Modern Internet Search Analytics: Is There a Difference in What Patients are Searching Regarding the Operative and Nonoperative Management of Scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN: Observational Study. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the most searched types of questions and online resources implicated in the operative and nonoperative management of scoliosis. METHODS: Six terms related to operative and nonoperative scoliosis treatment were searched on Google's People Also Ask section on October 12, 2023. The Rothwell classification was used to sort questions into fact, policy, or value categories, and associated websites were classified by type. Fischer's exact tests compared question type and websites encountered between operative and nonoperative questions. Statistical significance was set at the .05 level. RESULTS: The most common questions concerning operative and nonoperative management were fact (53.4%) and value (35.5%) questions, respectively. The most common subcategory pertaining to operative and nonoperative questions were specific activities/restrictions (21.7%) and evaluation of treatment (33.3%), respectively. Questions on indications/management (13.2% vs 31.2%, P < .001) and evaluation of treatment (10.1% vs 33.3%, P < .001) were associated with nonoperative scoliosis management. Medical practice websites were the most common website to which questions concerning operative (31.9%) and nonoperative (51.4%) management were directed to. Operative questions were more likely to be directed to academic websites (21.7% vs 10.0%, P = .037) and less likely to be directed to medical practice websites (31.9% vs 51.4%, P = .007) than nonoperative questions. CONCLUSIONS: During scoliosis consultations, spine surgeons should emphasize the postoperative recovery process and efficacy of conservative treatment modalities for the operative and nonoperative management of scoliosis, respectively. Future research should assess the impact of website encounters on patients' decision-making.

Risk Factors for Undergoing Surgical Intervention for Vertebral Compression Fractures: An Analysis of 703,499 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort OBJECTIVES: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are typically treated nonoperatively, but can be treated with either kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty when indicated. The decision to treat patients with/without surgical intervention is dependent on the severity of deformity and patient risk profile. The aims of this study were to: 1) compare baseline patient demographics, 2) identify risk factors of patients undergoing operative versus nonoperative management, and 3) identify patient-specific risk factors associated with post-operative re-admissions. METHODS: This retrospective database study used patient information from January 1st, 2010, to October 31st, 2021. Cohorts were identified by patients diagnosed with VCFs through International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10 codes, identifying those undergoing kyphoplasty/vertebroplasty via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. The two research domains utilized in this investigation were baseline demographic profiles of patients who underwent kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for treatment of VCFs, and those who underwent nonoperative management served as the control cohort. RESULTS: Of the 703,499 patients diagnosed with VCFs, 76,126 patients (10.8%) underwent kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty within 90 days of diagnosis of a VCF. Univariate analysis demonstrated female sex was associated with increased risk of undergoing surgical management for VCF (p<0.0001). Several co-morbidities were significantly associated with increased rates of readmission including hypertension, tobacco use, coronary artery disease, and COPD (p <0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights specific comorbidities that are significantly associated with higher rates of kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty for the treatment of thoracolumbar wedge compression fractures and increased risk for 90-day post-operative hospital readmission.

Intraspinal cervicothoracic junction chondrosarcoma: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Chondrosarcoma is an uncommon spinal tumor that can present as an extraskeletal mass. Rarely, these tumors present as dumbbell tumors through the neural foramina, mimicking schwannomas or neurofibromas. OBSERVATIONS: A 46-year-old female presented with 2 years of worsening right-arm radiculopathy. Magnetic resonance imaging of the thoracic spine revealed a peripherally enhancing extramedullary mass through the right T1 foramen and compressing the spinal cord. Computed tomography showed the mass to be partially calcified. She underwent C7-T2 laminectomy and C6-T3 posterior instrumented fusion with gross-total resection of an extradural mass. Pathology revealed a grade I chondrosarcoma. Her symptoms improved postoperatively, with some residual right-arm radicular pain. LESSONS: Intraspinal extradural dumbbell conventional chondrosarcoma is rare, with only 9 cases, including ours, reported. Patient ages range from 16 to 72 years old, and male sex is more common in these cases. The most common location is the thoracic spine, and our case is the only reported one in the cervicothoracic junction. These tumors often mimic schwannomas on imaging, but chondrosarcoma should remain in the differential diagnosis, because management of these tumors differs. Chondrosarcoma may benefit from more aggressive resection, including en bloc resection, and may require adjuvant radiotherapy.

Risk Factors for Readmission Following Surgical Decompression for Spinal Epidural Abscesses: An Analysis of 4595 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to (1) compare baseline demographics of patients undergoing surgery for SEA who were/were not readmitted; (2) identify risk factors for 90-day readmissions; and (3) quantify 90-day episode-of-care health care costs. BACKGROUND: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA), while rare, occurring ~2.5-5.1/10,000 admissions, may lead to permanent neurologic deficits and mortality. Definitive treatment often involves surgical intervention via decompression. METHODS: A search of the PearlDiver database from 2010 to 2021 for patients undergoing decompression for SEA identified 4595 patients. Cohorts were identified through the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), ICD-10, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Baseline demographics of patients who were/were not readmitted within 90 days following decompression were aggregated/compared, identifying factors associated with readmission. Using Bonferroni correction, a P-value<0.001 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Readmission within 90 days of surgical decompression occurred in 36.1% (1659/4595) of patients. While age/gender were not associated with readmission rate, alcohol use disorder, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, and obesity were associated with readmission. Readmission risk factors included fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, obesity, paralysis, tobacco use, and pathologic weight loss (P<0.0001). Mean same-day total costs ($17,920 vs. $8204, P<0.001) and mean 90-day costs ($46,050 vs. $15,200, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the readmission group. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients (36.1%) are readmitted within 90 days following surgical decompression for SEA. The top 5 risk factors in descending order are fluid/electrolyte abnormalities, pathologic weight loss, tobacco use, pre-existing paralysis, and obesity. This study highlights areas for perioperative medical optimization that may reduce health care utilization.

GPT-4 as a Source of Patient Information for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative study. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare Google and GPT-4 in terms of (1) question types, (2) response readability, (3) source quality, and (4) numerical response accuracy for the top 10 most frequently asked questions (FAQs) about anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: "Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion" was searched on Google and GPT-4 on December 18, 2023. Top 10 FAQs were classified according to the Rothwell system. Source quality was evaluated using JAMA benchmark criteria and readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Differences in JAMA scores, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, and word count between platforms were analyzed using Student's t-tests. Statistical significance was set at the .05 level. RESULTS: Frequently asked questions from Google were varied, while GPT-4 focused on technical details and indications/management. GPT-4 showed a higher Flesch-Kincaid grade level (12.96 vs 9.28, P = .003), lower Flesch Reading Ease score (37.07 vs 54.85, P = .005), and higher JAMA scores for source quality (3.333 vs 1.800, P = .016). Numerically, 6 out of 10 responses varied between platforms, with GPT-4 providing broader recovery timelines for ACDF. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates GPT-4's ability to elevate patient education by providing high-quality, diverse information tailored to those with advanced literacy levels. As AI technology evolves, refining these tools for accuracy and user-friendliness remains crucial, catering to patients' varying literacy levels and information needs in spine surgery.

ChatGPT as a Source of Patient Information for Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Laminectomy: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Observational Study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the utility of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, in providing patient information for lumbar spinal fusion and lumbar laminectomy in comparison with the Google search engine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot with seemingly unlimited functionality, may present an alternative to a Google web search for patients seeking information about medical questions. With widespread misinformation and suboptimal quality of online health information, it is imperative to assess ChatGPT as a resource for this purpose. METHODS: The first 10 frequently asked questions (FAQs) related to the search terms "lumbar spinal fusion" and "lumbar laminectomy" were extracted from Google and ChatGPT. Responses to shared questions were compared regarding length and readability, using the Flesch Reading Ease score and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Numerical FAQs from Google were replicated in ChatGPT. RESULTS: Two of 10 (20%) questions for both lumbar spinal fusion and lumbar laminectomy were asked similarly between ChatGPT and Google. Compared with Google, ChatGPT's responses were lengthier (340.0 vs. 159.3 words) and of lower readability (Flesch Reading Ease score: 34.0 vs. 58.2; Flesch-Kincaid grade level: 11.6 vs. 8.8). Subjectively, we evaluated these responses to be accurate and adequately nonspecific. Each response concluded with a recommendation to discuss further with a health care provider. Over half of the numerical questions from Google produced a varying or nonnumerical response in ChatGPT. CONCLUSIONS: FAQs and responses regarding lumbar spinal fusion and lumbar laminectomy were highly variable between Google and ChatGPT. While ChatGPT may be able to produce relatively accurate responses in select questions, its role remains as a supplement or starting point to a consultation with a physician, not as a replacement, and should be taken with caution until its functionality can be validated.

Distinctive Characteristics of Thoracolumbar Junction Region Stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series and systemic literature meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar junction region stenosis produces spinal cord compression just above the conus and may manifest with symptoms that are not typical of either thoracic myelopathy or neurogenic claudication from lumbar stenosis. OBJECTIVE: As few studies describe its specific pattern of presenting symptoms and neurological deficits, this investigation was designed to improve understanding of this pathology. METHODS: A retrospective review assessed surgically treated cases of T10-L1 degenerative stenosis. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with the thoracic Japanese Orthopedic Association score. In addition, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with guidelines provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). RESULTS: Of 1069 patients undergoing laminectomy at 1477 levels, 31 patients (16M/15F) were treated at T10-L1 a mean age 64.4 (SD=11.8). Patients complained of lower extremity numbness in 29/31 (94%), urinary dysfunction 11/31 (35%), and back pain 11/31 (35%). All complained about gait difficulty and objective motor deficits were detected in 24 of 31 (77%). Weakness was most often seen in foot dorsiflexion 22/31 (71%). Deep tendon reflexes were increased in 10 (32%), decreased in 11 (35%), and normal 10 (32%); the Babinski sign was present 8/31 (26%). Mean thoracic Japanese Orthopedic Association scores improved from 6.4 (SD=1.8) to 8.4 (SD=1.8) ( P <0.00001). Gait subjectively improved in 27/31 (87%) numbness improved in 26/30 (87%); but urinary function improved in only 4/11 (45%). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracolumbar junction stenosis produces distinctive neurological findings characterized by lower extremity numbness, weakness particularly in foot dorsiflexion, urinary dysfunction, and inconsistent reflex changes, a neurological pattern stemming from epiconus level compression and the myelomeres for the L5 roots. Surgery results in significant clinical improvement, with numbness and gait improving more than urinary dysfunction. Many patients with thoracolumbar junction stenosis are initially misdiagnosed as being symptomatic from lumbar stenosis, thus delaying definitive surgery.

Intramedullary Spinal Hemorrhage in Behcet's Syndrome: A Case Report and Systematic Review.

Acute neurological manifestations in patients with Behcet's syndrome are rare yet may lead to devastating outcomes. Distinguishing primary neurological deficits from spontaneous hemorrhagic insults is of particular importance for the prognosis of patients with Behcet's syndrome. Here, we investigate the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of nontraumatic hemorrhagic injury in patients with Bechet's syndrome. Following the case presentation, a systematic review of the literature identified cases of spontaneous hemorrhage among patients with Behcet's syndrome. Variables of interest were collected from each article to characterize patient demographics, clinical manifestations, management, and reported outcomes. Additionally, a rare case of nontraumatic intramedullary spinal bleeding in a young male with Behcet's syndrome is presented. Including our case, we analyzed 12 cases of spontaneous bleeding associated with Behcet's syndrome in 12 articles. Patient age ranged from 16 to 71 (median = 36), with a male predominance (n = 11, 91.7%). Involvement of cardiothoracic structures (n = 3, 25%), pulmonary (n = 4, 33.3%), and gastrointestinal or genitourinary vasculature (n = 3, 25%) was most common, followed by extracranial (n = 2, 16.7%) and central nervous system vasculature (n = 1, 8.3%). Clinical presentation varied depending on which specific systems or anatomical structures were involved. Anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy was mentioned in three cases (27.3%). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) were noted to be elevated in six cases (54.5%). Most cases were managed surgically (n = 8, 66.7%); four cases were managed conservatively (33.3%). In our case, the patient's intramedullary bleed was allowed to dissolve without further manipulation. Of the reported outcomes, major recovery was achieved in 10 patients (83.3%), and two patients died from aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm rupture (16.7%). New-onset neurological findings in patients with Behcet's syndrome should raise suspicion for possible spontaneous hemorrhage. Our case presents the first reported instance of an abrupt onset of neurological injury secondary to intramedullary spinal cord bleed in Behcet's syndrome. A systematic review of the literature demonstrates no difference in mortality for patients managed conservatively compared to those who undergo surgical treatment.

Thecal sac ligation in the setting of thoracic spondyloptosis with complete cord transection.

Background: Traumatic spondyloptosis (TS) with complete spinal cord transection and unrepairable durotomy is particularly rare and can lead to a difficult-to-manage cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature on TS and discuss the management strategies and outcomes of TS with cord transection and significant dural tear. We also report a novel case of a 26-year-old female who presented with thoracic TS with complete spinal cord transection and unrepairable durotomy with high-flow CSF leak. Results: Of 93 articles that resulted in the search query, 13 described cases of TS with complete cord transection. The approach to dural repair was only described in 8 (n = 20) of the 13 articles. The dura was not repaired in two (20%) of the cases. Ligation of the proximal end of the dural defect was done in 15 (75%) of the cases, all at the same institution. One (5%) case report describes ligation of the distal end; one (5%) case describes the repair of the dura with duraplasty; and another (5%) case describes repair using muscle graft to partially reconstruct the defect. Conclusion: Suture ligation of the thecal sac in the setting of traumatic complete spinal cord transection with significant dural disruption has been described in the international literature and is a safe and successful technique to prevent complications associated with persisting high-flow CSF leakage. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of thecal sac ligation of the proximal end of the defect from the United States.

Is Cervical Disk Arthroplasty a Suitable Alternative to Treat Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?

STUDY DESIGN: Systemic review. OBJECTIVE: To understand the role of cervical disk arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surgical management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) most frequently involves decompression and fusion, but stiffness introduced by the fusion and adjacent segment degeneration remain problems that can result in significant morbidity. Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) is a newer procedure that has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for the management of cervical spine degenerative disk disease, but it has not been traditionally considered as a treatment option for DCM and the use for this indication has not been extensively studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using a search strategy to query all relevant articles on the use of cervical disk arthroplasty in the setting of cervical myelopathy over a 20-year period (2004-2023). This review examines the literature to assess our current understanding of the appropriateness, safety, and value of CDA in the treatment of DCM. RESULTS: A total of 844 patients received CDA across the 14 studies that met inclusion criteria, with an average of 60.3±40.4 patients per study (range: 11-152 subjects). Featured studies included 5 (35.7%) prospective studies, of which 2 were randomized. All studies had primary outcome measures of disability and/or pain scores, with the Japanese Orthopedic Association myelopathy score and neck disability index as the most commonly assessed. Four (26.7%) studies compared arthroplasty with arthrodesis. Safety of CDA for DCM was found in all studies with improvement in clinical outcome measurements. CONCLUSION: Cervical disk arthroplasty appears to be a safe and effective surgical option in the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Further study is needed to assess if arthroplasty provides clinical improvement in DCM of comparable magnitude and durability as traditional fusion strategies.

Disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion provision and outcomes for cervical stenosis.

Background: Disparities in neurosurgical care have emerged as an area of interest when considering the impact of social determinants on access to health care. Decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical stenosis (CS) may prevent progression towards debilitating complications that may severely compromise one's quality of life. This retrospective database analysis aims to elucidate demographic and socioeconomic trends in ACDF provision and outcomes of CS-related pathologies. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database was queried between 2016 and 2019 using International Classification of Diseases 10th edition codes for patients undergoing ACDF as a treatment for spinal cord and nerve root compression. Baseline demographics and inpatient stay measures were analyzed. Results: Patients of White race were significantly less likely to present with manifestations of CS such as myelopathy, plegia, and bowel-bladder dysfunction. Meanwhile, Black patients and Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to experience these impairments representative of the more severe stages of the degenerative spine disease process. White race conferred a lesser risk of complications such as tracheostomy, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury in comparison to non-white race. Insurance by Medicaid and Medicare conferred significant risks in terms of more advanced disease prior to intervention and negative inpatient. Patients in the highest quartile of median income consistently fared better than patients in the lowest quartile across almost every aspect ranging from degree of progression at initial presentation to incidence of complications to healthcare resource utilization. All outcomes for patients age > 65 were worse than patients who were younger at the time of the intervention. Conclusions: Significant disparities exist in the trajectory of CS and the risks associated with ACDF amongst various demographic cohorts. The differences between patient populations may be reflective of a larger additive burden for certain populations, especially when considering patients' intersectionality.

Adult Trauma Patients With Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 4: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate characteristics of patients with thoracolumbar injury classification and severity (TLICS) score of 4 (To4) severity traumatic thoracolumbar injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The TLICS score is used to predict the need for operative versus nonoperative management in adult patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injury. Ambiguity exists in its application and score categorization. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed. The databases of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Review were queried. Studies included adults with traumatic thoracolumbar injury with assigned TLICS score and description of management strategy. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies met inclusion criteria representing 1911 adult patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injury. There were 503 (26.32%) patients with To4, of which 298 (59.24%) were operative. Studies focusing on the thoracolumbar junction and AO Type A fracture morphology had To4 patient incidences of 11.15% and 52.94%, respectively. Multiple studies describe better quality of life, pain scores, and radiographic outcomes in To4 who underwent operative treatment patients. CONCLUSION: To4 injuries are more commonly AO Type A and located in the thoracolumbar junction in adult patients with traumatic thoracolumbar injury. Despite ambiguous recommendations regarding treatment provided by TLICS, outcomes favor operative intervention in this subset of traumatic thoracolumbar injury patients.

The Natural History of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most frequent cause of spinal cord dysfunction and injury in the adult population and leads to significant loss of quality of life and economic impact from its associated medical care expenditures and loss of work. Surgical intervention is recommended for patients manifesting progressing neurological signs and symptoms of myelopathy, but the optimal management in individuals who have mild and clinically stable disease manifestations is controversial. Understanding the natural history of DCM is, thus, important in assessing patients and identifying those most appropriately indicated for surgical management. Despite the attempts to rigorously perform studies of the natural history of these patients, most published investigations suffer from methodological weaknesses or are underpowered to provide definitive answers. Investigations of particular patient subsets, however, provide some clinical guidance as to which patients stand most to benefit from surgery, and these may include those with lower baseline mJOA scores, evidence of segmental hypermobility, cord signal changes on MRI, abnormal somatosensory or motor-evoked potentials, or the presence of certain inflammatory markers. Clinicians should assess patients with mild myelopathy and those harboring asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression individually when making treatment decisions and an understanding of the various factors that may influence natural history may aid in identifying those best indicated for surgery. Further investigations will likely identify how variables that affect natural history can be used in devising more precise treatment algorithms.

Primary and Revision Cervical Disc Arthroplasty from 2010-2020: Patient Demographics, Utilization Trends, and Health Care Reimbursements.

OBJECTIVES: Despite lack of nationwide Medicare coverage by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the utilization of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has risen in popularity. The purpose was to compare primary and revision CDA from 2010 to 2020 with respect to: (1) utilization trends, (2) patient demographics, and (3) health care reimbursements. METHODS: Using the PearlDiver database, we studied patients undergoing primary and revision CDA for degenerative cervical spine pathology from 2010 to 2020. Endpoints of the study were to compare patient demographics (including Elixhauser Comorbidity Index [ECI]), annual utilization trends, length of stay (LOS), and reimbursements. Chi-square analyses compared patient demographics. t tests compared LOS and reimbursements. A linear regression was used to evaluate for trends in procedural volume over time. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In total, 15,306 patients underwent primary (n = 14,711) or revision CDA (n = 595). Patients undergoing revisions had a greater comorbidity burden (mean ECI 4.16 vs. 2.91; P < 0.0001). From 2010 to 2020, primary CDA utilization increased by 413% (447 vs. 2297 procedures; P < 0.001); comparatively, revision CDA utilization increased by 141% (32 vs. 77 procedures; P < 0.001). Mean LOS was greater for revision cases (1.37 vs. 3.30 days, P < 0.001). Reimbursements for revisions were higher on the day of surgery ($5585 vs. $13,692) and within 90 days of surgery ($7031 vs. $19,340), all P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of annual growth in CDA utilization and revision CDA in the United States. Reimbursements for revision CDA were more than double primary cases.

Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Associated With Increased Post-operative Infection Rates and Overall Re-Operation Relative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion or Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: Cervical radiculopathy meeting operative criteria has traditionally been managed using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are also reasonable options. This study aimed to assess differences in postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing multi-level ACDF, CDA, or PCF comparing medical/surgical complications and healthcare utilization parameters. METHODS: Patients who underwent multi-level ACDF, CDA, or PCF between 2012 and 2019 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified based on procedure type and propensity score matched to resolve baseline differences. ANOVA was performed to identify differences in medical complications, surgical complications, and healthcare utilization metrics. RESULTS: A total of 31 344 patients who underwent an eligible procedure were identified (ACDF: n = 28 089, CDA: n = 1748, PCF: n = 1507), and 684 patients remained in each group following propensity score matching. Patients undergoing multi-level PCF were found to experience longer lengths of hospital stay (PCF: 1.67 ± 1.61 days, ACDF: 1.50 ± 1.32 days, CDA: 1.27 ± 1.05 days, P < .001), higher rates of reoperation (PCF: 3.2%, ACDF: 1.0%, CDA: .4%, P = .020), superficial infection (PCF: 1.3%, ACDF: .3%, CDA: .1%, P = .008) and deep infection (PCF: 1.2%, ACDF: 0%, CDA: 0%, P < .001). There were no outcome differences between multi-level ACDF and CDA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing multi-level PCF were at increased risk for longer hospital stay, re-operation, and infection relative to those undergoing ACDF and CDA. Future research should aim to uncover the precise mechanisms underlying these complications, as well as analyze long term outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Characteristics of Patients Selected for Surgical Treatment of Spinal Meningioma.

BACKGROUND: Spinal meningiomas are benign extra-axial tumors that can present with neurological deficits. Treatment partly depends on the degree of disability as there is no agreed-upon patient selection algorithm at present. We aimed to elucidate general patient selection patterns in patients undergoing surgery for spinal meningioma. METHODS: Data for patients with spinal tumors admitted between 2016 and 2019 were extracted from the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We identified patients with a primary diagnosis of spinal meningioma (using International Classification of Disease, 10th revision codes) and divided them into surgical and nonsurgical treatment groups. Patient characteristics were evaluated for intergroup differences. RESULTS: Of 6395 patients with spinal meningioma, 5845 (91.4%) underwent surgery. Advanced age, nonwhite race, obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, and anticoagulant/antiplatelet use were less prevalent in the surgical group (all P < 0.001). The only positive predictor of surgical treatment was elective admission status (odds ratio, 3.166; P < 0.001); negative predictors were low income, Medicaid insurance, anxiety, obesity, and plegia. Patients with bowel-bladder dysfunction, plegia, or radiculopathy were less likely to undergo surgical treatment. The surgery group was less likely to experience certain complications (deep vein thrombosis, P < 0.001; pulmonary embolism, P = 0.002). Increased total hospital charges were associated with nonwhite race, diabetes, depression, obesity, myelopathy, plegia, and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated surgically had a decreased incidence of complications, comorbidities, and Medicaid payer status. A pattern of increased utilization of health care resources and spending was also observed in the surgery group. The results indicate a potentially underserved population of patients with spinal meningioma.

Management and outcomes of adult traumatic cervical spondyloptosis: A case report and systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate treatment modalities and outcomes of patients with traumatic cervical spondyloptosis (TCS). SUMMARY: Traumatic cervical spondyloptosis (TCS) is rare and typically leads to devastating neurological injury. Management strategies vary from case to case. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identified cases of adult TCS, and data was analyzed to characterize the patient population and to assess factors that influenced clinical outcome. In addition, an illustrative case is presented in which closed reduction of a severe C7-T1 spondyloptosis injury was guided with the use of cone beam computerized tomography (O-Arm) to overcome difficulties with visualizing the cervicothoracic junction region. RESULTS: In addition to our case, we identified 52 cases of adult TCS from 34 articles. Patient age ranged from 18 to 73 (average 45.6) with male a predominance (n = 37, 71.2%). Neurological function on presentation was most commonly ASIA E (34.6%), followed by ASIA D (21.2%) and ASIA A (19.2%). The most frequently affected levels were C7-T1 (44.2%) followed by C6-7 (33.0%). Closed reduction was attempted in 42 (80.8%) patients. A total of 49 (94.2%) patients underwent surgical treatment, with 31 (63.3%) undergoing single-approach procedures. The presence of neurological injury, cervical level of injury, and age were not significant predictors of successful closed reduction. Similarly, successful closed reduction, age, cervical level of injury, and neurological injury were not predictors of a single-approach treatment. CONCLUSION: TCS is rare and most frequently appears at or near the cervicothoracic junction and in males. The presentation is typically that of severe neurological injury, but partial neurological recovery occurs in many patients. No predictors of successful closed reduction or single approach surgery are identified. We postulate that the use of intraoperative multiplanar imaging technology like the O-Arm may enhance the ability to achieve a successful closed reduction given the predilection for the injury to occur at the cervicothoracic junction. Prospective study of the durability of constructs by single or combined approaches is warranted.

Cervical fusion for adult patients with atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation.

Background: Atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation (AARS) is a rare injury of the C1/C2 junction. It is often associated with trauma in adults. Treatment may depend on the duration of symptoms and clinical presentation, but there is no consensus regarding the ideal management of these injuries. Our objective is to ascertain the prevalence of neurological deficit, complications, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with AARS undergoing cervical fusion (CF) versus those treated without CF. Methods: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) for adult patients with C1/C2 subluxation. Patients undergoing CF were defined through ICD-10 procedure codes. Baseline health and acute illness severity was calculated using the 11-point modified frailty index (mFI-11). Presenting characteristics, treatment complications, and outcomes were evaluated of CF vs. non-CF patients. Results: Of 990 adult patients with AARS, 720 were treated without CF and 270 were treated with CF. CF patients were more often myelopathic. Patients that had undergone CF treatment were negatively associated with having had extensive trauma. Patients undergoing CF experienced significantly longer length of stay (LOS), increased healthcare resource utilization, and decreased inpatient mortality. Sepsis had a negative association with patients that underwent CF treatment while pneumonia had a positive association. Conclusions: Adult patients undergoing CF for AARS demonstrated an increase in healthcare resource utilization but also a significant decrease in mortality. Extent of acute injury appears to have a strong influence on decision making for CF. Further study of decision making for treatment of this rare injury in adults is warranted.

Classifications and level of evidence trends from the most influential literature on thoracolumbar burst fractures: A bibliometric analysis.

Background: There are known classifications that describe thoracolumbar (TL) burst type injury but it is unclear which have the most influence on management. Our objective is to investigate the association of classification publications with the quantity and type of the most influential articles on TL burst fractures. Methods: Web of Science was searched, and exclusion and inclusion criteria were used to extract the top 100 cited articles on TL burst fractures. The effects on type, number, and other variables were separated into four eras as defined by four major classification publications. Results: 30 out of the top 100 articles represent level 1 or 2 evidence. The most influential journal was Spine, accounting for 35 articles and 4,537 citations. The highest number of articles (53) was published between the years 1995-2005, culminating with the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Classification Score (TLICS) paper. After 2005, there was an increase in average citations per year. Following 2013, the number of highly influential articles decreased, and systematic reviews (SRs) became a larger proportion of the literature. There was a statistically significant increase in the level of 1 and 2 evidence articles with time until the publication of TLICS. The predictive value of time for higher levels of evidence was only seen in the pre-2005 years (AUC: 0.717, 95% CI 0.579-0.855, p = 0.002). Conclusions: In 1994, two articles marked the beginning of an era of highly influential TL burst fracture literature. The 2005 TLICS score was associated with a preceding increase in LOE and productivity. Following 2005, the literature saw a decrease in productivity and an increase in systematic review/meta-analysis (SR-MAs). These trends represent an increase in scholarly discussion that led to a systematic synthesis of the existing literature after publication of the 2005 TLICS article.

Intraoperative navigation in surgical management of traumatic spine injury: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) can lead to severe morbidity and significant health care resource utilization. Intraoperative navigation (ION) systems have been shown to improve outcomes in some populations. However, controversy about the benefit of ION remains. To our knowledge, there is no large database analysis studying the outcomes of ION on TSI patients. Here we hope to compare complications and outcomes in patients with TSI undergoing spinal fusion of 3 or more levels with or without the use of ION. METHODS: The 2015-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for cases of posterior spinal instrumentation of 3 or more levels. This population was then selected for postoperative diagnosis consistent with TSI. The effect of prolonged operative time was analyzed for all patients. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to create ION case and non-ION control groups. Baseline demographic characteristics, complications, and outcome data were collected and compared between ION and non-ION groups. RESULTS: A total of 1,034 patients were included in the propensity matched analysis. Among comorbidities, only obesity was significantly more likely in the non-ION group. There was no difference in case complexity between the two groups. ION was associated with higher incidence of prolonged operative time but was a negative independent predictor for sepsis. Prolonged operative time was a significant independent predictor for pulmonary embolism and requirement of transfusion in all patients. Discharge to home, readmission, and reoperation rates did not differ between TSI patients with or without ION. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ION during posterior spinal fusion of 3 or more levels in TSI patients is not associated with worse outcomes. Prolonged operative time, rather than ION, appears to have a higher influence on the rate of complications in this population. Evaluation of ION in the context of specific populations and pathology is warranted to optimize its use.