HELENA: HER2-Low as a prEdictive factor of response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eArly breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: HER2 expression has a prognostic and predictive impact in early-stage breast cancer (BC). HER2 positive BC (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 3 + or 2 + with in situ hybridization (ISH) amplification) are treated with HER2 targeted therapies. The concept of HER2-low BC (IHC score 1 + or 2 + without ISH amplification) is drawing attention as anti-HER2 treatment has recently shown efficacy in this subgroup. We aimed to explore the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-low early BC according to the HER2 score (1 + or 2 + without amplification). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in two French comprehensive cancer centers. All patients with HER2-low BC treated with NAC from January 2014 to December 2020 were included. The primary objective was to analyze the pathological complete response (pCR) rate to NAC using the Sataloff or RCB system, according to the HER2 score. Secondary objectives were to assess disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and to explore the immune environment through the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), according to HER2 expression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: We included 237 tumors for 229 patients. Of these, 160 (67.5%) tumors were HER2 1 + , 77 (32.5%) were HER2 2 + , and 152 (64.1%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive. The median age was 53.9 years. No differences in tumor characteristics were observed between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + subgroups. pCR was achieved in 38 tumors (17%), without any difference between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + subgroups (p = 0.77). DFS and OS were significantly different between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + patients (HR = 0.41,CI95%[0.17;0.97] p = 0.037 and HR = 0.31,CI95%[0.09;1.02] p = 0.042, respectively). HER2 status was still associated with DFS and OS after adjustment for age, HR status and NLR, with better outcomes in favor of HER2 score 2 + (HR = 0.35 [0.15-0.84] and HR = 0.24 [0.07-0.81], respectively). NLR was not associated with worse DFS or OS. CONCLUSION: In HER2-low early BC, no differences in pCR were observed between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + tumors, however patients with HER2 2 + tumors had a better DFS and OS than those with HER2 1 + . Further investigations are needed to describe the intrinsic differences in the spectrum of HER2-low BC.

Pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer treated with cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.

Background: Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CdK4/6i) changed the course of hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). To date, no factors have been shown to predict response to CdK4/6i. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an indicator of the host systemic inflammatory response, is an independent prognostic factor for survival in cancers. We conducted this study to evaluate the impact of NLR on survival in mBC patients treated with first line CdK4/6i. Methods: All mBC patients treated with first line CdK4/6i between November 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. The biomarker threshold was defined using ROC curves. We analyzed progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 12-month PFS and response rate according to NLR in univariable and multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 126 patients treated with palbociclib (n=101), ribociclib (n=18) or abemaciclib (n=7) were included, with a median follow-up of 33 months [range: 2.9-57]. Median age was 65 years [29-86], 40% patients had good performance status (ECOG-PS 0). Most patients (71%) were included at the metastatic relapse stage and 29% had only bone metastases. Median PFS and median OS were 27 and 51 months, respectively. High NLR (≥ 2.53) was significantly associated with worse PFS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.50, CI95% = [0.32-0.79]) and worse OS (HR=0.45, [CI95%: 0.23-0.87]). In multivariable analysis, NLR and ECOG PS were independently factors associated with PFS (p=0.016 and p=0.001, respectively). Conclusion: High NLR was associated with worse PFS and OS in HR+ HER2- mBC patients treated with first line CdK4/6i. NLR is a reliable and inexpensive prognostic marker, easily accessible in routine clinical practice, which could help optimize the therapeutic strategy. These results need to be confirmed in larger prospective studies.

Baseline lymphopenia as prognostic factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib.

Cyclin-dependent-kinase 4-6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved the management of hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Currently, there are no valid prognostic factors for response to CDK4/6i. Baseline lymphopenia is reported as a prognostic factor in several types of cancer. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on response to palbociclib. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), best response and safety. A total of 114 patients treated for mBC between 2016 and 2019 were included. Median baseline ALC was 1.4 g/l (range, 0.2-4.3 g/l). A total of 65 (57%) and 49 (43%) patients had baseline ALC values of <1.5 and ≥1.5 g/l, respectively. Patients with baseline lymphopenia exhibited significantly shorter PFS (6 vs. 10 months; P=0.004) and OS (20 vs. 33 months; P=0.02). ALC <1.5 g/l independently predicted worse survival, as indicated by multivariate analysis (P=0.04; hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.02). Patients with baseline ALC <1.5 g/l had significantly less partial response (14 vs. 22%; P=0.016) and more disease progression (46 vs. 20%; P=0.016) than those with ALC ≥1.5 g/l. ALC is a strong and easy-to-use dosage with prognostic factor for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Lymphopenia may also be a predictive factor of early progression. These data need to be verified in a larger prospective study.

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer With Symptomatic Bone Marrow Infiltration.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Currently, there is no recommendation for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with bone-marrow cell infiltration (BMI). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly-paclitaxel in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included all BC patients with BMI receiving weekly-paclitaxel between January 2014 and May 2018. Overall-survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were progression-free-survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: BMI was diagnosed in 26 patients. This infiltration was suggested by peripheral blood smear in 73% of cases. All patients had anemia, and 77% had thrombocytopenia. OS and PFS were 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.6-20.7] and 3.3 months (95%CI=1.6-7.2), respectively. Good performance-status, absence of thrombocytopenia and presence of less than 5% of circulating erythroblasts at BMI diagnosis, were associated with better survival. One patient presented grade 5 febrile neutropenia but no episodes of bleeding were reported. CONCLUSION: Weekly-paclitaxel is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity for BC with BMI.

Stereotactic radiotherapy on brain metastases with recent hemorrhagic signal: STEREO-HBM, a two-step phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases often occur in cancer evolution. They are not only responsible for death but also for disorders affecting the quality of life and the cognitive functions. Management of brain metastases usually consists in multi-modality treatments, including neurosurgery, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and more recently radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), systemic treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy), combined or not with corticosteroids. Almost 20% of brain metastases can present recent (within 15 days) bleeding signs on neuro-imagery. In these conditions, WBRT is the usual treatment. Yet, patients may benefit from a more aggressive strategy with SRT or FSRT. However, these options were suspected to possibly major the risk of brain haemorrhage, although no scientifically proven. Radiation oncologists therefore usually remain reluctant to deliver SRS/FSRT for bleeding brain metastases. It is therefore challenging to establish a standard of care for the treatment of bleeding brain metastases. We propose a phase II trial to simultaneously assess safety and efficacy of FSRT to manage brain metastases with hemorrhagic signal. METHODS: The STEREO-HBM study is a multicenter two-step non-randomised phase II trial addressing patients with at least one bleeding brain metastasis out of a maximum of 3 brain metastases. Each brain metastasis will be treated with 30 Gy in 3 fractions for 1 week. The main endpoint is based on both safety and efficacy endpoints as proposed by Bryant and Day's design. Safety endpoint is defined as the rate of bleeding complications 4 months post-FSRT while efficacy endpoint is defined as the 6-month local control rate. Multi-modal MRI will be used to assess intra-tumoral hemorrhagic events before and after treatment. Patients' quality of life will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: Management of bleeding brain metastases is still debated and poorly explored in clinical trials. There is sparse and weak data on the signification of pretreatment intra-tumour haemorrhagic signs or on the risk of brain bleeding complications after FSRT. We expect this first prospective phase 2 trial in this particular setting will allow to clarify the place of FSRT to optimally manage bleeding brain metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03696680, registered October, 4, 2018. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2.1 dated from 2018/11/09.

How to improve the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting? The French NAVI study.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) still remain frequent. The procedure for announcing the diagnosis (PAD) was an emblematic measure of the first French Plan Cancer aiming at providing patients with time to listen, information after cancer diagnosis, and discussion on treatments and their side effects. We aimed at assessing the risk factors of CINV, focusing on patients' satisfaction with the PAD. METHODS: This prospective multicentre study assessed the frequency and intensity of CINV among chemonaïve patients during the first cycle of treatment. CINV was defined by ≥1 emetic episode or reported nausea intensity ≥3 on a 0-10 scale. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors related to global CINV onset including satisfaction with the PAD (satisfaction score ≥the median on a 0-10 scale). RESULTS: Data from 291 patients (women, 85.2%; mean age, 57 years) were analyzed. Most patients (69.4%) received highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens and 77.7% received antiemetic drugs consistent with international guidelines. Acute, delayed and overall CINV were experienced by 40.4, 34.8 and 52.4% of patients, respectively. Sixty-seven per cent of patients were satisfied with the PAD. No relation was noted between PAD satisfaction and CINV onset. The nausea and vomiting dimension of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire before chemotherapy (OR 3.62), motion sickness history (OR 2.73), highly emetogenic CT (OR 2.73), anxiety (OR 1.99) and younger age (OR 1.96) were independent predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients were mostly satisfied with the PAD, half of them experienced CINV. A state of anxiety could be identified during the PAD to be managed.