Implementing Gender-Affirming Care in Correctional Settings: A Review of Key Barriers and Action Steps for Change.

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people are disproportionately impacted by incarceration, interpersonal violence, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections, substance use disorders, and suicidality. Little is known about successful approaches to improve health outcomes for TGD individuals impacted by incarceration. We review the barriers to providing gender-affirming clinical care in correctional systems in the United States, identify key knowledge gaps regarding the provision of gender-affirming care to incarcerated TGD populations, and highlight necessary steps to improve the health and safety of this highly vulnerable population. We also describe the components of a gender-affirming care model implemented in a state correctional facility, including support from correctional administrators, identifying a gender-affirming care provider, standardizing clinical care protocols, and adapting clinical services to TGD population needs. Similar models should be employed elsewhere to improve health outcomes for TGD populations during incarceration and on release.

Modifying the RAPT Score to Reflect Discharge Destination in Current Practice.

BACKGROUND: The Risk Assessment Prediction Tool (RAPT) is a validated 6-question survey designed to predict primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients' discharge disposition. It is scored from 1 to 12 with patients stratified into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups. Given recent advancements in rapid-discharge protocols and increasing utilization of home services, the RAPT score may require modified scoring cutoffs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing primary TJA at a single academic center over 14 months was performed. The RAPT score was implemented during the sixth month. Patients undergoing revision TJA, complex TJA, and TJA after resection of malignancy were excluded. Outcomes before and after RAPT implementation were analyzed with additional subanalysis investigating of post-RAPT data. RESULTS: A total of 1264 patients (624 Pre-RAPT and 640 Post-RAPT) were evaluated. The post-RAPT group (245 total hip arthroplasty and 395 total knee arthroplasty) experienced significant decreases in mean hospital length of stay (2.22 days pre-RAPT to 1.82 days post-RAPT, P < .001) and the proportion of patients discharged to facility (21.8% pre-RAPT to 15.2% post-RAPT, P = .002). The modified system demonstrated the highest overall predictive accuracy at 92% and was found to be predictive of hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION: Owing to the recent trends favoring in-home services over rehab facility after discharge, previously published RAPT scoring cutoffs are inaccurate for modern practice. Using mRAPT cutoffs maximizes the number of patients for whom a discharge prediction can be made, while maintaining excellent predictive accuracy.