Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
4.
Nihon Rinsho ; 74(8): 1280-1284, 2016 08.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30562429

ABSTRACT

Endoscpy is an essential tool in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) including reflux esophagitis. The Los Angeles (LA) classification was introduced in 1994 to provide endoscopists with a grading system(A-D) to describe and classify the appearance of erosive changes and mucosal breaks in the distal esophagus. Recent imaging techniques such as mucosal staining, magnification, and high-definition(high-resolution) endoscopy and electronic chromoendoscopy have improved the ability to visualize the superficial mucosa of the esophagus. Double-contrast esophagogram have sensitivity approaching 90 % for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis because of the ability to detect superficial ulcers or other findings that cannot be visualized on single-contrast studies.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy , Esophagitis, Peptic , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Esophagitis, Peptic/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans
7.
Intern Med ; 50(7): 667-71, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21467696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Gastroptosis is recognized by its characteristic appearance on barium studies. The present prospective study assessed the relationship between gastroptosis and dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: Japanese subjects underwent health screening, and gastroptosis was diagnosed by barium studies. Consecutive subjects (500 women and 167 men) with gastroptosis were identified and the same number of age-matched subjects without gastroptosis were selected as controls. Dyspepsia was classified as reflux-like (heartburn and belching), dysmotility-like (bloating and fullness), or ulcer-like dyspepsia (epigastralgia) based on the Rome II criteria. RESULTS: Body mass index was significantly lower in women with gastroptosis than in controls [19.7 ± 1.83 (SD) vs. 23.4 ± 3.70, p<0.0001], and also in men (19.7 ± 2.00 vs. 23.9 ± 2.89, p<0.0001). The incidence of dyspepsia was significantly lower in women with gastroptosis than in controls (56/500 vs. 87/500, p<0.01) and also in men (10/167 vs. 25/167, p<0.05), especially in women with ulcer-like dyspepsia (15/500 vs. 32/500, p<0.05) and in men with reflux-like dyspepsia (2/167 vs. 12/167, p<0.05). By logistic regression analysis, gastroptosis was associated with a lower risk of dyspepsia (odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.405-0.941, p=0.025) and ulcer-like dyspepsia (odds ratio: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.177-0.726, p=0.004) in women. CONCLUSION: Dyspeptic symptoms were significantly less common in subjects with gastroptosis. Accordingly, gastroptosis may protect against dyspeptic symptoms, rather than causing functional dyspepsia.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia/epidemiology , Dyspepsia/etiology , Stomach/abnormalities , Adult , Barium Sulfate , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Dyspepsia/ethnology , Female , Gastrointestinal Motility/physiology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Radiography , Risk Factors , Stomach/diagnostic imaging
8.
Dig Dis Sci ; 52(9): 2211-20, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17415637

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal motility may be impaired after endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric lesions. We investigated whether oral erythromycin could improve motility. Twenty patients were divided randomly into groups that received oral omeprazole with or without erythromycin. Motility was recorded overnight at 3 days before and 4 days after endoscopic resection using a microtransducer probe. In the group without erythromycin, gastric phase III activity decreased significantly after endoscopic resection, while it was increased significantly by erythromycin (P < 0.01). After resection, there were significantly more gastric phase III events in the erythromycin group (P < 0.05). The interval between the start of the evening meal and the initial gastric phase III activity was significantly prolonged after resection, while this interval was significantly shortened by erythromycin (P < 0.05). The gastric phase III cycle length was also significantly shortened by erythromycin (P < 0.05). Postprandial and fasting gastrointestinal motility were impaired after endoscopic resection, and postprandial as well as fasting motility were improved by oral erythromycin.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Erythromycin/administration & dosage , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastrointestinal Agents/administration & dosage , Gastrointestinal Motility/drug effects , Stomach/physiopathology , Adenoma/physiopathology , Adenoma/surgery , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Fasting/physiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Postoperative Period , Stomach/drug effects , Stomach/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/physiopathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
9.
Dig Dis Sci ; 52(7): 1673-7, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17385034

ABSTRACT

It has been reported that proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H2 receptor antagonists in patients with functional dyspepsia. Dyspeptic symptoms that respond to proton pump inhibitors are classified as acid-related dyspepsia. A new questionnaire for assessing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD, covers the 12 most common symptoms of GERD patients. A quantitative assessment of the changes of reflux symptoms and acid-related dyspepsia was made in GERD patients receiving proton pump inhibitor therapy. Sixty-eight GERD patients receiving proton pump inhibitor therapy completed the questionnaire before and after treatment for 8 weeks. There is a significant positive correlation between reflux symptoms and acid-related dyspepsia before and after therapy (r = 0.569 and r = 0.569; both P's < 0.001) and acid-related dyspepsia in patients with both nonerosive and erosive GERD. We conclude that GERD patients suffer not only from reflux symptoms, but also from acid-related dyspepsia, and proton pump inhibitors improve both types of symptoms.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Proton-Translocating ATPases/antagonists & inhibitors , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Dyspepsia/diagnosis , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Humans , Lansoprazole , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Rabeprazole , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 20(4): 643-7, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15836717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An early and accurate evaluation by a general practitioner is needed to screen out non-gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. A recent questionnaire (QUEST) highlighted problems with specificity and complexity, so the aim of the present study was to design a simplified questionnaire. METHODS: When admitted to hospital to undergo an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for suspected GERD, 333 patients completed a 50-item questionnaire requiring 'yes/no' answers to different combinations of questions relating to symptoms of upper gastrointestinal tract conditions (e.g. GERD, ulcers and functional dyspepsia) and psychosomatic symptoms. The endoscopic diagnosis was then correlated with the rate of positive answers to each question. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the 50 items, the 8-10 questions most often answered affirmatively by each of the GERD and non-GERD groups were chosen for the simplified questionnaire. Three draft questionnaires were compiled. After calculating the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in relation to the diagnosis of GERD and other conditions, it was found that questionnaire B (selection of persons answering 'yes' to at least one of questions 1-5 and exclusion of persons answering 'yes' to at least three of questions 7-10) had a high sensitivity, high specificity and low false positive rate. CONCLUSION: A novel questionnaire was developed. It was designed to detect the symptoms of GERD while simultaneously excluding non-GERD patients. This simplified nine-item simplified questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79.8%, a specificity of 53.6% and an accuracy of 63.4%.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Chi-Square Distribution , Diagnosis, Differential , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
J Gastroenterol ; 39(9): 888-91, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15565409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to produce a simplified questionnaire for evaluation of the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A total of 124 patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of GERD completed a 50-part questionnaire, requiring only "yes" or "no" answers, that covered various symptoms related to the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as psychosomatic symptoms. The 12 questions to which patients most often answered "yes" were selected, and were assigned scores (never = 0; occasionally = 1; sometimes = 2; often = 3; and always = 4) to produce a frequency scale for symptoms of GERD (FSSG). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the FSSG questionnaire were evaluated in another group of patients with GERD and non-GERD. The usefulness of this questionnaire was evaluated in 26 other GERD patients who were treated with proton pump inhibitors for 8 weeks. RESULTS: When the cutoff score was set at 8 points, the FSSG showed a sensitivity of 62%, a specificity of 59%, and an accuracy of 60%, whereas a cutoff score of 10 points altered these values to 55%, 69%, and 63%. The score obtained using the questionnaire correlated well with the extent of endoscopic improvement in patients with mild or severe GERD. CONCLUSIONS: This new questionnaire is useful for the objective evaluation of symptoms in GERD patients.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL