Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int Nurs Rev ; 65(4): 596-600, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29667762

ABSTRACT

This prospective study observed turnover during 1 year at a community hospital in Oregon (n = 39). The study tested whether nurses who at baseline nominated fewer peers as sources of safe patient handling support were more likely to quit than nurses with more supportive peers. Six nurses with tenure under 2 years left their positions. Nurses who quit reported half as many co-workers as sources of support relative to nurses who remained employed, and each additional peer nomination reduced the risk of turnover by 15%. Further research should establish the contribution of peer safety support reducing turnover among recent hires.


Subject(s)
Moving and Lifting Patients , Nursing Staff/organization & administration , Personnel Turnover , Adult , Employment , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Peer Group , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
Int Nurs Rev ; 59(2): 237-44, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22591096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nursing homes are occupational settings, with an increasing minority and immigrant workforce where several psychosocial stressors intersect. AIM: This study aimed to examine racial/ethnic differences in job strain between Black (n = 127) and White (n = 110) immigrant and American direct-care workers at nursing homes (total n = 237). METHODS: Cross-sectional study with data collected at four nursing homes in Massachusetts during 2006-2007. We contrasted Black and White workers within higher-skilled occupations such as registered nurses or licensed practical nurses (n = 82) and lower-skilled staff such as certified nursing assistants (CNAs, n = 155). RESULTS: Almost all Black workers (96%) were immigrants. After adjusting for demographic and occupational characteristics, Black employees were more likely to report job strain, compared with Whites [relative risk (RR): 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 6.6]. Analyses stratified by occupation showed that Black CNAs were more likely to report job strain, compared with White CNAs (RR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.0 to 9.4). Black workers were also more likely to report low control (RR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.0). Additionally, Black workers earned $2.58 less per hour and worked 7.1 more hours per week on average, controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSION: Black immigrant workers were 2.9 times more likely to report job strain than White workers, with greater differences among CNAs. These findings may reflect differential organizational or individual characteristics but also interpersonal or institutional racial/ethnic discrimination. Further research should consider the role of race/ethnicity in shaping patterns of occupational stress.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Health Status Disparities , Nursing Homes , Nursing Staff/psychology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Adult , Africa/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Long-Term Care , Male , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Nursing Assistants/psychology , Nursing, Practical , Regression Analysis , West Indies/ethnology , White People/psychology , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL