Oral Immunotherapy and Risk of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children: 15 Years' Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an effective treatment for children with persistent food allergy, and has concerns about its safety, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of EoE in a large cohort of children who underwent OIT in our center, and to determine if there were any clinical, endoscopic, or histologic differences depending on the food employed for the OIT. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed over a 15-year period (2005-2020). Children who underwent cow's milk (CM), egg, and/or peanut OIT and developed EoE were included. RESULTS: Six hundred and seven OIT were carried out (277 CM-OIT, 322 egg-OIT, and 8 peanut-OIT). Seventeen patients (2.8%) had a confirmed histologic diagnosis of EoE with a higher prevalence for patients who underwent CM-OIT (3.9%) than egg-OIT (2.2%). Symptoms suggestive of EoE and a confirmed diagnosis occurred at median times of 25 and 36 months, respectively, after the build-up phase of the OIT was completed. Choking, abdominal pain, and dysphagia were the most frequent symptoms and lamina propria fibrosis was observed in 41.2% of patients. No significant differences in clinical symptoms, endoscopic, or histologic findings between patients under CM or egg-OIT were found. One-third of patients reported mild symptoms suggestive of EoE before the OIT. CONCLUSIONS: EoE appears to be a rare but important adverse event that can occur even years after OIT. Validated questionnaires to screen EoE before the OIT and in the follow-up of these patients may be the main tool for an early diagnosis.

Advancements in Anaphylaxis Management.

Anaphylaxis is defined as a severe life-threatening, generalized or systemic hypersensitivity reaction. Yet, anaphylaxis is often difficult to diagnose, leading to a delay in applying appropriate management. Epinephrine is the medication of choice for the immediate treatment of anaphylaxis. The rest of the actions to be taken during the acute anaphylaxis episode, including administering other medications, will depend on the response to epinephrine. Epinephrine auto-injectors (EAI) are the preferred method for administering the treatment of anaphylaxis in the community setting. However, there are multiple potential barriers to using epinephrine during an anaphylactic reaction related to the physicians and the patients themselves. Strategies to overcome gaps in the acute management of anaphylaxis include novel injection devices and research of new routes for epinephrine delivery. Electronic health solutions may also have a role at this level. Long-term management of anaphylaxis is focused on the prevention of new episodes. Etiologic diagnosis and patient education are key to this end. The application of health information technologies, such as telemedicine, social media, and mobile health, can be helpful for the long-term management of anaphylaxis. Additionally, some patients may benefit from long-term immunomodulatory and etiologic treatments when allergen avoidance implies negative consequences. This review article addresses the most recent advances regarding the integral management of anaphylaxis, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures.

The Natural Course of Adult-Onset Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Adult-onset food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) has been increasingly recognized in recent years. Adult FPIES differs from pediatric FPIES in terms of dietary triggers and symptoms, thus further broadening the clinical phenotypes of the disease. The natural history of FPIES in adulthood is poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the natural course of FPIES in adults. METHODS: We performed an ambispective study of adults diagnosed with acute FPIES during 2016-2021. Data on age, sex, symptoms, implicated food, and oral food challenge (OFC) outcomes at baseline and during follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two adults were included (83.3% female; median age at diagnosis, 40 years). The predominant symptoms were diarrhea (92.9%) and abdominal cramps (71.4%); vomiting was reported by 59% of patients. The most common triggers were shellfish (n = 19, 45.2%) and fish (n = 19, 45.2%). The mean number of reactions before diagnosis was 6.3 (2-15). Twenty-one OFCs were carried out with the offending food in 15 patients. Six patients achieved tolerance (40%) after a mean of 17.8 months (range, 6-36 months). Twelve of all OFCs performed were positive (57.1%). The absolute leukocyte and neutrophil counts measured before and 1 to 2 hours after the positive challenge showed a mean increase of 3045 and 2736 cells/µL, respectively. Serum tryptase, C-reactive protein, and eosinophil and platelet values did not change significantly after the OFC. CONCLUSION: Some patients may outgrow adult-onset FPIES.

An unusual case of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome due to zucchini.

BACKGROUND: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy characterized by gastrointestinal symptoms, mainly protracted and delayed vomiting. Diagnosis is based on clinical history, and it can be challenging as symptoms are delayed and the causative food is often not very suspicious. OBJECTIVE: This case report highlights the importance of having a high degree of suspicion to reach a correct diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report an unusual case of FPIES due to zucchini. During the follow-up. Two oral food challenges (OFC) were carried out to evaluate tolerance to the food involved. RESULTS: The first OFC was positive and in the second the child tolerated the food without problems. CONCLUSIONS: In this case, the OFC was essential to identify the offending food and to verify that the child had overcome the disease.

Non-IgE-Mediated Gastrointestinal Food Protein-Induced Allergic Disorders. Clinical Perspectives and Analytical Approaches.

Non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergy (non-IgE-GI-FA) is the name given to a series of pathologies whose main entities are food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), food protein-induced enteropathy (FPE), and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). These are more uncommon than IgE-mediated food allergies, their mechanisms remain largely unknown, and their diagnosis is mainly done by clinical history, due to the lack of specific biomarkers. In this review, we present the latest advances found in the literature about clinical aspects, the current diagnosis, and treatment options of non-IgE-GI-FAs. We discuss the use of animal models, the analysis of gut microbiota, omics techniques, and fecal proteins with a focus on understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of these pathologies and obtaining possible diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers. Finally, we discuss the unmet needs that researchers should tackle to advance in the knowledge of these barely explored pathologies.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome oral food challenge: Time for a change?

OBJECTIVE: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is typically diagnosed based on a characteristic clinical history; however, an oral food challenge (OFC) may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis or evaluate for the development of tolerance. FPIES OFC methods vary globally, and there is no universally agreed upon protocol. The objective of this review is to summarize reported FPIES OFC approaches and consider unmet needs in diagnosing and managing FPIES. DATA SOURCES: PubMed database was searched using the keywords food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, oral food challenge, cow milk allergy, food allergy, non-immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy and FPIES. STUDY SELECTIONS: Primary and review articles were selected based on relevance to the diagnosis of FPIES and the FPIES OFC. RESULTS: We reviewed the history of FPIES and the evolution and variations in the FPIES OFC. A summary of current literature suggests that most patients with FPIES will react with 25% to 33% of a standard serving of the challenged food, there is little benefit to offering a divided dose challenge unless there is suspicion of specific immunoglobulin E to the food being challenged, reactions typically appear within 1 to 4 hours of ingestion, and reactions during OFC rarely result in emergency department or intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: International standardization in the FPIES OFC approach is necessary with particular attention to specific dose administration across challenged foods, timing between the patient's reaction and offered OFC to verify tolerance, patient safety considerations before the OFC, and identification of characteristics that would indicate home reintroduction is appropriate.

Poor prognosis of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome to fish.

BACKGROUND: Fish is the most common causative food of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) in Southern Europe. In children with FPIES, the development of tolerance varies according to the culprit food and specifically fish seems to have a poorer prognosis than other solid foods. We sought to evaluate the fish-FPIES resolution rate in children. METHODS: A descriptive retrospective analysis of children with fish-FPIES, followed during the last 20 years, was performed. The offending fish, age and symptoms at onset, the coexistence of atopic diseases and FPIES to other foods were registered. All the children included had undergone an oral food challenge (OFC) with the offending fish. We recorded those children that overcame their fish-FPIES and those that did not outgrow the disease. RESULTS: Seventy children were enrolled in this study (median age: 9 yo; IQR 6.4-13.8). Forty-two (60%) achieved tolerance to the offending fish with a median age of 4 years (IQR: 3-5). Among children ≤5 yo (n = 40), 35 (87.5%) developed tolerance; among 6-8yo (n = 14), 40% developed tolerance; and only 12.5% among those ≥9 yo (n = 16) developed tolerance. Twenty-eight children did not outgrow the disease (median age: 8.9 yo; IQR: 9-13.8). We did not find any statistical differences regarding the offending fish, presence of single vs multiple fish-FPIES, symptoms at the beginning, coexistence of other atopic diseases or the coexistence of other FPIES, between the children who overcame the disease and those who did not. CONCLUSION: One in five children with FPIES to fish will not overcome the disease during childhood.

Oral Food Challenge in Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome by Fish: Is There Any Room for Improvement?

BACKGROUND: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food hypersensitivity usually due to cow's milk or soy. Among the solid foods, rice is one of the most causative foods worldwide, but it varies depending on the geographic area. In the Mediterranean countries, fish is one of the most important triggers of FPIES. There is not a specific biological marker for the disease that allows us to confirm the diagnosis or to predict when tolerance to the offending food has been achieved, so all patients with a FPIES diagnosis undergo an oral food challenge (OFC) at least once. The OFC is a risky procedure and many patients develop severe symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety of a new OFC protocol in children with fish-FPIES. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed over a 22-year period (1996-2018). We compared two methodologies used in the OFC: Method 1 that consisted in giving several doses during the same day versus Method 2 that consisted in giving a unique dose per day on 2 or three non-consecutive days. RESULTS: A total of 75 positive OFC with fish done in 40 children were included. Forty-three (57.3%) OFC were performed following Method 1 and 32 (42.7%) with Method 2.The severity of the symptoms of the OFC done with Method 1 was mostly moderate (41.9%) followed by severe (39.5%) and mild (18.6%). The adverse reactions with Method 2 were mostly mild (68.8%) and only 18.8 and 12.5% presented moderate or severe symptoms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OFC performed in children with fish-FPIES are risky and many patients develop moderate or severe symptoms after this procedure. We propose a new protocol that has demonstrated to improve safety.