The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthodontic Adult Patients' Characteristics and Decision on Orthodontic Appliance.

Purpose: There is an overall paucity of data examining the specific details of orthodontic patients' patterns or orthodontic service disruptions possibly influenced by COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthodontic clinic disruption regarding the change in adult patients' characteristics and decisions of orthodontic treatment devices. Patients and Methods: A retrospective sample of 311 patients receiving orthodontic treatment from 2018 to 2022 were collected and divided into two groups: before (n = 167) and during (n = 144) the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographics, dental indices, the index of complexity outcome and need (ICON), and the degree of treatment difficulty were analyzed. Results: There were fewer students among patients during the COVID-19 pandemic than before (24.5% versus 35.9%, P = 0.036). Compared with patients before the pandemic, more patients selected ceramic brackets or Invisalign during the pandemic (P = 0.022). There were higher percentage of class I dental malocclusions among patients during than before the COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.044). Moreover, the ICON score and the score of the degree of treatment difficulty were both significantly lower for patients during than before the COVID-19 pandemic (63.9±14.0 versus 58.3±15.3, P=0.001 and 7.4±2.6 versus 6.8±2.6, P=0.049, respectively). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the characteristics and decisions of orthodontic patients. Those who still came to the orthodontic clinic despite the COVID-19 outbreak may have been those with less malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Besides, during the time of covid-19 pandemic, more patients chose ceramic bracket and Invisalign as their orthodontic treatment device rather than conventional or self-ligating metal brackets.

Does cleft lip and palate affect the severity of malocclusion?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3D anatomical features of unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) complete cleft lip and palate with those of skeletal Class III dentofacial deformities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 92 patients were divided into cleft and noncleft groups. The cleft group comprised 29 patients with UCLP and 17 patients with BCLP. The noncleft group comprised 46 patients with Class III dentofacial deformities. 3D anatomical landmarks were identified and the corresponding measurements were made on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). RESULTS: The differences between the affected and unaffected sides of the patients with UCLP were nonsignificant. The differences between the patients with UCLP and BCLP were nonsignificant except for the SNA angle. Significant differences between the patients with clefts and Class III malocclusion were identified for the SNA, A-N perpendicular, and A-N Pog line, indicating that the maxillae of the patients in the cleft group were more retrognathic and micrognathic. Relative to the noncleft group patients, the cleft group patients had a significantly smaller ramus height. CONCLUSION: The affected and unaffected sides of the patients with UCLP did not exhibit significant differences. The maxillae of the patients with UCLP were significantly more retrognathic than those of the patients with BCLP. The maxillae and mandibles of the patients in the cleft group were more micrognathic and retropositioned relative to those of the noncleft Class III patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The maxillary and mandibular findings indicated greater deficiencies in the patients with UCLP or BCLP than in those with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Appropriate surgical design should be administered.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Improve Facial Appearance?

BACKGROUND: Facial aesthetics may be optimized based on a deeper understanding of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to delineate facial soft tissue changes after clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex (MMC) to correct mandibular prognathism using the surgery-first approach. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients over 18 years of age with skeletal Class III malocclusion in the craniofacial center. The patients were excluded with previous history of craniofacial syndrome, orthognathic surgery trauma, infection at surgical sites, chin deviation (menton deviation ≥4 mm), 2 or more missing data points after surgery, or without informed consent. This study compared significant facial changes before (T0) and after orthodontic debonding (T1) in the CWR and control groups. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The patients were divided in accordance with maxillary occlusal plane change (OPC) after surgery into CWR (OPC >4°) and control (OPC ≤4°) groups. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was frontal lip curvature (FLC: Right Cheilion-Stomion-Left Cheilion, degree) with or without upper lip curving upward at T1, where upper lip curving upward was considered more favorable. COVARIATES: The covariates included age, sex, and various cephalometric measurements. ANALYSES: The Mann-Whitney U test, paired, and independent t-test were implemented to compare the intragroup and intergroup differences. Statistical significance was indicated by P value <.05. RESULTS: The study comprised 34 patients (21 women) in the control group and 37 (29 women) in the CWR group; their mean ages were 23.64 ± 4.38 and 24.21 ± 3.84 years, respectively (P value = .562). At T1, the CWR group had significant increased FLC (P value = .001), alar width (P value = .034), and lower vermilion height (P value = .018), and decreased lower lip length (P value = .004). The high FLC group had significant decreased upper lip projection (P value = .002) and increased nasolabial angle (P value = .013). The significant relationship between CWR and high FLC was supported by the χ2 test (P value = .018) and multiple logistic regression (P value = .017). CONCLUSION: Greater CWR of the MMC increased FLC and lower vermilion height and reduced lower lip length. High FLC resulting from the CWR of the MMC improved facial appearance by moving the upper lip curve upward.

Does the floor of the maxillary sinus affect tooth movement for premolar extraction space closure?

OBJECTIVE: The study investigated orthodontic tooth movement by comparing various horizontal and angular measures of the teeth having different sinus-root relationship (SRR) of patients undergoing first premolar extraction treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 45 Taiwanese adult patients, classified as the control group (n = 15) and the sinus group (n = 30) according to SRR. The control group had type I SRR (sinus floor above the level connecting the buccal and palatal root apices), whereas the sinus group included patients with type V SRR (the buccal and palatal root displayed apical protrusion into the sinus floor). Morphology was identified using pretreatment orthopantomograms. Lateral cephalometric measurements were conducted before treatment (T1) and at debonding (T2). RESULTS: Post debonding, there were no statistically significant difference in the two groups. However, the incisors in the control group became marginally more upright than those of the sinus group, and the molars demonstrated tipping movement with minimal anchorage loss in the sinus group than in the control group. The total treatment time was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the sinus-root relationship does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement. However, a more extensive 3-D study with larger sample size is strongly recommended before coming to any conclusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lining of the floor of the maxillary sinus does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Affect Surgical Movement and Stability?

PURPOSE: Orthognathic surgery (OGS) using the surgery-first approach (SFA) can decrease treatment time and increase patient satisfaction. Clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism leads to optimized functional, aesthetic, and stable outcomes. This study examined the combined effect of SFA and CWR of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism by comparing the surgical movement before (T0) and immediately after OGS (T1) and the stability between T1 and 12 months after OGS (T2). METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent SFA involving Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, with or without genioplasty. Based on the occlusal plane (OP) change at T0-T1, the patients were divided into CWR (OP > 4°) and control (C) groups (OP ≤ 4°). The predictor variable was OP change at T0-T1. The primary outcome variable was the stability of pogonion (Pog) at T1-T2. The covariates included demographic factors, cephalometric measurements (anterior facial height, posterior facial height, OP, mandibular plane angle, incisor mandibular plane angle, overjet, and overbite), and 3-dimensional landmark displacement (anterior nasal spine, A-point, upper central incisor, upper first molar, lower central incisor, lower first molar, Pog, gonion, and condylion). An independent t-test was used to compare between these 2 groups when appropriate. The level of significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample included 28 patients (17 females) in the C group and 36 (24 females) in the CWR group; the mean ages were 23.89 ± 3.35 and 24.08 ± 4.02 years, respectively. For the surgical movement at T0-T1, the CWR group showed an association with vertical movement of the maxilla at posterior nasal spine (P = .005), anterior nasal spine (P < .001), and A-point (P < .001) and horizontal backward movement of the mandible at B-point (P < .001), Pog (P < .001), and gonion (P = .042). At T1-T2, all landmarks remained stable without clinically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical movement in the CWR group could vertically displace the maxilla and setback mandible more than that in the C group. Postoperative skeletal stability remained the same between the 2 groups at 1 year after OGS.

Effects of maxillary advancement on maxillary incisor display in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and cleft lip and palate.

INTRODUCTION: The information on the hard- and soft-tissue factors correlated with tooth display after LeFort I osteotomy, especially in the surgery-first approach (SFA), are limited. This study aimed to correlate different parameters with the maxillary incisor display in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and those with cleft lip and palate (CLP) in SFA. METHODS: This study consisted of 35 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and 32 with cleft deformities who had undergone orthognathic surgery. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalometric analysis were obtained. Maxillary incisor display was measured in photographs. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess the intraexaminer repeatability. The Student t test was used to compare the maxillary incisor display between 2 groups. Analysis of covariance was performed with pretreatment measurement as covariates, and the important determinants for maxillary incisor display were identified by adjusting the baseline measurements. RESULTS: The mean increase of maxillary advancement at point A was 5.25 mm and 1.28 mm downward movement for skeletal Class III malocclusion, whereas it was 4.59 mm advancement and 2.16 mm downward movement for patients with CLP. The resulting maxillary incisor display was 2.86 mm for skeletal Class III malocclusion and 2.56 mm for patients with CLP. The covariates for maxillary incisor display before intervention was significantly associated with the maxillary incisor display after intervention (P <0.001). However, the interaction effect of groups was not seen (P = 0.933). The horizontal position of A, vertical position of ANS, and upper lip length were the most predictable parameters (P <0.001, P <0.001, P = 0.048, respectively) for maxillary incisor display in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Horizontal position of point A, vertical position of ANS, and upper lip length are the most important determinants for maxillary incisor display for patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and those with CLP.

Characteristics and Dental Indices of Orthodontic Patients Using Aligners or Brackets.

Background. Clear aligners have become a treatment alternative to metal brackets in recent years due to the advantages of aesthetics, comfort, and oral health improvement. Nevertheless, few studies have analyzed the clinical characteristics and dental indices of orthodontic patients using aligners or brackets. Methods. A total of 170 patients received orthodontic treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in 2021. Patients were stratified by types of treatment (Invisalign® clear aligner (n = 60) or metal bracket (n = 110). Results: Patients were aged 26.1 ± 7.2 years, and most were female (75.0%). The Invisalign® group was older than the bracket group (p = 0.003). The skeletal relationships were mainly Class I (49.4%), followed by Class II (30.0%) and Class III (20.6%). The molar relationships were primarily Class I (38.8%), followed by Class II (37.1%) and Class III (24.1%). The decayed, missing, and filled tooth (DMFT) index was 9.9 ± 6.0, including 2.1 ± 2.9 for decayed teeth, 0.5 ± 1.1 for missing teeth, and 7.3 ± 4.3 for filled teeth. There were no significant differences in the DMFT index or skeletal and molar relationships between the groups (p > 0.05). The index of complexity outcome and need (ICON) was 56.8 ± 13.5, and the score was lower in the Invisalign® group than in the bracket group (p = 0.002). Among the variables included in the ICON assessment, only the aesthetic variable was lower in the Invisalign® group than in the bracket group (p < 0.001). The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle was 27.9 ± 5.1 degrees. Finally, the E-line of the lower lip was lower in the Invisalign® group than in the bracket group (1.5 ± 2.4 versus 2.8 ± 3.1, p = 0.005). Conclusions. Older patients showed a greater intention to choose Invisalign® treatment for improving the appearance of their teeth than younger patients, who chose metal bracket treatment. The demand for Invisalign® aligner treatment for aesthetic reasons was substantial. A soft tissue profile with more protrusive lower lips and a greater need for orthodontic treatment was found in the bracket group.

Effect of Le Fort I Maxillary Repositioning on Three-Dimensional Nasal Tip Rotation: A Comparative Study with Implication for the Asian Nose.

BACKGROUND: Le Fort I maxillary repositioning influences nasal morphology. In Asian cultures, upward nasal tip rotation with increased nostril exposure is considered aesthetically unpleasant and can have psychosocial consequences. This three-dimensional imaging-based study evaluated the effect of different Le Fort I maxillary movements on nasal tip rotation. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery (n = 107) were enrolled. To achieve a standard head orientation, preoperative and 1-week and 12-month postoperative cone-beam computed tomography-derived three-dimensional craniofacial models were superimposed. Tip rotation angle was calculated according to the Frankfort horizontal plane for all three-dimensional digital models. The final tip rotation angle change was defined as 12-month postoperative value minus preoperative value. Translational maxillary movement types (advancement versus setback and intrusion versus extrusion), postoperative maxillary segment locations (anterosuperior, anteroinferior, posterosuperior, or posteroinferior), and actual linear maxillary changes were noted. RESULTS: Advancement (1.79 ± 5.20 degrees) and intrusion (2.23 ± 4.96 degrees) movements demonstrated significantly larger final tip rotation angle changes than setback (-0.88 ± 5.15 degrees) and extrusion (0.09 ± 5.44 degrees) movements (all p < 0.05). Postoperative anterosuperior location (2.95 ± 4.52 degrees) of the maxillary segment demonstrated a significantly larger final tip rotation angle change than anteroinferior (0.48 ± 5.65 degrees), posterosuperior (-1.08 ± 4.77 degrees), and posteroinferior (-0.64 ± 5.80 degrees) locations (all p < 0.05). Translational maxillary movement and actual linear maxillary change were not correlated with final tip rotation angle change. CONCLUSION: Effects of Le Fort I maxillary repositioning on nasal tip rotation depend on movement types and maxillary segment location. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary protraction with or without expansion is a widely known orthopedic treatment modality in growing skeletal Class III patients. However, limited data are available regarding the outcomes of long-term changes in the maxilla. Aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the long-term maxillary anteroposterior changes following a facemask therapy with or without rapid maxillary expansion in growing skeletal Class III patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Embase. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies, published up to Sep. 2020, with maxillary protraction and/or expansion as keywords were included in this meta-analysis. Risk of bias within and across studies were assessed using the Cochrane tools (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I) and GRADE approach. Overall and subgroup comparisons with the random-effect model were performed in this meta-analysis. Meta-regression models were designed to determine potential heterogeneity. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase (Mean difference, 2.29°; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-2.73; and p < 0.001 after facemask (FM) protraction. Mean difference, 1.73°; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.11; and p < 0.001 after rapid maxillary expansion(RME) and facemask protraction) in the Sella-Nasion-A point (SNA) angle in the treatment groups as compared with the control groups, when measured during the less than 3-year follow-up period. However, no statistically significant changes (Mean difference, 0.28°; 95% confidence interval, -0.57-1.13; and p = 0.52 after facemask protraction. Mean difference, 0.34°; 95% confidence interval, -0.64-1.33; and p = 0.50 after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask protraction) were observed in the SNA angle in the groups, when measured after 3 years of follow-up. Meta-regression analysis also showed that with increased follow-up duration, the effectiveness of maxillary protraction decreased. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis revealed that maxillary protraction therapy could be effective for a short-term in correcting maxillary hypoplasia and the treatment result was not affected by mean age and sex. However, with increased follow-up duration, the sagittal maxillary changes gradually decreased. Limitations on this review were only the SNA angle was used and clinical heterogeneity was not discussed. The quality of evidence was moderate. Further long-term observational studies are necessary for a comprehensive evaluation of the effects on maxillary skeletal changes.

Long-term maxillary three dimensional changes following maxillary protraction with or without expansion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Maxillary protraction with or without expansion appears to be an effective orthopedic treatment in skeletal class III growing patients, but the long-term effect on maxilla changes is less clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate long-term three dimensional skeletal effects on maxilla through face mask (FM) with or without rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in skeletal CIII growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched database including PubMed, Science Direct, Embase and Web of Science through Feb 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials or cohort studies recruiting growing patients who received maxillary protraction and/or expansion and comparing the treatment groups with untreated controls. The follow-up periods were more than 3 years. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tools (RoB2.0 and ROBINS-I). GRADE was used to qualify the evidence. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 6 studies comprising 327 participants in total. No statistically significant changes were observed on the degree of Sella-Nasion-A point (SNA) in the treated groups when compared with the untreated controls. However, significant increase on maxillary rotation degree (mean difference: 8.20, 95% CI = 6.87-9.53, p < 0.001) and maxillary base width (mean difference: 2.27, 95% CI = 1.39-3.15, p < 0.001) in the treated groups, if compared with untreated controls. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that FM and FM/RME treatments might not be long-term effective on correcting maxillary anteroposterior hypoplasia in growing patients. Additionally, more long-term studies are still necessary to further assess its skeletal benefits on maxilla in vertical and transverse dimension.

Type of maxillary segment mobilization affects three-dimensional nasal morphology.

BACKGROUND: Surgical mobilization of the maxillary segment affects nasal morphology. This study assessed the impact of the type of maxillary mobilization on the three-dimensional (3D) nasal morphometry. METHODS: Pre- and postsurgery cone beam computed tomography-derived facial image datasets of consecutive patients who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery were reviewed. Using preoperative 3D facial models as the positional reference of the skeletal framework, 12-month postoperative 3D facial models were classified into four types of maxillary mobilizations (advancement [n = 83], setback [n = 24], intrusion [n = 55], and extrusion [n = 52]) and four types of final maxillary positions (anterosuperior [n = 44], anteroinferior [n = 39], posterosuperior [n = 11], and posteroinferior [n = 13]). Six 3D soft tissue nasal morphometric parameters were measured, with excellent intra- and interexaminer reliability scores (ICC>0.897) for all the measurements. The 3D nasal change for each nasal parameter was computed as the difference between postoperative and preoperative measurement values. RESULTS: The intrusion maxillary mobilization resulted in a significantly (all p<0.05) larger 3D nasal change in terms of alar width, alar base width, and nostril angle parameters, and a smaller change in terms of the nasal tip height parameter than the extrusion maxillary mobilization; however, no significant (all p>0.05) difference was observed between advancement and setback maxillary mobilizations. The anterosuperior and posterosuperior maxillary positions had a significantly (all p<0.05) larger 3D nasal change in terms of the alar base width and nostril angle than the anteroinferior and posteroinferior maxillary positions. CONCLUSION: The type of maxillary mobilization affects the 3D nasal morphometry.

Are Signs of Degenerative Joint Disease Associated With Chin Deviation?

PURPOSE: Degenerative joint changes commonly affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and can result in chin deviation. However, the extent of degenerative TMJ changes and chin deviation has not been well-characterized. The present study sought to correlate degenerative TMJ changes with condylar volume, grayscale measures, and chin deviation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present cross-sectional study had enrolled women with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were acquired preoperatively. For each condyle, degenerative TMJ signs were analyzed and the condylar volume and grayscale were measured. The predictor variable was the presence of degenerative TMJ signs, classified as categorical data: 0, if none; 1, only present in 1 joint; and 2, present in both joints. The primary outcome variable was a chin deviation of 3 mm or more. Other associated variables were grouped by age, cephalometric data, and 3-dimensional condylar measurements. Descriptive bivariate statistics were computed, and univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify any associations between degenerative TMJ disease and chin deviation. RESULTS: We included 85 patients, who were classified into 2 groups: less than 3 mm of chin deviation (n = 43) and 3 mm or more of chin deviation (n = 42). The presence of more than 10 degenerative TMJ signs was significantly associated with the presence of 3 mm or more of chin deviation (P < .001). In multiple regression models, the presence of subcortical sclerosis in 1 joint and in both joints (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.698; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.051 to 13.012; adjusted OR, 5.001; 95% CI, 1.461-17.119, respectively) correlated significantly with the presence of 3 mm or more of chin deviation (P < .05). The volume difference between the 2 condyles was significantly greater in the group with more than 10 degenerative TMJ signs and 3 mm or more of chin deviation than in the group with 10 or fewer degenerative TMJ signs and less than 3 mm of chin deviation (P = .016 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In women with skeletal Class III malocclusion, the presence of more than 10 degenerative TMJ signs increased the prevalence of 3 mm or more of chin deviation. The presence of subcortical sclerosis in either 1 or both joints and volume differences between the 2 condyles were associated with greater chin deviation.

Skeletofacial Reconstruction for Cleft-Related Deformities: Four Decades of Evolving Cleft Care.

Skeletofacial reconstruction in skeletally mature patients with cleft lip/palate can be challenging because of multifaceted condition-specific anatomical features in addition to several repercussions from surgical intervention during the growing period. This surgical report presents the history and evolving philosophy of cleft-skeletofacial reconstruction at the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center, a referral center for cleft care in Taiwan. The maximization of satisfactory function and the appearance outcome-burden ratio have been the fundamental aims for this team to develop and upgrade cleft-skeletofacial reconstruction over the past 4 decades, with more than 10,000 mature patients treated. The study highlights key lessons learned in outcome-based and patient-oriented changes over time until the current approach, which focuses on patient-centered care with a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and team-based model. Substantial advances in surgical, orthodontic, anesthetic, and computer imaging aspects have contributed to improving and optimizing the correction of a broad spectrum of facial and occlusal deformities while ensuring safety, predictability, efficiency, and stability in outcomes. Understanding the development and refinement of cleft-skeletofacial reconstruction over the time and transferring these time-tested and scientifically validated protocols and principles to clinical practice may serve as a reliable foundation to continue the advancement and enhancement of the delivery of surgical cleft care worldwide.

History and Evolution of Orthognathic Surgery at Chang Gung Craniofacial Center: Lessons Learned From 35-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Modern orthognathic surgery (OGS) was established on the basis of contributions from multidisciplinary centers worldwide. This study reports the history and evolution of OGS at the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center (CGCC) and identifies the lessons learned from 35 years of experience. METHODS: The total number of OGS procedures managed by the CGCC multidisciplinary team between 1981 and 2016 was determined. The database of the senior author (Y.-R.C.) was reviewed for consecutive OGS procedures performed between 2003 and 2016. A literature review was also performed to retrieve the contributions from the total CGCC team. RESULTS: The 35 years of experience at a single center and 13-year experience of a single surgeon corresponded to 8073 and 2883 OGS procedures, respectively. Moreover, 53 peer-reviewed articles were reviewed. Teamwork (plastic surgeons, orthodontists, and anesthetists) ensured an optimal balance between occlusion functional and facial aesthetic outcomes, with patient safety ensured and a minimum of OGS-related complications. Progression from the conventional orthodontics-first approach to the surgery-first OGS approach decreased the overall treatment time. Transition from 1-jaw to 2-jaw surgery enabled more consistent aesthetic outcomes to be achieved. Conversion from the 2-splint to the single-splint technique enabled development of a more precise tridimensional simulation plan and surgical execution, including in challenging scenarios such as malocclusion associated with facial asymmetry. Clockwise pitch rotation of the maxillomandibular complex has been designed for facial aesthetic purposes in class III malocclusion, whereas counterclockwise pitch rotation of the maxillomandibular complex improves airway function in those with sleep apnea. CONCLUSIONS: The lessons learned from experience and outcome-based articles reveal that OGS has successfully evolved at the CGCC, with a balance being achieved between functional and aesthetic outcomes and effective decreases in the burden of care (ie, morbidity, complications, and treatment time).

The compressive strength of implant-abutment complex with different connection designs.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Implant-abutment connection is the component responsible for the transmitting of occlusal force from the crown down to the implant fixture. Different connection geometric structure will lead to different mechanical performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of internal hex Implant -abutment connection with internal hex with Morse taper implant-abutment connection by testing their compressive strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an in vitro study. The test group and the control group had 8 specimens separately. The test group was internal hex combined with Morse taper implant connection design, and the control group was internal hex connection design. Static force was applied to the specimens at a 30° angle until failure. The testing protocol was designed according to ISO14801 regulations. We compared the compressive strength of both groups. RESULTS: The control group showed significantly higher compressive strength than the test group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For the compressive strength of implant abutment complex, incorporating Morse taper design into internal hex connection failed to enhance its mechanical performance. According to this study, internal hex connection has higher compressive strength than internal hex connection combined with Morse taper design.

Does Sleep Quality Affect Temporomandibular Joint With Degenerative Joint Changes?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to answer the following question: Among female patients who have skeletal Class III malocclusion, does poor sleep quality increase the prevalence of degenerative joint changes in the temporomandibular joints (DJC-TMJ)? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a prospective cohort study and enrolled female patients who required orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion from January 2014 to December 2017. This is the first serial study to identify the relationship between sleep quality and DJC-TMJ before orthognathic surgery. The predictor variable was sleep quality, documented either as poor, indicated by a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score of 5 or greater, or as good, indicated by a PSQI score of less than 5. The primary outcome variable was the presence of 5 or more DJC-TMJ signs or fewer than 5 DJC-TMJ signs. Other associated variables were grouped into the following categories: demographic variables (age and body mass index) and cephalometric data. Descriptive bivariate statistics were computed and univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with DJC-TMJ. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 52 patients grouped as follows: good sleep quality group (n = 25, PSQI score < 5) and poor sleep quality group (n = 27, PSQI score ≥ 5). Poor sleep quality was significantly associated (P = .027) with an increase in DJC-TMJ signs. In the multiple regression model, a PSQI score of 5 or greater (adjusted odds ratio, 5.806; 95% confidence interval, 1.406 to 23.974) and greater sella-nasion-point A angle (adjusted odds ratio, 1.453; 95% confidence interval, 1.127 to 1.871) were significantly associated (P < .05) with an increased prevalence of DJC-TMJ. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that in female patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion, poor sleep quality could increase the prevalence of DJC-TMJ. Future cohort studies are required to support that sleep disturbance can increase DJC-TMJ in the general population.

Does Sensory Retraining Improve Subjective Rating of Sensory Impairment after Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: Sensory retraining could ameliorate neurosensory disturbance (NSD) resulting from the injury of the inferior alveolar nerve after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The aim of this study was to measure the effects of sensory retraining on NSD. METHODS: A randomized, prospective, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted on consecutive patients with NSD resulting from a BSSO to correct skeletal class III malocclusion. The outcome measurement of sensory recovery was performed using a patient-centered survey assessed by the total score of questionnaire (TSQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) at preoperation (T0), 1 week after surgery (T1), each month from 1 to 6 months after surgery (T2-T7), and 1 year after surgery (T8). RESULTS: In total, 115 consecutive patients were randomized into a control group (56 patients without sensory retraining) or study group (59 patients with sensory retraining). TSQ and VAS values continually decreased from T1 to T8 in both groups. The study group tended to have lower, but not significantly lower, TSQ and VAS values than the control group at each postoperative time point. Women and men responded similarly to sensory retraining at each time point. The oldest patients did not respond well to sensory retraining, compared with the youngest patients, from T1 to T8, and this age effect evaluated by the VAS reached a significant difference at T7 and T8. CONCLUSION: NSD, assessed by the TSQ and VAS, continually decreased over time after the BSSO. Sensory retraining could improve NSD, but not significantly.

Female Facial Attractiveness Assessed from Three-Dimensional Contour Lines by University Students.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) images could provide more accurate evaluation for facial attractiveness than two-dimensional (2D) images. The 3D facial image could be simplified into gray scale 3D contour lines. Whether female facial attractiveness could be perceived in these simplified 3D facial contour lines should be determined. METHODS: A series of 100 2D photographs (one frontal and two lateral views) and 3D contour lines extracted from 3D facial images of females were projected onto a screen. Each image presentation lasted 5 s, and the evaluators marked their impression of each image's facial attractiveness on a five-point Likert scale within 3 s of its presentation. The evaluation of the 3D contour lines was performed twice, 2 weeks apart. The evaluators were university students. RESULTS: High consistency (r = 0.92) was found for the first and second evaluation of 3D facial contour lines for female facial attractiveness. The judgments of unattractive face were more consistent than the judgments of attractive face. Male students tended to give lower scores than female students in the evaluation of female facial attractiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Female facial attractiveness could be evaluated by 3D facial contour lines. 3D facial contour lines should be one of the key factors of facial attractiveness.

The Effect of early physiotherapy on the recovery of mandibular function after orthognathic surgery for Class III correction: part I--jaw-motion analysis.

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the mandibular range of motion in Class III patients with and without early physiotherapy after orthognathic surgery (OGS). This study consisted of 63 Class III patients who underwent 2-jaw OGS. The experimental group comprised 31 patients who received early systematic physical rehabilitation. The control group consisted of 32 patients who did not have physical rehabilitation. Twelve variables of 3-dimensional (3D) jaw-motion analysis (JMA) were recorded before surgery (T1) and 6 weeks (T2) and 6 months (T3) after surgery. A 2-sample t test was conducted to compare the JMA results between the two groups at different time points. At T2, the JMA data were measured to be 77.5%-145.7% of presurgical values in the experimental group, and 60.3%-90.6% in the control group. At T3, the measurements were 112.2%-179.2% of presurgical values in the experimental group, and 77.6%-157.2% in the control group. The patients in the experimental group exhibited more favorable recovery than did those in the control group, from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3. However, after termination of physiotherapy, no significant difference in the extent of recovery was observed between groups up to 6 months after OGS.

The effect of early physiotherapy on the recovery of mandibular function after orthognathic surgery for class III correction. Part II: electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles.

The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of early physical rehabilitation by comparing the differences of surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity in the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion. The prospective study included 63 patients; the experimental groups contained 31 patients who received early systematic physical rehabilitation; the control group (32 patients) did not receive physiotherapy. The amplitude of sEMG in the masticatory muscles reached 72.6-121.3% and 37.5-64.6% of pre-surgical values in the experimental and control groups respectively at 6 weeks after orthognathic surgery (OGS). At 6 months after OGS, the sEMG reached 135.1-233.4% and 89.6-122.5% of pre-surgical values in the experimental and control groups respectively. Most variables in the sEMG examination indicated that recovery of the masticatory muscles in the experimental group was better than the control group as estimated in the early phase (T1 to T2) and the total phase (T1 to T3); there were no significant differences between the mean recovery percentages in the later phase (T2 to T3). Early physical rehabilitative therapy is helpful for early recovery of muscle activity in masticatory muscles after OGS. After termination of physical therapy, no significant difference in recovery was indicated in patients with or without early physiotherapy.