Deciphering the prognostic and therapeutic significance of BAG1 and BAG2 for predicting distinct survival outcome and effects on liposarcoma.

Liposarcoma (LPS) is the second most common kind of soft tissue sarcoma, and a heterogeneous malignant tumor derived from adipose tissue. Up to now, the prognostic value of BAG1 or BAG2 in LPS has not been defined yet. Expression profiling data of LPS patients were collected from TCGA and GEO database. Survival curves were plotted to verify the outcome differences of patients based on BAG1 or BAG2 expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze the prognostic ability of BAG1 or BAG2. Chaperone's regulators BAG1 and BAG2 were identified as prognostic biomarkers for LPS patients, which exhibited distinct expression patterns and survival outcome prediction performances. Patients with high BAG2 expression and/or low BAG1 expression had worse prognosis. Enrichment analysis showed that BAG1 was involved in negative regulation of TGF-ß signaling. Low expression of BAG1 was associated with high abundance of regulatory T cells (Tregs). The 2-gene signature model further confirmed the improved risk assessment performance of BAG1 and BAG2: high risk patients displayed poor prognosis. BAG1 and BAG2 are supposed to be potential prognostic biomarkers for LPS and have impacts on liposarcomagenesis and immune infiltration in distinctive manners, which may function as potential therapy targets (BAG1 agonists/BAG2 inhibitors) for LPS.

Emerging biological functions of Twist1 in cell differentiation.

Twist1 is required for embryonic development and expresses after birth in mesenchymal stem cells derived from mesoderm, where it governs mesenchymal cell development. As a well-known regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition or embryonic organogenesis, Twist1 is important in a variety of developmental systems, including mesoderm formation, neurogenesis, myogenesis, cranial neural crest cell migration, and differentiation. In this review, we first highlight the physiological significance of Twist1 in cell differentiation, including osteogenic, chondrogenic, and myogenic differentiation, and then detail its probable molecular processes and signaling pathways. On this premise, we summarize the significance of Twist1 in distinct developmental disorders and diseases to provide a reference for studies on cell differentiation/development-related diseases.

Comprehensive Analysis of a Six-Gene Signature Predicting Survival and Immune Infiltration of Liposarcoma Patients and Deciphering Its Therapeutic Significance.

BACKGROUND: As a common soft tissue sarcoma, liposarcoma (LPS) is a heterogeneous malignant tumor derived from adipose tissue. Due to the high risk of metastasis and recurrence, the prognosis of LPS remains unfavorable. To improve clinical treatment, a robust risk prediction model is essential to evaluate the prognosis of LPS patients. METHODS: By comprehensive analysis of data derived from GEO datasets, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained. Univariate and Lasso Cox regressions were subsequently employed to reveal distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS)-associated DEGs and develop a prognostic gene signature, which was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival and ROC curve. GSEA and immune infiltration analyses were conducted to illuminate molecular mechanisms and immune correlations of this model in LPS progression. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was involved to decipher the therapeutic significance of this model for LPS. RESULTS: A six-gene signature was developed to predict DRFS of LPS patients and showed higher precision performance in more aggressive LPS subtypes. Then, a nomogram was further established for clinical application based on this risk model. Via GSEA, the high-risk group was significantly enriched in cell cycle-related pathways. In the LPS microenvironment, neutrophils, memory B cells and resting mast cells exhibited significant differences in cell abundance between high-risk and low-risk patients. Moreover, this model was significantly correlated with therapeutic targets. CONCLUSION: A prognostic six-gene signature was developed and significantly associated with cell cycle pathways and therapeutic target genes, which could provide new insights into risk assessment of LPS progression and therapeutic strategies for LPS patients to improve their prognosis.

Deciphering the Prognostic and Therapeutic Significance of Cell Cycle Regulator CENPF: A Potential Biomarker of Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment for Patients with Liposarcoma.

Liposarcoma (LPS) is one of the most common subtypes of sarcoma with a high recurrence rate. CENPF is a regulator of cell cycle, differential expression of which has been shown to be related with various cancers. However, the prognostic value of CENPF in LPS has not been deciphered yet. Using data from TCGA and GEO datasets, the expression difference of CENPF and its effects on the prognosis or immune infiltration of LPS patients were analyzed. As results show, CENPF was significantly upregulated in LPS compared to normal tissues. Survival curves illustrated that high CENPF expression was significantly associated with adverse prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis suggested that CENPF expression could be an independent risk factor for LPS. CENPF was closely related to chromosome segregation, microtubule binding and cell cycle. Immune infiltration analysis elucidated a negative correlation between CENPF expression and immune score. In conclusion, CENPF not only could be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker but also a potential malignant indicator of immune infiltration-related survival for LPS. The elevated expression of CENPF reveals an unfavorable prognostic outcome and worse immune score. Thus, therapeutically targeting CENPF combined with immunotherapy might be an attractive strategy for the treatment of LPS.