Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 240, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714940

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has various sequelae, one of which might be hypertension. We aimed to evaluate COVID-19's impact on blood pressure (BP) in non-hospitalized patients at one-year follow-up. METHOD: A total of 7,950 consecutive COVID-19 patients regularly visiting our cardiology clinic were retrospectively screened. Patients' electronic medical records including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, treatments, and outcomes, were reviewed by two physicians. Individuals with at least one BP measurement in the three months preceding COVID-19 and one measurement in 12 months or more following recovery were included. BP levels before and after COVID-19 were compared using the paired t-test. RESULTS: 5,355 confirmed COVID-19 patients (mean age 55.51 ± 15.38 years) were included. Hypertension (56.9%) and diabetes mellitus (34%) were the predominant comorbidities, and 44.3% had prior major adverse cardiovascular events. Both systolic (126.90 ± 20.91 vs. 139.99 ± 23.94 mmHg, P < 0.001) and diastolic BP (80.54 ± 13.94 vs. 86.49 ± 14.40 mmHg, P < 0.001) were significantly higher post-COVID-19 vs. pre-COVID-19. Notably, 456 (14%) hypertensive patients experienced exacerbated hypertension, while 408 (17%) patients developed new-onset hypertension, overall 864 (16%) of patients had exacerbation or new hypertension. Linear regression analysis revealed that advanced age, smoking, previous cardiovascular events, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus predict increased BP following COVID-19 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 raised systolic and diastolic BP in the long term in non-hospitalized patients, with over one-sixth developing new-onset or exacerbated hypertension. All patients should be evaluated regarding BP, following COVID-19 recovery, particularly those with the mentioned predictive factors. (clinicaltrial.gov: NCT05798208).


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , COVID-19 , Hypertension , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Aged , Adult , Risk Factors , Comorbidity , Time Factors , Follow-Up Studies , SARS-CoV-2
2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 23(1): 286, 2023 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37280530

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Besides the lungs, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can affect the cardiovascular, digestive, urinary, hepatic, and central nervous systems. Other than its short-term effects, COVID-19 may also cause long-term complications. In this study, we assessed long-term COVID-19 cardiovascular symptoms among patients in a cardiovascular clinic. METHOD: A retrospective cohort was conducted between October 2020 to May 2021 on patients at an outpatient cardiovascular clinic in Shiraz, Iran. Patients with a history of COVID-19 at least one year before their referral were included. Baseline information was extracted from the clinic's database. Data were collected regarding symptoms like dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, and palpitations after a year of COVID-19. We also noted any major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Most common symptoms after a year of COVID-19 were exertional dyspnea (51.2%), dyspnea at rest (41.6%), fatigue (39%), and chest pain (27.1%). The symptoms were more prevalent in hospitalized patients than in non-hospitalized patients. The prevalence of MACE was about 6.1% during the 12-month follow-up, with this rate being higher in those with a history of hospitalization or comorbid diseases. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cardiovascular symptoms was fairly high in patients at our clinic a year after COVID-19, and the most common symptom was dyspnea. Hospitalized patients had more MACE. (Clinicaltrial.gov number: NCT05715879)(04/02/2023).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/epidemiology , Chest Pain/etiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Dyspnea/diagnosis , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Fatigue/diagnosis , Fatigue/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
3.
Materials (Basel) ; 16(4)2023 Feb 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36837190

ABSTRACT

The present study reveals the microstructural evolution and corresponding mechanisms occurring during different stages of quenching and partitioning (Q&P) conducted on 0.6C-1.5Si steel using in-situ High Energy X-Ray Diffraction (HEXRD) and high-resolution dilatometry methods. The results support that the symmetry of ferrite is not cubic when first formed since it is fully supersaturated with carbon at the early stages of partitioning. Moreover, by increasing partitioning temperature, the dominant carbon source for austenite enrichment changes from ongoing bainitic ferrite transformation during the partitioning stage to initial martensite formed in the quenching stage. At low partitioning temperatures, a bimodal distribution of low- and high-carbon austenite, 0.6 and 1.9 wt.% carbon, is detected. At higher temperatures, a better distribution of carbon occurs, approaching full homogenization. An initial martensite content of around 11.5 wt.% after partitioning at 280 °C via bainitic ferrite transformation results in higher carbon enrichment of austenite and increased retained austenite amount by approximately 4% in comparison with partitioning at 500 °C. In comparison with austempering heat treatment with no prior martensite, the presence of initial martensite in the Q&P microstructure accelerates the subsequent low-temperature bainitic transformation.

4.
J Interv Cardiol ; 2023: 5544440, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170033

ABSTRACT

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g., clopidogrel and ticagrelor) and aspirin is recommended for at least one year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent further myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis as the major adverse effects of PCI. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2022 to March 2023. Patients who had undergone elective PCI were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two different groups. One group took ASA 80 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, while the other took ASA 80 mg once daily and ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. After six months of close follow-up, patients were asked to score their dyspnea on a 10-point Likert scale. They were also asked about dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (PND), bleeding, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Results: 223 patients were allocated to the clopidogrel group and 214 to the ticagrelor group. In the ticagrelor group, 95 patients (44.3%) reported dyspnea at rest, compared with only 44 patients (19.7%) in the clopidogrel group (P < 0.001). MACEs occurred in 7 patients (2.8%) in the ticagrelor group, compared with 16 (7.6%) in the clopidogrel group (P = 0.031). Eight patients (3.8%) reported bleeding with ticagrelor, as did seven (3.2%) with clopidogrel (P = 0.799). Conclusions: New-onset dyspnea was recorded more frequently with ticagrelor than clopidogrel, yet fewer MACEs occurred with ticagrelor (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05858918).


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Clopidogrel/adverse effects , Ticagrelor/therapeutic use , Ticagrelor/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Dyspnea/etiology , Stents , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Treatment Outcome
5.
Clin Immunol ; 230: 108826, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are the major treatment in inborn errors of immunity (IEI) disorders; However, IVIg infusions show some adverse effects. We aimed to assess the adverse reactions of IVIg infusions. METHODS: Data of IVIg infusions in IEI patients were collected from 2011 to 2021. Totally, 363 IEI patients received IVIg regularly in Iran entered the study. The adverse reactions are classified regarding their severity and chronicity. RESULTS: 22,667 IVIg infusions were performed in the study. 157 patients (43.2%) and 1349 (5.9%) infusions were associated with at least one type of adverse reaction. The highest rates of adverse reactions were seen in severe combined immunodeficiency. Myalgia, chills, headache, fever, and hypotension were the most frequent adverse effects of IVIg. CONCLUSION: The reactions affect almost half of the patients mainly in the first infusions which necessitate the close observation of IEI patients receiving IVIg.


Subject(s)
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/adverse effects , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/genetics , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Agammaglobulinemia/genetics , Agammaglobulinemia/immunology , Agammaglobulinemia/therapy , Aged , Ataxia Telangiectasia/genetics , Ataxia Telangiectasia/immunology , Ataxia Telangiectasia/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/genetics , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/immunology , Common Variable Immunodeficiency/therapy , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/immunology , Infant , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...