Ileostomy versus colostomy: impact on functional outcomes after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

AIM: Even if a defunctioning stoma mitigates the serious consequences of anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, the presence of a temporary stoma or having a stoma for a prolonged period of time may also be a determining factor for further morbidities and poor bowel function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of diverting stomas on clinical and functional outcomes after TME, comparing ileostomy or colostomy effects. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent TME for rectal cancer between March 2017 and December 2020 in three Italian referral centres were enrolled in the present study. For every patient sex, age, stage of the tumour, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical technique, anastomotic technique, the presence of a diverting stoma, perioperative complications and functional postoperative status were recorded. Considering the diverting stoma, the kind of stoma, length of time before closure and stoma related complications were evaluated. RESULTS: During the study period 416 consecutive patients (63% men) were included. Preoperative neoadjuvant therapy was performed in 79%. A minimally invasive approach was performed in >95% of patients. Temporary stoma was performed during the operation in 387 patients (93%) (ileostomy 71%, colostomy 21%). The stoma was closed in 84% of patients. The median time from surgery to stoma closure was 145 days. No difference was found between ileostomy and colostomy in overall morbidity after stoma creation and closure. Moreover, increased postoperative functional disturbance seemed to be significantly proportional to the attending time for closure for ileostomy. CONCLUSION: The presence of a defunctioning stoma seems to have a negative impact on functional bowel activity, especially for delayed closure for ileostomy. This should be considered when the kind of stoma (ileostomy vs. colostomy) is selected for each patient.

The role of bed-side laparoscopy in the management of acute mesenteric ischemia of recent onset in post-cardiac surgery patients admitted to ICU.

PURPOSE: Acute mesenteric ischemia with non-occlusive mechanism (NOMI) is a possible complication after cardiac surgery in patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Since the diagnosis is often difficult with CT-scan, some authors have evaluated the role of bed-side diagnostic laparoscopy (DL). We aimed to contribute to this topic with a personal series. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients admitted to ICU after cardiac surgery since 2009 up to 2019, successively operated on for a suspected NOMI of recent onset with non-conclusive CT. They were divided into laparoscopic (Ls) and laparotomic (Lt) group, depending on whether or not they had a DL. They were compared for the CT false-positive (FP) and true-positive (TP) rate and the surgical outcome. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled. Lt included 30 patients (41%), Ls 43 (59%). The overall FP were 38 (52%), with a higher incidence in Ls. There was no difference in the mortality rate. The morbidity rate was higher in Lt, and especially in Lt-FP. The TP were 35 (47.9%). The mean operating time (OT) in the Lt-TP group was similar to the sum of the mean OT of the laparotomies plus that of the laparoscopies in the Ls-TP group. Conversely, when considering only laparotomic procedures, the Lt-TP had higher mean OT, such as an increased blood loss CONCLUSIONS: Post-cardiosurgical patients admitted to ICU have a relatively high rate of NOMI, in which CT-scan is often initially non-conclusive. Our data and those from the literature seem to show that in such cases bed-side DL may be an advantageous and safe procedure to avoid needless laparotomy and enables a more tailored open surgery.

Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia. Is it still an effective procedure?

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia still represents the most frequent late complication of abdominal surgery. After a direct repair, in literature is reported a recurrence rate ranging from 31 to 49%, meanwhile after a prosthetic repair such values were much lower, with a recurrence rate up to 10%. The sites of prosthetic placement in the abdominal wall are premusculo-aponeurotic (onlay, or Chevrel technique), retromuscular-prefascial and preperitoneal (Rives technique, Stoppa technique), whereas intraperitoneal insertion can be done with open or laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and late postoperative results in patients treated with a Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair between January 2008 and December 2018 at the Emergency Surgery Unit of the Careggi University Hospital in Florence. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and December 2018 at the Emergency Surgery Unit of the Careggi University Hospital in Florence, 461 patients (245 male, 216 female) with a mean age of 61,52 years were submitted to ventral incisional hernia repair with a Chevrel technique. The mean operatory time was 95.29 min (±50.48) and in 72 patients (15.61%) human fibrin glue was vaporized under the mesh using a spray device. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days and all drain tubes were removed after 7.1 days as mean (±4.3). No intraoperative mortality nor postoperative mortality was reported. In our experience the Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia show a recurrence rate (3.2%). Parietal complications observed were seroma in 7.1% of patients, hematoma in 4.7%, localized skin necrosis in 5.2%, surgical site infection in 6.7%, data comparable with the results reported in the other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the objections to the Chevrel procedure focus on the parietal complications and risk of infection. Chevrel procedure cannot be considered an obsolete intervention, in our series, results were very satisfactory in both immediate and late follow-up; moreover this technique is safe and easy to perform.

Urgent cholecystectomy in patient with left-sided gallbladder Case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Sinistroposition of the gallbladder, or true left-sided gallbladder (LSG) without situs viscerum inversus, is a rare congenital anatomical variant where the gallbladder is located to the left of round/falciform ligament. It can be associated with anomalies of the biliary tree, portal system and hepatic vascularization. The surgical management of a LSG could be challenging even for an experienced operator, being usually an incidental intraoperative finding. CASE REPORT: A 72 years old woman was admitted to our emergency department because of acute cholecystitis. There were no pre-operative indications of sinistroposition of the gallbladder and its aberrant position was discovered during the explorative laparoscopy; because of the unusual anatomy and chronic flogosis, the laparoscopic approach was converted to open surgery. The patient underwent a successful intervention and was discharged after 4 days without complications. Her family history revealed a daughter with biliary atresia. DISCUSSION: LSG could remain undetected at preoperative imaging, but today, with advances in diagnostic imaging, the report of this condition has increased. Several hypothesis suggest the presence of an underlying embriologic mechanism for LSG and its associated anomalies, but its etiology is still unknown. The association with the daughter's biliary atresia makes reasonable a possible genetic correlation with this condition. CONCLUSIONS: In case of LSG, laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be feasible and safe, but with an increased risk of injury to the major biliary structures, mostly in case of severe and chronic inflammation of the gallbladder. Surgeons have to know this variant because of its associated hepatic anomalies. KEY WORDS: Cholecystectomy, Emergency Surgery, Left-Sided-Gallbladder.

Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy for critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective study and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Bedside diagnostic laparoscopy could be helpful in extremely critically ill patients. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the safety and diagnostic accuracy of bedside diagnostic laparoscopy in the identification of intra-abdominal pathology in critically ill patients and to compare its accuracy and outcomes with the ones of laparotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Careggi University Hospital and submitted to bedside diagnostic laparoscopy between January 2006 and May 2017. This group of patients was compared with a group of patients that were admitted to the ICU and submitted directly to explorative laparotomy for suspected intra-abdominal pathologies. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients (M/F = 81/48, mean age = 71.64 years) underwent bedside diagnostic laparoscopy in ICU. 154 patients instead were submitted directly to explorative laparotomy in operatory room (mean age 75.70 years, M/F = 94/60). Among the 129 patients submitted to bedside laparoscopy, 53.49% were positive for intra-abdominal pathologies whereas 46.51% were negative, while among the 154 patients submitted directly to laparotomy, 76.62% were positive for intra-abdominal pathologies whereas 23.38% were negative. In 55.03% of all patients submitted to bedside laparoscopy, a non-therapeutic laparotomy was avoided, while the 33.76% of patients submitted directly to laparotomy had a non-therapeutic laparotomy that could be avoidable. CONCLUSIONS: Our results pinpoint the advantages of performing bedside diagnostic laparoscopy in the ICU setting, which can be considered an option every time there is the suspicion of an intra-abdominal pathology.

A minimally invasive approach with a 3d imaging system for the treatment of esophageal perforation due to Boerhaave syndrome.

Boerhaave's syndrome is a rare life-threatening condition that requires urgent surgical management. There are various methods of managing it, with the main principles of limiting sepsis, draining the area and maintaining nutrition. Although the gold standard is open thoracotomy and/or laparotomy, mostly in patients with sepsis, we present a case of a 53-year-old man treated with a combination of laparoscopic suture (3D imaging system) of the oesophageal perforation site, decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and feeding jejunostomy. We conclude that this approach is a safe and a viable option in the management of Boerhaave syndrome in a septic patient presenting early. KEY WORDS: Boerhaave's syndrome, Laparoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery, Oesophageal Rupture, Surgery, 3D-laparoscopy.