Perception of risk of adverse drug reactions: a 3-year follow-up of a cohort of medical students.

Previous studies have pointed out the question of effective training and information to health professionals on pharmacovigilance. The lack of training is known to induce inadequate use of drugs and noncompliance of patients. Pharmacology teaching is performed in the third year of medical studies at the Toulouse Faculty of Medicine. The aim of the study was to investigate the perception of risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by medical students at the end of the one year pharmacology course and two years later, after clinical training period. Sixty-seven students were interviewed in May 2005 and in October 2007. Visual analogue scales were used to define a score of perceived risk of ADRs associated with each drug class (ranking from 0 to 10) before and after pharmacology training. The drug classes evaluated were antibiotics, anticoagulants, antidepressants, aspirin, contraceptive pill, corticosteroids, drugs for arterial hypertension, drugs for diabetes (other than insulin), hypnotics, hypocholesterolaemic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and tranquilisers. After pharmacology courses (May 2005), antidepressants were ranked as the most dangerous drugs by medical students [median score (25th-75th centiles): 7.7 (6.3-8.6)], followed by anticoagulants [7.6 (6.6-8.4)] and hypnotics [7.4 (6.1-8.1)]. Contraceptive pills was listed in the last position [median score [4.7 (2.2-6.7)]. Two years later (October 2007), anticoagulants moved into the first position [8.3 (7.3-9.2)], followed by NSAIDs [6.9 (5.0-8.4)] and aspirin [6.8 (5.8-8.4)]. Contraceptive pills remained in the last position. No change was observed for NSAIDs and aspirin, still ranked as dangerous drugs by medical students after clinical training. Values of perceived risk were significantly increased for anticoagulant (+9.2%, P < 0.01) and hypoglycemiant drugs (+27.7%, P < 0.0001). The perceived risk significantly decreased for hypocholesterolaemic (-14.3%, P < 0.0001) and antidepressant drugs (-19.5%, P < 0.0001), but not for hypnotics. The study shows that the perception of risk of ADRs by medical students was modified after clinical training. They were still aware of potentially serious ADRs associated with anticoagulants, aspirin or NSAIDs, but they remained less cautious for drugs such as antidepressants. Additional pharmacology training at the end of medical studies will be useful.

Prescription of drugs during pregnancy: a study using EFEMERIS, the new French database.

BACKGROUND: Because of the limited data concerning drug risks in pregnancy, health professionals are often deprived of relevant and sufficient information related to prescribing or dispensing during pregnancy. However, previous studies have emphasised the widespread French prescription of several drugs (sometimes "typically French") which have not been assessed in pregnant women. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to create the first French database of drugs prescribed and dispensed during pregnancy and the outcome of these pregnancies. METHODS: This feasibility study concerns pregnant women who gave birth to a baby between 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 in Haute-Garonne and who are registered in the French Health Insurance Service. Data sources include (1) the French Health Insurance Database (drugs prescribed during pregnancy), (2) the Mother and Child Protection Centre Database (newborn health at birth and 9 months after) and (3) the Antenatal Diagnostic Centre Database (medical pregnancy interruptions). RESULTS: The database is composed of 10,174 "mother-outcome" pairs. The prevalence rate of congenital anomalies was 2.2%. Pregnant women were prescribed 11.3 +/- 8.2 different drugs. Among the 20 most frequently prescribed drugs, around half of them have not been evaluated in pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: The first results of this study show that implementation of a French database on prescription of drugs and pregnancy outcomes is feasible. Compared with several databases available in other countries, EFEMERIS provides exact data on period of exposure to drugs, pregnancy terminations, and follow up of the baby 9 months after birth. Recording these data would make it possible to assess the risk of malformations due to a greater number of drugs and would contribute to international drug evaluation studies.

Drug exposure and perceived adverse drug events reported by liver-transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant patient outcome and quality of life are affected by different factors, such as post-graft context, psychological state, and polymedication. Many surveys have been carried out to study immunosuppressant ADRs, and have mainly used a questionnaire completed by patients, but few have asked patients about their drug exposure. The aim of this study is to describe drug exposure and adverse drug events (ADEs) reported by liver-transplant patients (LTP). METHODS: This observational, retrospective study assessed questionnaires from LTPs concerning demographic data, drug exposure, and ADEs. RESULTS: 118 LTPs exposed to 5.9 (+/- 2.8) drugs with immunosuppressive regimens, consisting mainly of tacrolimus (79.3%), cyclosporine (18.1%), or sirolimus (2.6%), were also exposed to antihypertensive drugs (43.2%), protonpump inhibitors (30.5%), statins (28.8%), drugs acting on bile composition (26.3%), and diuretics (19.5%). 1,389 ADEs were reported: 30.1% neurological, 13.4% cutaneous, 12.4% hematological, 11.1% digestive, 10.1% osteomuscular, 6.6% cardiovascular, and 16.3% others. Significantly more ADEs were reported by patients exposed to cyclosporine than those receiving tacrolimus (p < 0.05). Patients with a transplant for < 18 months had more tremors and those with a transplant for > 79 months reported more hirsutism, gingival hypertrophia, and arterial hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the value of patient-reporting via structured interviews for both drug exposure and ADEs, and the importance of this approach to complement total data collection.

Perception of risk of adverse drug reactions by medical students: influence of a 1 year pharmacological course.

AIMS: To investigate how adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to several classes of drugs are perceived by young medical students before and after a 1 year pharmacology course. METHODS: The whole cohort of 92 medical students (63 females and 29 males) was questioned during their third year. A visual analogue scale was used to define a score (ranging from 0 to 10) of perceived risk of ADRs associated with each drug class before and at the end of the pharmacological training period. RESULTS: Before the pharmacology course, hypnotics were ranked as the most dangerous drugs by the medical students, followed by antidepressants and anticoagulants. Contraceptive pills were listed in the last position. After pharmacological training, antidepressants moved into the first position, followed by anticoagulants and hypnotics. When all different drug classes were taken as a whole, the mean (+/-SD) of median scores of the perceived risk were 4.8 (+/-1.3) before and 5.8 (+/-1.5) at the end of the pharmacology course (P < 0.0001). Except for antidiabetics, antihypertensive drugs, tranquillizers, corticosteroids and hypnotics, the perceived risk significantly increased after the pharmacology course for the other drugs. The highest increases were observed for contraceptive pills (+104%, P < 0.01), NSAIDs (+86%, P < 0.01) and aspirin (+56%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological training allows young medical students to be aware of potentially serious ADRs associated with drugs, in particular with drugs considered relatively safe (such as NSAIDs and aspirin) by nonhealth professionals.