ABSTRACT
AIM: The objectives of the study were to characterize the long-term risk of first recurrence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) among survivors of an incident ACS, as a function of the STEMI/NSTEMI/UA diagnosis. METHODS: Men and women (aged 35-74) hospitalized between 2009 and 2016 for an incident ACS in the French MONICA registries and still alive on discharge were followed-up until December 2017. Recurrent events were defined as the first (non-fatal or fatal) ACS occurring after hospital discharge from the incident event. RESULTS: The study comprised 15,739 incident ACSs with 63,777 patient-years of follow-up. The cumulative probability [95% confidence interval] of recurrent ACS was 6.7% [6.3-7.1%] at 1 year and 18.4% [17.4-19.5%] at 9 years. The cumulative probability of fatal recurrent ACS was 1.4% [1.2-1.5%] at 1 year and 4.3% [3.6-4.9%] at 9 years. The risk of recurrence did not depend on the type of the incident ACS after adjustment for confounding factors. The most frequent forms of recurrence were NSTEMI and UA. The presence of a major complication (OR = 1.59) and an impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR > 1.26) increased the risk of recurrence. The annual 1-year recurrence rates decreased from 7.4% in 2009 to 4.0% in 2016 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The recurrence rate after an incident ACS remained high in France, and the risk of recurrence did not depend on the etiology of the first event. Our results emphasize the importance of targeting patients with a major complication and/or an impaired LVEF who are at a higher risk of recurrence.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction , Male , Humans , Female , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Stroke Volume , Ventricular Function, Left , Registries , SurvivorsABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the predictive value of the large panel of occupational constraints (OC) on all-cause mortality with a 20-year follow-up, in general population of workers. Methods: In VISAT prospective cohort study, 3,138 workers (1,605 men; 1,533 women) were recruited during the periodic work health visits conducted by occupational physicians. OC (physical, organizational, psychological and employment categories) were collected through self-questionnaires. Exposure durations of each OC were divided by tertile distribution. Cox-regression models were performed to analyze the associations between all-cause mortality and each OC first separately and simultaneously in a single model. Results: The mortality rates were higher among exposed participants to most of OC compared to those unexposed. Being exposed and longer exposure increased the risks of all-cause mortality for exposures to carrying heavy loads, loud noise, working more than 48 h/week, starting its first job before 18 years old although these risks became non-significant after adjustments for cardiovascular risk factors. Shift work and night work confirmed a high risk of mortality whatever the adjustments and notably when the other occupational exposures were taking into account, with, respectively: HR: 1.38 (1.01-1.91) and 1.44 (1.06-1.95). After adjustments being exposed more than 13 years to a work requiring getting-up before 5:00 a.m. and more than 16 years in rotating shift work significantly increased the risk of mortality by one and a half. Conclusion: The links between each OC and all-cause mortality and the role of individual factors were stressed. For night-shift workers, it is urgent to implement preventive strategies at the workplace.
Subject(s)
Shift Work Schedule , Male , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Prospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Cohort Studies , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards ModelsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrence is common after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In order to better assess the prognosis for patients with ACS, we compared clinical profiles, treatments, and case fatality rates for incident vs. recurrent ACS. METHODS: We enrolled 1,459 men and women (age: 35-74) living in three geographical areas covered by French MONICA registries and who had been admitted to hospital for an ACS in 2015/2016. We recorded and compared the clinical characteristics and medical care for patients with an incident vs. a recurrent ACS. RESULTS: Overall, 431 (30%) had a recurrent ACS. Relative to patients with an incident ACS, patients with recurrence were older (p<0.0001), had a greater frequency of NSTEMI or UA (p<0.0001), were less likely to show typical symptoms (p = 0.045), were more likely to have an altered LVEF (p<0.0001) and co-morbidities. Angioplasty was less frequently performed among patients with recurrent than incident NSTEMI (p<0.05). There were no intergroup differences in the prescription of the recommended secondary prevention measures upon hospital discharge, except for functional rehabilitation more frequently prescribed among incident patients (p<0.0001). Although the crude 1-year mortality rate was higher for recurrent cases (14%) than for incident cases (8%) (p<0.05), this difference was no longer significant after adjustment for age, sex, region, diagnosis category and LVEF. CONCLUSION: Compared with incident patients, recurrent cases were more likely to have co-morbidities and to have suboptimal treatments prior to hospital stay, reinforcing the need for secondary prevention.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/classification , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Angioplasty/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Acute Coronary Syndrome/physiopathology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recurrence , Registries , Stroke Volume , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
Lockdown measures have obvious psychological impacts, which could, in turn, increase cardiovascular risk. We assessed the association between lockdown-related factors and the worsening of cardiovascular risk, incident anxiety and depression during 12 months' follow-up. During lockdown (April-May 2020), 534 subjects, aged 50-89 years, were included in the PSYCOV-CV study (NCT04397835) and followed for up to 12 months post-lockdown. We found that participants with symptoms of depression during lockdown were more likely to report increased cardiovascular drug treatment (Odds-Ratio (OR) = 5.08 (1.78-14.5), p = 0.002), decreased physical activity (OR = 1.76 (1.10-2.82), p = 0.019) and weight gain (OR = 1.85 (1.08-3.17), p = 0.024) after lockdown. Moreover, changes in sleep patterns (OR = 2.35 (1.13-4.88), p = 0.022) or living in a rural area during lockdown (OR = 1.70 (0.96-3.03, p = 0.069) were associated with higher incident depression, whereas a better relationship with one's partner during lockdown was associated with less incident depression (OR = 0.56 (0.29-1.08), p = 0.084). Finally, we found that continuing to work during lockdown in a role requiring in-person contact with the public (such as cashiers, nurses or physicians) was associated with more incident anxiety after lockdown (OR = 3.38 (1.12-10.2), p = 0.031). Interestingly, decreased consumption of alcohol during lockdown was associated with less incident anxiety (OR = 0.30 (0.10-0.90), p = 0.032). Our study, conducted in a representative sample of an age group at increased risk of both cardiovascular disease and severe COVID-19, increases the understanding of modifiable factors associated with the health impacts of lockdown measures.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cohort Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Depression/epidemiology , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The individual peripheral vascular disease risk factors are well documented, but the role of work conditions remains equivocal. This systematic review aims to assess relationships between lower limb peripheral venous diseases (lower limb varicose veins (LLVV), venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism), peripheral arterial disease (intermittent claudication, aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm) and occupational constraints among working adults. METHODS: Several databases were systematically searched until February 2019 for observational studies and clinical trials. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method was used for article selection. Quality assessment and risk of bias were evaluated using Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Newcastle-Ottawa scales. RESULTS: Among the 720 screened articles, 37 remained after full-text evaluation. Among the 21 studies on LLVV, prolonged standing was significantly associated to a higher risk of varicose veins with a threshold probably around >3 to 4 hours/day but exposure duration in years was not sufficiently considered. Seated immobility was often observed in workers, with no sufficient evidence to prove that prolonged sitting at work is related to VTE. Carrying heavy loads, stress at work and exposure to high temperatures have emerged more recently notably in relation to varicose veins but need to be better explored. Only three studies discussed the potential role of work on peripheral arterial disease development. CONCLUSIONS: Although some observational studies showed that prolonged standing can be related to varicose veins and that seated immobility at work could be linked to VTE, very little is known about peripheral arterial disease and occupational constraints. Clinical trials to determine preventive strategies at work are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019127652.
Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Varicose Veins/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Humans , Risk Factors , Sitting Position , Standing PositionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades decreases in coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality rates have been observed throughout the western world. We sought to determine whether the acute coronary event rates had decreased between 2006 and 2014 among French adults, and whether there were sex and age-specific differences. METHODS: We examined the French MONICA population-based registries monitoring the Lille urban area in northern France, the Bas-Rhin county in north-eastern France and the Haute Garonne county in south-western France. All acute coronary events among men and women aged 35-74 were collected. RESULTS: Over the study period, the age-standardised attack rates decreased in both men (annual percentage change -1.5%, P = 0.0006) and women (annual percentage change -2.1%, P = 0.002). Also, the age-standardised incidence rates decreased in both men (annual percentage change -0.9%, P = 0.03) and women (annual percentage change -1.8%, P = 0.002) due to decreases in the 65-74 year age group. In men, age-standardised mortality rates decreased by 3.5% per year (P = 0.0004), especially in the 55-64 and 65-74 year age groups. In women, these rates decreased by 4.3% per year (P = 0.0009), particularly in the 35-44 and 65-74 year age groups. We also observed significant decreases in case fatality among both men (annual percentage change -1.7%, P < 0.0001) and women (annual percentage change -1.9%, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Downward trends in acute coronary event attack, incidence and mortality rates were observed between 2006 and 2014 in men and women. This effect was age dependent and was primarily due to decreases in the 65-74 year age group. There were no substantial declines in the younger age groups except for mortality in young women. Prevention measures still need to be strengthened, particularly in young adults.
Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Registries , Risk Assessment/methods , Adult , Age Distribution , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chest pain is a frequent reason for calls in emergency medical communication centre (EMCC). Detecting a coronary origin by phone is a challenge. This is especially so as the presentations differ according to gender. We aimed to establish and validate a sex-based model to predict a coronary origin of chest pain in patients calling an EMCC. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients at 18 years of age or older who called the EMCC because of non-traumatic chest pain. The main outcome was the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) determined by expert evaluation of patient files. RESULTS: During 18 months, 3727 patients were enrolled: 2097 (56%) men and 1630 (44%) women. ACS was diagnosed in 508 (24%) men and 139 (9%) women. For men, independent factors associated with an ACS diagnosis were age, tobacco use, severe and permanent pain; retrosternal, breathing non-related and radiating pain; and additional symptoms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.79) for predicting ACS. The accuracy of the male model to predict ACS was validated in a validation dataset (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.554); the AUC was 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.80). For women, independent factors associated with an ACS diagnosis were age ≥ 60 years, personal history of coronary artery disease, and breathing non-related and radiating pain. The AUC was 0.79 (95%CI 0.75-0.83). The accuracy of the female model to predict ACS was not validated in the validation dataset (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.035); the AUC was 0.67 (95%CI 0.60-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of an ACS diagnosis in patients calling an EMCC for chest pain differ between men and women. We developed an accurate predictive model for men, but for women, the accuracy was poor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02042209 ).
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Call Centers , Chest Pain/etiology , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Cohort Studies , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , SmokersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The role of occupational stressors (OS) on blood pressure (BP) is often suspected, but asserting its impact remains uncertain. Our goal was to evaluate their impact on BP increase and on incident cases of hypertension over a 5-year period. METHODS: One thousand, one hundred and fifty-six men and women from the French prospective VISAT study were followed up over five-years (T1 to T2). Exposures to a large panel of OS (physical, organizational, psychosocial and employment categories) were collected. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess associations between OS and T2-T1 SBP difference and incident cases of hypertension. They were performed to determine the role of OS first considered separately, then in combination, in crude and adjusted models for main cardiovascular risk factors (gender, age, education, BMI, lifestyle habits and medical history). RESULTS: For initial SBP level < 130 mmHg, carrying loads, intense noise exposure, working more than 48 h/week, active and high strain tended to be associated with an SBP difference increase, while job recognition was associated with a decrease. After adjustment, only significant associations with job strain and job recognition persisted. For initial SBP level ≥ 130 mmHg, being exposed to an active job strain was positively associated with T2-T1 SBP difference only in unadjusted model. Considering all the OS, the recognition of completed tasks had a major protective role. No impact of OS on incident cases of hypertension was observed. CONCLUSION: Associations between OS and SBP were observed mainly when initial SBP is within the normal range, and are mainly explained by cardiovascular factors, requiring physician's particular attention to people exposed to these OS. VISAT study is registered in "LE PORTAIL EPIDEMIOLOGIE - FRANCE- AVIESAN -ID 3666".
Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Hypertension/epidemiology , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Stress/physiopathology , WorkplaceABSTRACT
CONTEXT: As population grow older, chronic diseases are more prevalent. It leads to an increase of hospitalization for acute decompensation, sometimes iterative. Management of these patients is not always clear, and care provided is not always proportional to life expectancy. Making decisions in acute situations is not easy. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to list and describe mortality scores within a year following hospitalization of patients of 65 years or older. SOURCES: Following keywords were searched in title and abstract of articles via an advanced search in PudMed, and by searching Mesh terms: "aged", "aged, 80 and over", "mortality", "prognosis", "hospitalized", "models, statistical", "acute geriatric ward", "frailty", "outcome". STUDIES SELECTION: Studies published in English between 1985 and 2015 were selected. Last article was published in June 2015. Articles that described prognostic factors of mortality without a scoring system were excluded. Articles that focus either on patients in the Emergency Department and in Intensive Care Unit, or living in institution were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-two scores are described in 17 articles. These scores use items that refer to functional status, comorbidities, cognitive status and frailty. Scores of mortality 3 or 6 months after hospitalization are not discriminative. Few of the 1-year mortality prognostic score are discriminative with AUC≥0.7. LIMITS: This review is not systematic. CONCLUSION: Practical use of these scores might help management of these patients, in order to initiate appropriate reflexion and palliative care if necessary.
Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment , Health Status Indicators , Hospitalization , Mortality , Aged , Humans , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fat content of dairy foods is diverse, potentially leading to varying effects on cardiovascular risk. We studied relationships of low- and high-fat dairy products with lipids and level of cardiovascular risk (assessed by the SCORE equation), in a cross-sectional population survey conducted in three French areas. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A sample of 3078 participants aged 35-64 years underwent a standardized cardiovascular risk assessment. Subjects were asked to record the types and amounts of foods and beverages they consumed over a three-consecutive-day period. Dairy products were separated into two groups: the low-fat group comprised milk (including milk in desserts and beverages), yogurts and cottage cheese, whereas other cheeses formed the high-fat group. RESULTS: After adjustment (including physical activity and a diet quality score), the probability of an increased cardiovascular mortality score (≥1%) decreased from the lowest to the highest quartile (Q) of low-fat dairy intake: odds ratio (OR) ORQ1 = 1; ORQ2 = 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-1.10), ORQ3 = 0.78 (0.63-0.97) and ORQ4 = 0.68 (0.55-0.85) for the first, second, third and fourth quartile, respectively. Results were notably different for high-fat dairy intake: ORQ2 = 1.02 (0.82-1.25); ORQ3 = 0.90 (0.73-1.11); ORQ4 = 1.07 (0.86-1.32). Intake of low-fat dairy products was inversely associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), but no significant independent relationship was found with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglycerides. None of the lipid parameters was significantly associated with the consumption of high-fat dairy products. CONCLUSION: Participants with the highest intake of low-fat dairy products had the lowest mortality risk score and exhibited the best LDL-C profile. Such favourable associations were not observed with cheese consumption.