Critical Thinking: A Program Review of Doctor of Audiology Students.

PURPOSE: Critical thinking is a crucial component of health care, and its importance has been recognized in training medical professionals. This study reports critical thinking skills for entering doctor of audiology (AuD) students and the trajectory of the change in critical thinking skills measured 2 times over a period of 3 years. METHOD: This longitudinal, descriptive, and exploratory design was implemented for programmatic review. Critical thinking skills were measured using the Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT; Insight Assessment) upon entering the program and compared to measurements during the final month of academic coursework. Descriptive statistics, exploratory analyses of the HSRT scores among cohorts, the relationship of the HSRT to the graduate record examinations (GREs), and changes in the HSRT over time using a repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance were conducted. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in critical thinking skills between any of the cohort years. There was a significant correlation between the GRE verbal scores and OVERALL HSRT. Improvements in critical thinking skills were found between the time the students entered the graduate program and their final academic semester. Greater gains were reported for students who initially scored below the 50th percentile on the OVERALL HSRT. CONCLUSIONS: This program review showed improvement in the critical thinking skills of AuD students during their academic training program. Information regarding critical thinking skills may be useful for programs to monitor students' clinical thinking skills and possibly include clinical and didactical activities to promote critical thinking skills.

A Program Review of Head Start and Elementary School Hearing Screenings.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to review quality benchmarks from hearing screening programs conducted at local Head Start centers and preschool and elementary schools associated with our university training programs. Method Hearing screening results from 6,043 children were reviewed. Hearing screening was accomplished using either distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at Head Start centers, pure-tone audiometry at preschool and elementary schools, and tympanometry at all settings. All children who did not pass the initial screening were screened a second time. Referrals were made if a child did not pass the automated DPOAE pass criteria for one ear, failed at least one pure-tone frequency for one ear, or had abnormal tympanometry in one ear. Results Refer rates were 10.9% for DPOAEs and 11.4% for pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry, with an overall refer rate of 11%. Conclusions Our hearing screening program review yielded refer rates that are similar to other published reports for this population. Presently, there are no published target refer rates for hearing screening programs in preschool and elementary schools. Although we were not able to complete other program quality benchmark indicators including sensitivity and specificity, these data may support benchmarks for other hearing screening programs.

Delayed diagnosis of a patient with Usher syndrome 1C in a Louisiana Acadian family highlights the necessity of timely genetic testing for the diagnosis and management of congenital hearing loss.

Advances in sequencing technologies and increased understanding of the contribution of genetics to congenital sensorineural hearing loss have led to vastly improved outcomes for patients and their families. Next-generation sequencing and diagnostic panels have become increasingly reliable and less expensive for clinical use. Despite these developments, the diagnosis of genetic sensorineural hearing loss still presents challenges for healthcare providers. Inherited sensorineural hearing loss has high levels of genetic heterogeneity and variable expressivity. Additionally, syndromic hearing loss (hearing loss and additional clinical abnormalities) should be distinguished from non-syndromic (hearing loss is the only clinical symptom). Although the diagnosis of genetic sensorineural hearing loss can be challenging, the patient's family history and ethnicity may provide critical information, as certain genetic mutations are more common in specific ethnic populations. The early identification of the cause of deafness can benefit patients and their families by estimating recurrence risks for future family planning and offering the proper interventions to improve their quality of life. Collaboration between pediatricians, audiologists, otolaryngologists, geneticists, and other specialists are essential in the diagnosis and management of patients with hearing disorders. An early diagnosis is vital for proper management and care, as some clinical manifestations of syndromic sensorineural hearing loss are not apparent at birth and have a delayed age of onset. We present a case of Usher syndrome (congenital deafness and childhood-onset blindness) illustrating the challenges encountered in the diagnosis and management of children presenting with congenital genetic sensorineural hearing loss, along with helpful resources for clinicians and families.

Detailed Audiological Evaluation of a Patient with Xeroderma Pigmentosum with Neural Degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive condition characterized by extreme sensitivity to ultraviolet light. Individuals with XP lack the ability to repair DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) damage caused by ultraviolet radiation, leading to sunburn and increased susceptibility to skin cancers. Approximately 25% of patients also exhibit neural degeneration, which includes progressive mental deterioration, cortical thinning, and sensorineural hearing loss. PURPOSE: Herein, we describe the audiological and genetic findings in a patient with XP subtype D with neural degeneration and hearing loss. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a case report of a patient with XP subtype D, type 1 diabetes, and some clinical features typical of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We obtained audiological evaluations over a course of 11 yr, including serial audiograms, auditory processing disorders evaluations, and electrophysiological testing. RESULTS: Hearing sensitivity has progressed from a unilateral mild high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss to a bilateral sloping moderate to severe/profound sensorineural hearing loss. In addition to the dramatic decline in hearing sensitivity, the patient demonstrates global auditory processing deficits, indicating a central component to his hearing loss. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the importance of the contribution of audiological evaluations to the diagnosis of a genetic disorder. Periodic evaluations of hearing sensitivity and auditory processing can provide information on disease progression in patients with XP with neural degeneration.

Dichotic listening training in children with autism spectrum disorder: A single subject design.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown that dichotic listening training has improved auditory and language processing for individuals with large interaural asymmetries on dichotic listening tasks. This training can be a useful treatment for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). DESIGN: A single subject, multiple baseline across subjects study was utilized. STUDY SAMPLE: Three children with ASD, between the ages of 8-12, participated in the study. RESULTS: This training demonstrated improvement in language and auditory processing tasks following completion of up to twelve weeks of auditory training. CONCLUSION: This study supports the idea that deficit specific, dichotic auditory training can remediate auditory and language deficits for children with ASD. More research is needed, with a group design and controls, in order to generalize these results to the larger ASD population.

Evaluating a model to predict protocol performance.

BACKGROUND: A test protocol is created when individual tests are combined. Even with a few tests, many different protocols are possible. Often, the clinician must select a protocol without information as to the performance of the possible protocols. A model to predict protocol performance could help in this selection process. PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity and accuracy of a mathematical model for predicting protocol performance. RESEARCH DESIGN: Predictions of the model are compared to actual data on protocol performance. RESULTS: With complete information, there was almost perfect agreement between predicted and actual data. With partial information, the model still made very accurate estimates of protocol performance. CONCLUSIONS: Even with incomplete information, which is frequently the case in a clinical situation, the model can eliminate many protocols from consideration and aid in the selection of an appropriate protocol.

The impact of hearing impairment, perceptions and attitudes about hearing loss, and noise exposure risk patterns on hearing handicap among farm family members.

Farm noise exposure is the major cause of noise-induced hearing loss among farmers. Hearing impairment associated with hearing loss, however, may not adequately represent communication handicap and the impact on quality of life. This descriptive correlational study examines the impact of hearing impairment, perceptions and attitudes about hearing loss, and noise exposure risk patterns on hearing handicap among farm family members. A convenience sample of 56 farmers and family members recruited from community-based agricultural events was studied. A hearing impairment was noted in the majority of the participants (80.4%). Fewer than 10 reported regularly wearing protection during work or recreational activities. High-frequency hearing loss in the left ear (F= 10.30, p < .002), the attitude that wearing hearing protection prevents others from getting one's attention (F= 11.90, p < .001), and the self-reported description of hearing (F= 6.66, p < .013) significantly predicted hearing handicap using multiple regression analysis. Farmers and family members do not use hearing protection because they are concerned they will not hear others who are trying to communicate with them. The findings of this study confirm that this attitude, along with hearing loss in the left ear, is associated with a communication handicap in work settings. Although being able to hear others on a day-to-day basis is important, this attitude may contribute to behaviors leading to hearing loss and decreased communication over time.

Development of low-frequency tone burst versus the click auditory brainstem response.

Often ABR threshold testing employs clicks to assess high-frequency hearing, and low-frequency tone bursts to assess low-frequency sensitivity. While a maturation effect has been shown for click stimuli, similar data are lacking for low-frequency toneburst stimuli. Thus, 305 infants ranging in conceptional age (CA) from 33 weeks to 74 weeks were tested. Absolute latencies were measured for wave V at 55, 35, and 25 dB nHL in response to a click and for wave V500 in response to a 500 Hz tone burst. Major wave latency in response to 500 Hz tone bursts decreases with age and do not stabilize by 70 weeks CA. Likewise, waves III and V latencies in response to clicks decrease with age, as has been reported by others, and do not stabilize by 70 weeks CA. Wave I latency produced by clicks did not decrease with age, being mature by 33 weeks CA.

The effect of midline petrous apex lesions on tests of afferent and efferent auditory function.

OBJECTIVES: Historically, audiological procedures have focused on the assessment of the afferent (ascending) cochlear-VIIIth nerve system and have, for the most part, ignored the efferent (descending) auditory system. We report afferent and efferent auditory test results for two cases with a cholesterol cyst of the right petrous apex; one lesion involves the afferent segment of the auditory system, and the second lesion involves both the afferent and efferent segments of the auditory system. These "natural experiments" provide a unique opportunity to study the effect of a space-occupying lesion of the petrous apex on afferent and efferent function of the auditory system. DESIGN: Transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) suppression studies were performed to assess the effect of the cholesterol cyst on the efferent system of the two cases. In addition, three complementary afferent tests of brain stem auditory function were administered: 1) acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs); 2) masking level difference (MLD); and 3) auditory brain stem response (ABR). These tests are complementary because the superior olivary complex (SOC) is involved not only in the mediation of the sound evoked efferent reflex assessed in TEOAE suppression, but in the mediation of the ARTs, the MLD, and the ABR. RESULTS: The two cases with midline petrous apex lesions, one not involving the VIII-cochlear efferent auditory system, differed from each other with regards to TEOAEs suppression, and ARTs. Specifically, the case with only afferent involvement produced normal TEOAE suppression, a normal MLD, normal ARTs, and abnormal waves III and V of the ABR, whereas the case with both afferent and efferent involvement produced abnormal TEOAE suppression, a normal MLD, abnormal ARTs, and abnormal waves III and V of the ABR. CONCLUSIONS: These cases illustrate that although several auditory tests can be mediated within the same or adjacent anatomical structures, i.e., the SOC, they may not be equally affected by the same lesion due to different physiology. Further, the TEOAE suppression paradigm is a clinically relevant test to assay the sound evoked efferent reflex that is mediated by the medial olivocochlear system of the SOC.