Hospital and long-term opioid use according to analgosedation with fentanyl vs. morphine: Findings from the ANALGESIC trial.

Objectives: Opioid use disorder is extremely common. Many long-term opioid users will have their first exposure to opioids in hospitals. We aimed to compare long-term opioid use in patients who received fentanyl vs. morphine analgosedation and assess ICU related risk factors for long-term opioid use. Design: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the Assessment of Opioid Administration to Lead to Analgesic Effects and Sedation in Intensive Care (ANALGESIC) cluster randomised crossover trial of fentanyl and morphine infusions for analgosedation in mechanically ventilated patients. Setting: Two mixed, adult, university affiliated intensive care units in Melbourne, Australia. Participants: Adult patients who were mechanically ventilated and received fentanyl or morphine for analgosedation in the ANALGESIC trial. Main outcome measures: We assessed discharge and long-term (90-365 days) opioid use in opioid-naïve patients at hospital admission according to the agent used for analgosedation. Results: We studied 477 patients (242 fentanyl and 235 morphine). There were no differences between discharge (16.5% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.45), 90-180 day post-discharge use (3.7% vs 2.1%, p = 0.30) or 180-365 day post-discharge use (3.4% vs 1.3%, p = 0.22) of opioids when comparing those patients who received fentanyl vs. those who received morphine. Surgical diagnosis and one chronic condition were associated with increased hospital discharge prescription of opioids, whereas increasing APACHE II score was associated with decreased discharge prescription. No ICU-related factors were associated with long-term opioid use. Conclusions: Approximately one in seven opioid-naïve patients who receive analgosedation for mechanical ventilation in ICU will be prescribed opioid medications at hospital discharge. There was no difference in discharge prescription or long-term use of opioids depending on whether fentanyl or morphine was used for analgosedation.

Using machine learning to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery with machine learning using the data from the Australia New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database, cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion database, intensive care unit database and laboratory results. METHODS: We obtained surgical, perfusion, intensive care unit and laboratory data from a single Australian tertiary cardiac surgical hospital from February 2015 to March 2022 and included 2000 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We trained our models to predict either the Papworth definition or Dyke et al.'s universal definition of perioperative bleeding. Our primary outcome was the performance of our machine learning algorithms using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and area under precision-recall curve (AUPRC). RESULTS: Of the 2000 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 13.3% (226/2000) had bleeding using the Papworth definition and 17.2% (343/2000) had moderate to massive bleeding using Dyke et al.'s definition. The best-performing model based on AUPRC was the Ensemble Voting Classifier model for both Papworth (AUPRC 0.310, AUROC 0.738) and Dyke definitions of bleeding (AUPRC 0.452, AUROC 0.797). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning can incorporate routinely collected data from various datasets to predict bleeding after cardiac surgery.

The association between intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass power and complications after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Low cardiac power (product of flow and pressure) has been shown to be associated with mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction, but has not been studied in cardiac surgical patients. This study's hypothesis was that cardiac power during cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery would have a greater association with adverse events than either flow or MAP (mean arterial pressure) alone. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective observational study using patient data from February 2015 to March 2022 undergoing cardiac surgery at Fiona Stanley Hospital in Perth Australia. Excluded were patient age less than 18 years old, patients undergoing thoracic transplantation, ventricular assist devices, off pump cardiac surgery and aortic surgery. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of 30-days mortality, stroke or new-onset renal insufficiency. RESULTS: Overall, 1984 cardiac surgeries were included in the analysis. Neither duration nor area below thresholds tested for power, MAP or flow was associated with the primary composite outcome. However, we found that an area below MAP thresholds 35-50 mmHg was associated with new renal insufficiency (adjusted odds ratio 1.17 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.35] for patients spending 10 min at 10 mmHg below 50 mmHg MAP compared to those who did not). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that MAP during cardiopulmonary bypass, but not power or flow, was an independent risk factor for adverse renal outcomes for cardiac surgical patients.

Theoretical Feasibility of Using Arch Branched Endograft Devices for Repair of Post Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With Prior Ascending Aortic Replacement.

PURPOSE: Ascending aortic replacement is a common emergency procedure for treating acute type A aortic dissection. Secondary open or endovascular interventions for residual arch pathologies is difficult because of adhesions, short prosthetic grafts, and distorted anatomies. Aortic arch branched stent grafts have emerged as a potential solution for these patients if they have suitable anatomical conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the theoretical anatomical and technical feasibility of 2 currently used aortic arch branch endografts in patients who had prior replacement of the ascending aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who had a prosthetic ascending aortic or hemiarch replacement for acute type A dissection in a single institution between January 2013 and December 2018 were included. Contrast computed tomography images on the most recent follow-up were analyzed on a 3-dimensional workstation. Morphological parameters were measured individually for the ascending aorta, aortic arch, supra-aortic branches, and access iliac arteries. The computed tomography scan of each patient was individually evaluated for anatomical suitability for the arch branched and double-branch devices according to set selection criteria. RESULTS: Computed tomography images of 56 patients (median age of 57 years, 45 males) were reviewed. Based on our evaluation, 26 patients (46.4%) were good candidates for an endovascular arch branched device. It would be feasible for 13 patients (23.2%), but prudent preoperative planning was required due to complicated anatomy. The other 17 patients (30.4%) were unsuitable because they met at least 1 exclusion criterion. Short prosthetic grafts, extreme graft angulations, and extensive dissections in the supra-aortic branches were the main reasons for exclusion. CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair using arch branched endografts is feasible in patients with prior ascending aortic arch or hemiarch replacement for acute type A aortic dissection. The most common anatomical conditions that may influence the feasibility of the arch branched endograft procedure include insufficient proximal seal length, severe angulation of the graft, and extensive aortic dissection within the supra-aortic vessels.

Opioid Prescription After Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To characterise short-term and long-term opioid prescription patterns after cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We obtained data from a single Australian tertiary hospital from November 2012 to July 2019 and included 2,205 patients who underwent a primary cardiac surgical procedure. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the dose of opioids at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included factors associated with high dose opioid prescriptions and persistent opioids use after cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 76.4% of study patients were prescribed opioids at hospital discharge, with a median discharge prescription of 150 mg oral morphine equivalents. Moreover, 52.8% of discharge opioid prescriptions were as slow-release formulations and 60.0% of all discharge prescriptions were for patients who had received no opioids the day before discharge. In the subset of our patients with long-term data, 14.0% were still receiving opioids at 3-12 months after cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgical patients, opioid prescriptions at discharge were common, most were at higher than recommended doses and more than half were slow-release formulations. Such prescription was associated with one in seven patients continuing to receive opioids 3-12 months after surgery.

The use of organ donor blood in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Blood removed from organs during deceased donor organ procurement is routinely discarded but is a potential resource for donor-specific transfusion (DST) in subsequent liver transplantation (LT). This study retrospectively analyses the impact of DST on intraoperative bank blood product usage, long-term graft, and patient survival, as well as frequency of rejection post-LT. METHODS: A total of 992 adult LT performed from 1993 to 2018 in a single quaternary center were included. Intraoperative blood product usage, patient, and graft survival, as well as acute and chronic rejection were assessed in patients who received blood retrieved from the organ donor, the "donor blood" (DB) group (n = 437) and patients who did not, the "no donor blood" (NDB) group (n = 555). RESULTS: Processing of DB ensured safe levels of potassium, magnesium, and insulin. There were fewer units of bank red blood cells transfusion required in the DB group compared to NDB group (2 vs. 4 units, P = .01). Graft survival was significantly superior in the DB group (10-year survival 75% vs. 69%, respectively, P = .04) but DST was not an independent predictor of graft survival. There was no significant difference in patient survival or rejection between the groups. There was no difference in treated, biopsy-proven rejection between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-cohort study assessing long-term outcomes of intraoperative DST in LT. The collection of organ donor blood and subsequent use in LT recipients appeared feasible with appropriate quality checks ensuring safety. DST resulted in a reduction in the use of packed red blood cells. There was no difference in the rate of rejection or graft or patient survival.

The Impact of Intraoperative Donor Blood on Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion During Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Blood from deceased organ donors, also known as donor blood (DB), has the potential to reduce the need for packed red blood cells (PRBCs) during liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that DB removed during organ procurement is a viable resource that could reduce the need for PRBCs during LT. METHODS: We retrospectively examined data on LT recipients aged over 18 y who underwent a deceased donor LT. The primary aim was to compare the incidence of PRBC transfusion in LT patients who received intraoperative DB (the DB group) to those who did not (the nondonor blood [NDB] group). RESULTS: After a propensity score matching process, 175 patients received DB and 175 did not. The median (first-third quartile) volume of DB transfused was 690.0 mL (500.0-900.0), equivalent to a median of 3.1 units (2.3-4.1). More patients in the NDB group received an intraoperative PRBC transfusion than in the DB group: 74.3% (95% confidence intervals, 67.8-80.8) compared with 60% (95% confidence intervals, 52.7-67.3); P = 0.004. The median number of PRBCs transfused intraoperatively was higher in the NDB group compared with the DB group: 3 units (0-6) compared with 2 units (0-4); P = 0.004. There were no significant differences observed in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Use of DB removed during organ procurement and reinfused to the recipient is a viable resource for reducing the requirements for PRBCs during LT. Use of DB minimizes the exposure of the recipient to multiple donor sources.

Complications of post-craniectomy cranioplasty: risk factor analysis and implications for treatment planning.

The aim of this study was to review all post-craniectomy cranioplasties performed in a single institution, with an emphasis on procedure-related complications and risk factor analysis. Post-craniectomy cranioplasty is known to be associated with significant complications. Previous studies on predictors of complications have yielded conflicting results. We conducted a retrospective study on prospectively collected data on all cranioplasties done between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2012. Multivariate analysis was performed to interrogate potential risk factors predisposing to procedure-related complications. Of the 162 procedures, the overall complication rate was 16.7%. Infection and flap depression occurred in 13 (8%) and five patients (3.1%), respectively. These led to reoperations in 12 patients. The presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt during cranioplasty was the only significant factor associated with a higher rate of infection (28.6% versus 9.7%, p=0.001) and flap depression (14.3% versus 3.3%, p=0.03). Indications for the initial craniectomy, choice of graft materials and the time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty had no significant association with complications. The presence of ventriculoperitoneal shunt at the time of cranioplasty is a significant risk factor for cranioplasty complications. Early cranioplasty is safe. Whether temporizing lumbar or external ventricular drainage is a better alternative to shunting in patients who are drainage-dependent at the time of cranioplasty remain to be determined.