Simple fundoplication versus additional vagotomy and pyloroplasty in neurologically impaired children--a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a significant problem in children with neurological impairment (NI) with high failure rates for fundoplication. Fundoplication with vagotomy and pyloroplasty (FVP) can improve the outcome by altering the sensory or motor dysfunction associated with the reflux. We report our comparative outcomes for simple fundoplication (SF) and FVP in NI children. METHODS: Case records of all patients having fundoplication under a single consultant at a tertiary UK paediatric surgical centre between January 1997 and December 2012 were retrospectively assessed for recurrent symptoms and redo surgery. The data were collected using a Microsoft Excel database and analysed on Graphpad prism software program. Data are median (range). P value<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Data were available for 244 out of 275 patients who underwent fundoplication during this period (157 SF and 87 FVP). Neurological disease or known syndromes were recorded in 158 patients. Thirty-five children had congenital anatomical abnormalities. Laparoscopic fundoplication was done in 37 cases. Revisional surgery for recurrent symptoms was performed in 22 patients. In the neurologically normal children, all of whom had SF, the revision rate was 6.5%. In the NI children the revision rates were 18.5% for SF and 3.9% for FVP, respectively (Fisher's exact, P<0.05). The median time to redo surgery was 10 (1-63) months, and the median time to follow up was 19.5 (2-177) months. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a significantly lower need for redo surgery following FVP than SF in children with NI.

Neonatal testicular torsion: a survey of current practice amongst paediatric surgeons and urologists in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

PURPOSE: Management of neonatal testicular torsion (NTT) is controversial, with varied opinion regarding the merit(s) and role of "emergent" testicular exploration and/or contralateral orchidopexy of the healthy testis. METHODS: A survey of consultant paediatric surgeons and urologists working in the United Kingdom and Ireland was conducted to ascertain views to guide best practice. RESULTS: A total of 148 questionnaires were mailed, of which 110 were returned (74% response rate). Of these, 60 (54.5%) surgeons considered NTT secondary to torsion of the spermatic cord and 8 (7.2%) thought primary vascular infarction of the testis responsible. Twelve (10.9%) use Doppler ultrasound to guide management and exclude tumour. Eighty-two surgeons (74.5%) explore the scrotum, and 59 (71.9%) perform ipsilateral orchidectomy and contralateral orchidopexy of the "healthy" testis. Few surgeons undertake emergent exploration. Only 11 (10%) surgeons have ever found a viable testis. Seven (6.4%) cases of synchronous NTT were reported. Twenty-four (21.8%) surgeons do not perform contralateral orchidopexy with concerns of damaging a healthy testis. Orchidopexy is favoured by 89 surgeons, with 46 (52%) using nonabsorbable suture fixation and 28 (31.4%) creating a sutureless extradartos pouch. In boys later found to have a "solitary scrotal testis" and a contralateral testicular remnant, 38 (36.5%) of 104 would always "pex" the testis to avert anorchia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons' opinions with NTT in the United Kingdom and Ireland remain diverse. Strong argument can be made for scrotal exploration with/without contralateral orchidopexy. Parents should be counselled on the merits of varied strategies to gain better understanding of the long-term outcomes for their male child.