Pathological Complete Response to Liver Metastasis With Pembrolizumab in a Previously Treated Patient With Microsatellite Instability-high Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in treating microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Pathological complete response to immune checkpoint inhibitors for MSI-H metastatic CRC have been described in several reports. Liver metastasis is known to predict resistance to ani-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy in several cancers, including CRC. CASE REPORT: Herein, we report the case of a 23-year-old man with MSI-H colorectal liver metastasis who exhibited a pathological complete response to pembrolizumab following systemic chemotherapies. Pathological examination of the primary lesion revealed strong HLA-class I and HLA-DR expression in cancer cells. Elevated PD-L1 expression was observed in areas of increased CD8-postive T cell infiltration. Additional pathological study of regional lymph nodes showed increased PD-L1 and CD169 expression. CONCLUSION: A detailed pathological examination revealed PD-L1 expression not only in the primary CRC lesion but also in regional lymph nodes. Recent studies have highlighted the significance of regional lymph nodes in anti-cancer immune responses. Therefore, pathological studies using resected lymph nodes might be beneficial for predicting the response of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Dysphagia in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Background/Objectives: Recently, pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP), nivolumab plus FP, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab have become the first-line treatments for patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, the treatment efficacy in primary tumors has not been reported. We assessed the outcomes of these treatments in advanced esophageal cancer, specifically focusing on esophageal dysphagia improvements and the primary tumor response. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between October 2021 and November 2023. We investigated 23 patients with esophageal cancer and dysphagia who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus FP or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-12.5), and the median overall survival was not reached (95%CI: 13.0-NA). Improvement in dysphagia was observed in 19/23 (82.6%) patients, with a median time to improvement of 26 days (range: 15-77 days) and a median dysphagia PFS of 12.6 months (range: 8.1-NA months). Ten patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs): seven had interstitial pneumonia, and three had thyroid dysfunction, pituitary dysfunction, and rash, respectively. Conclusions: Although there was a high frequency of irAEs, ICI for esophageal cancer achieved high response rates and prolonged survival. The observed improvement in dysphagia suggests the potential efficacy of the treatment against primary tumors.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid, FOLFIRINOX, and S-1 as second-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel.

This study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy. We conducted an integrated analysis of two retrospective studies included 318 patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (NFF) (n = 102), S-1 (n = 57), or FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) as second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the NFF group was 9.08 months, significantly better than S-1 (4.90 months, P = 0.002). FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 4.77 months, not statistically different from NFF. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated NFF was generally superior, however, a statistical interaction was observed between the treatment regimen in serum Alb < 3.5 g/dL (P = 0.042) and serum CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.93 months for NFF, significantly better than S-1 (2.53 months, P = 0.024), while FOLFIRINOX had a comparable PFS (3.04 months, P = 0.948). Multivariate analysis identified the serum CRP, serum CA19-9, duration of first-line GnP therapy, and use (yes/no) of S-1 for second-line treatment as independent predictors for OS. This study concludes that second-line NFF therapy demonstrated a more favorable OS compared to S-1 therapy, however, it is still important to consider the patient background characteristics while selecting the most appropriate treatment.

Cardiovascular safety of pimitespib in patients with advanced solid tumors: An open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Pimitespib (TAS-116), a first-in-class, oral, selective heat-shock protein 90 inhibitor, is approved as fourth-line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Japan. This phase 1 study evaluated the cardiac safety of pimitespib. METHODS: In this open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter study, Japanese patients (aged ≥20 years) with refractory, advanced solid tumors received placebo on day -1, then pimitespib 160 mg daily on days 1-5 of the cardiac safety evaluation period. Electrocardiograms were conducted at baseline, and on days -2, -1, 1, and 5; and blood samples were collected on days 1 and 5. Patients then received once-daily pimitespib for 5 days every 3 weeks. The primary end point was the time-matched difference in QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia correction (QTcF) between pimitespib and placebo. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy were also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients in the cardiac safety-evaluable population, no clinically relevant QTc prolongation was observed; the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the time-matched difference in change from baseline in QTcF was <20 msec at all time points on days 1 and 5. Pimitespib pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with previous data, and the time-matched difference in change from baseline in QTcF showed no marked increase as plasma concentrations increased. The safety profile was acceptable; 40% of patients experienced grade 3 or greater adverse drug reactions, mostly diarrhea (20%). The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with refractory, advanced solid tumors, pimitespib was not associated with clinically relevant QTc prolongation, and there were no cardiovascular safety concerns. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Pimitespib is a new anticancer drug that is being used to treat cancer in the stomach or intestines (gastrointestinal stromal tumors). This study demonstrated that pimitespib had no marked effect on heart rhythm or negative effects on the heart or blood vessels and had promising anticancer effects in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors who were unable to tolerate or benefit from standard treatment.

Optimizing Organ-Preservation Strategies Through Chemotherapy-Based Selection in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results From the CROC Multi-Institutional Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the viability of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an organ-preservation strategy for remarkable responders who were downstaged to stage IA after receiving induction chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with resectable ESCC (stage IB-III, Union for International Cancer Control, International Cancer Control seventh edition) were eligible for the study. All patients received 3 cycles of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (DCF) therapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, repeated every 3 weeks). Remarkable response was defined as a reduction in the tumor to T1, metastatic lymph nodes <1 cm on the short axis, and downstaging to stage IA after 3 cycles of DCF therapy. Remarkable responders then underwent dCRT, which included 2 courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4, repeated every 4 weeks, along with 50.4 Gy of concurrent radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival in remarkable responders following DCF therapy and subsequent dCRT. Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS) and esophagectomy-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients registered, 90 were analyzed. A remarkable response to 3 courses of DCF therapy was observed in 58.4% of patients. Among these responders, 89.8% achieved a complete response after dCRT. During the median follow-up period of 33 months (range, 1-85 months), the 1-year progression-free survival was 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.2%-95.6%, primary endpoint), and the 3-year OS was 83.7%. The 3-year OS and esophagectomy-free survival rates in the analysis group were 74.1% and 45.3%, respectively. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response after 2 courses of DCF therapy was significantly associated with OS (P = .0049). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable ESCC, dCRT for remarkable responders downstaging to stage IA after induction chemotherapy with 3 courses of DCF therapy is a feasible treatment option and provides an optimizing organ-preservation strategy of chemotherapy-based selection.

A multicenter retrospective observational NAPOLEON2 study of nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (NFF) is a standard regimen after gemcitabine-based therapy for patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer. However, there are limited clinical data on its efficacy and safety in the real-world. We therefore initiated a retrospective and prospective observational study (NAPOLEON-2). The results of the retrospective part were reported herein. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 161 consecutive patients who received NFF as second-or-later-line regimen. The main endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the other endpoints were response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), dose intensity, and adverse events (AEs). The median age was 67 years (range, 38-85 years). The median OS and PFS were 8.1 and 3.4 months, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were 5% and 52%, respectively. The median relative dose intensity was 81.6% for nanoliposomal irinotecan and 82.9% for fluorouracil. Grade 3 or 4 hematological and nonhematological AEs occurred in 47 and 42 patients, respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 AEs included neutropenia (24%), anorexia (12%), and leukocytopenia (12%). Subanalysis of patients treated with second-line and third-or-later-line demonstrated no statistical significant difference in OS (7.6 months vs. 9.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.35; p = 0.68). In conclusion, NFF has acceptable efficacy and safety profile even in real-world clinical settings. The prospective study is in progress to validate these findings.

CA125 Kinetics as a Potential Biomarker for Peritoneal Metastasis Progression following Taxane-Plus-Ramucirumab Administration in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Currently, no established marker exists for predicting peritoneal metastasis progression during chemotherapy, although they are major interruptive factors in sequential chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from June 2015 to July 2019, analyzing 73 patients with AGC who underwent taxane-plus-ramucirumab (TAX/RAM) therapy and had their serum carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) concentrations measured. Of 31 patients with elevated CA125 levels above a cutoff of 35 U/mL, 25 (80.6%) had peritoneal metastasis. The CA125 concentrations before TAX/RAM treatment were associated with ascites burden. The overall survival was significantly shorter in the CA125-elevated group. CA125 kinetics, measured at a median of 28 days after chemotherapy, were associated with the ascites response (complete or partial response: -1.86%/day; stable disease: 0.28%/day; progressive disease: 2.33%/day). Progression-free survival in the CA125-increased group, defined by an increase of 0.0067%/day using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was significantly poorer among patients with peritoneal metastases. In conclusion, this study highlights that CA125 kinetics can serve as an early predictor for the progression of peritoneal metastasis during TAX/RAM treatment.

The Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Gastric Cancer with Severe Peritoneal Metastasis.

(1) Background: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy is established as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). While mFOLFOX6 is commonly used for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis, the efficacy of nivolumab combined with it remains uncertain. We evaluated the outcomes of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 for AGC with severe peritoneal metastasis in clinical practice. (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted between December 2021 and June 2023. We investigated AGC patients with massive ascites or inadequate oral intake due to severe peritoneal metastasis and who received nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. (3) Results: Among 106 patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy, 21 (19.8%) had severe peritoneal metastasis, with 14 receiving nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6. The median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95%CI 1.9-10.1), and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95%CI 5.3-NA), with four patients (28.5%) surviving more than 12 months. Improved ascites and oral intake were observed in 6/14 patients (42.8%) and 10/11 patients (90.9%), respectively. The major grade 3 or more adverse events included leukopenia (28.5%) and neutropenia (21.4%), with no severe immune-related adverse events reported. (4) Conclusions: The safety and moderate efficacy of nivolumab plus mFOLFOX6 were suggested even in AGC patients with severe peritoneal metastasis.

Liver metastasis affects progression pattern during immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy in gastric cancer.

Introduction: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is heterogeneous at each metastatic site, and tumor progression pattern is associated with survival; however, it remains unclear in gastric cancer (GC). Therefore, we aimed to clarify the progression pattern in response to ICIs in patients with GC, and we analyzed its mechanism focusing on the intratumoral immune cells. Methods: Patients who received ICIs were retrospectively classified into non-systemic and systemic progression groups based on their radiological assessments. Moreover, the best percentage change in target lesions from each organ was compared. Results: Among 148 patients, the non-systemic progression group showed a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) compared with the systemic progression group (median, 5.6 months vs. 3.3 months; HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.32-0.89; p = 0.012). Poor performance status (HR, 1.73, 95%CI, 1.00-2.87) and systemic progression (HR, 3.09, 95%CI, 1.95-4.82) were associated with OS. Of all metastatic sites, the liver showed the poorest percentage change, and liver metastasis (OR, 2.99, 95%CI, 1.04-8.58) was associated with systemic progression. Hence, intratumoral CD8+ T-cell density was lower in patients with liver metastasis than in those without liver metastasis after ICIs, although the density of CD4+ T-cells (Th1, Th17, and Treg) and CD163+ cells (TAM) were not significantly different. Conclusion: The new progression pattern was associated with OS in GC. Liver metastasis may be a predictive factor of systemic progression during ICIs by regulating intratumoral CD8+ T-cells.

Extracellular Volume Fraction Calculated Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography as a Biomarker of Oxaliplatin-Induced Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome: A Preliminary Histopathological Analysis.

Background: Oxaliplatin (OX)-based chemotherapy induces sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) in the nontumorous liver parenchyma, which can increase the risk of liver resection due to colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The extracellular volume (ECV) calculated from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) has been reported to reflect the morphological change of hepatic fibrosis. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the ECV fraction as a predictive factor for OX-induced SOS. Methods: Our study included 26 patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM after OX-based chemotherapy with a preoperative dynamic CT of appropriate quality. We investigated the relationship between the pathological SOS grade and the ECV fraction. Results: Overall, 26 specimens from the patients were graded with the SOS classification of Rubbia-Brandt et al. as follows: grade 0, n = 17 (65.4%); grade 1, n = 4 (15.4%); and grade 2, n = 5 (19.2%). No specimens showed grade 3 SOS. In a univariate analysis, the ECV fraction in grade 0 SOS was significantly lower than that in grade 1 + 2 SOS (26.3 ± 3.4% vs. 30.6 ± 7.0%; P = 0.025). The cutoff value and AUC value of the ECV fraction to distinguish between grades 0 and 1 + 2 were 27.5% and 0.771, respectively. Conclusions: Measurement of the ECV fraction was found to be a potential noninvasive diagnostic method for determining early-stage histopathological sinusoidal injury induced by OX-based chemotherapy.

Factors, Including Clinical Trial Eligibility, Associated with Induction of Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Third-line chemotherapy has been suggested to improve survival in patients with gastric cancer. This study aimed to identify factors associated with the induction of third-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, focusing on patient eligibility for clinical trial. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 335 patients treated for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer between April 2009 and May 2020. The patients were grouped into those that met the key eligibility criteria for clinical trial (136 patients, 40.6%) and those that did not (199 patients, 59.4%) before receiving first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) was 16.8 months (95% CI: 14.0-19.6) and 9.3 months (95% CI: 7.8-11.0) in the eligible and ineligible group, respectively. Multivariate analyses to identify the risk factors associated with the induction of third-line chemotherapy revealed ineligibility of clinical trial (OR 1.95; 95% CI: 1.15-3.31), number of metastatic sites (OR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.23-3.22), low albumin concentration (OR 2.24; 95% CI: 1.14-4.38), and a lack of complete or partial response to first-line treatment (OR 1.85; 95% CI: 1.05-3.26). Indeed, in responders to first-line treatment for ineligible patients, the median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI: 10.6-27.9), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes were different for those eligible for clinical trials and those who were not. However, this study suggested that patients who responded to first-line treatment have more favorable prognosis when treated with salvage chemotherapy, even if they were deemed ineligible for clinical trials.

Feasibility of edoxaban for asymptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer: ExCAVE study.

BACKGROUND: Although initial therapy with a parenteral anticoagulant is required before edoxaban, this strategy is frequently avoided in actual clinical practice because of its complexity. This study assessed the feasibility of edoxaban without initial heparin usage for asymptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) at high risk of bleeding. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective feasibility study conducted at 10 Japanese institutions, patients with active GIC who developed accidental asymptomatic CAT during chemotherapy were recruited. Edoxaban was orally administered once daily without initial parenteral anticoagulant therapy within 3 days after detecting asymptomatic CAT. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) during the first 3 months of edoxaban administration. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients enrolled from October 2017 to September 2020, one was excluded because of a misdiagnosis of CAT. In the remaining 53 patients, the primary outcome occurred in six patients (11.3%). MB occurred in four patients (7.5%), including gastrointestinal bleeding in three patients and intracranial hemorrhage in one patient. CRNMB occurred in two patients (3.8%), including bleeding from the stoma site and genital bleeding in one patient each. There were no deaths attributable to bleeding, and all patients who experienced MB or CRNMB recovered. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of bleeding after edoxaban without heparin pretreatment was acceptable, demonstrating new treatment options for asymptomatic CAT in patients with GIC.

Efficacy and Safety of FOLFOX in Advanced Gastric Cancer Initially Presenting With Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) rarely presents with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) at the time of diagnosis. Chemotherapy should be selected in consideration of hematological toxicities because these patients are at high risk of hemorrhagic complications. The leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen is an effective and less toxic regimen for patients with AGC and poor performance status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study assessed overall survival of all patients receiving first-line chemotherapy with and without DIC using Kaplan-Meier methods and examined the clinicopathological factors, DIC parameters, response, and survival of five patients with AGC and DIC who received FOLFOX in the first-line setting between February 2017 and February 2020. RESULTS: Among the patients, four patients (80%) recovered from DIC after a median of 12 days of FOLFOX therapy (range=12-25), and their platelet count gradually increased within 1 week after the start of chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 46 (range=22-296) and 115 days (range=83-324), respectively. No patients experienced adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation, including gastrointestinal bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, all patients received second-line treatment after progression, and one patient exhibited improvement of DIC symptoms following nab-paclitaxel and ramucirumab treatment. CONCLUSION: FOLFOX therapy is well tolerated and effective in patients with AGC initially presenting with DIC and subsequent second-line treatment might be crucial for better prognosis.

Rare resected eight cases of duodenal adenocarcinomas.

INTRODUCTION: Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy; recently, it has been found to be accompanied by operative indications. METHODS: Nine consecutive rare cases were diagnosed with duodenal carcinoma (DC), in which clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively examined. Age was ranged over middle-aged males and females. No clinical onset with severe symptoms was observed, and the specific treatment for accompanied diseases or habits was not found. OUTCOMES: One case of two T1 stage DCs that underwent pancreas-sparing duodenectomy. Stage II DC was diagnosed in three cases, and stage III DC was diagnosed in four cases. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) mainly occurred in seven patients, and duodenectomy was limited in two patients. All operations were safely performed, and the postoperative course showed no severe morbidity. Histological findings showed R0 resection in eight cases and R1 at the retroperitoneal dissecting part in one case. Five patients with advanced-stage DC underwent adjuvant chemotherapy; however, four patients showed tumor recurrence within 12 months. With additional strong chemotherapy, eight patients survived up to 84 months, and one died of liver metastasis at 43 months after surgery. Three representative cases of mucosal invasion with widespread pancreas-sparing duodenectomy and advanced-stage DC cases undergoing duodenectomy or PD are shown. CONCLUSION: In the field of upper digestive tract surgery, duodenal adenocarcinoma and various applications of surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy for long-term survival are important.

A management of neutropenia using granulocyte colony stimulating factor support for chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: An exploratory study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of granulocyte colony stimulating factor support for chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, (2) a schedule to receive three courses of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 days 1-5, every 3 weeks), (3) stage IB-III, (4) 20-75 years old, (5) 0-1 performance status, (6) preserved organ functions and (7) written informed consent. The endpoints were to evaluate the efficacy of granulocyte colony stimulating factor support including secondary prophylactic usage for docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy. Patients who previously had 'febrile neutropenia', or 'Grade 3 or 4 infection accompanied by grade 3 or 4 neutropenia' prophylactically received granulocyte colony stimulating factor support from day 7. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor support was given to 81.3%. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were 81.3 and 32.9%, respectively. The dose of anticancer agents was reduced in 48.4%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The relative dose intensity of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil were 92.7 ± 9.8%, 86.0 ± 15.6% and 91.8 ± 10.0%, respectively. In the secondary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor support group, the neutrophil count significantly increased between day 7 and day 13 as compared with the non-prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor support group (P < 0.05 for each day). CONCLUSIONS: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor support including secondary prophylactic usage may be feasible for maintaining the intensity of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. The aim of this randomized, multicentre phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy to determine the significance of induction chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm A) or induction chemotherapy followed by the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm B). Patients in Arm A underwent radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. Patients in Arm B received induction gemcitabine for 12 weeks, and thereafter, only patients with controlled disease underwent the same chemoradiotherapy as Arm A. After chemoradiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: Amongst 102 patients enrolled, 100 were eligible for efficacy assessment. The probability of survival was greater in Arm B in the first 12 months, but the trend was reversed in the following periods (1-year survival 66.7 vs. 69.3%, 2-year survival 36.9 vs. 18.9%). The hazard ratio was 1.255 (95% confidence interval 0.816-1.930) in favour of Arm A. Gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly more frequent and three treatment-related deaths occurred in Arm A. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the chemoradiotherapy using S-1 alone had more promising efficacy with longer-term survival, compared with induction gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000006811.

Small intestinal mucosal injury and its risk factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancer who developed complicated fluoropyrimidine-induced diarrhea.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is a common adverse event of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, limited data are available on the frequency and risk factors of complicated chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) and small intestinal mucosal damage. In this current study, we aimed to determine the incidence of complicated CID and mucosal injury among patients with complicated CID receiving fluoropyrimidine via small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) and determined baseline risk factors associated with complicated CID. METHODS: In total, 536 patients with advanced or recurrent gastrointestinal cancer who received fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Diarrhea was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Complicated CID was defined according to the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. To evaluate small intestinal mucosal injury in patients with complicated CID, CE was performed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for complicated CID. RESULTS: Total number of 32 (6%) patients developed complicated CID. Complicating symptoms were noted in 25 (78%) patients, with cramping, vomiting, and sepsis being observed in 15 (60%), 8 (32%), and 3 (12%) patients, respectively. Among the 13 patients who underwent CE, 11 (85%) showed abnormal findings. Multivariate analysis revealed that oral fluoropyrimidine administration was a risk factor for complicated CID (odds ratio 2.95; 95% confidence interval 1.06-8.19). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively low incidence of complicated CID, mucosal injury of small intestine was common in patients with complicated fluoropyrimidine-induced diarrhea and oral fluoropyrimidine was an independent risk factor.

Morphologic response to chemotherapy containing bevacizumab in patients with colorectal liver metastases: A post hoc analysis of the WJOG4407G phase III study.

The phase III West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) 4407G study showed noninferiority of folinic acid, bolus/continuous fluorouracil, and irinotecan plus bevacizumab to modified folinic acid, bolus/continuous fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin 6 plus bevacizumab in progression-free survival (PFS) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of morphologic response in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) as a post hoc analysis of the WJOG4407G study.Morphologic response was assessed by comparing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images at baseline and week 8. Three blinded radiologists evaluated CT images and classified their response as optimal, incomplete, or no response according to the morphologic criteria. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) response, early tumor shrinkage (ETS), and depth of response (DpR) were also evaluated.Among 395 patients who were eligible for efficacy analysis in the WJOG4407G study, 70 patients had liver-limited disease. We finally evaluated 55 of these patients. Optimal morphologic response was identified in 19 of 55 patients (34.5%). The median PFS was 10.7 months for patients with optimal response and 10.1 months in those with incomplete/no response (log-rank, P = .96). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.2 and 35.5 months, respectively (log-rank, P = .062). According to univariate analysis, morphologic response was not associated with PFS or OS, whereas RECIST response was significantly associated with both PFS and OS, with ETS and DpR being associated with significantly longer PFS.Morphologic response might be neither a predictive nor a prognostic factor in patients with CLM undergoing chemotherapy containing bevacizumab, whereas RECIST response was significantly associated with both PFS and OS.

Nasogastric administration of lenvatinib solution in a mechanically ventilated patient with rapidly growing anaplastic thyroid cancer.

SUMMARY: A 54-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a cervical tumor. CT revealed a cervical tumor extending to the upper mediastinum, tracheal deviation and tumor infiltration in the cervical vessels. She was followed-up because no diagnosis of malignancy was made by cytology. However, 2 months later, a CT scan showed enlargement of the tumor and tracheal stenosis, and a surgical biopsy was performed and she was diagnosed with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). The tracheal tube with tracheal stenosis could not be removed due to the rapid growth of the tumor, necessitating management by mechanical ventilation. Due to the difficulty of surgical resection, she was treated with lenvatinib. A lenvatinib solution was made and administered via a nasogastric tube. After lenvatinib treatment, the tumor volume decreased and the tracheal stenosis improved. The tracheal tube was removed and oral intake became possible. She was discharged and received ambulatory lenvatinib therapy. The tumor was significantly reduced in size, but gradually grew and was exposed through the cervical wound 6 months later. Esophageal perforation occurred 10 months after the start of treatment. Lenvatinib was re-administered via a nasogastric tube. Eleven months later, the patient died of massive bleeding from the exposed cervical tumor. Patients with advanced ATC may require management with mechanical ventilation for airway stenosis or with a nasogastric tube for esophageal stenosis and perforation. We experienced a case in which lenvatinib was safely administered via a nasogastric tube while performing mechanical ventilation. LEARNING POINTS: An anaplastic thyroid cancer patient under mechanical ventilator management was treated with lenvatinib via a nasogastric tube. The lenvatinib solution can easily be prepared and administered via a nasogastric tube. The lenvatinib solution was effective for a patient with difficulty in oral intake. Lenvatinib could also improve the prognosis of an anaplastic thyroid cancer patient with severe airway and esophageal trouble.

Randomised phase II study of panitumumab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (WJOG 6510G).

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab has been shown to be clinically active when given in combination with irinotecan in patients with irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it has remained unclear whether panitumumab is effective when combined with irinotecan. We compared efficacies of both regimens in this randomised phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC previously treated with fluorouracil-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies were randomised (1:1) to either panitumumab plus irinotecan (panitumumab arm) or cetuximab plus irinotecan (cetuximab arm). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). The planned sample size was 120, expecting a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.0 with non-inferiority margin of 1.3 (one-sided alpha error 0.2 and power 0.7). Major secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), response rate and safety. RESULTS: From December 2011 to September 2014, 121 patients were enrolled, and 61 and 59 patients were randomised to the panitumumab and cetuximab arms, respectively (1 patient excluded). Most patients (97%) had received prior chemotherapies containing bevacizumab. The median PFS was 5.42 months in the panitumumab arm and 4.27 months in the cetuximab arm (HR = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.94, P < 0.001 for non-inferiority, P = 0.058 for superiority), and median OS was 14.85 and 11.53 months (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-1.00, P = 0.050 for superiority), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hypomagnesaemia was higher in the panitumumab arm than that in the cetuximab arm (17% vs. 7%). CONCLUSION: Panitumumab may be non-inferior to cetuximab in combination with irinotecan in survival of patients with irinotecan-refractory mCRC.