ABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 emerged from animals and is now easily transmitted between people. Sporadic detection of natural cases in animals alongside successful experimental infections of pets, such as cats, ferrets and dogs, raises questions about the susceptibility of animals under natural conditions of pet ownership. Here, we report a large-scale study to assess SARS-CoV-2 infection in 919 companion animals living in northern Italy, sampled at a time of frequent human infection. No animals tested PCR positive. However, 3.3% of dogs and 5.8% of cats had measurable SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers, with dogs from COVID-19 positive households being significantly more likely to test positive than those from COVID-19 negative households. Understanding risk factors associated with this and their potential to infect other species requires urgent investigation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/veterinary , Adaptive Immunity , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/isolation & purification , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cats , Dogs , Humans , Italy/epidemiologyABSTRACT
SARS-CoV-2 originated in animals and is now easily transmitted between people. Sporadic detection of natural cases in animals alongside successful experimental infections of pets, such as cats, ferrets and dogs, raises questions about the susceptibility of animals under natural conditions of pet ownership. Here we report a large-scale study to assess SARS-CoV-2 infection in 817 companion animals living in northern Italy, sampled at a time of frequent human infection. No animals tested PCR positive. However, 3.4% of dogs and 3.9% of cats had measurable SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers, with dogs from COVID-19 positive households being significantly more likely to test positive than those from COVID-19 negative households. Understanding risk factors associated with this and their potential to infect other species requires urgent investigation. ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY: SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pets from Italy.
Subject(s)
Plasmodium/pathogenicity , Psychodidae/classification , Psychodidae/microbiology , Wolbachia/pathogenicity , Animals , Insect Vectors/classification , Insect Vectors/genetics , Insect Vectors/microbiology , Insect Vectors/parasitology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Psychodidae/genetics , Psychodidae/parasitologyABSTRACT
The bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia manipulates arthropod host biology in numerous ways, including sex ratio distortion and differential offspring survival. These bacteria infect a vast array of arthropods, some of which pose serious agricultural and human health threats. Wolbachia-mediated phenotypes such as cytoplasmic incompatibility and/or pathogen interference can be used for vector and disease control; however, many medically important vectors and important agricultural species are uninfected or are infected with strains of Wolbachia that do not elicit phenotypes desirable for disease or pest control. The ability to transfer strains of Wolbachia into new hosts (transinfection) can create novel Wolbachia-host associations. Transinfection has two primary benefits. First, Wolbachia-host interactions can be examined to tease apart the influence of the host and bacteria on phenotypes. Second, desirable phenotypes induced by Wolbachia in a particular insect can be transferred to another recipient host. This can allow the manipulation of insect populations that transmit pathogens or detrimentally affect agriculture. As such, transinfection is a valuable tool to explore Wolbachia biology and control arthropod-borne disease. The present review summarizes what is currently known about Wolbachia transinfection methods and applications. We also provide a comprehensive list of published successful and unsuccessful Wolbachia transinfection attempts.
Subject(s)
Insecta/microbiology , Isopoda/microbiology , Pest Control, Biological/methods , Wolbachia/physiology , Animals , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Species SpecificityABSTRACT
This survey of Wolbachia infections in populations of the planthoppers Perkinsiella saccharicida and Perkinsiella vitiensis revealed variable frequencies, low-titer infections, and high phylogenetic diversities of strains. These observations add to the growing realization that Wolbachia infections may be extremely common within invertebrates and yet occur infrequently within populations and at low titer within individuals.
Subject(s)
Saccharum/microbiology , Wolbachia/genetics , Molecular Sequence Data , Phylogeny , Wolbachia/classificationABSTRACT
Fiji leaf gall (FLG) is caused by the Reovirus, Fiji disease virus (FDV), which is transmitted to sugarcane by planthoppers of the genus Perkinsiella. Low vector transmission rates and slow disease symptom development make experimentation within the FDV-Perkinsiella-sugarcane system inherently difficult. A laboratory-based technique was devised to rear the vector using sugarcane leaves as a food source. Planthoppers were reared on sugarcane leaf segments embedded in agarose enclosed within plastic containers. To provide a nondestructive assay for determination of the inoculation potential of planthoppers, FDV was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in newly infected sugarcane leaf segments following exposure to viruliferous planthoppers. Leaf segment inoculation correlated with development of FLG symptoms in whole plants that were fed on by the same planthoppers. Analysis of FDV RNAs within the planthopper, measured by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), indicated that FDV RNA concentration was associated with successful inoculation of the leaf segment, transmission of FDV to sugarcane and subsequent development of FLG in plants. Quantification of FDV RNA within planthoppers provided an additional measure to assess vector competence in individuals.
Subject(s)
Hemiptera/virology , Plant Leaves/virology , Reoviridae/physiology , Saccharum/virology , Animals , Hemiptera/physiology , Insect Vectors/physiology , Insect Vectors/virology , Plant Diseases/parasitology , Plant Diseases/virology , Plant Leaves/parasitology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reoviridae/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Saccharum/parasitologyABSTRACT
Host specificity data for gnathiid isopods are scarce because the parasitic stages are difficult to identify and host-parasite contact is often brief. We examined two common nocturnal species, Gnathia falcipenis and Gnathia sp. C, collected in light traps from two locations at Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Engorged third stage gnathiids were photographed and permitted to moult into adults to allow identification. We compared approximately 580 bp sequences of 16S mtDNA from blood meals with host sequences available on GenBank using BLASTn. Where homology was <98%, familial identity was investigated with neighbour-joining trees. All blood meal sequences (n=60) and homologous fish sequences (n=87) from GenBank were used in a Bayesian analysis, which identified all but three sequences to family. The host frequency distributions used by each species were significantly different; only four host families were shared. No gnathiids fed on elasmobranchs, blennies or apogonids, and most fed on host families whose representatives are typically large. Gnathia sp. C showed a distinct predilection for nemipterids. Gnathia falcipenis often parasitised sand-dwelling families, and unlike sympatric diurnal gnathiid species, it also frequently parasitised pomacentrids. We conclude that G. falcipenis and Gnathia sp. C operate as generalist micropredators with preferences.