A narrative review of oncologic emergencies in patients with head and neck cancers: initial management and the role of radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompass a complex group of malignancies with high morbidity, often leading to critical emergencies such as pain crises, airway obstruction and hemorrhage. This review aims to outline an evidence-based approach to the multidisciplinary management of HNC oncologic emergencies with a focus on the role of emergent radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases with a focus on three common oncological emergencies using the following keywords: "head and neck cancer", "radiation OR radiotherapy", "pain", "bleeding OR haemorrhage", and "airway obstruction". All English language articles published up to April 2022 were screened to identify studies pertaining to the management of oncologic emergencies in HNC. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The management of oncologic emergencies in HNC present a unique set of challenges that require early recognition and aggressive treatment. In this narrative review, we summarize the evidence supporting the role of RT in the management of HNC patients presenting with pain crisis, malignant airway obstruction and acute haemorrhage. We demonstrate that while RT can be used as a primary or adjunct therapy, optimal management depends on the involvement of a multi-disciplinary team that includes head and neck surgeons, interventional radiology and palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: RT plays a critical role in the multidisciplinary management of HNC oncological emergencies. Further prospective and comparative studies are needed to assess optimal management strategies.

Quantitative US Delta Radiomics to Predict Radiation Response in Individuals with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Purpose To investigate the role of quantitative US (QUS) radiomics data obtained after the 1st week of radiation therapy (RT) in predicting treatment response in individuals with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Materials and Methods This prospective study included 55 participants (21 with complete response [median age, 65 years {IQR: 47-80 years}, 20 male, one female; and 34 with incomplete response [median age, 59 years {IQR: 39-79 years}, 33 male, one female) with bulky node-positive HNSCC treated with curative-intent RT from January 2015 to October 2019. All participants received 70 Gy of radiation in 33-35 fractions over 6-7 weeks. US radiofrequency data from metastatic lymph nodes were acquired prior to and after 1 week of RT. QUS analysis resulted in five spectral maps from which mean values were extracted. We applied a gray-level co-occurrence matrix technique for textural analysis, leading to 20 QUS texture and 80 texture-derivative parameters. The response 3 months after RT was used as the end point. Model building and evaluation utilized nested leave-one-out cross-validation. Results Five delta (Δ) parameters had statistically significant differences (P < .05). The support vector machines classifier achieved a sensitivity of 71% (15 of 21), a specificity of 76% (26 of 34), a balanced accuracy of 74%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 on the test set. For all the classifiers, the performance improved after the 1st week of treatment. Conclusion A QUS Δ-radiomics model using data obtained after the 1st week of RT from individuals with HNSCC predicted response 3 months after treatment completion with reasonable accuracy. Keywords: Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD), Ultrasound, Radiation Therapy/Oncology, Head/Neck, Radiomics, Quantitative US, Radiotherapy, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Machine Learning Clinicaltrials.gov registration no. NCT03908684 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Lymph node yield: Impact on oncologic outcomes in oral cavity cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastases are associated with poor prognosis in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). In other cancers, clinical guidelines on the number of lymph nodes removed during primary surgery, lymph node yield (LNY), exist. Here, we evaluated the prognostic capacity of LNY on regional failure, locoregional recurrence, and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with OCSCC treated by primary neck surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study took place at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Canada and involved a chart review of all adult patients with treatment-naive OCSCC undergoing primary neck dissection. For each outcome, we first used the maximally selected rank statistics and an optimism-corrected concordance to identify an optimal threshold of LNY. We then used a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to assess the association between high LNY (>threshold) and each outcome. RESULTS: Among the 579 patients with OCSCC receiving primary neck dissection, 61.7% (n = 357) were male with a mean age of 62.9 years (standard deviation: 13.1) at cancer diagnosis. When adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, LNY >15 was significantly associated with improved DFS (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.98), locoregional recurrence (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.49-0.95), and regional failure (aHR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggested high LNY to be a strong independent predictor of various patient-level quality of surgical care metrics. The optimal LNY we found (15) was lower than the conventionally recommended (18), which calls for further research to establish validity in practice.

In Vivo Verification of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Biodosimetry Using Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy Treatment.

PURPOSE: Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) biodosimetry, used to triage large numbers of individuals incidentally exposed to unknown doses of ionizing radiation, is based on detecting a stable physical response in the body that is subject to quantifiable variation after exposure. In vivo measurement is essential to fully characterize the radiation response relevant to a living tooth measured in situ. The purpose of this study was to verify EPR spectroscopy in vivo by estimating the radiation dose received in participants' teeth. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A continuous wave L-band spectrometer was used for EPR measurements. Participants included healthy volunteers and patients undergoing head and neck and total body irradiation treatments. Healthy volunteers completed 1 measurement each, and patients underwent measurement before starting treatment and between subsequent fractions. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters and diodes were used to determine the dose delivered to the teeth to validate EPR measurements. RESULTS: Seventy measurements were acquired from 4 total body irradiation and 6 head and neck patients over 15 months. Patient data showed a linear increase of EPR signal with delivered dose across the dose range tested. A linear least-squares weighted fit of the data gave a statistically significant correlation between EPR signal and absorbed dose (P < .0001). The standard error of inverse prediction (SEIP), used to assess the usefulness of fits, was 1.92 Gy for the dose range most relevant for immediate triage (≤7 Gy). Correcting for natural background radiation based on patient age reduced the SEIP to 1.51 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of using spectroscopic measurements from radiation therapy patients to validate in vivo EPR biodosimetry. The data illustrated a statistically significant correlation between the magnitude of EPR signals and absorbed dose. The SEIP of 1.51 Gy, obtained under clinical conditions, indicates the potential value of this technique in response to large radiation events.

Outcomes for oligometastatic head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results from an international multi-institutional consortium.

BACKGROUND: We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT. METHODS: Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA). RESULTS: Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.

Cine MRI-based analysis of intrafractional motion in radiation treatment planning of head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate intrafraction motion of (HN) target volumes and to determine patient-specific planning target volume (PTV) margins. MATERIALS/METHODS: MR-cine imaging was performed for radiation treatment planning in HN cancer patients treated with definitive EBRT (n = 62) or SBRT (n = 4) on a 1.5 T MRI between 2017-2019. Dynamic MRI scans (sagittal orientation, 2 × 82 × 7 mm3 resolution), ranging from 3-5 min and 900-1500 images, were acquired. The position of the maximum tumor displacement along each direction in the anterior/posterior (A/P) and superior/inferior (S/I) position was recorded and analyzed to determine average PTV margins. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites (n = 66) were oropharynx (n = 39), larynx (n = 24) and hypopharynx (n = 3). PTV margins for A/P/S/I positions were 4.1/4.4/5.0/6.2 mm and 4.9/4.3/6.7/7.7 mm for oropharyngeal and laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancers when accounting for all motion. V100 for PTV was calculated and compared to the original plans. The mean drop in PTV coverage was in most cases under 5%. For a subset of patients with 3 mm plans available, V100 for PTV had more substantial decreases in coverage averaging 8.2% - and 14.3% for oropharyngeal and laryngeal/hypopharynx plans, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of MR-cine in treatment planning allows for quantification of tumor motion during swallow and resting periods and should be accounted for during treatment planning. With motion considered, the derived margins may exceed the commonly used 3-5 mm PTV margins. Quantification and analysis of tumor and patient-specific PTV margins is a step towards real-time MRI guidance adaptive radiotherapy.

Empirical planning target volume modeling for high precision MRI guided intracranial radiotherapy.

Purpose: Magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy for intracranial indications is a promising advance; however, uncertainties remain for both target localization after translation-only MR setup and intrafraction motion. This investigation quantified these uncertainties and developed a population-based planning target volume (PTV) model to explore target and organ-at-risk (OAR) volumetric coverage tradeoffs. Methods: Sixty-six patients, 49 with a primary brain tumor and 17 with a post-surgical resection cavity, treated on a 1.5T-based MR-linac across 1329 fractions were included. At each fraction, patients were setup by translation-only fusion of the online T1 MRI to the planning image. Each fusion was independently repeated offline accounting for rotations. The six degree-of-freedom difference between fusions was applied to transform the planning CTV at each fraction (CTVfx). A PTV model parameterized by volumetric CTVfx coverage, proportion of fractions, and proportion of patients was developed. Intrafraction motion was quantified in a 412 fraction subset as the fusion difference between post- and pre-irradiation T1 MRIs. Results: For the left-right/anterior-posterior/superior-inferior axes, mean ± SD of the rotational fusion differences were 0.1 ± 0.8/0.1 ± 0.8/-0.2 ± 0.9°. Covering 98 % of the CTVfx in 95 % of fractions in 95 % of patients required a 3 mm PTV margin. Margin reduction decreased PTV-OAR overlap; for example, the proportion of optic chiasm overlapped by the PTV was reduced up to 23.5 % by margin reduction from 4 mm to 3 mm. Conclusions: An evidence-based PTV model was developed for brain cancer patients treated on the MR-linac. Informed by this model, we have clinically adopted a 3 mm PTV margin for conventionally fractionated intracranial patients.

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for Differentiating Radiation Necrosis From Tumor Progression in Brain Metastasis-Application in a Clinical Setting.

BACKGROUND: High radiation doses of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) can increase the likelihood of radiation necrosis (RN). Advanced MRI sequences can improve the differentiation between RN and tumor progression (TP). PURPOSE: To use saturation transfer MRI methods including chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and magnetization transfer (MT) to distinguish RN from TP. STUDY TYPE: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Seventy patients (median age 60; 73% females) with BM (75 lesions) post-SRS. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, CEST imaging using low/high-power (saturation B1  = 0.52 and 2.0 µT), quantitative MT imaging using B1  = 1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 µT, WAter Saturation Shift Referencing (WASSR), WAter Shift And B1 (WASABI), T1 , and T2 mapping. All used gradient echoes except T2 mapping (gradient and spin echo). ASSESSMENT: Voxel-wise metrics included: magnetization transfer ratio (MTR); apparent exchange-dependent relaxation (AREX); MTR asymmetry; normalized MT exchange rate and pool size product; direct water saturation peak width; and the observed T1 and T2 . Regions of interests (ROIs) were manually contoured on the post-Gd T1 w. The mean (of median ROI values) was compared between groups. Clinical outcomes were determined by clinical and radiologic follow-up or histopathology. STATISTICAL TESTS: t-Test, univariable and multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic, and area under the curve (AUC) with sensitivity/specificity values with the optimal cut point using the Youden index, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Cohen's d. P < 0.05 with Bonferroni correction was considered significant. RESULTS: Seven metrics showed significant differences between RN and TP. The high-power MTR showed the highest AUC of 0.88, followed by low-power MTR (AUC = 0.87). The combination of low-power CEST scans improved the separation compared to individual parameters (with an AIC of 70.3 for low-power MTR/AREX). Cohen's d effect size showed that the MTR provided the largest effect sizes among all metrics. DATA CONCLUSION: Significant differences between RN and TP were observed based on saturation transfer MRI. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Dose-Escalated 2-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: 28 Gy Versus 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases improves pain response rates compared with conventional external beam radiation therapy; however, the optimal fractionation schedule is unclear. We report local control and toxicity outcomes after dose-escalated 2-fraction spine SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prospectively maintained institutional database of over 600 patients and 1400 vertebral segments treated with spine SBRT was reviewed to identify those prescribed 28 or 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions. The primary endpoint was magnetic resonance imaging based local failure (LF), and secondary endpoints included overall survival and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). RESULTS: A total of 947 treated vertebral segments in 482 patients were identified, of which 301 segments in 159 patients received 28 Gy, and 646 segments in 323 patients received 24 Gy in 2 fractions. Median follow-up per patient was 23.5 months, and median overall survival was 49.1 months. In the 28 Gy cohort, the 6-, 12-, and 24-month cumulative incidences of LF were 3.5%, 5.4%, and 11.1%, respectively, versus 6.0%, 12.5%, and 17.6% in the 24 Gy cohort, respectively (P = .008). On multivariable analysis, 24 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.525; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-2.238; P = .031), paraspinal disease extension (HR, 1.422; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-2.002; P = .044), and epidural extension in either radioresistant or radiosensitive histologies (HR, 2.117 and 1.227, respectively; P = .003) were prognostic for higher rates of LF. Risk of VCF was 5.5%, 7.6%, and 10.7% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and was similar between cohorts (P = .573). Spinal malalignment (P < .001), baseline VCF (P = .003), junctional spine location (P = .030), and greater minimum dose to 90% of planning target volume were prognostic for higher rates of VCF. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation to 28 Gy in 2 daily fractions was associated with improved local control without increasing the risk of VCF. The 2-year local control rates are consistent with those predicted by the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic spine tumor control probability model, and these data will inform a proposed dose escalation randomized trial.

Conventionally fully fractionated Gamma Knife Icon re-irradiation of primary recurrent intracranial tumors: the first report indicating feasibility and safety.

OBJECTIVE: With the incorporation of real-time image guidance on the Gamma Knife system allowing for mask-based immobilization (Gamma Knife Icon [GKI]), conventionally fully fractionated (1.8-3.0 Gy/day) GKI radiation can now be delivered to take advantage of an inherently minimal margin for delivery uncertainty, sharp dose falloff, and inhomogeneous dose distribution. This case series details the authors' preliminary experience in re-irradiating 7 complex primary intracranial tumors, which were considered to have been previously maximally radiated and situated adjacent to critical organs at risk. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients who received fractionated re-irradiation using GKI at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, between 2016 and 2021. Patients with brain metastases, and those who received radiotherapy courses in 5 or fewer fractions, were excluded. All radiotherapy doses were converted to the equivalent total dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2), with the assumption of an α/ß ratio of 2 for late normal tissue toxicity and 10 for the tumor. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients were included in this case series. Three patients had recurrent meningiomas, as well as 1 patient each with ependymoma, intracranial sarcoma, pituitary macroadenoma, and papillary pineal tumor. Six patients had undergone prior linear accelerator-based conventional fractionated radiotherapy and 1 patient had undergone prior proton therapy. Patients were re-irradiated with a median (range) total dose of 50.4 (30-63.4) Gy delivered in a median (range) of 28 (10-38) fractions with GKI. The median (range) target volume was 6.58 (0.2-46.3) cm3. The median (range) cumulative mean EQD2 administered to the tumor was 121.1 (107.9-181.3) Gy, and the median (range) maximum point EQD2 administered to the brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm were 91.6 (74.0-111.5) Gy, 58.9 (6.3-102.9) Gy, and 59.9 (36.7-127.3) Gy, respectively. At a median (range) follow-up of 15 (6-42) months, 6 of 7 patients were alive with 4 having locally controlled disease. Only 3 patients experienced treatment-related toxicities, which were self-limited. CONCLUSIONS: Fractionated radiotherapy using GKI may be a safe and effective method for the re-irradiation of complex progressive primary intracranial tumors, where the aim is to minimize the potential for serious late effects.

Proposing a quantitative MRI-based linear measurement framework for response assessment following stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with spinal metastasis.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence towards a quantitative response assessment framework incorporating MRI-based linear measurements for spinal metastasis that predicts outcome following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: Adult patients with de novo spinal metastases treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively assessed. The metastatic lesions involving the pedicles, articular processes, lamina, transverse process, spinous process and vertebral body at leach level were measured separately using linear measurements on pre- and all post-SBRT MRIs. The outcome was segment-specific progression (SSP) using SPINO guidelines which was dated to the first clinical documentation of progression, or the date of the associated MRI if imaging was the reason for progression. Random forest analysis for variable selection and recursive partitioning analysis for SSP probability prediction were used. RESULTS: Five Hundred Ninety-three spinal levels (323 patients) from 4081 MRIs were evaluated. The appearance of new T1 hypointensity and increase in Bilsky grade had an odds ratio (OR) of 33.5 and 15.5 for SSP, respectively. Compared to baseline, an increase of > 3 mm in any lesion dimension, combined with a 1.67-fold increase in area, had an OR of 4.6 for SSP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, balanced accuracy and area under the curve of the training model were 96.7%, 89.6%, 28.6%, 99.8%, 93.2% and 0.905 and of the test model were 91.3%, 89.3%, 27.1% 99.6%, 90.3% and 0.933, respectively. CONCLUSION: With further refinement and validation in prospective multicentre studies, MRI-based linear measurements can help predict response assessment in SBRT-treated spinal metastases.

Comparison of Prospectively Generated Glioma Treatment Plans Clinically Delivered on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Linear Accelerator (MR-Linac) Versus Conventional Linac: Predicted and Measured Skin Dose.

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator radiotherapy is an innovative technology that requires special consideration for secondary electron interactions within the magnetic field, which can alter dose deposition at air-tissue interfaces. As part of ongoing quality assurance and quality improvement of new radiotherapy technologies, the purpose of this study was to evaluate skin dose modelled from the treatment planning systems of a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator and a conventional linear accelerator, and then correlate with in vivo measurements of delivered skin dose from each linear accelerator. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 37 consecutive glioma patients had treatment planning completed and approved prior to radiotherapy initiation using commercial treatment planning systems: a Monte Carlo-based algorithm for magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator or a convolution-based algorithm for conventional linear accelerator. In vivo skin dose was measured using an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter. Results: Monte Carlo-based magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator plans and convolution-based conventional linear accelerator plans had similar dosimetric parameters for target volumes and organs-at-risk. However, magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator plans had 1.52 Gy higher mean dose to air cavities (P < .0001) and 1.10 Gy higher mean dose to skin (P < .0001). In vivo skin dose was 14.5% greater for magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator treatments (P = .0027), and was more accurately predicted by Monte Carlo-based calculation (ρ = 0.95, P < .0001) versus convolution-based (ρ = 0.80, P = .0096). Conclusion: This is the first prospective dosimetric comparison of glioma patients clinically treated on both magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator and conventional linear accelerator. Our findings suggest that skin doses were significantly greater with magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator plans but correlated better with in vivo measurements of actual skin dose from delivered treatments. Future magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator planning processes are being designed to account for skin dosimetry and treatment delivery.

Gamma knife icon based hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (GKI-HSRS) for brain metastases: impact of dose and volume.

OBJECTIVE: Gamma Knife Icon-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (GKI-HSRS) is a novel technical paradigm in the treatment of brain metastases that allows for both the dosimetric benefits of the GKI stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) platform as well as the biologic benefits of fractionation. We report mature local control and adverse radiation effect (ARE) outcomes following 5 fraction GKI-HSRS for intact brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with intact brain metastases treated with 5-fraction GKI-HSRS were retrospectively reviewed. Survival, local control, and adverse radiation effect rates were determined. Univariable and multivariable regression (MVA) were performed on potential predictive factors. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-nine metastases in 146 patients were identified. The median clinical follow-up was 10.7 months (range 0.5-47.6). The median total dose and prescription isodose was 27.5 Gy (range, 20-27.5) in 5 daily fractions and 52% (range, 45-93), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 months, and the 1-year local failure rate was 15.2%. MVA identified a total dose of 27.5 Gy vs. ≤ 25 Gy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, p = 0.042), and prior chemotherapy exposure (HR 1.99, p = 0.015), as significant predictors of LC. The 1-year ARE rate was 10.8% and the symptomatic ARE rate was 1.8%. MVA identified a gross tumor volume of ≥ 4.5 cc (HR 7.29, p < 0.001) as a significant predictor of symptomatic ARE. CONCLUSION: Moderate total doses in 5 daily fractions of GKI-HSRS were associated with high rates of LC and a low incidence of symptomatic ARE.

Skull phantom-based methodology to validate MRI co-registration accuracy for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Target localization, for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment with Gamma Knife, has become increasingly reliant on the co-registration between the planning MRI and the stereotactic cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Validating image registration between modalities would be particularly beneficial when considering the emergence of novel functional and metabolic MRI pulse sequences for target delineation. This study aimed to develop a phantom-based methodology to quantitatively compare the co-registration accuracy of the standard clinical imaging protocol to a representative MRI sequence that was likely to fail co-registration. The comparative methodology presented in this study may serve as a useful tool to evaluate the clinical translatability of novel MRI sequences. METHODS: A realistic human skull phantom with fiducial marker columns was designed and manufactured to fit into a typical MRI head coil and the Gamma Knife patient positioning system. A series of "optimized" 3D MRI sequences-T1 -weighted Dixon, T1 -weighted fast field echo (FFE), and T2 -weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)-were acquired and co-registered to the CBCT. The same sequences were "compromised" by reconstructing without geometric distortion correction and re-collecting with lower signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) to simulate a novel MRI sequence with poor co-registration accuracy. Image similarity metrics-structural similarity (SSIM) index, mean squared error (MSE), and peak SNR (PSNR)-were used to quantitatively compare the co-registration of the optimized and compromised MR images. RESULTS: The ground truth fiducial positions were compared to positions measured from each optimized image volume revealing a maximum median geometric uncertainty of 0.39 mm (LR), 0.92 mm (AP), and 0.13 mm (SI) between the CT and CBCT, 0.60 mm (LR), 0.36 mm (AP), and 0.07 mm (SI) between the CT and T1 -weighted Dixon, 0.42 mm (LR), 0.23 mm (AP), and 0.08 mm (SI) between the CT and T1 -weighted FFE, and 0.45 mm (LR), 0.19 mm (AP), and 1.04 mm (SI) between the CT and T2 -weighted FLAIR. Qualitatively, pairs of optimized and compromised image slices were compared using a fusion image where separable colors were used to differentiate between images. Quantitatively, MSE was the most predictive and SSIM the second most predictive metric for evaluating co-registration similarity. A clinically relevant threshold of MSE, SSIM, and/or PSNR may be defined beyond which point an MRI sequence should be rejected for target delineation based on its dissimilarity to an optimized sequence co-registration. All dissimilarity thresholds calculated using correlation coefficients with in-plane geometric uncertainty would need to be defined on a sequence-by-sequence basis and validated with patient data. CONCLUSION: This study utilized a realistic skull phantom and image similarity metrics to develop a methodology capable of quantitatively assessing whether a modern research-based MRI sequence can be co-registered to the Gamma Knife CBCT with equal or less than equal accuracy when compared to a clinically accepted protocol.

Management of Older Adults with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

Thirty percent of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at least 70 years of age. This number continues to rise as life expectancy continues to increase. Still, older adults with HNSCC remain underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in ambiguity on optimal management. Older adults are a complex patient population, often requiring increased support due to issues relating to functional and performance status, medical comorbidities, and medication management. Furthermore, in older adults with HNSCC, many of these conditions are independently associated with increased toxicity and worse outcomes. Toxicity in the older adult remains difficult to predict and to understand, and as treatment decisions are based on treatment tolerability, it is essential to understand the toxicities and how to minimize them. Novel predictive scores are being developed specifically for older adults with HNSCC to understand toxicity and to assist in personalized treatment decisions. There are clinical trials presently underway that are investigating shortened radiation courses and novel, less toxic systemic treatments in this population. In the forthcoming sections, we provide a detailed overview of the clinical data, treatment paradigms, and considerations in this population. This review provides a comprehensive overview of existing clinical data and clinical considerations in the older adult head and neck cancer population. Additionally, we provide a detailed overview of pertinent current and ongoing clinical trials, as well as future areas for investigation.

Mature Local Control and Reirradiation Rates Comparing Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Conventional Palliative External Beam Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves complete pain response for painful spinal metastases compared with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT). We report mature local control and reirradiation rates in a large cohort of patients treated with SBRT versus cEBRT enrolled previously in the Canadian Clinical Trials Group Symptom Control 24 phase 2/3 trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred thirty-seven of 229 (60%) patients randomized to 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions or 20 Gy in 5 cEBRT fractions were retrospectively reviewed. By including all treated spinal segments, we report on 66 patients (119 spine segments) treated with SBRT and 71 patients (169 segments) treated with cEBRT. The primary outcomes were magnetic resonance-based local control and reirradiation rates for each treated spine segment. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 11.3 months (interquartile range, 5.3-27.7 months), and median overall survival in the SBRT and cEBRT cohorts were 21.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.3, upper bound not reached) and 18.9 (95% CI, 12.2-29.1) months (P = .428), respectively. The cohorts were balanced with respect to radioresistant histology and presence of mass (paraspinal and/or epidural disease extension). Risk of local failure after SBRT versus cEBRT at 6, 12, and 24 months were 2.8% (95% CI, 0.8%-7.4%) versus 11.2% (95% CI, 6.9%-16.6%), 6.1% (95% CI, 2.5%-12.1%) versus 28.4% (95% CI, 21.3%-35.9%), and 14.8% (95% CI, 8.2-23.1%) versus 35.6% (95% CI, 27.8%-43.6%), respectively (P < .001). cEBRT (hazard ratio [HR], 3.48; 95% CI, 1.94-6.25; P < .001) and presence of mass (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.29-3.31; P = .002) independently predicted local failure on multivariable analysis. The 1-year reirradiation rates and median times to reirradiation after SBRT versus cEBRT were 2.2% (95% CI, 0.4-7.0%) versus 15.8% (95% CI, 10.4%-22.3%) (P = .002) and 22.9 months versus 9.5 months, respectively. cEBRT (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.27-5.30; P = .009) and radioresistant histology (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.12-3.60; P = .020) independently predicted for reirradiation. Eight of 12 iatrogenic vertebral compression fractures were after SBRT and 4 of 12 after cEBRT; grade 3 adverse fracture effects were isolated to the SBRT cohort (5 of 12). CONCLUSIONS: Risk of local failure and reirradiation is lower with SBRT compared with cEBRT for spinal metastases. Although the iatrogenic vertebral compression fracture rates were within expectations, grade 3 vertebral compression fractures were isolated to the SBRT cohort.

Radiation myelopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM). METHODS: We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM. RESULTS: There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1-5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence. CONCLUSION: RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.

Trastuzumab emtansine increases the risk of stereotactic radiosurgery-induced radionecrosis in HER2 + breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we investigate factors associated with radionecrosis (RN) in HER2 + (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) patients with brain metastases (BrM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Patients with HER2 + breast cancer BrM treated with SRS (2010-2020) were identified from an institutional database. The incidence of RN was determined per treated BrM according to serial imaging and/or histology. Factors associated with RN such as age, RT dose, BrM volume, and initiation of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) were investigated with univariate and multivariable analyses (MVA). RESULTS: 67 HER2 + patients with 223 BrM were identified. 21 patients (31.3%) were treated with T-DM1 post-SRS, including 14 patients (20.9%) who received T-DM1 within 12 months of SRS. The median follow-up was 15.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.4-35.3) months. The overall probability of RN post-SRS was 21.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-10.7), and the 1 and 2 year risk was 6.7% (95% CI 2.7-10.7) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.2-21.3). MVA identified T-DM1 treatment post-SRS (hazard ratio (HR) 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.3, p = 0.02) and equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) > 90 Gy2 (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.1, p = 0.02) as predictors of RN. Patients treated with T-DM1 and SRS had a 29.9% (95% CI 15.3-44.6%) probability of RN, with a 25.2% (95% CI 12.8-37.6%) risk at 1- and 2 years post-T-DM1. The majority of RN were symptomatic (71%), with a median time to RN of 4.8 months. CONCLUSION: T-DM1 exposure post-SRS was associated with a higher risk of RN among patients with HER2 + BrM.

Placement technique impacts gastrostomy tube-related complications amongst head and neck cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is essential for the provision of enteral nutrition in select head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Minimally invasive tube placement is facilitated through one of two techniques, push or pull, but there have been conflicting results regarding safety profiles of these procedures. The objectives of this study were to determine the association of PEG insertion technique with gastrostomy tube complications, including stomal metastases. METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients with HNC undergoing PEG insertion by either the pull (gastroscope assisted) or push (fluoroscopy assisted) technique was performed. Tube-related complications included infection, dislodgement, deterioration, leak, and other. Adjusted analysis was performed via a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: 1,575 patients were included across three institutions. Tube-related complications occurred in 36% of patients, the most common being peristomal leak (13%) and infection (16%). The push technique (OR 2.66, 95% CI: 1.42-4.97), and the presence of T4 disease (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 1.58-13.51), were associated with a greater risk of developing any tube-related complication. Infection rates were similar between pull and push cohorts. All detected stoma metastases occurred with the pull technique, with an overall prevalence of 0.32% amongst the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The push technique is associated with a greater risk of developing any tube-related complication, but the rate of stomal metastases may be higher with the pull technique. There is potential for quality improvement measures to improve tube-related complications associated with either technique.