Regulation of SOCS3-STAT3 in urate-induced cytokine production in human myeloid cells.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperuricaemia is necessary for gout. High urate concentrations have been linked to inflammation in mononuclear cells. Here, we explore the role of the suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in urate-induced inflammation. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from gout patients, hyperuricemic and normouricemic individuals were cultured for 24h with varying concentrations of soluble urate, followed by 24h restimulation with lipopolysaccharides (LPS)±monosodium urate (MSU) crystals. Transcriptomic profiling was performed using RNA-Sequencing. DNA methylation was assessed using Illumina Infinium® MethylationEPIC BeadChip system (EPIC array). Phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) was determined by flow cytometry. Cytokine responses were also assessed in PBMCs from patients with JAK2 V617F tyrosine kinase mutation. RESULTS: PBMCs pre-treated with urate produced more interleukin-1beta (IL-1ß) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and less interleukin-1 receptor anatagonist (IL-1Ra) after LPS simulation. In vitro, urate treatment enhanced SOCS3 expression in control monocytes but no DNA methylation changes were observed at the SOCS3 gene. A dose-dependent reduction in phosphorylated STAT3 concomitant with a decrease in IL-1Ra was observed with increasing concentrations of urate. PBMCs with constitutively activated STAT3 (JAK2 V617F mutation) could not be primed by urate. CONCLUSION: In vitro, urate exposure increased SOCS3 expression, while urate priming, and subsequent stimulation resulted in decreased STAT3 phosphorylation and IL-1Ra production. There was no evidence that DNA methylation constitutes a regulatory mechanism of SOCS3. Elevated SOCS3 and reduced pSTAT3 could play a role in urate-induced hyperinflammation since urate priming had no effect in PBMCs from patients with constitutively activated STAT3.

GWAS-identified hyperuricemia-associated IGF1R variant rs6598541 has a limited role in urate mediated inflammation in human mononuclear cells.

Gout is a common autoinflammatory joint diseases characterized by deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals which trigger an innate immune response mediated by inflammatory cytokines. IGF1R is one of the loci associated with both urate levels and gout susceptibility in GWAS to date, and IGF-1-IGF-1R signaling is implicated in urate control. We investigate the role of IGF-1/IGF1R signaling in the context of gouty inflammation. Also, we test the gout and urate-associated IGF1R rs6598541 polymorphism for association with the inflammatory capacity of mononuclear cells. For this, freshly isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were exposed to recombinant IGF-1 or anti-IGF1R neutralizing antibody in the presence or absence of solubilized urate, stimulated with LPS/MSU crystals. Also, the association of rs6598541 with IGF1R and protein expression and with ex vivo cytokine production levels after stimulation with gout specific stimuli was tested. Urate exposure was not associated with IGF1R expression in vitro or in vivo. Modulation of IGF1R did not alter urate-induced inflammation. Developing urate-induced trained immunity in vitro was not influenced in cells challenged with IGF-1 recombinant protein. Moreover, the IGF1R rs6598541 SNP was not associated with cytokine production. Our results indicate that urate-induced inflammatory priming is not regulated by IGF-1/IGF1R signaling in vitro. IGF1R rs6598541 status was not asociated with IGF1R expression or cytokine production in primary human PBMCs. This study suggests that the role of IGF1R in gout is tissue-specific and may be more relevant in the control of urate levels rather than in inflammatory signaling in gout.

Hyperuricemia remodels the serum proteome toward a higher inflammatory state.

Gout is an autoinflammatory disease triggered by a complex innate immune response to MSU crystals and inflammatory triggers. While hyperuricemia is an obligatory risk factor for the development of gout, the majority of individuals with hyperuricemia never develop gout but have an increased risk of developing cardiometabolic disorders. Current management of gout aims at MSU crystal dissolution by lowering serum urate. We apply a targeted proteomic analysis, using Olink inflammation panel, to a large group of individuals with gout, asymptomatic hyperuricemia, and normouricemic controls, and we show a urate-driven inflammatory signature. We add in vivo evidence of persistent immune activation linked to urate exposure and describe immune pathways involved in the pathogenesis of gout. Our results support a pro-inflammatory effect of asymptomatic hyperuricemia and pave the way for new research into targetable mechanisms in gout and cardiometabolic complications of asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Effect modification by contextual factors of urate-lowering therapy on serum urate in people with gout: A systematic review with meta-regression analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize evidence of the effect of contextual factors (CFs) on efficacy of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) on serum urate (SU) as outcome in gout patients. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from (updated) Cochrane reviews were the starting point. RCTs were included if they explored the role of any CF on efficacy of ULT on SU in gout patients. For CFs with sufficient data (i.e. ≥3 trials), a mixed-effects meta-regression analysis was performed with trial and comparison as random effects, whereas specific CFs were modelled as fixed factors. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included. Effect modification by CFs was explored for age, sex, race, renal function, cardiovascular comorbidity, tophi, thiazide-diuretic use, and previous ULT use. Crude data stratified by renal function were available for four trials (36 randomised comparisons), and suitable for meta-analysis. Pooled estimates revealed that gout patients with a normal, mildly-, or moderately impaired renal function were consistently more likely to achieve SU target with ULT compared to control. Among RCTs comparing ULT to placebo (30 comparisons), effects of ULT on achieving SU target were not statistically different for those with normal (OR:66.87;[11.39-392.75]) compared to mildly (OR:28.54;[5.11-159.46]) and moderately (OR:21.45;[3.20-143.64]) impaired renal function, but seemed lower in those with severely impaired (OR:9.13;[0.96-86.97]) renal function. Data were insufficient to draw conclusions on effect modification by other CFs. CONCLUSION: Few RCTs report stratified analyses exploring the role of CFs. ULT seemed effective in reaching the SU target in all levels of renal function, though severely impaired renal function appeared to render a slight disadvantage.