ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic generated the need for a teaching tool for enhancing remote education and evaluation of medical trainees. Smart glasses are being explored as a hands-free teaching tool for teleconferencing with hands-on demonstrations in addition to livestreaming capability. We wanted to understand the efficacy of such virtual teaching techniques in teaching procedural and surgical skills. METHODS: Medical students in their Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship at our medical school were recruited to participate in a virtual demonstration of normal vaginal delivery. A birthing simulator and smart glasses were used to livestream the simulated delivery, and a previously published checklist was used to show the steps for conducting routine vaginal delivery. A follow-up electronic survey assessed the clarity of the video and audio feed, level of satisfaction, positive and constructive feedback, and an error-identification exercise with a smart glass-recorded video. RESULTS: A total of 62 students participated; 98% of them reported that the audio and video feeds were clear and 95% of the students reported being extremely satisfied or satisfied with the teaching tool. Students could identify on average three out of four errors. Students believed the streaming to be "interactive" and a "most effective remote learning" tool, but expressed that it did not "take the place of clinical skills learning." CONCLUSIONS: The combination of smart glass technology and simulation can be a useful new tool for clinical faculty who simultaneously deliver care to patients and teach. Continued research is needed to explore the use of smart glass technology into livestreaming or surgeries and examinations, with consideration for patient privacy concerns and remote assessment of students.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gynecology , Obstetrics , Smart Glasses , Students, Medical , Female , Humans , Obstetrics/education , Gynecology/educationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have attracted extensive attention as therapeutic targets in gastric cancer (GC). Circ_0003356 is known to be downregulated in GC tissues, but its cellular function and mechanisms remain undefined. AIM: To investigate the role of circ_0003356 in GC at the molecular and cellular level. METHODS: Circ_0003356, miR-668-3p, and SOCS3 expression were assessed via quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Wound healing, EdU, CCK-8, flow cytometry and transwell assays were used to analyze the migration, proliferation, viability, apoptosis and invasion of GC cells. The subcellular localization of circ_0003356 was monitored using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The interaction of circ_0003356 with miR-668-3p was confirmed using RIP-qRT-PCR, RNA pull-down, and dual luciferase reporter assays. We observed protein levels of genes via western blot. We injected AGS cells into the upper back of mice and performed immunohistochemistry staining for examining E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Ki67, and SOCS3 expressions. TUNEL staining was performed for the assessment of apoptosis in mouse tumor tissues. RESULTS: Circ_0003356 and SOCS3 expression was downregulated in GC cells, whilst miR-668-3p was upregulated. Exogenous circ_0003356 expression and miR-668-3p silencing suppressed the migration, viability, proliferation, epithelial to mesenchy-mal transition (EMT) and invasion of GC cells and enhanced apoptosis. Circ_0003356 overexpression impaired tumor growth in xenograft mice. Targeting of miR-668-3p by circ_0003356 was confirmed through binding assays and SOCS3 was identified as a downstream target of miR-668-3p. The impacts of circ_0003356 on cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion and EMT were reversed by miR-668-3p up-regulation or SOCS3 down-regulation in GC cells. CONCLUSION: Circ_0003356 impaired GC development through its interaction with the miR-668-3p/SOCS3 axis.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, anesthesiology residents faced increased risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 while performing aerosolizing procedures. We developed an airway simulation on the out-of-operating-room management of COVID-19 patients. Methods: A 90-minute simulation focused on caring for a 45-year-old COVID-19 patient provided training in donning and doffing personal protective equipment, intubation, management of postinduction hypotension, management of ICU ventilators, treatment strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), interpersonal communication, and resource management. Presimulation, postsimulation, and 3-months postsimulation questionnaires measured changes in confidence, knowledge, and clinical practice. Statistical analysis was completed using related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Results: Twenty-four residents participated in the simulation. Questionnaire response rates were 100% presimulation and postsimulation and 88% 3-months postsimulation. Confidence scores (1 = not at all, 5 = extremely) improved with donning and doffing personal protective equipment (from 3.0 to 4.1, p < .001), ARDS management (from 3.1 to 4.0, p < .001), and COVID-19 airway management (from 2.8 to 4.0, p < .001). Correct answers on 10 knowledge questions increased significantly between presimulation and postsimulation (from 5.1 to 9.0, p < .001) but not between presimulation and 3-months postsimulation (from 5.1 to 5.8, p = .27). All participants who cared for COVID-19 patients at 3 months agreed or strongly agreed that their current management of COVID-19 patients was directly influenced by the simulation session (M = 4.4). Discussion: This simulation is a safe, effective method of providing the experiential training necessary to care for actual COVID-19 patients during an active pandemic.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , COVID-19 , Simulation Training , Humans , Middle Aged , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare results of simulator-based vs traditional training of medical students in direct ophthalmoscopy. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: First-year medical student volunteers completed 1 hour of didactic instruction regarding direct ophthalmoscopes, fundus anatomy, and signs of disease. Students were randomized to an additional hour of training on a direct ophthalmoscope simulator (n = 17) or supervised practice examining classmates (traditional method, n = 16). After 1 week of independent student practice using assigned training methods, masked ophthalmologist observers assessed student ophthalmoscopy skills (technique, efficiency, and global performance) during examination of 5 patient volunteers, using 5-point Likert scales. Students recorded findings and lesion location for each patient. Two masked ophthalmologists graded answer sheets independently using 3-point scales. Students completed surveys before randomization and after assessments. Training groups were compared for grades, observer- and patient-assigned scores, and survey responses. RESULTS: The simulator group reported longer practice times than the traditional group (P = .002). Observers assigned higher technique scores to the simulator group after adjustment for practice time (P = .034). Combined grades (maximum points = 20) were higher for the simulator group (median: 5.0, range: 0.0-11.0) than for the traditional group (median: 4.0, range: 0.0-9.0), although the difference was not significant. The simulator group was less likely to mistake the location of a macular scar in 1 patient (odds ratio: 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.056-1.35, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Direct ophthalmoscopy is difficult, regardless of training technique, but simulator-based training has apparent advantages, including improved technique, the ability to localize fundus lesions, and a fostering of interest in learning ophthalmoscopy, reflected by increased practice time.
Subject(s)
Students, Medical , Clinical Competence , Fundus Oculi , Humans , Ophthalmoscopy/methods , Prospective Studies , TeachingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The need for teamwork training is well documented; however, teaching these skills is challenging given the logistics of assembling individual team members together to train in person. We designed 2 modes of screen-based simulation for training teamwork skills to assess whether interactivity with nonplayer characters was necessary for in-game performance gains or for player satisfaction with the experience. METHODS: Mixed, randomized, repeated measures study with licensed healthcare providers block-stratified and randomized to evaluation-participant observes and evaluates the team player in 3 scenarios-and game play-participant is immersed as the leader in the same 3 scenarios. Teamwork construct scores (leadership, communication, situation monitoring, mutual support) from an ontology-based, Bayesian network assessment model were analyzed using mixed randomized repeated measures analyses of variance to compare performance, across scenarios and modes. Learning was measured by pretest and posttest quiz scores. User experience was evaluated using χ2 analyses. RESULTS: Among 166 recruited and randomized participants, 120 enrolled in the study and 109 had complete data for analysis. Mean composite teamwork Bayesian network scores improved for successive scenarios in both modes, with evaluation scores statistically higher than game play for every teamwork construct and scenario (r = 0.73, P = 0.000). Quiz scores improved from pretest to posttest (P = 0.004), but differences between modes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: For training teamwork skills using screen-based simulation, interactivity of the player with the nonplayer characters is not necessary for in-game performance gains or for player satisfaction with the experience.
Subject(s)
Patient Care Team , Simulation Training , Bayes Theorem , Clinical Competence , Communication , Health Personnel , Humans , LeadershipABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to determine how resident performance deficiencies affect graduation and board certification. METHODS: Primary documents pertaining to resident performance were examined over a 10-yr period at four academic anesthesiology residencies. Residents entering training between 2000 and 2009 were included, with follow-up through February 2016. Residents receiving actions by the programs' Clinical Competency Committee were categorized by the area of deficiency and compared to peers without deficiencies. RESULTS: A total of 865 residents were studied (range: 127 to 275 per program). Of these, 215 residents received a total of 405 actions from their respective Clinical Competency Committee. Among those who received an action compared to those who did not, the proportion graduating differed (93 vs. 99%, respectively, P < 0.001), as did the proportion achieving board certification (89 vs. 99%, respectively, P < 0.001). When a single deficiency in an Essential Attribute (e.g., ethical, honest, respectful behavior; absence of impairment) was identified, the proportion graduating dropped to 55%. When more than three Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Core Competencies were deficient, the proportion graduating also dropped significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Overall graduation and board certification rates were consistently high in residents with no, or isolated, deficiencies. Residents deficient in an Essential Attribute, or multiple competencies, are at high risk of not graduating or achieving board certification. More research is needed on the effectiveness and selective deployment of remediation efforts, particularly for high-risk groups.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/education , Anesthesiology/standards , Internship and Residency/standards , Accreditation , Certification , Clinical Competence , Communication , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Educational Measurement , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Professional Role , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The acquisition and use of pharmaceuticals in simulation is a common challenge for many institutions and simulation centers. There are 2 major avenues of obtaining medications, namely, via expired drugs donated by manufacturers or via purchasing simulated medication vials filled with inactive ingredients. Neither option is ideal to keep pace with busy simulation centers or to meet the specialized requirements of many educational programs. We describe an alternative solution through internal production of simulated drugs using readily available materials from laboratory suppliers. METHODS: Serum vials, stoppers, and flip off vial caps can be purchased in 2-, 5-, 10-, and 20-mL volumes. Vials can be filled with substances such as 0.9% NaCl or table salt to mimic a variety of available injectable drugs. Labels can be produced using the free online Web application, Simulated Online Pharmaceutical Image Editor (SOPHIE) and printed on glossy adhesive photo paper for application onto completed vials. RESULTS: A wide range of simulated drugs, customized to the needs of each center, can be produced in an affordable and reliable manner. The appearance of the vials can be tailored for each program to meet educational objectives and enhance fidelity in simulation. CONCLUSIONS: Low-cost production of simulated drug vials increases learning opportunities for participants to practice skills related to drug delivery and preparation. Further expansion can include nonintravenous drugs, code syringes, or reconstitution devices used for blood factors. Simulation centers should consider safety, availability, affordability, and fidelity concerns before integrating an in-house simulated pharmacy.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical/methods , Pharmaceutical Services , Simulation Training , Drug Labeling , Drug Storage , Humans , Professional CompetenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study describes anesthesiologists' practice improvements undertaken during the first 3 yr of simulation activities for the Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Program. METHODS: A stratified sampling of 3 yr (2010-2012) of participants' practice improvement plans was coded, categorized, and analyzed. RESULTS: Using the sampling scheme, 634 of 1,275 participants in Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Program simulation courses were evaluated from the following practice settings: 41% (262) academic, 54% (339) community, and 5% (33) military/other. A total of 1,982 plans were analyzed for completion, target audience, and topic. On follow-up, 79% (1,558) were fully completed, 16% (310) were partially completed, and 6% (114) were not completed within the 90-day reporting period. Plans targeted the reporting individual (89% of plans) and others (78% of plans): anesthesia providers (50%), non-anesthesia physicians (16%), and non-anesthesia non-physician providers (26%). From the plans, 2,453 improvements were categorized as work environment or systems changes (33% of improvements), teamwork skills (30%), personal knowledge (29%), handoff (4%), procedural skills (3%), or patient communication (1%). The median word count was 63 (interquartile range, 30 to 126) for each participant's combined plans and 147 (interquartile range, 52 to 257) for improvement follow-up reports. CONCLUSIONS: After making a commitment to change, 94% of anesthesiologists participating in a Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Program simulation course successfully implemented some or all of their planned practice improvements. This compares favorably to rates in other studies. Simulation experiences stimulate active learning and motivate personal and collaborative practice improvement changes. Further evaluation will assess the impact of the improvements and further refine the program.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/education , Anesthesiology/standards , Certification , Clinical Competence/standards , Manikins , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Documentation , Humans , Patient Simulation , Retrospective Studies , Teaching MaterialsSubject(s)
Appendicitis/etiology , Endometriosis/complications , Adult , Appendectomy , Appendicitis/surgery , Chronic Disease , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is wide variation in end-of-life (EOL) intensive care unit (ICU) use among academic medical centers (AMCs). Our objective was to develop hypotheses regarding medical decision-making factors underlying this variation. METHODS: This was a high-fidelity simulation experiment involving a critically and terminally ill elder, followed by a survey and debriefing cognitive interview and evaluated using triangulated quantitative-qualitative comparative analysis. The study was conducted in 2 AMCs in the same state and health care system with disparate EOL ICU use. Subjects were hospital-based physicians responsible for ICU admission decisions. Measurements included treatment plan, prognosis, diagnosis, qualitative case perceptions, and clinical reasoning. RESULTS: Sixty-seven of 111 (60%) eligible physicians agreed to participate; 48 (72%) could be scheduled. There were no significant between-AMC differences in 3-month prognosis or treatment plan, but there were systematic differences in perceptions of the case. Case perceptions at the low-intensity AMC seemed to be influenced by the absence of a do-not-resuscitate order in the context of norms of universal code status discussion and documentation upon admission, whereas case perceptions at the high-intensity AMC seemed to be influenced by the patient's known metastatic gastric cancer in the context of norms of oncologists' avoiding code status discussions. CONCLUSIONS: In this simulation study of 2 AMCs, hospital-based physicians had different perceptions of an identical case. We hypothesize that different advance care planning norms may have influenced their decision-making heuristics.
Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Decision Making , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Patient Simulation , Physicians , Prognosis , Terminal Care/organization & administrationABSTRACT
Simulation has become ubiquitous in medical education over the last decade. However, while many health-care professions and disciplines have embraced the use of simulation for training, its use for high-stakes testing and credentialing is less well established. This chapter explores the incorporation of simulation into training requirements and board certification, and its role for quality assurance of educational programmes and professional competence. Educational theories that underlie the use of simulation are described. The driving forces that support the simulation movement are outlined. Accreditation bodies have mandated simulation in training and maintenance of certification. It may be only a matter of time before simulation becomes one of the standards for performance assessment.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Credentialing , Education, Medical/methods , Accreditation , Anesthesiology/education , Certification/methods , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Education, Medical/standards , Humans , Specialty BoardsABSTRACT
There is an increasing body of evidence that a brief exposure to anesthesia induces ischemic tolerance in rat brain (anesthetic preconditioning). However, it is unknown whether preconditioning with sevoflurane, a commonly used volatile anesthetic in current clinical practice, produces a delayed window of neuroprotection against ischemia and what the mechanisms are for this protection. To address these issues, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to middle cerebral arterial occlusion (MCAO) for 2 h. Sevoflurane preconditioning was induced 24 h before brain ischemia by exposing the animals to sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (2.4%) in oxygen for 60 min. Animals preconditioned with sevoflurane had lower neurological deficit scores and smaller brain infarct volumes than animals with brain ischemia at 6 and 24 h after MCAO, respectively. Application of a selective antagonist for mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mitoK(ATP)) channel, 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD, 40 mg/kg i.p.) 30 min before sevoflurane exposure attenuated this beneficial effect. Moreover, protein kinase C ε (PKC ε) was translocated to the membrane fraction at 6 h, but not 24 h, after brain reperfusion in animals preconditioned with sevoflurane and this effect was also abolished by 5-HD. We concluded that sevoflurane preconditioning induces a delayed neuroprotection and that mitochondrial K(ATP) channels and PKC ε may be involved in this neuroprotection.
Subject(s)
Ion Channel Gating/drug effects , Methyl Ethers/pharmacology , Neuroprotective Agents/pharmacology , Potassium Channels/metabolism , Protein Kinase C-epsilon/metabolism , Animals , Enzyme Activation/drug effects , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/complications , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/enzymology , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/pathology , Infarction, Middle Cerebral Artery/physiopathology , Ischemic Preconditioning , Male , Methyl Ethers/administration & dosage , Neuroprotective Agents/administration & dosage , Oxygen/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reperfusion Injury/complications , Reperfusion Injury/enzymology , Reperfusion Injury/pathology , Reperfusion Injury/physiopathology , SevofluraneABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists are responsible for the management of perioperative cardiopulmonary arrest in children. This study used simulation to assess the pediatric resuscitation skills of experienced anesthesia residents. METHODS: Nineteen anesthesia residents were evaluated using a pediatric pulseless electrical activity scenario. The authors used a standardized checklist to evaluate the residents' diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. RESULTS: After the onset of pulseless electrical activity, 79% of residents initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 1 min. Approximately one third (31%) performed chest compressions at the recommended rate. Epinephrine was administered by 95% of residents, but only one third used the correct pediatric dose. All residents administered fluid boluses, but only 16% administered the recommended volume. Only one fourth of the residents considered hyperkalemia as a cause of pulseless electrical activity. None of the residents asked for dosing aids. CONCLUSION: During this simulated pediatric emergency, anesthesia residents demonstrated an acceptable knowledge of general resuscitation maneuvers. However, a subset of resuscitation skills was incorrectly performed, mostly related to age or weight. Importantly, many residents did not consider the full differential diagnosis of pulseless electrical activity. Anesthesia residents may benefit from additional pediatric resuscitation training and practice using cognitive aids to access dosages and complicated diagnostic algorithms.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/education , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hyperkalemia/complications , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Checklist , Child , Clinical Competence , Electroencephalography , Epinephrine/administration & dosage , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant , Internship and Residency , Male , Patient Simulation , Resuscitation , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
The Society for Simulation in Healthcare convened the second Simulation Education Summit meeting in October 2007 in Chicago, Illinois. The purpose of the Summit was to bring together leaders of public, private, and government organizations, associations, and agencies involved in healthcare education for a focused discussion of standards for simulation-based applications. Sixty-eight participants representing 36 organizations discussed in structured small and large groups the criteria needed for various training and assessment applications using simulation. Although consensus was reached for many topics, there were also areas that required further thought and dialogue. This article is a summary of the results of these discussions along with a preliminary draft of a guideline for simulation-based education.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical/standards , Patient Simulation , Chicago , Congresses as Topic , Humans , SocietiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether full-scale simulation (SIM) is superior to interactive problem-based learning (PBL) for teaching medical students acute care assessment and management skills. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Simulation center at a U.S. medical school. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one fourth-year medical students in a week-long acute care course. INTERVENTIONS: After institutional review board approval and informed consent, eligible students were randomized to either the SIM or PBL group. On day 1, all subjects underwent a simulator-based initial assessment designed to evaluate their critical care skills. Two blinded investigators assessed each student using a standardized checklist. Subsequently, the PBL group learned about dyspnea in a standard PBL format. The SIM group learned about dyspnea using the simulator. To equalize simulator education time, the PBL group learned about acute abdominal pain on the simulator, whereas the SIM group used the PBL format. On day 5, each student was tested on a unique dyspnea scenario. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean initial assessment and final assessment checklist scores and their change for the SIM and PBL groups were compared using the Student's t-test. A p < .05 was considered significant. The SIM and PBL groups had similar mean (PBL 0.44, SIM 0.47, p = .64) initial assessment scores (earned score divided by maximum score) and were deemed equivalent. The SIM group performed better than the PBL group on the final assessment (mean, PBL 0.53, SIM 0.72, p < .0001). When each student's change in score (percent correct on final assessment minus percent correct on the initial assessment) was compared, SIM group students performed better (mean improvement, SIM 25 percentage points vs. PBL 8 percentage points, p < .04) CONCLUSIONS: For fourth-year medical students, simulation-based learning was superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills.