Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594876

ABSTRACT

Radiotherapy (RT) has potential synergistic effects with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T but is not widely used as bridging therapy due to logistical challenges and lack of standardised protocols. We analysed RT bridging in a multicentre national cohort of large B-cell lymphoma patients approved for 3L axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel across 12 UK centres. Of 763 approved patients, 722 were leukapheresed, 717 had data available on bridging therapy. 169/717 (24%) received RT bridging, 129 as single modality and 40 as combined modality treatment (CMT). Of 169 patients, 65.7% had advanced stage, 36.9% bulky disease, 86.5% elevated LDH, 41.7% international prognostic index (IPI) ≥3 and 15.2% double/triple hit at the time of approval. Use of RT bridging varied from 11% to 32% between centres and increased over time. Vein-to-vein time and infusion rate did not differ between bridging modalities. RT-bridged patients had favourable outcomes with 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 56% for single modality and 47% for CMT (1-year PFS 43% for systemic bridging). This is the largest cohort of LBCL patients receiving RT bridging prior to CAR T reported to date. Our results show that RT bridging can be safely and effectively used even in advanced stage and high-risk disease, with low dropout rates and excellent outcomes.

3.
Ann Oncol ; 33(3): 288-298, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34921960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), outcomes using frontline treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like therapy are typically poor. The ECHELON-2 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) exhibited statistically superior progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central review and improvements in overall survival versus CHOP for the frontline treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma or other CD30-positive PTCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase III study. We present an exploratory update of the ECHELON-2 study, including an analysis of 5-year PFS per investigator in the intent-to-treat analysis group. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients were randomized (1 : 1) to six or eight cycles of A+CHP (N = 226) or CHOP (N = 226). At median follow-up of 47.6 months, 5-year PFS rates were 51.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 42.8% to 59.4%] with A+CHP versus 43.0% (95% CI: 35.8% to 50.0%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.1% (95% CI: 63.3% to 75.9%) with A+CHP versus 61.0% (95% CI: 54.0% to 67.3%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.99). Both PFS and OS were generally consistent across key subgroups. Peripheral neuropathy was resolved or improved in 72% (84/117) of patients in the A+CHP arm and 78% (97/124) in the CHOP arm. Among patients who relapsed and subsequently received brentuximab vedotin, the objective response rate was 59% with brentuximab vedotin retreatment after A+CHP and 50% with subsequent brentuximab vedotin after CHOP. CONCLUSIONS: In this 5-year update of ECHELON-2, frontline treatment of patients with PTCL with A+CHP continues to provide clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus CHOP, with a manageable safety profile, including continued resolution or improvement of peripheral neuropathy.


Subject(s)
Ki-1 Antigen , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Brentuximab Vedotin , Humans , Ki-1 Antigen/metabolism , Ki-1 Antigen/therapeutic use , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral/drug therapy , Vincristine/adverse effects
8.
Ann Oncol ; 29(2): 301-310, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29309540

ABSTRACT

Despite the unheralded success of immune checkpoint blockade in delivering durable responses for some patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the majority of patients do not respond. PD-L1 tumour expression and pre-existing tumour T-cell infiltration have been correlated with improved clinical outcomes to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1. However, patients with tumours that are negative for PD-L1 expression can also respond to treatment. Strategies to combine other treatment modalities like radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being investigated as means of improving the response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 antibody blockade. RT induces immunogenic changes in cancer cells, can adaptively upregulate tumour cell PD-L1 expression and can improve the efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. How we design future clinical trials in NSCLC also depends on practical considerations of delivering these treatment combinations, such as RT dose, fractionation and field volume, as well as scheduling with immune checkpoint blockade. Here, we review reasons for resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and how RT may be utilised in combination with these drugs to enhance their effect by building better translational research platforms.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Translational Research, Biomedical , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Humans , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors
9.
Leukemia ; 31(10): 2278, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28751765

ABSTRACT

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.352.

10.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 29(4): 207-217, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063623

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer accounting for 85% of the disease. Over 70% of patients present with locally advanced, non-resectable or metastatic disease and despite improvements in chemoradiotherapy regimens and the development of molecularly targeted agents, 5 year survival rates remain poor, with acquired resistance to novel targeted therapies becoming a growing concern. Currently there remains an unmet need in effectively treating and inducing durable responses in advanced disease. Targeting the immune system has, however, recently given hope of improving therapeutic outcomes for these patients. The notion that the immune system is capable of recognising and eliminating cancer cells is now a widely accepted phenomenon and growing evidence suggests lung cancer is an attractive target for such intervention. Recent success targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis of immune checkpoint inhibition suggests a major immunotherapeutic advance in treating lung cancer and unheralded opportunity for such approaches to further improve outcome for patients. Currently there is considerable interest in combining anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies with established standard of care therapies such as radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is known to be immunostimulatory and efforts are underway to combine and augment the efficacy of the immune checkpoint inhibitors further. This review outlines the interaction between lung cancer and the immune system, summarises current evidence supporting the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1 axis in lung cancer and explores the potential of combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy to augment anti-tumour immune responses.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/drug effects , B7-H1 Antigen/therapeutic use , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Treatment Outcome
11.
Leukemia ; 31(7): 1611-1621, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27890931

ABSTRACT

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as rituximab have been proven to be highly effective at improving outcome in B-cell malignancies. However, many patients ultimately relapse and become refractory to treatment. The glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb obinutuzumab was developed to induce enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent phagocytosis and direct cell death and was shown to lead to improved outcomes in a randomized study in B-CLL. We hypothesized that immune stimulation through Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) agonism in combination with obinutuzumab would further enhance lymphoma clearance and the generation of long-term antitumor immune responses. Here we demonstrate, in syngeneic human CD20 (hCD20)-expressing models of lymphoma, that systemic administration of a TLR7 agonist (R848) increases responses when administered in combination with obinutuzumab and protects against disease recurrence. Depletion studies demonstrate that primary antitumor activity is dependent on both NK cells and CD4+ T cells but not on CD8+ T cells. However, both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells appear necessary for the generation of protective immunological memory. Importantly, increased tumor-free survival post obinutuzumab and R848 combination therapy was seen in hCD20 transgenic mice, which express hCD20 on normal B cells. These findings provide a rationale for clinical testing of obinutuzumab in combination with systemically administered TLR7 agonists to further improve outcome.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Toll-Like Receptor 7/agonists , Animals , Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation/drug effects , Lymphoma/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Rituximab/pharmacology
12.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 28(11): 726-731, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27519157

ABSTRACT

The goal of re-programming the host immune system to target malignancy with durable anti-tumour clinical responses has been speculated for decades. In the last decade such speculation has been transformed into reality with unprecedented and durable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors seen in solid tumours. This mini-review considers the mechanism of action of immune modulating agents and the potential for combination with radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/immunology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Immune System/radiation effects , Immunotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy , Humans
15.
Oncoimmunology ; 4(7): e1016709, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26140246

ABSTRACT

Fractionated radiation therapy (RT) leads to adaptive changes in the tumor microenvironment that may limit the generation of an antitumor immune response. We demonstrated that fractionated RT led to increased tumor cell expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in response to CD8+ T cell production of interferon gamma. Our data reveal that the efficacy of fractionated RT can be significantly improved through the generation of durable systemic immune responses when combined with concurrent, but not sequential, blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.

18.
Ann Oncol ; 25(9): 1807-1812, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948692

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Forodesine is a potent inhibitor of purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) that leads to intracellular accumulation of deoxyguanosine triphosphate (dGTP) in T and B cells, resulting in apoptosis. Forodesine has demonstrated impressive antitumor activity in early phase clinical trials in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II study, patients with CTCL who had already failed three or more systemic therapies were recruited. We investigated the response rate, safety and tolerability of oral forodesine treatment in subjects with cutaneous manifestations of CTCL, stages IB, IIA, IIB, III and IVA. The safety population encompassing all stages was used for analysis of accountability, demographics and safety. The efficacy population differed from the safety population by exclusion of stage IB and IIA patients. RESULTS: All 144 patients had performance status 0-2. The median duration of CTCL from diagnosis was 53 months (5-516 months). The median number of pretreatments was 4 (range: 3-15). No complete remissions were observed. In the efficacy group of patients, 11% achieved partial remission and 50% had stable disease. The median time to response was 56 days and the median duration of response was 191 days. A total of 96% of all treated patients reported one or more adverse events (AEs) and 33% reported a serious AE. The majority of AEs were classified as mild or moderate in severity. The most commonly reported AEs (>10%) were peripheral edema, fatigue, insomnia, pruritus, diarrhea, headache and nausea. Overall eight patients died during the study: five due to sepsis and infections, one due to a second malignancy (esophageal cancer), one due to disease progression and one due to liver failure. CONCLUSION: Oral forodesine at a dose of 200 mg daily is feasible and shows partial efficacy in this highly selected CTCL population and some durable responses.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Mycosis Fungoides/drug therapy , Purine Nucleosides/therapeutic use , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Sezary Syndrome/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Apoptosis/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Purine Nucleosides/adverse effects , Purine-Nucleoside Phosphorylase/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyrimidinones/adverse effects , Treatment Failure
19.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 26(5): 266-76, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24602563

ABSTRACT

Recent drug discovery developments in the field of small molecule targeted agents have led to much interest in combining these with radiotherapy. There are good preclinical data to suggest this approach worthy of investigation and in this review we discuss how this has translated into recent clinical trials. The outcome of clinical trials investigating radiotherapy/targeted drug combinations published in the last 5 years is discussed, as are trials in progress. The perceived future opportunities and challenges in the development of this exciting area are considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Celecoxib , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/pharmacology , ErbB Receptors/drug effects , ErbB Receptors/radiation effects , Humans , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/radiotherapy , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Sulfonamides/pharmacology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/drug effects , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/radiation effects
20.
Br J Cancer ; 109(10): 2566-73, 2013 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24136145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Both gemcitabine and bexarotene are established single agents for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of combining these drugs in a single-arm phase II study. METHODS: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma patients who had failed standard skin-directed therapy and at least one prior systemic therapy were given four cycles of gemcitabine and concurrent bexarotene for 12 weeks. Responders were continued on bexarotene maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years, stage IB (n=5), stage IIA (n=2), stage IIB (n=8), stage III (n=8) and stage IVA (n=12), 17 patients were erythrodermic, 17 patients were B1, and 10 patients were both erythrodermic and B1. Thirty (86%) patients completed four cycles of gemcitabine. In all, 80.0% of patients demonstrated a reduction in modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) score although the objective disease response rate at 12 weeks was 31% (partial response (PR) 31%) and at 24 weeks 14% (PR 14%, stable disease (SD) 23%, progressive disease (PD) 54%, not evaluable 9%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 21.2 months. CONCLUSION: The overall response rate of the combination did not reach the specified target to proceed further and is lower than that previously reported for gemcitabine as a single agent.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bexarotene , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/mortality , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...