ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of lidocaine administered intravenously, intranasally or as an infraorbital nerve block in dogs undergoing rostral rhinoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 43 client-owned dogs. METHODS: After premedication with medetomidine 0.01 mg kg-1 and methadone 0.2 mg kg-1 intramuscularly, anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Dogs were randomly allocated to receive 2 mg kg-1 of 2% lidocaine as a bilateral infraorbital nerve block (INB) via the caudal intraoral approach, via bilateral topical intranasal administration (TIA) or as an intravenous bolus (IVB). At 5 minutes following lidocaine administration, responses to rhinoscopy (RR) and biopsies (RB) were evaluated using a simple scoring system (0: no reaction; 1: reaction). Response to the rhinoscopy in the recovery period (RE) was recorded. Recovery quality was scored using a simple descriptive score. Heart rate, respiratory rate and noninvasive arterial blood pressure were recorded. Intravenous (IV) fentanyl 0.001 mg kg-1 was administered if an increase > 20% in any variable occurred. Gross movement was attenuated using propofol 0.5 mg kg-1 IV. Scores were analysed using the Chi-square test with Monte Carlo method. Cardiorespiratory changes among and overtime between groups were compared using one-way anova and one-way anova for repeated measures, respectively, or the correspondent non-parametric tests; p < 0.05. RESULT: Of the 43 dogs, 42 completed the study. No statistically significant differences were detected in either physical reactions or changes in cardiorespiratory variables for RR, RB, RE or recovery quality, although RB tended to be higher in group TIA (7/10 versus 1/10 INB and 3/13 IVB).Various cardiorespiratory variables changed overtime within groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In dogs, all three investigated techniques attenuated responses during rostral rhinoscopy in dogs, although INB and IVB were more efficacious when biopsies were taken.
Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Anesthetics, Local , Lidocaine , Nerve Block , Animals , Dogs , Female , Male , Administration, Intranasal/veterinary , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/pharmacology , Nerve Block/veterinaryABSTRACT
The study aimed to investigate if arterial blood analysis in conscious horses presenting with signs of colic and breathing ambient air had diagnostic or prognostic value. Arterial blood samples from 352 horses presenting with colic at a university equine referral hospital were analysed for pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), concentrations of sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), ionised calcium (Ca2+) and chloride (Cl-), actual and standardised plasma bicarbonate concentration (HCO3- (P) and HCO3- (P, st)), blood and extracellular fluid base excess (Base (B) and Base (ecf)) and anion gap (AG). Results were compared to previously reported values for healthy horses, and comparisons were made between final diagnosis, treatment and survival to hospital discharge. Significant differences were found between colic cases and healthy reference values between some primary aetiologies. Overall, surgical and non-surgical colic cases differed in Ca2+ and Cl- concentrations and Ca2+ differed between cases that survived to discharge and those that did not. PaO2 differed between small intestinal surgical cases that survived and those that did not. From these results, we developed regression models that demonstrated excellent or good predictive value in identifying the likelihood of surgical versus medical management and survival to hospital discharge.
Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral , Tail , Dogs , Animals , Tail/surgery , Catheters, Indwelling , Catheterization, Peripheral/veterinaryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the ease of endoscopic duodenal intubation (EDI) in dogs during maintenance of general anaesthesia with isoflurane or propofol infusion. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, partially blinded clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 22 dogs undergoing upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy to include EDI were recruited. METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned isoflurane (ISO; n = 10) or propofol (PROP; n = 11) for maintenance of general anaesthesia. Following anaesthetic premedication with intramuscular medetomidine (0.005 mg kg-1) and butorphanol (0.2 mg kg-1), general anaesthesia was induced with propofol, to effect, maintained with 1.5% (vaporizer setting) isoflurane in 100% oxygen or 0.2 mg kg-1 minute-1 propofol. The dose of both agents was adjusted to maintain general anaesthesia adequate for the procedure. Degree of sedation 20 minutes post-anaesthetic premedication, propofol induction dose, anaesthetist and endoscopist training grade, animal's response to endoscopy, presence of gastro-oesophageal and duodenal-gastric reflux, spontaneous opening of the lower oesophageal and pyloric sphincters, antral movement and time to achieve EDI were recorded. EDI was scored 1 (immediate entry with minimal manoeuvring) to 4 (no entry after 120 seconds) by the endoscopist, blinded to the agent in use. Data were tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and differences between groups analysed using independent t test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups for EDI score [median (interquartile range): 2 (3) ISO, 2 (3) PROP] or time to achieve EDI [mean ± standard deviation: 52.50 ± 107.00 seconds (ISO), 70.00 ± 196.00 seconds (PROP)]. Significantly more dogs responded to passage of the endoscope into the oesophagus in group PROP compared with group ISO (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maintenance of general anaesthesia with either isoflurane or propofol did not affect EDI score or time to achieve EDI.
Subject(s)
Isoflurane , Propofol , Dogs , Animals , Propofol/pharmacology , Isoflurane/pharmacology , Prospective Studies , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthesia, General/veterinary , Endoscopy/veterinary , Intubation, Intratracheal/veterinaryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In equine anaesthesia, the recovery period is critical, accounting for most anaesthesia-related fatalities reported. Horses may recover unassisted or may be assisted, for example, using a head and tail rope recovery method. OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of head and tail rope and unassisted recovery method on quality of recovery in horses undergoing colic surgery under general anaesthesia (GA). STUDY DESIGN: Single centre retrospective cross-sectional study, with prospective model performance analysis. METHODS: Clinical data were obtained from horses undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy over a 6-year period. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the perioperative factors that affect quality of recovery. The final prediction model was assessed prospectively. RESULTS: Records from 502 general anaesthetics (490 horses) were included. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that head and tail rope recovery (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.3, P < .001) and sevoflurane administration (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.3, P = .02) were associated with better quality of recovery when compared with unassisted recovery and isoflurane administration respectively. Increasing GA duration (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99-1.0, P = .03), increasing intraoperative dosages (in mg/kg) of thiopental (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, P = .02) or ketamine (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99, P = .04) were linked to poor quality of recovery. No statistically significant difference was found between recovery groups in terms of mortality. MAIN LIMITATIONS: The clinical prediction model obtained is only applicable to the specific facilities, recovery methodology, referral population and anaesthetic protocols practiced at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: Head and tail rope recovery is significantly associated with better quality of recovery, compared with unassisted recovery, in horses undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy. Sevoflurane administration, in detriment of isoflurane, was associated with better quality of recovery. Other risk factors, such as increasing GA duration, the use of higher intra-operative dosages of ketamine and/or thiopental, were associated with poor quality of recovery.
Subject(s)
Isoflurane , Ketamine , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthesia, General/veterinary , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Horses , Laparotomy/veterinary , Models, Statistical , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Sevoflurane , Tail , ThiopentalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To establish reference intervals for arterial blood-gas (ABG), acid-base and electrolyte values from a healthy equine population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 139 client-owned, systemically healthy horses, 1 year of age and older, presented for elective surgical procedures. METHODS: Blood samples were collected anaerobically from the transverse facial or common carotid artery of horses breathing room air, prior to administration of preanaesthetic medication. Samples were analysed immediately, without correction for body temperature, using an automated bench-top analyser. Variables analysed included pH, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and plasma concentrations of sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), calcium (Ca2+) and chloride (Cl-). Actual and standardized plasma bicarbonate concentration [HCO3- (P) and HCO3- (P, st)], blood and extracellular fluid base excess [base (B) and base (ECF)] and anion gap (AG) were calculated by the machine from preprogrammed algorithms. Methods used for determination of PaCO2, PaO2, HCO3- (P), HCO3- (P, st), base (B) and base (ECF) met the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference intervals were determined with the nonparametric or the standard parametric method dependent on data distribution. RESULTS: Reference intervals were determined for pH, 7.37-7.49; PaCO2, 4.84-7.20 kPa (36.3-54.0 mmHg); PaO2, 11.01-14.97 kPa (82.6-112.3 mmHg); Na+, 133-141 mmol L-1; K+, 3.05-4.65 mmol L-1; Ca2+, 1.34-1.72 mmol L-1; Cl-, 100-110 mmol L-1; HCO3- (P), 23.55-33.90 mmol L-1; HCO3- (P, st), 23.87-32.45 mmol L-1; base (B), 0.51-8.80 mmol L-1; base (ECF), -0.53 to 9.39 mmol L-1 and AG, 1.5-11.5 mEq L-1. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data were derived from the largest group of horses reported in a single study and may aid in interpretation of ABG, acid-base and electrolyte measurements in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Acid-Base Equilibrium/physiology , Blood Gas Analysis/veterinary , Electrolytes/blood , Horses/blood , Animals , Carbon Dioxide/blood , Extracellular Fluid/chemistry , Food Deprivation , Oxygen/blood , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) with soiling in children may result from slow colonic transit (SCT) or anorectal dysfunction and/or psychological problems known as functional fecal retention (FFR). Evidence is accumulating that SCT and FFR need different treatments, but they are poorly distinguished by solid marker studies. The authors used radionuclear transit scintigraphy to categorize children with CIC as having either FFR or SCT. METHODS: Children (N = 101) with CIC (and soiling) who were referred for further investigation after failure of standard treatments (diet, laxatives) received radiolabeled colloid orally, and scintillation images were collected at 0 to 2, 6, 24, 30 and 48 hours (total radiation dosage = 2 standard x-rays). Radioactivity in 6 regions (precolonic, ascending, transverse, descending, rectosigmoid, and evacuated feces) was measured, and the median position (geometric center) of radioactivity at each time was determined. RESULTS: In children, meals normally reach the cecum at 6 hours and are evacuated in 30 to 58 hours. Fifty patients had retention of radioactivity in the proximal colon at 48 hours, indicating SCT. Analysis of the images and the geometric center showed that passage through the ascending colon and transverse colon was delayed in SCT. In 24 patients, radioactivity was passed by 30 hours, indicating normal transit or possible FFR. Twenty-two patients had retention in the rectum, indicating definite FFR. Five studies were borderline. CONCLUSIONS: Radionuclear transit scintigraphy is useful for categorizing patients with CIC as having either FFR or SCT, allowing for different treatments. Radionuclear transit scintigraphy provides more detail and greater sensitivity than solid marker studies in diagnosing CIC. Radionuclear transit scintigraphy showed that half of our patients had SCT.