Morphologic Variability of the Shoulder between the Populations of North American and East Asian.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if there were significant differences in glenohumeral joint morphology between North American and East Asian populations that may influence sizing and selection of shoulder arthroplasty systems. METHODS: Computed tomography reconstructions of 92 North American and 58 East Asian patients were used to perform 3-dimensional measurements. The proximal humeral position was normalized in all patients by aligning it with the scapular plane utilizing anatomic landmarks. Measurements were performed on the humerus and scapula and included coronal and axial humeral head radius, humeral neck shaft and articular arc angles, glenoid height and width, and critical shoulder angle. Glenohumeral relationships were also measured and included lateral distance to the greater tuberosity and acromion, abduction lever arm, and acromial index. Parametric and nonparametric statistical analyses were used to compare population metrics. RESULTS: East Asian glenohumeral measurements were significantly smaller for all linear metrics (p < 0.05), with the exception of acromial length, which was greater than in the North American cohort (p < 0.001). The increase in acromial length affected all measurements involving the acromion including abduction lever arms. No difference was found between the neck shaft and articular angular measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The East Asian population exhibited smaller shoulder morphometrics than their North American cohort, with the exception of an extended acromial overhang. The morphologic data can provide some additional factors to consider when choosing an optimal shoulder implant for the East Asian population, in addition to creating future designs that may better accommodate this population.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear: risk factors for poor functional improvement.

BACKGROUND: Some patients unexpectedly have poor functional improvement after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. Our aim was to identify risk factors for this outcome. We also assessed the value of RSA for cases with poor functional improvement vs. METHODS: The study was a retrospective case-control analysis for primary RSA performed for massive rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis with minimum 2-year follow-up. Cases were defined as Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score improvement of ≤1, whereas controls improved SST score ≥2. Risk factors were chosen on the basis of previous association with poor outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer results were analyzed as a subgroup. Value was defined as improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score per $10,000 hospital cost. RESULTS: In a multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis, neurologic dysfunction (P = .006), age <60 years (P = .02), and high preoperative SST score (P = .03) were independently associated with poor functional improvement. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer patients significantly improved in active external rotation (-0.3° to 38.7°; P < .01). The value of RSA (ΔASES/$10,000 cost) for cases was 0.8 compared with 17.5 for controls (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Young age, high preoperative function, and neurologic dysfunction were associated with poor functional improvement. Surgeons should consider these associations in counseling and selection of patients. Concurrent latissimus dorsi transfer was successful in restoring active external rotation in a subgroup of patients. The critical economic importance of improved patient selection is emphasized by the very low value of the procedure in the case group.

Outcome and value of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is commonly used to treat glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) with an intact rotator cuff. Recently, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been used for GHOA patients who are elderly or have eccentric glenoid wear. We evaluated patients with GHOA scheduled to have TSA but who were changed to RSA because of intraoperative difficulties with the glenoid component or instability and compared them with a cohort that underwent TSA to determine if the groups had similar outcomes. METHODS: We identified 24 consecutive GHOA patients who underwent RSA and matched them to 96 patients who underwent TSA. Glenoid wear and rotator cuff musculature were assessed with preoperative computed tomography scans. Direct hospital costs of the procedure were collected. RESULTS: Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and range of motion were similar between the 2 groups. Five TSA patients had radiographic glenoid loosening, whereas no RSA patients did. Neither group required a revision. One RSA patient required surgery for treatment of a periprosthetic fracture. RSA was $7274 more costly than TSA, related mainly to implant cost. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GHOA who were converted intraoperatively to RSA because of improper seating of the glenoid trial or persistent posterior subluxation had outcomes comparable to those of a similar group of patients in whom TSA was performed. At midterm follow-up, TSA is associated with lower cost than RSA. The higher rate of radiographic loosening in the TSA group warrants longer follow-up to assess revision costs. In cases in which a TSA cannot be performed with confidence, RSA is a reasonable alternative.

Glenosphere dissociation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is gaining popularity for the treatment of debilitating shoulder disorders. Despite marked improvements in patient satisfaction and function, the RSA complication rate is high. Glenosphere dissociation has been reported and may result from multiple mechanisms. However, few RSA retrieval studies exist. METHODS: We reviewed our RSA database and identified patients with glenosphere dissociation between 1999 and 2013. Prosthesis type, glenosphere size, and contributing factors to dissociation were noted. Five retrieved implants were available for analysis, and evidence of wear or corrosion on the Morse taper was documented. Further, we biomechanically investigated improper Morse taper engagement that may occur intraoperatively as a potential cause of acute dissociation. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with glenosphere dissociation were identified (0.5 months to 7 years postoperatively). Glenosphere size distribution was as follows: 32 mm (n = 1), 36 mm (n = 4), 40 mm (n = 6), and 44 mm (n = 2). Incidence of dissociation was correlated to glenosphere size (P < .001). Taper damage was limited to fretting wear, and there was minimal evidence of taper corrosion. Biomechanically, improper taper engagement reduced the torsional capacity of the glenosphere-baseplate interface by 60% from 19.2 ± 1.0 N-m to 7.5 ± 1.5 N-m. CONCLUSION: We identified several mechanisms contributing to glenosphere dissociation after RSA, including trauma and improper taper engagement. Limited evidence of corrosive wear on the taper interface was identified. Although it is rare, the incidence of glenosphere dissociation was higher when 40- and 44-mm glenospheres were implanted compared with smaller glenospheres (32 and 36 mm), probably because of the larger exposed surface area for potential impingement.

Glenoid subchondral bone density distribution in male total shoulder arthroplasty subjects with eccentric and concentric wear.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty may be prevented by component placement on a congruent and adequate bony surface. Glenoid subchondral bone density (SBD) variability may be correlated with this concept. This study analyzed the 3-dimensional distribution of glenoid SBD in total shoulder arthroplasty patients with osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry (CT-OAM) was performed in 42 men (21 with eccentric and 21 with concentric wear patterns) with glenohumeral arthritis. Glenoid SBD was measured from the joint surface based on 5 clinically relevant topographic zones. The correlation of the wear pattern with the SBD distribution was investigated. RESULTS: The glenoid subarticular layers could be separated into distinct regions: calcified cartilage (≤ 1.5 mm), subchondral plate (2-4.5 mm) and cancellous bone (≥ 5 mm). There were significant differences in SBD among these layers within and between patients with concentric and eccentric wear patterns. In concentric glenoids, the SBD distribution was homogeneous, with greater mineralization in the central zone, 1,749.1 ± 162.3 Hounsfield units (HU) (at 2.5 mm), compared with the posterior, anterior, and superior zones (P < .001). In the eccentric group, the SBD distribution was inhomogeneous. Mineralization was greatest in the posterior zone, 1,739.0 ± 172.6 HU (at 2.5 mm), followed by the inferior zone, 1,722.1 ± 186.6 HU (at 3 mm). CONCLUSION: This study represents the first study using CT-OAM to evaluate the 3-dimensional SBD distribution of the glenoid vault for different arthritic wear patterns. The study findings indicate that the SBD distribution is dependent on (1) depth from the articular surface, (2) topographic zone, and (3) wear pattern. CT-OAM may be an effective tool to assist in preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty.

The effects of glenoid wear patterns on patients with osteoarthritis in total shoulder arthroplasty: an assessment of outcomes and value.

BACKGROUND: Despite the success of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), concerns remain about the longevity of the implant, in particular, glenoid component survivorship. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative glenoid wear patterns affect clinical outcomes and value in patients undergoing TSA. METHODS: A comparative cohort study was conducted of 309 patients with a total of 344 TSA procedures, performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Computed tomography scans were obtained in all patients, with preoperative glenoid wear pattern characterized as either concentric (n = 196; follow-up time, 49.2 months) or eccentric (n = 148; follow-up time, 52.3 months) according to a modified Levine classification. A clinical, radiographic, and economic assessment was performed between the 2 wear patterns. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score in the concentric group (80.8 ± 20.8) compared with the eccentric group (77.6 ± 21.2) at final follow-up (P = .159). Range of motion and final visual analog scale for pain score were similar between the 2 groups. Radiographic evidence of gross glenoid loosening was significantly lower in the concentric group [11 of 195 (5.6%)] compared with the eccentric group [18 of 147 (12.2%)] (P = .030). Revision rates were similar between the concentric group [4 of 195 (2.0%)] and the eccentric group [3 of 147 (2.0%)]. A value assessment also showed no significant difference between the concentric and eccentric groups [concentric 26.1 vs. eccentric 25.5 (ΔASES score/$10,000 hospital cost) (P = .479)]. CONCLUSIONS: Similar clinical results and value can be expected with both concentric and eccentric glenoid wear patterns in TSA. Concerns arise, however, as the eccentric group demonstrated a more than 2-fold increased rate of glenoid component loosening compared with the concentric group.

Analysis of neurovascular safety between superior and anterior plating techniques of clavicle fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Clavicle fractures are commonly plated as a method of fixation, with superior and anterior techniques described. Although advantages and disadvantages have been attributed to both, it is unclear if one approach provides a lower risk of neurovascular injury. The aim of this study was to compare the potential for neurovascular injury between these 2 plate locations in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Seventeen adult fresh frozen cadavers underwent bilateral dissections exposing the clavicle and underlying neurovasculature. After taking baseline anatomical measurements, a superior and anterior clavicle plate was applied, removed and measurements were taken from the nearest screw exit site to the underlying subclavian vein/artery and brachial plexus. The differences between superior and anterior measurements were compared based on proximity with the neurovasculature. RESULTS: Distance to the vessels were unobtainable in 6 specimens (35%) plated with the anterior technique due to the trajectory of the screws projecting cephalad to the vessels. In the remaining specimens, there was no significant difference in the distance to the subclavian vein/artery and brachial plexus in the superior plate position (9.2 ± 4.6, 12.2 ± 5.8, and 9.8 ± 5.2 mm, respectively) compared with the anterior plate position (8.3 ± 3.5, 12.2 ± 6.5, and 9.7 ± 5.3 mm, respectively). In addition, no significant difference in potential neurovascular injury with regard to body size or gender was found. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of our specimens showed no significant difference between superior and anterior plating in regard to potential risk for injury to the underlying neurovasculature. However, there appears to be a subset of the population with a more caudal position of the neurovascular structures in which anterior plating may be potentially safer.