"Eculizumab First" in the Management of Posttransplant Thrombotic Microangiopathy.

Introduction: Posttransplant thrombotic microangiopathy (PT-TMA) is an uncommon event that characterizes approximately 3% to 14% of kidney transplants (KTs), and that is associated with a higher risk of delayed graft function and graft loss. PT-TMA occurs more frequently within the first 3 months after transplant and can be a manifestation of de novo disease or the recurrence of previous atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Abnormalities in complement regulation genes could explain the increased susceptibility of some patients to PT-TMA. Eculizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the formation of the membrane attack complex C5b-9. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of eculizumab as treatment for PT-TMA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of 45 KT patients who received eculizumab immediately after the clinical diagnosis of PT-TMA. Results: Kidney biopsy was performed in 91.1% of patients, and complement genetic study was performed in 64.4%. Of the kidney biopsies, 85.4% showed signs of TMA; genetic analysis revealed 1 pathogenetic variant, 2 variants of uncertain significance, 1 likely benign variant, 8 risk polymorphisms, and 27 risk haplotypes. After 2 weeks from the treatment starting, hemoglobin and platelets significantly increased. A remarkable improvement in kidney function was also observed. After 6 months, 28.8% of patients had a complete renal recovery whereas 44.4% had a partial recovery. Conclusion: This is, to our knowledge, the largest series of KT patients with PT-TMA treated with eculizumab. These data suggest that eculizumab is associated with a normalization of hemolysis indices and an important and progressive improvement of graft function.

A roadmap to parathyroidectomy for kidney transplant candidates.

Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder may persist after successful kidney transplantation. Persistent hyperparathyroidism has been identified in up to 80% of patients throughout the first year after kidney transplantation. International guidelines lack strict recommendations about the management of persistent hyperparathyroidism. However, it is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes, including higher fracture risk and an increased risk of all-cause mortality and allograft loss. Secondary hyperparathyroidism may be treated medically (vitamin D, phosphate binders and calcimimetics) or surgically (parathyroidectomy). Guideline recommendations suggest medical therapy first but do not clarify optimal parathyroid hormone targets or indications and timing of parathyroidectomy. There are no clear guidelines or long-term studies about the impact of hyperparathyroidism therapy. Parathyroidectomy is more effective than medical treatment, although it is associated with increased short-term risks. Ideally parathyroidectomy should be performed before kidney transplantation to prevent persistent hyperparathyroidism and improve graft outcomes. We now propose a roadmap for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients eligible for kidney transplantation that includes the indications and timing (pre- or post-kidney transplantation) of parathyroidectomy, the evaluation of parathyroid gland size and the integration of parathyroid gland size in the decision-making process by a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, radiologists and surgeons.

A Case Report of Tolvaptan Therapy for ADPKD Patients With COVID-19. The Need for Appropriate Counselling for Temporary Drug Discontinuation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) may require specific therapy with vasopressin receptor antagonists to slow the progression of renal disease. Because of its mechanism of action, the most common side effects are polyuria, nocturia, and polydipsia. Elevations of liver enzyme levels can also occur during treatment with Tolvaptan. Temporary drug withdrawal may be indicated if the patient is unable to hydrate adequately or if there are concomitant causes of dehydration, including major infectious events. During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, this should be considered in the management of patients on Tolvaptan therapy. CASE REPORT: We present the clinical case of a 51-year-old male with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and ADPKD receiving Tolvaptan therapy with particular reference to the medical management of the patient during the infectious event. The patient was instructed to discontinue promptly Tolvaptan as soon as symptoms appeared. He was treated with forced hydration and symptomatic therapy. Nevertheless, a transient elevation of liver enzyme levels was detected. The timely discontinuation of Tolvaptan therapy avoided the risk of potential hepatotoxicity in a condition of known susceptibility. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan therapy of patients with ADPKD is safe even during SARS-CoV-2 infection. There is need for appropriate and prompt patient counseling to avoid potentially adverse side effects.

Erratum to: A roadmap to parathyroidectomy for kidney transplant candidates.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac050.].

An update on tenapanor to treat hyperphosphatemia.

Hyperphosphatemia is a common feature in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Commonly, high serum phosphate levels are observed only in later stages of CKD. The control of hyperphosphatemia plays a key role in the management of CKD patients. However, the optimal range for serum phosphate levels in CKD patients is still controversial. Currently, phosphate binders are the only medications available to reduce elevated serum phosphate levels in patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis. Tenapanor, an inhibitor of gastrointestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3), acts via a non-phosphate-binding mechanism, reducing paracellular phosphate transport in the intestine. Has tenapanor the potential to improve management of mineral bone disorder in CKD?

The link between homocysteine, folic acid and vitamin B12 in chronic kidney disease.

Patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease experience tremendous cardiovascular risk. Cardiovascular events are the leading causes of death in these patient populations, thus the interest in non-traditional risk factors such as hyperhomocysteinemia, folic acid and vitamin B12 metabolism is growing. Hyperhomocysteinemia is commonly found in CKD patients because of impaired renal metabolism and reduced renal excretion. Folic acid, the synthetic form of vitamin B9, is critical in the conversion of homocysteine to methionine like vitamin B12. Folic acid has also been shown to improve endothelial function without lowering homocysteine, suggesting an alternative explanation for the effect of folic acid on endothelial function. Whether hyperhomocysteinemia represents a reliable marker of cardiovascular risk and cardiovascular mortality or a therapeutic target in this population remains unclear. However, it is reasonable to consider folic acid with or without methylcobalamin supplementation as appropriate adjunctive therapy in patients with CKD. The purpose of this review is to summarize the characteristics of homocysteine, folic acid, and vitamin B12 metabolism, the mechanism of vascular damage, and the outcome of vitamin supplementation on hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with CKD, ESRD, dialysis treatment, and in kidney transplant recipients.

Denosumab-Induced Hypocalcemia and Hyperparathyroidism in de novo Kidney Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Denosumab represents a realistic treatment option to increase bone mineral density in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). It is still unknown how and at what extent posttransplantation bone disease and graft function influence the effects of denosumab on mineral metabolism indexes. In this study, we analyze risk factors of hypocalcemia and parathyroid hormone (PTH) increase after denosumab administration in eighteen de novo KTRs and its management before and after this treatment. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, observational, prospective study on de novo KTRs. All KTRs enrolled received a single 60 mg subcutaneous dose of denosumab every 6 months. Before kidney transplantation, no patients were treated with calcio-mimetic. After kidney transplantation and before antiresorptive therapy, no patients were treated with calcio-mimetic drugs and/or vitamin D receptor agonists, while all patients received nutritional vitamin D supplementation (from 1,000 IU to 1,500 IU daily). RESULTS: Hypocalcemia was related to the degree of lumbar osteoporosis (p = 0.047); the increase in the PTH level was correlated to baseline bone turnover markers (bone alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin, and ß-C-terminal telopeptide), the 25 OH status, and eGFR. The introduction of calcitriol, after the PTH increase, in addition to cholecalciferol was necessary to ensure an adequate control of serum calcium and PTH during a follow-up of 15 months. Following the treatment with denosumab, it was observed an improvement of areal bone mineral density both at lumbar and femoral sites with a mean percentual increase of 1.74% and 0.25%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab is an effective treatment for bone disease in KTRs. In our study, the increase in PTH is not a transient event but prolonged throughout the follow-up period and requires continuous supplementation therapy with calcitriol.

Vitamin D Effects on Bone Homeostasis and Cardiovascular System in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Renal Transplant Recipients.

Poor vitamin D status is common in patients with impaired renal function and represents one main component of the complex scenario of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Therapeutic and dietary efforts to limit the consequences of uremia-associated vitamin D deficiency are a current hot topic for researchers and clinicians in the nephrology area. Evidence indicates that the low levels of vitamin D in patients with CKD stage above 4 (GFR < 15 mL/min) have a multifactorial origin, mainly related to uremic malnutrition, namely impaired gastrointestinal absorption, dietary restrictions (low-protein and low-phosphate diets), and proteinuria. This condition is further worsened by the compromised response of CKD patients to high-dose cholecalciferol supplementation due to the defective activation of renal hydroxylation of vitamin D. Currently, the literature lacks large and interventional studies on the so-called non-calcemic activities of vitamin D and, above all, the modulation of renal and cardiovascular functions and immune response. Here, we review the current state of the art of the benefits of supplementation with native vitamin D in various clinical settings of nephrological interest: CKD, dialysis, and renal transplant, with a special focus on the effects on bone homeostasis and cardiovascular outcomes.