ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression significance, predictive value, immunologic function, and biological role of transmembrane protein 158 (TMEM158) in the development of pan-cancer. To achieve this, we utilized data from multiple databases, including TCGA, GTEx, GEPIA, and TIMER, to collect gene transcriptome, patient prognosis, and tumor immune data. We evaluated the association of TMEM158 with patient prognosis, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in pan-cancer samples. We performed immune checkpoint gene co-expression analysis and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to better understand the immunologic function of TMEM158. Our findings revealed that TMEM158 was significantly differentially expressed between most types of cancer tissues and their adjacent normal tissues and was associated with prognosis. Moreover, TMEM158 was significantly correlated with TMB, MSI, and tumor immune cell infiltration in multiple cancers. Co-expression analysis of immune checkpoint genes showed that TMEM158 was related to the expression of several common immune checkpoint genes, especially CTLA4 and LAG3. Gene enrichment analysis further revealed that TMEM158 was involved in multiple immune-related biological pathways in pan-cancer. Overall, this systematic pan-cancer analysis suggests that TMEM158 is generally highly expressed in various cancer tissues and is closely related to patient prognosis and survival across multiple cancer types. TMEM158 may serve as a significant predictor of cancer prognosis and modulate immune responses to various types of cancer.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Biomarkers , Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Tumor Suppressor ProteinsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Migraine is the most common primary headache among children and adolescents. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs in the prevention of pediatric migraine. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for eligible published RCTs from January 1970 to June 2020. Migraine frequency and ≥50% response rate were measured as the efficacy outcomes. We used "Risk of Bias" tool for quality assessment and RevMan5.3 software for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Four articles containing 7 RCTs with 794 participants compared the efficacy of AEDs with placebo. Four RCTs assessed topiramate vs. placebo and 3 RCTs evaluated divalproex sodium extended-release (DVPX ER) vs. placebo. The results demonstrated that children receiving antiepileptic drugs had a significant advantage in remitting the mean monthly migraine days compared to those who received placebo, with an MD of -0.48 (n=930, 95% CI: -0.84 to -0.12, Z=2.60, P=0.009). Topiramate significantly reduced monthly migraine days (MD =-0.70, n=489, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.25, Z=3.01, P=0.003) but failed to improve the ≥50% response rate (MD =-1.50, n=489, 95% CI: 0.70 to 3.22, Z=1.05, P=0.30). DVPX ER did not significantly reduce monthly headache frequency (n=441, 95% CI: -0.70 to 0.47, Z=0.38, P=0.70) or improve the ≥50% response rate (n=441, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.25, Z=0.82, P=0.41) compared with placebo. Topiramate and DVPX ER were related to higher rates of side effects and adverse reactions. DISCUSSION: Topiramate can reduce monthly headache days in children and adolescents with migraine. However, it failed to improve the ≥50% response rate. DVPX ER showed no difference from placebo in the prophylactic treatment pediatric migraine. Side effects seemed to be more frequent in topiramate and DVPX ER treated children but generally well-tolerated.
