (BDII), and valproate (BDII), and less often took lamotrigine (BDI). Research regarding bipolar disorder core pharmacotherapy relationships with bipolar subtype and treatment location is warranted to enhance clinical management.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Antimanic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
5.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 35(1): 49-58, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31453901

ABSTRACT

Evidence supports increasing antipsychotic use in bipolar disorder, especially second-generation antipsychotics. However, data regarding first-generation antipsychotic contemporary use are limited. We studied 380 Northern Italian bipolar disorder inter-episode patients, grouped according to current antipsychotic use, stratified by bipolar subtype (BDI vs. BDII). Furthermore, we compared first-generation antipsychotic users vs. non-users. In our sample (n = 357), 81.8% were taking antipsychotics (74% second-generation antipsychotics, 24.1% first-generation antipsychotics), with antipsychotic use in BDI significantly more prevalent than in BDII (85.2% vs. 72.0%). Overall, antipsychotic users vs. non-users had higher rates of hypo/manic last episode, lifetime psychiatric hospitalization, psychosis, and current psychotropic use, but lower rates of anxiety disorder main comorbidity and current antidepressant use. First-generation antipsychotic use rates (30.3% in BDI vs. 6.5% in BDII) were associated with more frequently being unpartnered, having elevated first/last episodes, higher lifetime hospitalization, involuntary commitment, psychosis, and psychosocial rehabilitation rates, and more current psychotropic use, but lower Global Assessment Functioning scores and less current antidepressant use. Bipolar disorder patients had robust antipsychotic (second-generation antipsychotic > first-generation antipsychotic) use, consistently with previous reports. FGAs were still prescribed for a substantial group of patients, likely suffering from severe bipolar disorder. Prescriptions need to be monitored to assess their appropriateness and adherence to evidence-based recommendations.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/classification , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Severity of Illness Index
6.
J Affect Disord ; 246: 836-842, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30795488

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Antidepressants are common in bipolar disorder (BD), but controversial due to questionable efficacy/tolerability. We assessed baseline antidepressant use/depression associations in BD. METHODS: Stanford BD Clinic outpatients, enrolled during 2000-2011, assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation, were monitored up to two years with the STEP-BD Clinical Monitoring Form while receiving naturalistic expert treatment. Prevalence/correlates of baseline antidepressant use in recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks)/depressed patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses assessed times to depressive recurrence/recovery in patients with/without baseline antidepressant use, and Cox Proportional Hazard regression analyses assessed covariate effects. RESULTS: Baseline antidepressant use was significantly (albeit without Bonferroni multiple comparison correction) less among 105 recovered (31.4%) versus 153 depressed (44.4%) patients, and among recovered patients (again without Bonferroni correction), associated with Caucasian race, earlier onset, worse Clinical Global Impression scores, and hastened depressive recurrence (only if mood elevation episodes were not censored), driven by lifetime anxiety disorder, and more (even with Bonferroni correction) bipolar II disorder, lifetime anxiety and eating disorders, and core psychotropics. Baseline antidepressant use among depressed patients was associated with significantly (again without Bonferroni correction) older age, female gender, and more (even with Bonferroni correction) anxiolytics/hypnotics, complex pharmacotherapy, and core psychotropics, but no other unfavorable illness characteristic/current mood symptom, and not time to depressive recovery. LIMITATIONS: Tertiary BD clinic referral sample receiving open naturalistic expert treatment. Analyses without/with Bonferroni correction. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is required to assess the complex associations between baseline antidepressant use and longitudinal depressive burden in BD.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Affect , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Recurrence
7.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 38(3): 207-211, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29620693

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess lurasidone effectiveness/efficacy/tolerability in bipolar disorder (BD) patients. METHODS: Outpatients assessed with Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD Affective Disorders Evaluation received naturalistically administered (primarily adjunctive) open lurasidone while monitored at visits with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD Clinical Monitoring Form. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (32 type I, 26 type II, 3 type not otherwise specified; mean ± SD age, 45.1 ± 14.0 years; 63.9% were female) received lurasidone with 3.1 ± 1.4 (≥2 in 88.5%, monotherapy in only 3.3%) other nonanxiolytic/hypnotic prescription psychotropics, started during syndromal depression in 57.4%, subsyndromal depression in 23.0%, and euthymia in 19.7%. Lurasidone was taken for median 126 days, with final dose 55.6 ± 30.8 mg/d. By final visit taking lurasidone, syndromal depression rate decreased by nearly one-half to 31.1%, and euthymia rate more than doubled to 42.6%, whereas subsyndromal depression rate was unchanged at 23.0%. Clinical Global Impressions-BD-Overall Severity improved significantly only in patients with baseline syndromal depression. Seventy-seven percent of patients discontinued lurasidone after median 103 days, because of adverse events in 54.1% (most often akathisia, sedation/somnolence, nausea, and weight gain), inefficacy in 16.4%, and other reasons in 6.6%; 12.1% had equal to or greater than 7% weight gain, and 3.3% developed hypomania. Limitations to this study were the open design and demographically homogeneous (relatively affluent, predominantly white female) small sample taking complex pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In American specialty clinic BD outpatients, adjunctive longer-term lurasidone commonly relieved syndromal depression and maintained euthymia, suggesting possible effectiveness/efficacy. However, lurasidone was discontinued in 54.1% because of adverse events, suggesting tolerability limitations in these challenging patients, nearly 90% of whom were already taking at least 2 other nonanxiolytic/hypnotic prescription psychotropics.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Lurasidone Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Lurasidone Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
J Affect Disord ; 234: 74-79, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29524749

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Antidepressant use is controversial in bipolar disorder (BD) due to questionable efficacy/psychiatric tolerability. We assessed demographic/clinical characteristics of baseline antidepressant use in BD patients. METHODS: Prevalence and correlates of baseline antidepressant use in 503 BD I and BD II outpatients referred to the Stanford Bipolar Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. RESULTS: Antidepressant use was 39.0%, overall, and was higher in BD II versus BD I (46.9% versus 30.5%, p = 0.0002). Both BD I and BD II antidepressant compared to non-antidepressant users had higher rates of complex pharmacotherapy (≥ 4 mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and/or antidepressants) and use of other psychotropics. Antidepressant use in BD II versus BD I was higher during euthymia (44.0% vs. 28.0%) and subsyndromal symptoms (56.1% vs. 28.6%), but not depression or mood elevation. LIMITATIONS: American tertiary BD clinic referral sample receiving open naturalistic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, antidepressant use was higher in BD II versus BD I patients, and was associated with markers of heightened illness severity in both BD I and BD II patients. Additional research is warranted to investigate these complex relationships.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Demography/statistics & numerical data , Patient Preference/psychology , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Outpatients/psychology , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , United States
9.
J Affect Disord ; 227: 657-664, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29174739

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Assess episode accumulation (≥ 10 prior mood episodes) associations with demographic/baseline clinical characteristics and mood episode recurrence/recovery in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Stanford BD Clinic outpatients enrolled during 2000-2011 were assessed with Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. Among recovered and syndromal mood episode patients, we assessed episode accumulation associations with demographic/baseline clinical characteristics and with recurrence/recovery (by Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, with mediators assessed with Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio (HR) analyses). RESULTS: Among all 450 BD outpatients, almost twice as many had versus lacked episode accumulation (65.8% versus 34.2%), which was less common among 92 recovered versus 193 syndromal mood episode patients (51.1% versus 69.9%). Among recovered patients, episode accumulation was associated with 14/18 (77.7%) demographic/other baseline clinical characteristics, and hastened mood episode recurrence. Among syndromal mood episode patients, episode accumulation was associated with 13/18 (72.2%) demographic/other baseline clinical characteristics, and delayed mood episode recovery. LIMITATIONS: American tertiary BD clinic referral sample. CONCLUSION: Studies are needed to confirm episode accumulation is associated with hastened mood episode recurrence and delayed mood episode recovery in BD, and to further explore its' associations with hastened mood elevation recurrence and delayed recovery from depressive and mood elevation episodes, considered separately.


Subject(s)
Affect , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Recurrence , Time Factors
10.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 24(27): 21610-21624, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28752305

ABSTRACT

Because of the harmful effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted by petroleum-based fuels, the adoption of alternative green fuels such as biodiesel and compressed natural gas (CNG) is an inevitable trend in the transportation sector. However, the transition to alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) fleets is not easy and, particularly at the beginning of the transition period, drivers may be forced to travel long distances to reach alternative fueling stations (AFSs). In this paper, the utilization of bi-fuel vehicles is proposed as an operational approach. We present a mathematical model to address vehicle routing problem (VRP) with bi-fuel vehicles and show that the utilization of bi-fuel vehicles can lead to a significant reduction in GHG emissions. Moreover, a simulated annealing algorithm is adopted to solve large instances of this problem. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated on some random instances.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/prevention & control , Algorithms , Biofuels , Greenhouse Gases , Models, Theoretical , Motor Vehicles , Natural Gas , Petroleum , Transportation , Vehicle Emissions/analysis
11.
J Affect Disord ; 219: 165-171, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28558363

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess differential relationships between lifetime anxiety disorder/current anxiety symptoms and longitudinal depressive severity in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Stanford BD Clinic outpatients enrolled during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation and followed with the STEP-BD Clinical Monitoring Form while receiving naturalistic treatment for up to two years. Baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms and times to depressive recurrence/recovery were compared in patients with versus without lifetime anxiety disorder/current anxiety symptoms. RESULTS: Among 105 currently recovered patients, lifetime anxiety disorder was significantly associated with 10/27 (37.0%) demographic/other unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms/current psychotropics, hastened depressive recurrence (driven by earlier onset age), and a significantly (> two-fold) higher Kaplan-Meier estimated depressive recurrence rate, whereas current anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with 10/27 (37.0%) demographic/other unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms/current psychotropics and hastened depressive recurrence (driven by lifetime anxiety disorder), but only a numerically higher Kaplan-Meier estimated depressive recurrence rate. In contrast, among 153 currently depressed patients, lifetime anxiety disorder/current anxiety symptoms were not significantly associated with time to depressive recovery or depressive recovery rate. LIMITATIONS: American tertiary BD clinic referral sample, open naturalistic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Research is needed regarding differential relationships between lifetime anxiety disorder and current anxiety symptoms and hastened/delayed depressive recurrence/recovery - specifically whether lifetime anxiety disorder versus current anxiety symptoms has marginally more robust association with hastened depressive recurrence, and whether both have marginally more robust associations with hastened depressive recurrence versus delayed depressive recovery, and related clinical implications.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depression/psychology , Adult , Age of Onset , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Recurrence , Time Factors
12.
J Affect Disord ; 218: 374-379, 2017 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abnormal sleep duration (ASD, <6 or ≥9h) is common in bipolar disorder (BD), and often persists beyond acute mood episodes. Few longitudinal studies have examined the ASD's impact upon BD illness course. The current study examined the longitudinal impact of ASD upon bipolar depressive recurrence/recovery. METHODS: Outpatients referred to the Stanford BD Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation at baseline, and with the Clinical Monitoring Form at monthly follow-ups for up to two years of naturalistic treatment. Prevalence and clinical correlates of ASD in 93 recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks) and 153 depressed BD patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analyses (Log-Rank tests) assessed relationships between baseline ASD and longitudinal depressive severity, with Cox Proportional Hazard analyses assessing potential mediators. RESULTS: ASD was only half as common among recovered versus depressed BD outpatients, but was significantly associated with hastened depressive recurrence (Log-Rank p=0.007), mediated by lifetime anxiety disorder and attenuated by lifetime history of psychosis, and had only a non-significant tendency towards association with delayed depressive recovery (Log-Rank p=0.07). In both recovered and depressed BD outpatients, baseline ASD did not have significant association with any baseline BD illness characteristic. LIMITATIONS: Self-reported sleep duration. Limited generalizability beyond our predominately white, female, educated, insured American BD specialty clinic sample. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline ASD among recovered BD patients may be a risk marker for hastened depressive recurrence, suggesting it could be an important therapeutic target between mood episodes.


Subject(s)
Affect/physiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depression/psychology , Sleep Wake Disorders/psychology , Sleep/physiology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/physiopathology , Depression/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients/psychology , Prevalence , Recurrence , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Time Factors
13.
Int J Bipolar Disord ; 5(1): 2, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124233

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic, frequently comorbid condition characterized by high rates of mood episode recurrence and suicidality. Little is known about prospective longitudinal characterization of BD type II (BD II) versus type I (BD I) in relation to time to depressive recurrence and recovery from major depressive episode. We therefore assessed times to depressive recurrence/recovery in tertiary clinic-referred BD II versus I patients. METHODS: Outpatients referred to Stanford BD Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation and with Clinical Monitoring Form during up to 2 years of naturalistic treatment. Prevalence and clinical correlates of bipolar subtype in recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks) and depressed patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the relationships between bipolar subtype and longitudinal depressive severity, and Cox proportional hazard analyses assessed the potential mediators. RESULTS: BD II versus BD I was less common among 105 recovered (39.0 vs. 61.0%, p = 0.03) and more common among 153 depressed (61.4 vs. 38.6%, p = 0.006) patients. Among recovered patients, BD II was associated with 6/25 (24.0%) baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/mood symptoms/psychotropics and hastened depressive recurrence (p = 0.015). Among depressed patients, BD II was associated with 8/25 (33.0%) baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/mood symptoms/psychotropics, but only non-significantly associated with delayed depressive recovery. CONCLUSIONS: BD II versus BD I was significantly associated with current depression and hastened depressive recurrence, but only non-significantly associated with delayed depressive recovery. Research on bipolar subtype relationships with depressive recurrence/recovery is warranted to enhance clinical management of BD patients.

14.
Int J Bipolar Disord ; 4(1): 15, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27473754

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current irritability is associated with greater retrospective and current bipolar disorder (BD) illness severity; less is known about prospective longitudinal implications of current irritability. We examined relationships between current irritability and depressive recurrence and recovery in BD. METHODS: Outpatients referred to the Stanford BD Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation at baseline, and with the Clinical Monitoring Form during follow-up during up to 2 years of naturalistic treatment. Prevalence and clinical correlates of any current irritability in depressed and recovered (euthymic ≥8 weeks) BD patients were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analyses (Log-Rank tests) assessed relationships between current irritability and longitudinal depressive severity, with Cox Proportional Hazard analyses assessing potential mediators. RESULTS: Recovered BD outpatients with vs. without current irritability had significantly higher rates of 13/19 (68.4 %) other baseline unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms and hastened depressive recurrence (Log-Rank p = 0.020), driven by lifetime history of anxiety disorder and prior year rapid cycling, and attenuated by history of psychosis. Depressed BD outpatients with vs. without current irritability had significantly higher rates of 7/19 (36.8 %) other unfavorable illness characteristics/current mood symptoms and delayed depressive recovery (Log-Rank p = 0.034), NOT mediated by any assessed parameter. LIMITATIONS: Limited generalizability beyond our predominately white, female, educated, insured American BD specialty clinic sample. CONCLUSIONS: Current irritability was associated with hastened depressive recurrence and delayed depressive recovery in BD. Treatment studies targeting irritability may yield strategies to mitigate increased longitudinal depressive burden.

15.
J Psychiatr Res ; 79: 101-107, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27218815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although current irritability and current/prior anxiety have been associated in unipolar depression, these relationships are less well understood in bipolar disorder (BD). We investigated relationships between current irritability and current/prior anxiety as well as other current emotions and BD illness characteristics. METHODS: Outpatients referred to the Stanford Bipolar Disorders Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. Prevalence and clinical correlates of current irritability and current/prior anxiety and other illness characteristics were examined. RESULTS: Among 497 BD outpatients (239 Type I, 258 Type II; 58.1% female; mean ± SD age 35.6 ± 13.1 years), 301 (60.6%) had baseline current irritability. Patients with versus without current irritability had significantly higher rates of current anxiety (77.1% versus 42.9%, p < 0.0001) and history of anxiety disorder (73.1% versus 52.6%, p < 0.0001). Current irritability was more robustly related to current anxiety than to current anhedonia, sadness, or euphoria (all p < 0.001), and current irritability-current anxiety associations persisted across current predominant mood states. Current irritability was more robustly related to past anxiety than to all other assessed illness characteristics, including 1° family history of mood disorder, history of alcohol/substance use disorder, bipolar subtype, and current syndromal/subsyndromal depression (all p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: Limited generalizability beyond our predominately white, female, educated, insured American BD specialty clinic sample. CONCLUSIONS: In BD, current irritability was robustly related to current/prior anxiety. Further studies are warranted to assess longitudinal clinical implications of relationships between irritability and anxiety in BD.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Irritable Mood , Adult , Anxiety/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/complications , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Outpatients , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
16.
J Psychiatr Res ; 76: 128-35, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26926801

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although bipolar disorder (BD) is a common recurrent condition with highly heterogeneous illness course, data are limited regarding clinical implications of interactions between gender and onset age. We assessed relationships between onset age and demographic/illness characteristics among BD patients stratified by gender. METHODS: Demographic and unfavorable illness characteristics, descriptive traits, and clinical correlates were compared in 502 patients from Stanford University BD Clinic patients enrolled in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD between 2000 and 2011, stratified by gender, across pre-, peri-, and post-pubertal (<12, 13-16, and >17 years, respectively) onset-age subgroups. RESULTS: Among 502 BD patients, 58.2% were female, of whom 21.9% had pre-pubertal, 30.7% peri-pubertal, and 47.4% post-pubertal onset. Between genders, although demographics, descriptive characteristics, and most clinical correlates were statistically similar, there were distinctive onset-age related patterns of unfavorable illness characteristics. Among females, rates of 6/8 primary unfavorable illness characteristics were significantly higher in pre-pubertal and peri-pubertal compared to post-pubertal onset patients. However, among males, rates of only 3/8 unfavorable illness characteristics were significantly higher in only pre-pubertal versus post-pubertal onset patients, and none between peri-pubertal versus post-pubertal onset patients. LIMITATIONS: Caucasian, insured, suburban, American specialty clinic-referred sample limits generalizability, onset age based on retrospective recall. DISCUSSION: We describe different phenotypic presentations across age at illness onset groups according to gender. Among females and males, peri-pubertal and post-pubertal onset age groups were more different and more similar, respectively. Further investigation is warranted to assess implications of gender-by-onset-age interactions to more accurately delineate distinctive BD phenotypes.


Subject(s)
Age of Onset , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/physiopathology , Sex Characteristics , Adult , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Phenotype , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Residence Characteristics , Retrospective Studies
17.
J Psychiatr Res ; 76: 94-100, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26921874

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Suicide attempts are common in patients with bipolar disorder (BD), and consistently associated with female gender and certain unfavorable BD illness characteristics. Findings vary, however, regarding effects of BD illness subtype and yet other illness characteristics upon prior suicide attempt rates. We explored the effects of demographics and BD illness characteristics upon prior suicide attempt rates in patients stratified by BD illness subtype (i.e., with bipolar I disorder (BDI) versus bipolar II disorder (BDII)). METHODS: Outpatients referred to the Stanford BD Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD Affective Disorders Evaluation. Rates of prior suicide attempt were compared in patients with and without diverse demographic and BD illness characteristics stratified by BD subtype. RESULTS: Among 494 BD outpatients (mean ± SD age 35.6 ± 13.1 years; 58.3% female; 48.6% BDI, 51.4% BDII), overall prior suicide attempt rates in were similar in BDI versus BDII patients, but approximately twice as high in BDI (but not BDII) patients with compared to without lifetime eating disorder, and in BDII (but not BDI) patients with compared to without childhood BD onset. In contrast, current threshold-level suicidal ideation and lifetime alcohol use disorder robustly but less asymmetrically increased prior suicide attempt risk across BD subtypes. LIMITATIONS: American tertiary bipolar disorder clinic referral sample, cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to assess the extent to which varying clinical characteristics of samples of patients with BDI and BDII could yield varying prior suicide attempt rates in patients with BDI versus BDII.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Retrospective Studies , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data
18.
J Psychiatr Res ; 76: 52-8, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874463

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) use, demographics, and clinical correlates in patients with bipolar I disorder (BDI) versus bipolar II disorder (BDII). METHODS: Stanford Bipolar Disorder (BD) Clinic outpatients enrolled during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD (STEP-BD) Affective Disorders Evaluation. Current SGA use, demographics, and clinical correlates were assessed for BDI versus BDII. RESULTS: Among 503 BD outpatients, in BDI versus BDII, SGA use was more than twice as common (44.0% versus 21.2%), and doses were approximately twice as high. BDI patients taking (N = 107) versus not taking (N = 136) SGAs less often had current full time employment and college degree; and more often had lifetime psychiatric hospitalization, current depression, and current complex pharmacotherapy, and had a higher mean current Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Version Overall Severity score, and these persisted significantly after covarying for employment and education. Prior psychiatric hospitalization was the most robust correlate of SGA use in BDI patients. In contrast, these demographic and clinical correlates of SGA use were not statistically significant among patients with BDII, although BDII (but not BDI) patients taking (N = 55) versus not taking (N = 205) SGAs were more likely to have current mood stabilizer use (67.3% versus 51.7%). LIMITATIONS: American tertiary bipolar disorder clinic referral sample, cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Current SGA use was robustly associated with prior psychiatric hospitalization in BDI and to a more limited extent with current mood stabilizer use in BDII. SGA use associations with other unfavorable illness characteristics in BDI were less robust.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder , Demography , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Educational Status , Employment , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Young Adult
19.
J Affect Disord ; 188: 257-62, 2015 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26378735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prevalence and relative severity of bipolar II disorder (BDII) vs. bipolar I disorder (BDI) are controversial. METHODS: Prevalence, demographics, and illness characteristics were compared among 260 BDII and 243 BDI outpatients referred to the Stanford University BD Clinic and assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder Affective Disorders Evaluation. RESULTS: BDII vs. BDI outpatients had statistically similar prevalence (51.7% vs. 48.3%), and in multiple ways had more severe illness, having significantly more often: lifetime comorbid anxiety (70.8% vs. 58.4%) and personality (15.4% vs. 7.4%) disorders, first-degree relative with mood disorder (62.3% vs. 52.3%), at least 10 prior mood episodes (80.0% vs. 50.9%), current syndromal/subsyndromal depression (52.3% vs. 38.4%), current antidepressant use (47.3% vs. 31.3%), prior year rapid cycling (33.6% vs. 13.4%), childhood onset (26.2% vs. 16.0%), as well as earlier onset age (17.0±8.6 vs. 18.9±8.1 years), longer illness duration (19.0±13.0 vs. 16.1±13.0), and higher current Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder-Overall Severity (4.1±1.4 vs. 3.7±1.5). However, BDII vs. BDI patients significantly less often had prior psychosis (14.2% vs. 64.2%), psychiatric hospitalization (10.0% vs. 67.9%), and current prescription psychotropic use, (81.5% vs. 93.0%), and had a statistically similar rate of prior suicide attempt (29.5% vs. 32.1%). LIMITATIONS: American tertiary bipolar disorder clinic referral sample, cross-sectional design. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are warranted to determine the extent to which BDII, compared to BDI, can be more severe in multiple ways but less severe in a few other ways, and contributors to occurrence of more severe forms of BDII.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Adult , Age of Onset , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Personality Disorders/psychology , Prescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
J Affect Disord ; 179: 114-20, 2015 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25863906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The strengths and limitations of considering childhood-and adolescent-onset bipolar disorder (BD) separately versus together remain to be established. We assessed this issue. METHODS: BD patients referred to the Stanford Bipolar Disorder Clinic during 2000-2011 were assessed with the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for BD Affective Disorders Evaluation. Patients with childhood- and adolescent-onset were compared to those with adult-onset for 7 unfavorable bipolar illness characteristics with replicated associations with early-onset patients. RESULTS: Among 502 BD outpatients, those with childhood- (<13 years, N=110) and adolescent- (13-18 years, N=218) onset had significantly higher rates for 4/7 unfavorable illness characteristics, including lifetime comorbid anxiety disorder, at least ten lifetime mood episodes, lifetime alcohol use disorder, and prior suicide attempt, than those with adult-onset (>18 years, N=174). Childhood- but not adolescent-onset BD patients also had significantly higher rates of first-degree relative with mood disorder, lifetime substance use disorder, and rapid cycling in the prior year. Patients with pooled childhood/adolescent - compared to adult-onset had significantly higher rates for 5/7 of these unfavorable illness characteristics, while patients with childhood- compared to adolescent-onset had significantly higher rates for 4/7 of these unfavorable illness characteristics. LIMITATIONS: Caucasian, insured, suburban, low substance abuse, American specialty clinic-referred sample limits generalizability. Onset age is based on retrospective recall. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood- compared to adolescent-onset BD was more robustly related to unfavorable bipolar illness characteristics, so pooling these groups attenuated such relationships. Further study is warranted to determine the extent to which adolescent-onset BD represents an intermediate phenotype between childhood- and adult-onset BD.


Subject(s)
Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age of Onset , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , California/epidemiology , Child , Comorbidity , Family Health , Female , Humans , Male , Mood Disorders/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL