ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of multimodal analgesia in patients with end-stage head and neck cancer in open gastrostomy surgery. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. From June to December 2023, 50 patients with end-stage head and neck cancer who underwent elective open gastrostomy surgery in Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University were prospectively selected. The patients were divided into multimodal analgesia group and local anesthesia group using the random number table method according to different anesthesia methods, with 25 cases in each group. In multimodal analgesia group, a multimodal analgesia regimen was adopted: ultrasound-guided abdominal wall nerve block (rectus sheath block and transverse abdominis plane block)+intravenous injection of oxycodone+intravenous injection of flurbiprofen axetil and dexamethasone. In local anesthesia group, local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine was adopted. The main outcome measure was the incidence of intraoperative pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score>3 points in the two groups. The secondary observation indicators included NRS score and hemodynamic indexes [mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)] at various time points during surgery [before anesthesia (T0), at the time of incision (T1), 10 minutes after surgery (T2), during gastric body traction (T3), and at the end of surgery (T4)], incidence of adverse reactions, postoperative patient satisfaction score, as well as the NRS scores at rest and activity (coughing) within 24 hours after surgery. Results: The multimodal analgesia group included 21 males and 4 females, aged (61.4±9.9) years. There were 19 males and 6 females in the local anesthesia group, aged (58.6±10.8) years. The incidence of intraoperative NRS score>3 points and the incidence of salvage analgesia in the multimodal analgesia group were both 12.0% (3/25), which were lower than 60.0% (15/25) in the local anesthesia group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001); The NRS score [M (Q1, Q3)] at T3 in the multimodal analgesia group was 2 (2, 3) points, which were lower than 5 (3, 6) points in the local anesthesia group (P<0.05). There were smaller variabilities in MAP and HR in the multimodal analgesia group than those in the local anesthesia group (all P<0.05). The incidence of intraoperative tachycardia, surgical traction reaction, and nausea in the multimodal analgesia group was lower than that in the local anesthesia group (all P<0.05). The postoperative satisfaction score of patients in the multimodal analgesia group was (9.25±0.71) points, which were higher than (7.33±0.87) points in the local anesthesia group (P<0.001). NRS score during postoperative activity within 24 hours in the multimodal analgesia group were (2.36±0.75) points, which were lower than (3.03±0.81) points of the local anesthesia group (P=0.005). No adverse reactions such as urinary retention, nausea, vomiting and dizziness occurred in both groups. Conclusion: Compared with local anesthesia, the multimodal analgesic strategy could provide better analgesic effect and longer duration, better hemodynamic stability, and fewer intraoperative adverse reactions in patients with end-stage head and neck cancer undergoing open gastrostomy.
Subject(s)
Analgesia , Gastrostomy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Nerve Block , Humans , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Analgesia/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Gastrostomy/methods , Male , Anesthesia, Local , Pain, Postoperative , Female , Pain Management/methods , Prospective Studies , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Pain MeasurementABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the feasibility and application value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in evaluating the degree of renal fibrosis after kidney transplantation. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Renal transplant recipients who received treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from December 2021 to December 2022 were enrolled. All participants underwent ASL scan, and the values of renal cortical renal blood flow (RBF) were measured through post-processing software. The participants were divided into different groups according to the Banff interstitial fibrosis score (ci score) of the transplanted kidneys, and then relevant indicators were compared. One-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare the differences in renal cortical RBF among the groups. Spearman correlation analysis was employed to investigate the association between renal cortical RBF and ci score of the transplanted kidney. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the diagnostic effectiveness of renal cortical RBF and laboratory indicators for distinguishing varying degrees of fibrosis in transplanted kidneys. The Delong test was utilized to compare the area under the curve (AUC). Results: A total of 60 patients (42 males and 18 females) were included in the study, with a mean age of (44.6±10.8) years. All patients were divided into 4 groups: ci0 group (ci score=0, 11 cases), ci1 group (ci score=1, 21 cases), ci2 group (ci score=2, 20 cases), and ci3 group (ci score=3, 8 cases). With an increase in the degree of fibrosis in the transplanted kidney, there was a corresponding decrease in the renal cortical RBF value. The differences in renal cortical RBF values among the 4 groups were statistically significant[ci0 group: (214.9±28.5) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci1 group: (181.7±29.3) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci2 group: (158.8±39.2) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; ci3 group: (123.1±27.2) ml·(100 g)-1·min-1; F=14.02, P<0.001]. The renal cortical RBF was moderately negatively correlated with the ci score (r=-0.644, P<0.001). The AUC for discriminating between ci0 and ci1-3 of renal cortical RBF and 24-hour urine protein was 0.881 (95%CI: 0.772-0.950) and 0.680 (95%CI: 0.547-0.795), respectively. The AUC for renal cortical RBF was significantly higher than that for 24-hour urine protein (P=0.047). The renal cortical RBF can distinguish between ci0-1 and ci2-3, as well as ci0-2 and ci3, with the corresponding AUC value of 0.796 (95%CI: 0.673-0.889) and 0.900 (95%CI: 0.795-0.963), respectively. Conclusion: ASL can quantitatively assess renal blood perfusion in transplanted kidneys and demonstrates high operational efficacy in distinguishing varying degrees of fibrosis in the transplanted kidneys.