Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment of Pericarditis: A Review.

Importance: Pericarditis accounts for up to 5% of emergency department visits for nonischemic chest pain in North America and Western Europe. With appropriate treatment, 70% to 85% of these patients have a benign course. In acute pericarditis, the development of constrictive pericarditis (<0.5%) and pericardial tamponade (<3%) can be life-threatening. Observations: Acute pericarditis is diagnosed with presence of 2 or more of the following: sharp, pleuritic chest pain that worsens when supine (≈90%); new widespread electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation and PR depression (≈25%-50%); a new or increased pericardial effusion that is most often small (≈60%); or a pericardial friction rub (<30%). In North America and Western Europe, the most common causes of acute pericarditis are idiopathic or viral, followed by pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations. Tuberculosis is the most common cause in endemic areas and is treated with antituberculosis therapy, with corticosteroids considered for associated constrictive pericarditis. Treatment of acute idiopathic and pericarditis after cardiac procedures or operations involves use of high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with doses tapered once chest pain has resolved and C-reactive protein level has normalized, typically over several weeks. These patients should receive a 3-month course of colchicine to relieve symptoms and reduce the risk of recurrence (37.5% vs 16.7%; absolute risk reduction, 20.8%). With a first recurrence of pericarditis, colchicine should be continued for at least 6 months. Corticosteroids are often used if pericarditis does not improve with NSAIDs and colchicine. In certain patients with multiple recurrences, which can occur for several years, interleukin 1 (IL-1) blockers have demonstrated efficacy and may be preferred to corticosteroids. Conclusions: Acute pericarditis is a common cause of nonischemic chest pain. Tuberculosis is the leading cause of pericarditis in endemic areas and is treated with antitubercular therapy. In North America and Western Europe, pericarditis is typically idiopathic, develops after a viral infection, or develops following cardiac procedures or surgery. Treatment with NSAIDs and colchicine leads to a favorable prognosis in most patients, although 15% to 30% of patients develop recurrence. Patients with multiple recurrent pericarditis can have a disease duration of several years or more, are often treated with corticosteroids, and IL-1 blockers may be used for selected patients as steroid-sparing therapy.

Recurrent pericarditis in older adults: Clinical and laboratory features and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pericarditis refer to the general adult population. Few and fragmentary data regarding recurrent pericarditis in older adults exist. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: Given the absence of specific data in scientific literature, we hypothesized that there might be clinical, laboratory and outcome differences between young adults and older adults affected by idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an international multicentric retrospective cohort study analyzing data from patients affected by recurrent pericarditis (idiopathic or post-cardiac injury) and referring to tertiary referral centers. Clinical, laboratory, and outcome data were compared between patients younger than 65 years (controls) and patients aged 65 or older. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three older adults and 142 young adult controls were enrolled. Comorbidities, including chronic kidney diseases, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes, were more present in older adults. The presenting symptom was dyspnea in 54.1% of the older adults versus 10.6% in controls (p < 0.001); pain in 32.3% of the older adults versus 80.3% of the controls (p < 0.001). Fever higher than 38°C was present in 33.8% versus 53.5% (p = 0.001). Pleural effusion was more prevalent in the older adults (55.6% vs 34.5%, p < 0.001), as well as severe pericardial effusion (>20 mm) (24.1% vs 12.7%, p = 0.016) and pericardiocentesis (16.5% vs 8.5%, p = 0.042). Blood leukocyte counts were significantly lower in the older adults (mean + SE: 10,227 + 289/mm3 vs 11,208 + 285/mm3, p = 0.016). Concerning therapies, NSAIDS were used in 63.9% of the older adults versus 80.3% in the younger (p = 0.003), colchicine in 76.7% versus 87.3% (p = 0.023), corticosteroids in 49.6% versus 26.8% (p < 0.001), and anakinra in 14.3% versus 23.9% (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults affected by recurrent pericarditis show a different clinical pattern, with more frequent dyspnea, pleural effusion, severe pericardial effusion, and lower fever and lower leukocyte count, making the diagnosis sometimes challenging. They received significantly less NSAIDs and colchicine, likely due to comorbidities; they were also treated less commonly with anti-IL1 agents, and more frequently with corticosteroids.

Aortic pseudoaneurysm with a fistula between the non-coronary sinus and right atrium: a case report.

The authors present a case report of a 68-year-old man evaluated at the emergency department for repeated syncope, asthenia, and general malaise, suggesting heart failure in a patient with several comorbidities. At presentation, the patient was afebrile, but he had reported a low-grade fever in the previous six months. At first glance, transthoracic echocardiography was not clear, while transesophageal echocardiography revealed an echo-free image at the level of the non-coronary sinus of the aortic root, suggestive of a pseudoaneurysm, communicating with the right atrium with continuous systo-diastolic flow, compatible with the aorto-cavitary fistula between the aortic root and the RA. Echocardiographic findings were confirmed by cardiac computed tomography. The case was discussed with the heart team and was considered suitable for surgery, but the patient suddenly died just before surgery due to impairment and friability.

Prognostic value of electroanatomic-guided endomyocardial biopsy in patients with myocarditis, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and non dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy.

A wide variety of non-invasive and invasive techniques for SCD risk stratification in non ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have been proposed, including left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, QRS duration, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and invasive electrophysiologic study with or without three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (3D-EAM), to identify and characterize the arrhythmogenic substrate. There is still no clear consensus on the risk stratification in this clinical setting. The aim of our study is to characterize the 3D-EAM substrate in patients with the same clinical presentation of unexplained complex VAs and NICM using CMR, three-dimensional electranatomic mapping (3D-EAM) in association with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and genetic screening, as a more precise and early diagnostic assessment may provide important subsequent prognostic impact. The study was designed as a prospective multi-center observational evaluation and the patient follow-up was scheduled at 6 months interval. We enrolled 125 patients distinct into four different group by complete diagnostic work-up: myocarditis, non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and control group. The four groups were compared in terms of clinical, imaging and 3D-EAM data. At multivariate analysis sustained VT/VF on admission [HR: 3.64 (1.79-7.4), p < 0.001], total bipolar scar area of left and right ventricle detected by 3D-EAM [HR: 2.24 (1.13-4.49), p = 0.02], histological diagnosis of myocarditis by 3D-EAM guided endomyocardial biopsy (EBM) [HR: 2.79 (1.04-7.44), p = 0.01] were independent predictors of complex VAs or death at follow-up. 3D-EAM guided EMB represent not only a valid diagnostic tool to identify the arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with NICM and ventricular arrhythmic phenotype but also an important predictor of complex Vas at long term follow-up.

Pericardial Diseases: International Position Statement on New Concepts and Advances in Multimodality Cardiac Imaging.

Pericardial diseases have gained renewed clinical interest, leading to a renaissance in the field. There have been many recent advances in pericardial diseases in both multimodality cardiac imaging of diagnoses, such as recurrent, transient constrictive and effusive-constrictive pericarditis, and targeted therapeutics, especially anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents that affect the inflammasome as part of autoinflammatory pathophysiology. There remains a large educational gap for clinicians, leading to variability in evaluation and management of these patients. The latest pericardial imaging (American Society of Echocardiography, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging) and clinical guidelines (European Society of Cardiology) are >8-10 years of age and may not reflect current practice. Recent clinical trials involving anti-IL-1 agents in recurrent pericarditis, including anakinra (AIRTRIP), rilonacept (RHAPSODY), and goflikicept have demonstrated their efficacy. The present document represents an international position statement from world leaders in the pericardial field, focusing on novel concepts and emphasizing the role of multimodality cardiac imaging as well as new therapeutics in pericardial diseases.

Longitudinal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following clinical response to rilonacept and prior to recurrence upon treatment suspension: a RHAPSODY subgroup analysis.

AIMS: In the phase 3 trial, RHAPSODY, rilonacept effectively resolved active pericarditis recurrences, and long-term treatment led to sustained pericarditis recurrence risk reduction. Prior analysis suggested association between higher late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at baseline and more rapid recurrence upon rilonacept suspension after 12 weeks of treatment. This subgroup analysis assessed the utility of longitudinal serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for tracking clinical improvement and predicting post-treatment-cessation outcomes to help guide clinical decision making. METHODS AND RESULTS: At an 18-month decision milestone (18MDM) in the RHAPSODY long-term extension, investigators decided if patients would continue rilonacept, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation, or discontinue the study. Pericardial thickness, pericardial edema (T2-STIR), and LGE were determined at baseline and 18MDM by an imaging core lab blinded to clinical data, and pericarditis recurrence was investigator-assessed. CMR results in patients with data at both baseline and 18MDM (n=13) showed that pericardial thickness, T2-STIR, and LGE were reduced during rilonacept treatment. Among patients with CMR data who suspended rilonacept at the 18MDM (n=7), 5 (71%) had a pericarditis recurrence within 1-4 months of rilonacept suspension, despite all having had none/trace LGE (n=7) and negative T2-STIR (n=7) at the 18MDM and 2 having received prophylactic colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: Continued clinical improvement during prolonged rilonacept treatment corresponded with improvement on CMR, including reduced pericardial thickness, resolution of pericardial edema, and resolution of LGE. However, none/trace LGE at 18MDM while on treatment did not predict absence of pericarditis recurrence upon subsequent rilonacept suspension in this size-limited subgroup.

Asymptomatic Chronic Large Pericardial Effusions: To Drain or to Observe?

Pericardial effusions, especially large ones, have traditionally been regarded with concern by clinicians due to the sometimes unpredictable development of life-threatening cardiac tamponade. In the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on pericardial diseases, the simplified algorithm for pericardial effusion triage and management recommends pericardial drainage in cases of cardiac tamponade and/or suspicion of bacterial or neoplastic etiology. In the presence of acute pericarditis, empiric anti-inflammatory treatment should be given, while when a specific indication known to be associated with pericardial effusion is found, then treatment of the underlying cause is indicated. Notably, the most challenging subgroup of patients includes those with large, asymptomatic, C-reactive-protein-negative, idiopathic effusions. In the latter subjects, pericardial drainage is proposed in cases of chronic effusions (lasting more than three months). However, this recommendation is based on scant data stemming from small-sized non-randomized studies. Nevertheless, recent evidence in a larger cohort of patients pointed out that a watchful waiting strategy is a safe option in terms of complication-free survival. This review summarizes the contemporary evidence on this challenging topic and provides recommendations for tailoring individual patient treatments.

Absence of Pericarditis Recurrence in Rilonacept-Treated Patients With COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: Results From the RHAPSODY Long-term Extension.

Background: Rilonacept inhibits the interleukin-1 pathway, and extended treatment in patients with recurrent pericarditis (RP) reduced recurrence risk by 98% in the phase 3 trial, RHAPSODY long-term extension (LTE). Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 vaccination and/or infection may trigger pericarditis recurrence, and in clinical practice, it is unknown whether to continue rilonacept during SARS-CoV-2 infection. This post-hoc analysis of the RHAPSODY LTE aimed to inform rilonacept management in RP patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 or who contract COVID-19. Methods: Analysis was conducted from May 2020 to June 2022. The LTE portion of RHAPSODY LTE enabled up to 24 months of additional open-label rilonacept treatment beyond the pivotal study. Rilonacept efficacy data in preventing pericarditis recurrence were assessed, and concomitant SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and COVID-19 adverse event data were evaluated. Results: No pericarditis recurrences were temporally associated with vaccination. Sixteen COVID-19 cases were reported; 10 in 30 unvaccinated or partially vaccinated patients (33%) vs 6 of 44 fully vaccinated patients (14%; P = 0.04). Twelve of 16 patients (75%) were receiving rilonacept at the time of infection, and none experienced pericarditis recurrence. One pericarditis recurrence occurred in the peri-COVID-19 period in 1 of 4 patients who had stopped rilonacept treatment > 4.5 months prior. COVID-19 severity was mild in 13 patients, moderate in 2, and severe in 1. Conclusions: Full vaccination effectively reduced COVID-19 events in patients treated with rilonacept. Vaccination or COVID-19 during rilonacept treatment did not increase pericarditis recurrence. Continued rilonacept treatment in patients contracting COVID-19 did not worsen disease severity, whereas rilonacept interruption increased pericarditis recurrence, supporting a recommendation for continued rilonacept treatment for RP during vaccination or COVID-19. ClinicalTrialsgov identifier: NCT03737110.

Contexte: Le rilonacept inhibe la voie de l'interleukine-1 et, d'après les résultats de la période de prolongation à long terme de l'essai de phase III RHAPSODY, la poursuite du traitement par cet agent chez les patients atteints de péricardite récidivante a réduit le risque de récidive de 98 %. La vaccination contre le syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SRAS)-CoV-2 ou l'infection à ce virus pourrait toutefois déclencher une récidive de la péricardite, et dans la pratique clinique, on ignore s'il vaut mieux poursuivre le traitement par rilonacept pendant l'infection à SRAS-CoV-2. Cette analyse post-hoc de la période de prolongation à long terme de l'essai RHAPSODY vise à orienter la gestion du rilonacept chez les patients atteints de péricardite récidivante qui sont vaccinés contre le SRAS-CoV-2 ou qui contractent la COVID-19. Méthodologie: L'analyse a été effectuée de mai 2020 à juin 2022. La période de prolongation à long terme de l'essai RHAPSODY a permis d'accumuler des données en mode ouvert pendant une période allant jusqu'à 24 mois au-delà de l'étude pivot. Les données sur l'efficacité du rilonacept en prévention de la récidive de péricardite ont été évaluées, tout comme les données sur la vaccination concomitante contre le SRAS-CoV-2 et les cas de COVID-19. Résultats: Aucune récidive de la péricardite n'a pu être associée sur le plan temporel avec la vaccination. Au total, 16 cas de COVID-19 ont été signalés, dont 10 chez les patients non vaccinés ou partiellement vaccinés sur 30 (33 %) et 6 chez les patients complètement vaccinés sur 44 (14 %; p = 0,04). De ces 16 patients, 12 (75 %) prenaient du rilonacept au moment de l'infection et aucun n'a connu de récidive de la péricardite. Une récidive de la péricardite s'est produite dans la période suivant la COVID-19 chez 1 des 4 patients qui avaient cessé de prendre le rilonacept > 4,5 mois auparavant. La COVID-19 a été légère chez 13 patients, modérée chez 2 patients et sévère chez 1 patient. Conclusions: La vaccination complète a réduit efficacement les cas de COVID-19 chez les patients traités par le rilonacept. La vaccination ou l'infection à SRAS-CoV-2 pendant le traitement par rilonacept n'a pas augmenté le risque de récidive de la péricardite. La poursuite du traitement par rilonacept chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 n'a pas aggravé la sévérité de la maladie, tandis que l'interruption du traitement a augmenté le risque de récidive de la péricardite, ce qui plaide en faveur de la recommandation de poursuivre le traitement de la péricardite récidivante par le rilonacept pendant la vaccination ou la COVID-19. Numéro d'identification ClinicalTrialsgov: NCT03737110.

Colchicine for the treatment of the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: current evidence and ongoing perspectives.

Colchicine is one of the oldest drugs in medicine. Traditionally used to treat and prevent gouty attacks, it has been introduced into cardiovascular medicine for the treatment and prevention of pericarditis, starting from the positive experience in the treatment and prevention of polyserositis in familial mediterranean fever. Colchicine is a lipophilic drug that enters the cells and is eliminated by glycoprotein P. As granulocytes are lacking in this protein, colchicine is able to concentrate in these cells, exerting a substantial anti-inflammatory action, even with low oral doses. As these cells may trigger acute cardiovascular events, colchicine has been shown to be efficacious and safe to prevent acute coronary syndromes and ischemic stroke with an efficacy comparable to more established treatments, such as antiplatelet agents and statins. On this basis, colchicine seems a promising, efficacious, well tolerated, and cheap option for the prevention of several cardiovascular events, and it may become an additional pillar in the pharmacologic treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Management of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy associated with significant clinical complications such as high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure as well as sudden cardiac death. It is therefore important to provide an expert consensus statement summarizing the role of different available diagnostic tools and emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. By integrating clinical information and the results of diagnostic tests, an accurate, validated, and timely diagnosis can be made, while alternative diagnoses can be reasonably excluded. This clinical expert consensus statement reviews the evidence on the management of different CS manifestations and provides advice to practicing clinicians in the field on the role of immunosuppression and the treatment of cardiac complications based on limited published data and the experience of international CS experts. The monitoring and risk stratification of patients with CS is also covered, while controversies and future research needs are explored.

OPTImal PHARMacological therapy for patients with heart failure: Rationale and design of the OPTIPHARM-HF registry.

AIMS: Patients with heart failure (HF) remain often undertreated for multiple reasons, including treatment inertia, contraindications, and intolerance. The OPTIimal PHARMacological therapy for patients with Heart Failure (OPTIPHARM-HF) registry is designed to evaluate the prevalence of evidence-based medical treatment prescription and titration, as well as the causes of its underuse, in a broad real-world population of consecutive patients with HF across the whole ejection fraction spectrum and among different clinical phenotypes. METHODS: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicenter, observational, national study of adult patients with symptomatic HF, as defined by current international guidelines, regardless of ejection fraction. Both outpatients and inpatients with chronic and acute decompensated HF will be recruited. The study will enroll up to 2500 patients with chronic HF at approximately 35 Italian HF centres. Patients will be followed for a maximum duration of 24 months. The primary objective of the OPTIPHARM-HF registry is to assess prescription and adherence to evidence-based guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with HF. The primary outcome is to describe the prevalence of GDMT use according to target guideline recommendation. Secondary objectives include implementation of comorbidity treatment, evaluation of sequence of treatment introduction and up-titration, description of GDMT implementation in the specific HF population, main causes of GDMT underuse, and assessment of cumulative rate of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry will provide important implications for improving patient care and adoption of recommended medical therapy into clinical practice among HF patients.

Transcatheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Based Analysis.

Background: The prognostic impact of catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients has not yet been satisfactorily elucidated. Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of CA of AF on clinical outcomes in a large cohort of HCM patients. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 555 HCM patients with AF were enrolled, 140 undergoing CA and 415 receiving medical therapy. 1:1 propensity score matching led to the inclusion of 226 patients (113 medical group, 113 intervention group) in the final analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplant and acute heart failure exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included AF recurrence and transition to permanent AF. Additionally, an inverse probability weighted (IPW) model was examined. Results: At propensity score matching analysis, after a median follow-up of 58.1 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 29 (25.7%) patients in intervention group vs 42 (37.2%) in medical group (P = 0.9). Thromboembolic strokes and major arrhythmic events in intervention vs medical group were 9.7% vs 7.1% (P = 0.144) and 4.4 vs 8.0% (P = 0.779), respectively. Fewer patients in intervention vs medical group experienced AF recurrences (63.7% vs 84.1%, P = 0.001) and transition to permanent AF pattern (20.4% vs 33.6%, P = 0.026). IPW analysis showed consistent results. Severe complications related to CA were uncommon (0.7%). Conclusions: After 5 years of follow-up, CA did not improve major adverse cardiac outcomes in a large cohort of patients with HCM and AF. Nevertheless, CA seems to facilitate the maintenance of sinus rhythm and slow the progression to permanent AF, without significant safety concerns.

The impact of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines and whole exome sequencing on genetic testing in hereditary cardiac diseases.

In the last decade, an incredible improvement has been made in elucidating the genetic bases of cardiomyopathies. Here we report the impact of either the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines or the use of whole exome sequencing (WES) in terms of a number of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and missed diagnoses in a series of 260 patients affected by inherited cardiac disorders. Samples were analyzed using a targeted gene panel of 128 cardiac-related genes and/or WES in a subset of patients, with a three-tier approach. Analyzing (i) only a subset of genes related to the clinical presentation, strictly following the ESC guidelines, 20.77% positive test were assessed. The incremental diagnostic rate for (ii) the whole gene panel, and (iii) the WES was 4.71% and 11.67%, respectively. The diverse analytical approaches increased the number of VUSs and incidental findings. Indeed, the use of WES highlights that there is a small percentage of syndromic conditions that standard analysis would not have detected. Moreover, the use of targeted sequencing coupled with "narrow" analytical approach prevents the detection of variants in actionable genes that could allow for preventive treatment. Our data suggest that genetic testing might aid clinicians in the diagnosis of inheritable cardiac disorders.

The 2023 new European guidelines on infective endocarditis: main novelties and implications for clinical practice.

The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis update the previous 2015 guidelines with main novelties in five areas: (1) antibiotic prevention for high-risk patients, and prevention measures for intermediate-risk and high-risk patients; (2) diagnosis with emphasis on multimodality imaging to assess cardiac lesions of infective endocarditis' (3) antibiotic therapy allowing an outpatient antibiotic treatment for stabilized, uncomplicated cases; (4) cardiac surgery with an emphasis on early intervention without delay for complicated cases; and (5) shared management decision by the endocarditis team. Most evidence came from observational studies and expert opinions. The guidelines strongly support a patient-centred approach with a shared decision process by a multidisciplinary team that should be implemented either in tertiary referral centres, becoming heart valve centres, and referral centres. A continuous sharing of data is warranted in the hospitals' network between heart valve centres, which are used for referrals for complicated cases of infective endocarditis, and referral centres, which should be able to manage uncomplicated cases of infective endocarditis.

Age-stratified patterns in clinical presentation, treatment and outcomes in acute pericarditis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on acute pericarditis according to different age groups. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of age-related features in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of acute pericarditis, with a focus on the geriatric population. METHODS: Patients with a first episode of acute pericarditis were consecutively enrolled between January 2014 and June 2022, and divided into four groups according to age (G1: 18-35 years; G2: 35-55 years; G3: 55-75 years; G4: >75 years). Clinical characteristics and medical therapy were recorded at baseline, and during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients (median age 56.3 (IQR 33-73) years, 32.3% women) were included. Younger age (G1-G2-G3) was associated with a higher frequency of chest pain, pericardial rubs (p<0001), ECG changes (p=0.002) and were more commonly treated with colchicine (p<0.001), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p=0.006). Older patients (G4) depicted more commonly dyspnoea, pericardial/pleural effusion (p=0.007) and were more often treated with corticosteroids (p=0.037). A secondary cause of pericarditis was detected in 128/471 (27.2%) patients. Older patients were more commonly hospitalised and had a complicated course with new-onset atrial fibrillation (p<0.001) and cardiac tamponade (p=0.005), compared with younger patients, who presented more recurrences (respectively G1: 43.0%, G2: 34.7%, G3: 28.2% and G4: 16.2%; p<0.001). After multivariable analysis, younger age remained the strongest independent predictor for recurrences (HR 3.23, 95% CI 1.81 to 5.58, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Older age is associated with less recurrences of pericarditis, but more severe complications with need for hospitalisation.

Prevalence of left internal mammary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and meta-regression study.

Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass left anterior descending artery has demonstrated to improve survival in multivessel coronary artery disease, but its routine angiography during index coronary angiography is seldom performed as LIMA is rarely diseased. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases selecting the studies reporting prevalence of LIMA disease among patients undergoing coronary angiography and considered for CABG. Meta-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prevalence of LIMA disease and the relative predictive value of canonical risk factors. After scrimmage, 9 studies for a total of 1365 patients were included. LIMA disease prevalence was 1.8 % (95 % CI; 1.2 %-2.8 %) in the entire cohort, whereas we reported a rate of subclavian artery disease of 7.6 % (95 % CI, 6-9.9 %). At univariate meta-regression analysis, only age (p = 0.031) and smoking habit (p = 0.035) were directly correlated with LIMA disease. In conclusion, LIMA angiographic assessment might be considered in selected patients that could undergo CABG, during index coronary angiography. However, prospective studies are needed to better evaluate the safety of routine selective LIMA angiography prior to CABG and whether the practice is associated with improved clinical outcomes among those individuals.

Medical therapy of pericarditis: tips and tricks for clinical practice.

Medical therapy of pericarditis should be targeted at its aetiology. Unfortunately, many cases of pericarditis remain idiopathic after a complete diagnostic workup. In such cases, empiric anti-inflammatory therapy for pericarditis is aimed at controlling symptoms and preventing recurrences. The aim of the present clinical review is to summarize published evidence, guidelines, and to provide tips and tricks for clinical management of acute and recurrent pericarditis.