Impact of surgical treatment on patient reported outcome in patients with spinal metastases from prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate postoperative outcomes in patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer, with a focus on patient-oriented assessments. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter registry study involving 35 centers. A total of 413 patients enrolled in the Japanese Association for Spine Surgery and Oncology Multicenter Prospective Study of Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors were evaluated for inclusion. The eligible patients were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. The Frankel Classification, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, visual analog scale for pain, face scale, Barthel Index, vitality index, indications for oral pain medication, and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were used for evaluating functional status, activities of daily living, and patient motivation. RESULTS: Of the 413 eligible patients, 41 with primary prostate cancer were included in the study. The patient-oriented assessments indicated that the patients experienced postoperative improvements in quality of life and motivation in most items, with the improvements extending for up to 6 months. More than half of the patients with Frankel classifications B or C showed improved neurological function at 1 month after surgery, and most patients presented maintained or improved their classification at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention for spinal metastases of prostate cancer significantly improved neurological function, quality of life, and motivation of the patients. Consequently, our results support the validity of surgical intervention for improving the neurological function and overall well-being of patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer.

Prospective Registration Study for Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective registry study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for surgical interventions for spinal metastases, thereby enhancing patient care by integrating quality of life (QoL) assessments with clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite its proven usefulness in degenerative spinal diseases and deformities, the MCID remains unexplored regarding surgery for spinal metastases. METHODS: This study included 171 (out of 413) patients from the multicenter "Prospective Registration Study on Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors" by the Japan Association of Spine Surgeons. These were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using the Face scale, EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), including the visual analog scale (VAS), and performance status. The MCIDs were calculated using an anchor-based method, classifying participants into the improved, unchanged, and deteriorated groups based on the Face scale scores. Focusing on the improved and unchanged groups, the change in the EQ-5D-5L values from before to after treatment was analyzed, and the cutoff value with the highest sensitivity and specificity was determined as the MCID through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The validity of the MCIDs was evaluated using a distribution-based calculation method for patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: The improved, unchanged, and deteriorated groups comprised 121, 28, and 22 participants, respectively. The anchor-based MCIDs for the EQ-5D-5L index, EQ-VAS, and domains of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression were 0.21, 15.50, 1.50, 0.50, 0.50, 0.50, and 0.50, respectively; the corresponding distribution-based MCIDs were 0.17, 15,99, 0.77, 0.80, 0.78, 0.60, and 0.70, respectively. CONCLUSION: We identified MCIDs for surgical treatment of spinal metastases, providing benchmarks for future clinical research. By retrospectively examining whether the MCIDs are achieved, factors favoring their achievement and risks affecting them can be explored. This could aid in decisions on surgical candidacy and patient counseling.

Histology and chronological magnetic resonance images of congenital spinal deformity: An experimental study in mice model.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of the congenital spinal deformity and its clinical magnitude vary widely in human species. However, we previously reported that the spinal deformities of congenital scoliosis mice did not progress throughout our observational period according to soft X-ray and MRI data. In this study, congenital vertebral and intervertebral malformations in mice were assessed via magnetic resonance (MR) and histological images. METHODS: Congenital spinal anomalies were chronologically assessed via soft X-ray and 7 T MR imaging. MR images were compared to the histological images to validate the findings around the malformations. RESULTS: Soft X-ray images showed the gross alignment of the spine and the contour of the malformed vertebrae, with the growth plate and cortical bone visible as higher density lines, but could not be used to distinguish the existence of intervertebral structures. In contrast, MR images could be used to distinguish each structure, including the cortical bone, growth plate, cartilaginous end plate, and nucleus pulposus, by combining the signal changes on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). The intervertebral structure adjacent to the malformed vertebrae also exhibited various abnormalities, such as growth plate and cartilaginous end plate irregularities, nucleus pulposus defects, and bone marrow formation. In the chronological observation, the thickness and shape of the malformed structures on T1WI did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal malformations in mice were chronologically observed via 7 T MRI and histology. MR images could be used to distinguish the histological structures of normal and malformed mouse spines. Malformed vertebrae were accompanied by adjacent intervertebral structures that corresponded to the fully segmented structures observed in human congenital scoliosis, but the intervertebral conditions varied. This study suggested the importance of MRI and histological examinations of human congenital scoliosis patients with patterns other than nonsegmenting patterns, which may be used to predict the prognosis of patients with spinal deformities associated with malformed vertebrae.

Thoracic kyphosis in light of lumbosacral alignment in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: recognition of thoracic hypokyphosis and therapeutic implications.

BACKGROUND: The uniqueness of spinal sagittal alignment in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), for example, the drastically smaller thoracic kyphosis seen in some patients, has been recognized but not yet fully understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of sagittal alignment of thoracic AIS and to determine the contributing factors. METHODS: Whole spine radiographs of 83 thoracic AIS patients (73 females) were analyzed. The measured radiographic parameters were the Cobb angle of thoracic scoliosis, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). Additionally, max-LL, which was defined as the maximum lordosis angle from the S1 endplate, the inflection point between thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis, and the SVA of the inflection point (IP SVA) were measured. The factors significantly related to a decrease in TK were assessed by stepwise logistic regression analysis. In addition, cluster analysis was performed to classify the global sagittal alignment. RESULTS: The significant factors for a decrease in TK were an increase in SS (p = 0.0003, [OR]: 1.16) and a decrease in max-LL (p = 0.0005, [OR]: 0.89). According to the cluster analysis, the global sagittal alignment was categorized into the following three types: Type 1 (low SS, low max-LL, n = 28); Type 2 (high SS, low max-LL, n = 22); and Type 3 (high SS, high max-LL, n = 33). CONCLUSIONS: In thoracic AIS, a decreased TK corresponded to an increased SS or a decreased max-LL. The sagittal alignment of thoracic AIS patients could be classified into three types based on SS and max-LL. One of these three types includes the unique sagittal profile of very small TK.

Anterior instrumentation surgery for the treatment of Lenke type 1AR curve patterns.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated that Lenke lumbar modifier A contains 2 distinct types (AR and AL), and the AR curve pattern is likely to develop adding-on (i.e., a progressive increase in the number of vertebrae included within the primary curve distally after posterior surgery). However, the results of anterior surgery are unknown. The purpose of this study was to present the surgical results in a cohort of patients undergoing scoliosis treatment for type 1AR curves and to compare anterior and posterior surgeries to consider the ideal indications and advantages of anterior surgery for type 1AR curves. METHODS: Patients with a Lenke type 1 or 2 and lumbar modifier AR (L4 vertebral tilt to the right) and a minimum 2-year postoperative follow-up were included. The incidence of adding-on and radiographic data were compared between the anterior and posterior surgery groups. The numbers of levels between the end, stable, neutral, and last touching vertebra to the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with a mean follow-up of 57 months were included. There were 14 patients in the anterior group and 30 patients in the posterior group. The main thoracic Cobb angle was not significantly different between the groups preoperatively and at final follow-up. At final follow-up, the anterior group had significantly less tilting of the LIV than the posterior group (-0.8° ± 4.5° vs 3° ± 4°). Distal adding-on was observed in no patient in the anterior group and in 6 patients in the posterior group at final follow-up (p = 0.025). In the anterior group, no LIV was set below the end vertebra, and all LIVs were set above last touching vertebra. The LIV was significantly more proximal in the anterior group than in the posterior surgery patients without adding-on for all reference vertebrae (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate the surgical results of anterior surgery for Lenke type 1AR curve patterns, and it showed that anterior surgery for the curves could minimize the distal extent of the instrumented fusion without adding-on. This would leave more mobile disc space below the fusion.

Growing rod technique with prior foundation surgery and sublaminar taping for early-onset scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to show the surgical results of growing rod (GR) surgery with prior foundation surgery (PFS) and sublaminar taping at an apex vertebra. METHODS: Twenty-two early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients underwent dual GR surgery with PFS and sublaminar taping. PFS was performed prior to rod placement, including exposure of distal and proximal anchor areas and anchor instrumentation filled with a local bone graft. After a period of 3-5 months for the anchors to become solid, dual rods were placed for distraction. The apex vertebra was exposed and fastened to the concave side of the rods using sublaminar tape. Preoperative, post-GR placement, and final follow-up radiographic parameters were measured. Complications during the treatment period were evaluated using the patients' clinical records. RESULTS: The median age at the initial surgery was 55.5 months (range 28-99 months), and the median follow-up duration was 69.5 months (range 25-98 months). The median scoliotic curves were 81.5° (range 39°-126°) preoperatively, 30.5° (range 11°-71°) after GR placement, and 33.5° (range 12°-87°) at the final follow-up. The median thoracic kyphotic curves were 45.5° (range 7°-136°) preoperatively, 32.5° (range 15°-99°) after GR placement, and 42° (range 11°-93°) at the final follow-up. The median T1-S1 lengths were 240.5 mm (range 188-305 mm) preoperatively, 286.5 mm (range 232-340 mm) after GR placement, and 337.5 mm (range 206-423 mm) at the final follow-up. Complications occurred in 6 patients (27%). Three patients had implant-related complications, 2 patients had alignment-related complications, and 1 patient had a wound-related complication. CONCLUSIONS: A dual GR technique with PFS and sublaminar taping showed effective correction of scoliotic curves and a lower complication rate than previous reports when a conventional dual GR technique was used.

Can we stop the long fusion at L5 for selected adult spinal deformity patients with less severe disability and less complex deformity?

OBJECTIVES: It is controversial whether to stop the fusion at L5 or S1 in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Our hypothesis is that we can stop long fusion at L5 for selected patients with less severe disability and less complex deformity. Aim was to compare minimum 5-year outcomes between ASD patients with fusion to L5 versus S1. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive 40 patients (≥50 years of age) with ASD underwent spinal fusion from lower thoracic spine to L5 or S1 between 2008 and 2011. 33 patients (82.5 %) had a minimum 5-year follow-up. Lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was L5 in 12 patients (L5 group) and S1 in 21 (S1 group). Clinical and radiographical parameters were compared between L5 and S1 group. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between two groups (L5 vs S1) in %male (50 % vs 14 %), %type-N of SRS-Schwab classification (83 % vs 38 %), preop ODI (40.5 vs 56), correction loss of LL (11˚ vs 3˚), final TK (32˚ vs 50˚), correction loss of TK (-1˚ vs 17˚), final improvement of PT (3˚ vs 10˚), final improvement of PI-LL (26˚ vs 39˚), PJK (8% vs 48 %), and revision surgery rate (50 % vs 14 %). Causes of revision surgery in L5 group were distal junctional failure in 5 patients and foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 in 1. All of them underwent additional spinal fusion to the sacrum. Whereas, causes of revision surgery in S1 group were rod fracture in 2 patients and proximal junctional failure in 1. CONCLUSION: Although fusion to L5 was conducted for selected ASD patients with less severe disability (better ODI) and less complex deformity (type N), 50 % of the patients required additional fusion to the pelvis. Decision making to stop the long fusion at L5 for ASD patients ≥50 years of age should be made with careful considerations.