Use of safety syringes for administration of local anaesthesia among a sample of UK primary care dental professionals.

Background: Safer sharps devices (SSDs) are commercially available and their use is mandated through UK legislation. Aim: To identify the current usage of SSDs in UK primary care dentistry. Method: A cross-sectional survey was administered to delegates at the 2017 British Dental Association (BDA) Conference and Exhibition in Manchester, and at the 2017 BDA Scottish Conference and Exhibition in Glasgow. The survey covered a range of questions relating to sharps injuries and use of traditional and safety syringes for delivery of local anaesthesia. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 22 (IBM Corp., 2013) and included chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Results: Seven hundred and ninety-six delegates participated, of whom 396 (49.7%) were using safety syringes for delivery of local anaesthesia. Of the 166 participants who had experienced a sharps injury in the past year, 76 (45.8%) worked in facilities that most commonly used SSDs for delivery of local anaesthesia. Conclusion: Our results indicate that a significant number of dental practices in our sample have not adopted SSDs and suggest sharps injuries are still being sustained in some practices using SSDs. Further epidemiological research is required to provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of SSDs and reasons why SSDs have not been fully adopted in UK primary dental care.

Blood borne virus testing of 2250 patients in an unusual, repeated dental patient notification exercise: challenges faced and lessons learnt.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to ascertain the risk created for patients of two dental practices where infection control was found to be inadequate, and if the risk was deemed to be significant, initiate an investigation involving notification and blood borne virus (BBV) testing to establish if any patient-to-patient BBV transmissions had occurred as a result of these infection control breaches. STUDY DESIGN: A case study. METHODS: A public health investigation and patient notification. Investigations involved practice inspections, staff interviews and examination of invoices. The practices were not fully cooperative during the investigation and provided misleading information regarding the allegations. This led to two patient notification exercises, as more serious breaches were uncovered following the first notification exercise. Risk assessments of BBV transmission likelihood were undertaken and informed the nature of the advice given to patients. RESULTS: The health board wrote to 5100 patients informing them of the situation. BBV testing was offered in the second notification exercise and 2250 patients opted to be tested for HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C. There were no new cases of HIV or hepatitis B but less than five patients were found to be positive for hepatitis C. None of these cases were proven to have contracted their infection as a result of the dental infection control lapses. CONCLUSIONS: This incident was unusual in that the practice was found to be repeatedly and knowingly putting patients at risk, and attempts were made to cover up breaches during the investigation. In future, health boards would benefit from a risk assessment tool to aid decision making regarding notification exercises, and whether testing is indicated where risk to patients is low. This would help ensure that notification exercises do more good than harm.

No longer 'written off' - times have changed for the BBV-infected dental professional.

There is a recognised potential risk of transmission of blood-borne viruses (BBVs) from infected healthcare workers to patients during exposure prone procedures (EPPs). The restrictions placed on performance of EPPs by infected clinicians in the UK have had a particularly significant impact on dentists because of the exposure-prone nature of most dental procedures and the difficulties in identifying alternative career pathways in the profession that do not involve EPPs. More recently, the significant positive impact of antiviral drugs on viral load, together with a re-categorisation of EPPs in dentistry have resulted in evolution of the guidance with a consequent significant improvement to the career prospects of dentists infected with BBVs. This paper provides an update for practitioners on the progress that has been made and outlines the current position with respect to practice restrictions.

The development of research in nursing in the United Kingdom.

The last 30 years have seen considerable development in research in nursing. Nursing is building a repository of research-based knowledge. Formal structures around which research can be developed and organized are being established. Research findings are still not being implemented in practice, but strategies to address this issue are being developed. Nurses are being educated to utilize research findings in practice. The Report of the Task-force on the Strategy for Research in Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting was published in May 1993 (DoH, 1993). It advocates that research in nursing should be fully integrated in health-services research and outlines future strategy in four key areas: priorities, education, practice and careers.