Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 52(6): 571-574, 2022 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35296901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In this study, the accuracy of preoperative staging for gastric stump cancer, which has not been thoroughly investigated since the condition is rare, was investigated using computed tomography and gastroscopic imaging. METHODS: Between February 1994 and April 2018, 49 patients with gastric stump cancer, following subtotal or total gastrectomy, were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative diagnoses of clinical T and clinical N categories were compared with post-operative pathological diagnoses (pT and pN categories). Positive predictive values, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of T staging was 40.8%. The positive predictive value for cT3/T4 was 96.3%, whereas the positive predictive value for cT1/T2 was 72.7%. The overall accuracy for N staging was 61.2%. The positive predictive value of lymph node positive patients was 73.3%. The positive predictive value and sensitivity of over stage II were 96.6% and 84.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of preoperative diagnosis using both computed tomography and gastroscopy imaging may be feasible for T3/T4 advanced gastric stump cancer, whereas diagnosing T1/2 gastric stump cancer must be carefully considered due to high misdiagnosis rates, relating to depth.


Subject(s)
Gastric Stump , Stomach Neoplasms , Gastrectomy , Gastric Stump/diagnostic imaging , Gastric Stump/pathology , Gastric Stump/surgery , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL