ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a relatively modern concept, quickly arising in its use. The aim of this systematic review is to assess, according to the existing literature, which are the functional and clinical outcomes and component positioning and implant survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery performed using an image-free hand-held robotic system. Moreover, we analyzed whether there are significant differences and advantages compared to conventional surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review has been performed on studies published between 2004 and 2021, on the electronic library databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The inclusion criteria were all studies described as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with the Navio robotic system. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included, and 1,262 unicondylar knee arthroplasties were analyzed. These studies showed a satisfactory recovery of joint function, with a good range of motion (extension <5° and flexion which ranged from 105° to 130.3°) in patients of the NAVIO group. The revision rate was <2% while the infection rate <1%; no postoperative transfusion was needed in all UKA implanted. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a robotic tool for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) could lead to a better implant positioning and joint alignment than conventional surgery. There is still limited evidence to support that the use of this robot in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is a greater survivorship than other systems or conventional techniques; therefore, a long-term follow-up is needed.
