A Call to Disrupt Heteronormativity and Cisnormativity in Physical Therapy: Perspectives of 2SLGBTQIPA+ Participants on Future Directions for PT Curricula.

Purpose: To explore the perspectives of individuals with self-reported expertise and/or lived experiences regarding aspects of 2SLGBTQIPA+ health that should be included in pre-licensure physical therapy (PT) curricula across Canada, including how, when, and by whom this content should be delivered. Method: We conducted a critical qualitative, cross-sectional study with semi-structured virtual interviews. We analyzed participants' perspectives thematically using the DEPICT method. Results: Thirteen participants across Canada with a variety of gender identities and sexual orientations were interviewed. Participants described how transformative change on 2SLGBTQIPA+ issues in PT requires an approach that is based on interrupting heteronormativity and cisnormativity in PT curricula. Participants explained how this could be achieved by (1) emphasizing both historical inequities and present-day considerations for safe and inclusive practice, (2) introducing the content early and integrating it throughout the programme using a variety of large- and small-group sessions, and (3) including 2SLGBTQIPA+ individuals in content delivery and creation. Conclusions: This study brings attention to the need for the PT profession to understand how the pervasive social structures of heteronormativity and cisnormativity shape education and practice, and offer strategies for disrupting complicity with these systems of inequality.

Objectif: explorer les points de vue des personnes qui déclarent avoir des compétences ou des expériences de vie relativement à des aspects de la santé des LGBTQIPA2+ qui pourraient être inclus dans le programme de physiothérapie avant l'obtention du permis au Canada, y compris la manière de transmettre la matière, ainsi que le moment où la transmettre et par qui elle doit être transmise. Méthodologie: étude qualitative transversale critique comprenant des entrevues virtuelles semi-structurées. Les chercheurs ont analysé les points de vue des participants par thèmes, à l'aide de la méthode DEPICT. Résultats: au total, 13 participants du Canada de diverses identités de genre et orientations sexuelles ont participé à une entrevue. Ils ont décrit que, pour parvenir à un changement transformatif des enjeux LGBTQIPA2+ en physiothérapie, il faut adopter une approche reposant sur l'interruption de l'hétéronormativité et de la cisnormativité au sein du programme de physiothérapie. Les participants expliquent comment y parvenir : 1) en soulignant à la fois les iniquités historiques et les considérations actuelles en matière de pratique inclusive sécuritaire, 2) en présentant la matière tôt et en l'intégrant à tout le programme dans le cadre de séances en grands et en petits groupes 3) en faisant participer les personnes LGBTQIPA2+ à la présentation et à la création de la matière. Conclusions: la présente étude fait ressortir toute l'importance de faire comprendre à la profession comment les structures sociales d'hétéronormativité et de cisnormativité omniprésentes modèlent l'éducation et la pratique, et comment offrir des stratégies pour enrayer la complicité avec ces systèmes d'inégalité.

Clinician perspectives on implementing a team-based metacognitive strategy training approach to stroke rehabilitation.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this research study was to explore site and clinician specific experiences, successes and challenges in implementing a complex intervention (cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance approach) to enhance stroke team's ability to address cognitive impairments as part of comprehensive stroke rehabilitation. METHODS: A focus group was held with clinicians from five study sites, all rehabilitation stroke hospitals in a large urban setting, to discuss implementation experiences. Participants were clinicians (site champions) from each of the five participating stroke program study sites and included four occupational therapists, three physiotherapists and one speech-language pathologist. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes that represented clinicians' perspectives. RESULTS: Implementing this complex team-based intervention was influenced by three themes-organizational support, experiential evidence, and clinicians' perspectives. Continued implementation of the intervention following the withdrawal of study support was represented on a continuum that ranged from not using the approach at all to implementing it with all patients. Sites where managers encouraged and supported use of the intervention within teams (organization support), continued to use it after the study support period as did clinicians who were willing to try new interventions (clinicians' perspectives). Development of iterative conclusions through implementation or attempts to implement the intervention had both positive and negative effects on continued implementation (experiential evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that reinforce development of positive experiential evidence and building organizational support for innovative practice were found to be useful adjuncts in facilitating implementation of complex interprofessional interventions.

Implementing a shared decision-making and cognitive strategy-based intervention: Knowledge user perspectives and recommendations.

The aim of this study was to employ knowledge user perspectives to develop recommendations that facilitate implementation of a complex, shared decision-making (SDM)-based intervention in an interprofessional setting. This study was part of a larger knowledge translation (KT) study in which interprofessional teams from five freestanding, academically affiliated, rehabilitation hospitals were tasked with implementing a cognitive strategy-based intervention approach that incorporates SDM known as Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) to treat survivors of stroke. At the end of the 4-month CO-OP KT implementation support period, 10 clinicians, two from each site, volunteered as CO-OP site champions. A semi-structured focus group was conducted with 10 site champions 3 months following the implementation support period. To meet the study objective, an exploratory qualitative research design was used. The focus group session was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed through the lens of the integrated promoting action on research implementation in health services (iPARIHS) framework. The focus group participants (n = 8) consisted of occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech language pathologists. Ten recommendations for CO-OP implementation were extracted and co-constructed from the focus group transcript. The recommendations reflected all four iPARHIS constructs: Facilitation, Context, Innovation, and Recipients. Implementation recommendations, from the knowledge user perspective, highlight that context-specific facilitation is key to integrating a novel, complex intervention into interprofessional practice. Facilitators should lay out a framework for training, communication and implementation that is structured but still provides flexibility for iterative learning and active problem-solving within the relevant practice context.

Implementing a function-based cognitive strategy intervention within inter-professional stroke rehabilitation teams: Changes in provider knowledge, self-efficacy and practice.

BACKGROUND: The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach is a complex rehabilitation intervention in which clients are taught to use problem-solving cognitive strategies to acquire personally-meaningful functional skills, and health care providers are required to shift control regarding treatment goals and intervention strategies to their clients. A multi-faceted, supported, knowledge translation (KT) initiative was targeted at the implementation of CO-OP in inpatient stroke rehabilitation teams at five freestanding rehabilitation hospitals. The study objective was to estimate changes in rehabilitation clinicians' knowledge, self-efficacy, and practice related to implementing CO-OP. METHODS: A single arm pre-post and 6-month follow up study was conducted. CO-OP KT consisted of a 2-day workshop, 4 months of implementation support, a consolidation session, and infrastructure support. In addition, a sustainability plan was implemented. Consistent with CO-OP principles, teams were given control over specific implementation goals and strategies. Multiple choice questions (MCQ) were used to assess knowledge. A self-efficacy questionnaire with 3 subscales (Promoting Cognitive Strategy Use, PCSU; Client-Focused Therapy, CFT; Top-Down Assessment and Treatment, TDAT) was developed for the study. Medical record audits were used to investigate practice change. Data analysis for knowledge and self-efficacy utilized mixed effects models. Medical record audits were analyzed with frequency counts and chi-squares. RESULTS: Sixty-five health care providers consisting mainly of occupational and physical therapists entered the study. Mixed effects models revealed intervention effects for MCQs, CFT, and PCSU at post intervention and follow-up, but no effect on TDAT. No charts showed any evidence of CO-OP use at baseline, compared to 8/40 (20%) post intervention. Post intervention there was a trend towards reduction in impairment goals and significantly more component goals were set (z = 2.7, p = .007).